STAR WARS Actor John Boyega Dismisses Claims He's Nabbed A Secret Marvel Cinematic Universe Role

STAR WARS Actor John Boyega Dismisses Claims He's Nabbed A Secret Marvel Cinematic Universe Role

John Boyega is frequently linked to the Marvel Cinematic Universe, but the Star Wars actor has now dismissed rumours that he's shot a secret role for Marvel Studios. Find more details after the jump...

By JoshWilding - Aug 03, 2022 05:08 AM EST
Filed Under: Marvel Studios
Source: Men's Health

John Boyega put himself on the map in Attack the Block, but was shot into the stratosphere after being cast as Finn in the Star Wars sequels. With that, he became a global megastar, and while there's no denying his character was wasted across that trilogy, there's a lot of excitement to see what Boyega could do in another big franchise.

This could explain persistent rumours about him joining the Marvel Cinematic Universe, including claims he's shot a secret role in an upcoming Phase 4 movie or TV show. 

However, during a recent interview with Men's Health, Boyega explained why he's not looking to head down that route with his career.  "That's not in the vision for me now," he said. "I want to do nuanced things. I want to donate my services to original indie films that come with new, fresh ideas, because I know it's real hard to top Iron Man in that universe."

The actor has a lot of exciting projects on the horizon, including The Woman King, Breaking, and The Test. The fact that he's avoiding blockbuster fare is understandable, and after Chaos Walking proved to be something of a disappointment, we've seen Daisy Ridley similarly shift focus. 

Things can always change, and we'd be shocked if Boyega doesn't lend his talents to a major superhero blockbuster at some point in the not-too-distant future. There are a lot of characters he'd be a great fit for, of course, with Blue Marvel and John Stewart among the heroes the actor has most often found himself linked to. 

It's worth noting that there's no way Boyega was going to confirm that he has a secret MCU role in this interview. With that in mind, there's always a chance he could show up in anything from Black Panther: Wakanda Forever to The Marvels, so we'll just have to wait and see.

Which superhero character do you think Boyega would be a good fit for?

RUMOR: The Leader Of The MCU's MIDNIGHT SONS Has Been Revealed (And It's Not Blade)
Related:

RUMOR: The Leader Of The MCU's MIDNIGHT SONS Has Been Revealed (And It's Not Blade)

MCU Rumor Roundup: AVENGERS: DOOMSDAY's Invincible Avengers, MARVEL ZOMBIES Character Details, And More
Recommended For You:

MCU Rumor Roundup: AVENGERS: DOOMSDAY's "Invincible Avengers," MARVEL ZOMBIES Character Details, And More

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

LSHF
LSHF - 8/3/2022, 5:52 AM
Yes, and Andrew G. didn't nab a secret Marvel role in the last Spider-Man film, either!
LSHF
LSHF - 8/3/2022, 5:53 AM
@LSHF - P.S.

I still wish Andrew would keep denying he was that film. That would be hilarious to me.
bkmeijer1
bkmeijer1 - 8/3/2022, 6:01 AM
@LSHF - same. Even after the movie's release, it would be fun if he kept saying in interviews ''that's not me, I don't know anything about that!''
LSHF
LSHF - 8/3/2022, 6:13 AM
@bkmeijer1 - It would have seriously made me laugh out loud every time he did that!
bkmeijer1
bkmeijer1 - 8/3/2022, 6:00 AM
Yeah, that's a reasonable argument. But on the other hand, not everything has the top a certain other thing. Constantly trying to one-up each other just ends up being boring.
LSHF
LSHF - 8/3/2022, 6:18 AM
@bkmeijer1 - Yes, I wish the studios would stop that old routine of trying to make each sequel "bigger and better", as that sometimes leads to them getting their priorities out of whack, and the film then suffers.

I know there is lots of "pressure" from some of the general audience to make each sequel this way, but giving in to such pressure isn't always the best idea for the films. Some of the general audience (and some hard-core fans) just want too much.
bkmeijer1
bkmeijer1 - 8/3/2022, 9:11 AM
@LSHF - I always wonder what that is based. I assume actual market research, and not just social media buzz or what they think the audience wants
LSHF
LSHF - 8/3/2022, 9:32 AM
@bkmeijer1 - I got the impression years ago that either market research was a thing of the past for some companies (though not likely) OR they have a very narrow understanding and view of market research, since they don't use all of the available options and use it to its full potential by learning more about any given subject they want to make a decision on.

I mean, they have their own websites and they can just "ask" people, with multiple choice questions, and find out what means the most to them on potential ideas for stories and also within the films Just ask.

But many directors want to direct films for themselves, writers want to write what they like, and studio execs want to make their own decisions without at least trying to find out what the general audience wants, and the next thing we know we have another multi-million dollar "Robin Hood" movie that not many people asked for.

