Robert Pattinson's Future As The Batman In Doubt — But James Bond Could Be What Decides It

Robert Pattinson's Future As The Batman In Doubt — But James Bond Could Be What Decides It

Robert Pattinson could be done with Batman after The Batman Part II, with his potential James Bond future creating a major dilemma for Skydance as it looks to fast-track the Caped Crusader's future.

By JoshWilding - Nov 13, 2026 05:11 AM EST
Filed Under: The Batman 2

By the time The Batman Part II is released, more than six years will have passed since the first instalment arrived in theaters in 2022. That's a huge gap between sequels, particularly for an IP as valuable as Batman.

With Matt Reeves forced to step away for personal reasons, Steven Soderbergh is directing the rest of the long-delayed sequel. No one has said what Reeves is going through, but there's obviously a risk this affects The Batman Part III (while the filmmaker is doing the right thing by prioritising his family, Hollywood—and fans—can be ruthless).

Puck's Matt Belloni has chimed in, saying he believes that The Batman sequel could mark Robert Pattinson's final time wearing the cape and cowl.

"Even before director Matt Reeves was temporarily replaced by Steven Soderbergh due to a personal issue, Reeves had fallen far behind on the project, which eventually pushed the release date to February 2028," Belloni writes. "It's hard to believe that Skydance, and its new DC president, Jeremy Latcham, will go down that path again."

"Indulging a lengthy timeline on the company's number one franchise is probably not an option for the debt-laden Skydance," he adds. "And without Reeves, Pattinson is unlikely to continue in the role."

While Nexus Point News reported last night that Skydance would like Pattinson to serve as the DCU's Batman (more on that for you soon), it seems James Bond 26 could be the deciding factor. 

Belloni reveals that Amazon is eager for Pattinson to become the next 007, with a three-picture deal compared to the four-film commitment that would be required of Jack Lowden and Josh O'Connor. Pattinson is far more expensive than them, but is used to handling the pressure that comes with a big role and is obviously an A-list star (who has already worked with Denis Villeneuve on Dune: Part Three). 

If Pattinson gets Bond, then Batman likely falls by the wayside. However, that could be beneficial to Skydance, which is eager to monetise the DC Universe and would like to get the Caped Crusader on screen as much as possible moving forward. 

Directed by Matt Reeves and Steven Soderbergh from a script by him and Mattson Tomlin, The Batman Part II stars Robert Pattinson, Scarlett Johansson, Sebastian Stan, Colin Farrell, Andy Serkis, Jeffrey Wright, Charles Dance, Jayme Lawson, Gil Perez-Abraham, Sebastian Koch, and Brian Tyree Henry. 

The Batman Part II is set to be released in theaters on February 18, 2028.

The Batman 2: Everything The Recent Leak Reveals & Confirms About Matt Reeves' Sequel - Spoilers
Related:

The Batman 2: Everything The Recent Leak Reveals & Confirms About Matt Reeves' Sequel - Spoilers

Origins Of The Hood: Marvel Rivals #1 Brings Parker Robbins' Path To Power To Marvel Unlimited
Recommended For You:

Origins Of The Hood: Marvel Rivals #1 Brings Parker Robbins' Path To Power To Marvel Unlimited

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
harryba11zack
harryba11zack - 11/13/2026, 5:08 AM
User Comment Image
TheJok3r
TheJok3r - 11/13/2026, 5:14 AM
Pattinson likely signed a 3-picutre deal for Batman, so getting him back for a 3rd movie won't be an issue at all, same with Reeves. However, like Bale and Nolan before them, he and Reeves have a clear vision for this character and will walk away once that vision is brought to life. For a company looking for someone of Pattinson's status to play the same character for 10+ movies, that becomes a problem.
BobGarlen
BobGarlen - 11/13/2026, 9:14 AM
@TheJok3r - That's if they decide or if his contract doesn't expire before they can get a third film in front of a camera. Bond contracts could complicate things further with certain restrictions.
TheJok3r
TheJok3r - 11/13/2026, 9:20 AM
@BobGarlen - Actors film multiple movies at the same time on a regular basis; Pattinson himself was filming two other movies while filming Batman a few years ago. The issue here isn't whether he will want to work on a third movie, it's will he be willing to be part of a wider DC universe for multiple other movies after that, without Reeves directing him. Skydance is going to want another trilogy of Batman films, a JL trilogy, maybe team up movies with Superman, cameos in other movies, etc. It's one thing to ask ask an actor to star in 3 movies, but 10 or 12 ? that's a big ask, especially for an actor as in demand as Pattinson is.
BobGarlen
BobGarlen - 11/13/2026, 9:26 AM
@TheJok3r - Contracts do expire, and I don't think he wouldn't re-upp for Batman, but Bond contracts? They're notoriously strict. Pierce Brosnan couldn't legally wear a tuxedo in any other movie because of the contract citing it too close to Bond's silhouette. Who knows what other ridiculous clauses might be tied to those things. Personally, I think it would be best for all for Part II to be the end of this Crime Saga.
Knightrider
Knightrider - 11/13/2026, 5:22 AM
There won’t be a third unless this mages serious money. WB can’t make the same mistake a 3 times in a rite of trying to start a cinematic universe when a separate Batman franchise is already running

Gut feeling, they plan to stop at 2 and reboot.

Of course, as I say, if it made billions they may let him finish the trilogy but he’ll be told he has two years to do it
UltronIO
UltronIO - 11/13/2026, 7:24 AM
@Knightrider - This film will make serious money but that still doesn't mean there will be a third. Not with Matt Reeves anyway. Skydance can't afford to wait for him. And they won't want a muddled franchise by having two competing Batmen like Gunn.

I agree with your gut feeling. They plan to stop at 2 and reboot.

But I do think it'll be more of a Boond-esque softboot on the Batman side of things, especially if Batman II is a success. They'll move the franchise on with or without Pattinson. Just recast him and others and keep the same vague set-up.

With MOT it's more difficult. Batman II is just a regular Batman story. Easy to carry on from. But MOT makes major decisions in world building he entire universe. Not so easy. Problematic even, one might say.
UltronIO
UltronIO - 11/13/2026, 7:25 AM
*Bond-esque
KennKathleen
KennKathleen - 11/13/2026, 5:28 AM
The smart money is letting a J-Lo"less" Affleck get back in this role and make the version he wanted.

It's either that, or get another group of fresh actors.
UltraEgo
UltraEgo - 11/13/2026, 5:36 AM
Remember when all you guys wanted Paramount over Netflix? Here’s your stupid prize.

Skydance is going to reduce DC to nothing.
ArthurFuchsache
ArthurFuchsache - 11/13/2026, 6:01 AM
@UltraEgo - agreed
Mercwitham0uth
Mercwitham0uth - 11/13/2026, 6:09 AM
@UltraEgo - Feels like DC has already been reduced to nothing.
UltronIO
UltronIO - 11/13/2026, 7:28 AM
@UltraEgo - 3 years from now you're going to thanking Jeremy Latcham and his grandma for saving the universe.

The DC universe that is. But who knows, a good superhero tale can travel and have long-lasting effects on teh world around us. Maybe Jeremy Latcham's grandma will save the actual universe after all.
UltraEgo
UltraEgo - 11/13/2026, 7:46 AM
@UltronIO - [frick] Latcham’s grandma.
UltronIO
UltronIO - 11/13/2026, 8:07 AM
@UltraEgo - I am not Gunnverse John Stewart.
SaxoWolf
SaxoWolf - 11/13/2026, 5:38 AM
Batfleck would be cool but I don't see it happening. Also cool, Batman Beyond with Michael Keaton and Tim Burton, but also Impossible unfortunately.
UltraEgo
UltraEgo - 11/13/2026, 5:38 AM
“Leave politics out of my comic book movies.”

This is what it really looks like when politics enters the chat. Enjoy your Superman nativity adaptions. DC is cooked.
UltronIO
UltronIO - 11/13/2026, 7:30 AM
@UltraEgo - When politics enters the chat comments like yours happen.