Or Pan. And I'm sure we can all name a few more "What the f#ck were they thinking?" films they released without enough "proper" market research.

Like when Disney released the Lone Ranger (2013) film after spending waaaaaay too much money on a western movie that only pertains to a short period in U.S. history. Like other countries were really going to be so interested in a blockbuster "western" that multi-millions would flock to the theater to see it? WtF? And Depp as a Native American? What the f#ck were they thinking and what kind of half-assed market research was used to determine that this would be a good idea to invest over 200 million dollars into it?

I could go on, and I'm sure others could, too.
bkmeijer1
bkmeijer1 - 8/3/2022, 10:47 AM
@LSHF - ''and the next thing we know we have another multi-million dollar "Robin Hood"''

Yup, that sums up how I perceive it as well. There is nothing wrong with those movies really, but there's definitely an approach going on where I too wonder ''who exactly are you doing this for?''
LSHF
LSHF - 8/3/2022, 11:47 AM
@bkmeijer1 - Yes, nothing wrong with those films (I didn't mean to imply that there was), but I guess my point was (and I suspect you know this) that the studios are risking way too much money on property they don't really know if there is enough demand to justify the investment cost.

I have, for many decades, discussed movies with others, hearing/reading what they like and what they "would" like to see, and Robin Hood NEVER comes up. LOL. It's like they think we need a new one every few years for reason(s).

Good grief! If they are going to take risks with stories, find the writers who can create stories that doesn't need a hundred million dollars to make! It's been done before!

Example: The latest Dolittle (2020) film? Why did they need to (very expensively) go to another island and make the VFX people create ships and all sorts of other expensive and unnecessary creations? That film cost $175 million (and I'm guessing about the same amount in promotion), but only made $251 million, so that lost money.

But, Eddie Murphy did a really nice Dolittle (1998) that only cost $75.5 million and made $294.4 million. And they didn't need to go to another island and whatever else it took to explode that budget (I didn't the see the film) for RDJ's film.

So, as you put it, who exactly did they make this movie for? Just because it made profit before doesn't mean it going to again. It was a risk, and they spent way too much money on it.

Market Research, anyone? I'm guessing they do that, but aren't doing it well enough (obviously). And again, I still suspect ego gets in the way, as that seems to be a very normal thing with management.
bkmeijer1
bkmeijer1 - 8/3/2022, 1:37 PM
@LSHF - I guess they see big CGI action movies make momey, and think "hey, we can do this with existing IP too!" And I wouldn't be surprised if ego plays a role in that.

And to be honest, I would like to another Robin Hood. Or any of those mythical or legendary stories that exist in the public domain. Just not the big CGI action type.
LSHF
LSHF - 8/3/2022, 3:46 PM
@bkmeijer1 - Robin Hood is a great story , along with the King Arthur stories (especially Monty Python and the Holy Grail), and various other public domain stories.

I really enjoyed "Excalibur" (1981), which had several stars before they were famous in supporting roles; Helen Mirren (she was HOT), Nicol Williamson (as Merlin), Gabriel Byrne (as Uther Pendragon), Liam Neeson (as Gawain), and Patrick Stewart (as Leondegrance). And it was pretty realistic in terms of showing how slow it was to move around with all of that weight of the armor on them.

The studios just probably need to cut way back on the budgets, because since the audience for these films isn't near as large of the MCU films, they should all be considered financial "risks". So, yes, not the big CGI action type. Just focus on good story telling.
bkmeijer1
bkmeijer1 - 8/3/2022, 5:05 PM
@LSHF - the whole King Arthur mythology is fascinating as well.

Think those stories don't need CGI either anyway. They're often set in medieval/semi-fantasy settings, so it's not like they need a lot of explosions and such.
Urubrodi
Urubrodi - 8/3/2022, 7:09 AM
Bad scripts aside, he wasn't that good in Star Wars, so not something that bothers me one bit.
McMurdo
McMurdo - 8/3/2022, 7:45 AM
Lol.
CookieHound
CookieHound - 8/3/2022, 8:04 AM
“ I want to donate my services… “

So…he’s working for free?
AmazingFILMporg
AmazingFILMporg - 8/3/2022, 8:41 AM
He ain't getting the calls😬
GuardianAngel
GuardianAngel - 8/3/2022, 10:01 AM
Here me out… John Boyega as Wolverine.
JamesBaxter00
JamesBaxter00 - 8/3/2022, 10:24 AM
@GuardianAngel - I am here for the comments🍿🍺🤣
LSHF
LSHF - 8/3/2022, 11:53 AM
I want to see Attack the Block someday if and when it shows up on one of my streaming channels.
mcmurray
mcmurray - 8/8/2022, 2:46 AM
@LSHF - OK.
View Recorder