Maybe you SHOULD enjoy the next Superman adaptation. Just a thought.
UltraEgo
UltraEgo - 11/13/2026, 7:49 AM
@UltronIO - I’m good, thanks.
dragon316
dragon316 - 11/13/2026, 7:55 AM
@UltraEgo - didn’t for Star Wars that was long boring in andor series
SteviesRightFoo
SteviesRightFoo - 11/13/2026, 5:41 AM
What a mess. I really like Pattinson as an actor but he is not a james bond
BiffDitko
BiffDitko - 11/13/2026, 6:14 AM
Let's just hope "The Batman II" doesn't end on a cliffhanger.
UltronIO
UltronIO - 11/13/2026, 7:32 AM
@BiffDitko - oh shit.
BiffDitko
BiffDitko - 11/13/2026, 7:53 AM
@UltronIO - Right??? I don't want it to get
"Last Man On Earth"-ed.
An awesome show that ended on a HUUUUUUGE cliffhanger. Man, I'm still livid about that one. Lol
NodrickStripson
NodrickStripson - 11/13/2026, 8:26 AM
@BiffDitko - As a huge Deadwood fan I can relate.
BiffDitko
BiffDitko - 11/13/2026, 8:48 AM
@NodrickStripson - 🤣
Damn, forgot all about that!!
Nonameforme
Nonameforme - 11/13/2026, 6:21 AM
Just cancel the whole thing.
UltronIO
UltronIO - 11/13/2026, 7:33 AM
@Nonameforme - That's the first thing you've said that's not batshit insane. Batgirl MOT. Cancel the whole thing I agree. Good for you for saying it. I applaud your bravery.👀
Nonameforme
Nonameforme - 11/13/2026, 8:57 AM
@UltronIO - i never say insane things
UltronIO
UltronIO - 11/13/2026, 9:33 AM
@Nonameforme - I agree. Batgirling MOT is not insane at all. It's probably the sanest move.
BillyBatson1000
BillyBatson1000 - 11/13/2026, 7:04 AM
The way things are going, Pattison could do 3 Bond films and still be back for The Batman III.
UltronIO
UltronIO - 11/13/2026, 7:35 AM
@BillyBatson1000 - The Batman III: Batman Beyond.
BillyBatson1000
BillyBatson1000 - 11/13/2026, 7:37 AM
@UltronIO - I know, right. Literally a license to print money.
MaximusTheMad
MaximusTheMad - 11/13/2026, 7:11 AM
Everything I hear about the new plans for DC sounds smart. I was excited by Gunn's approach but he was simply too nice to the filmmakers. You need a producer (like Kevin Feige) to make these kinds of decisions. Gunn had the comic enthusiasm but not the strong will and experience of a producer.

If Feige was hired as DC-boss instead of Gunn after the success of Superman, he would have fired Reeves before he finished writing Batman 2 and incorporated Battinson into the DCU with a yes-man director who had a more comic-booky take. Problem solved. If Pattinson (and any other cast members) refused then they'd recast like with Hulk but without doing a hard reboot of the character. Welcome to the Marvel Method.

A cinematic universe is producer-driven if you want MCU-level success and the heavy-hitter characters always come first. Anything else will turn to loosely connected prequel-heavy weirdness like Star Wars, Fox X-Men, Sony Spider-Verse and this failed DCU.

You need success after success to keep going - ESPECIALLY in the beginnning.
SADFFLECK
SADFFLECK - 11/13/2026, 7:27 AM
Christ! That cowl is atrocious. It'd be perfect for a bdsm tim burton take though...
AgentofSH1ELD
AgentofSH1ELD - 11/13/2026, 7:37 AM
@SADFFLECK - 😂😂😂😂😂
AgentofSH1ELD
AgentofSH1ELD - 11/13/2026, 7:38 AM
@SADFFLECK - Immediately my mind went to Spider-babe.. Look that one up.
SADFFLECK
SADFFLECK - 11/13/2026, 8:06 AM
@AgentofSH1ELD - lol bruhh
AgentofSH1ELD
AgentofSH1ELD - 11/13/2026, 1:06 PM
@SADFFLECK - hey its a classic. My dad got me and my brother a copy of it after we made him watch Spiderman (toby 1st one)
AgentofSH1ELD
AgentofSH1ELD - 11/13/2026, 7:40 AM
Odd situation. Technically this wasnt under Gunn's watch. Something he inherited and, while the theories are out there he tried to squash it, its still alive. kinda. If Reeves can get his shit together I do see a seat for him in the creation of the new DC world. I do not, however, see Pattinson continuing the role after this film unless there is a strong push from the new leadership. I also do not see Pattinson as James Bond but hey, I said the same about his Batman.
1 2

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder