Star Trek 2: Back to the Future?

Star Trek 2: Back to the Future?

J.J. Abrams and Damon Lindelof hint at time shifts as a key plot device of the Star Trek sequel and say it's too early for Khan rumors...but that doesn't mean they're not true!

By bsprecher - Nov 18, 2009 08:11 AM EST
Filed Under: Star Trek
Source: Sci-Fi Wire

Director J.J. Abrams and writer/producer Damon Lindelof recently discussed the inevitable sequel to this year's mega-successful relaunch of the Star Trek franchise at the DVD/Blue-Ray premiere of their film at the Griffiths Observatory in Los Angeles and Sci-Fi Wire was on the scene to ask some of the questions that fans are dying to know the answers to.

As for when we'll see the next film, Lindelof said:

"I think that we would be hard pressed to get it on screens by 2011. If that’s the case, we’d better get to writing right now."








When asked if they had any story ideas in mind, Lindelof wouldn't specify how the characters would evolve or even at what period in time the film will take place in:

"One of the things we like to do as storytellers is drop you in the middle of something. And the question that you’re asking yourself is: Where am I in relation to the last time I left these guys? Could this be something that predated even, perhaps, some of the adventures that they had in the first movie? Does it happen five years later? Is it happening two seconds later? Who knows? So we’re not going to tell you."

As for the recent rumors about Khan making a return in Star Trek 2, Abrams said:

"We’re not even at that stage yet, but the fun of where we are on the sequel is we could use some of what was done before in a new way."

Of course, just to keep things cryptic, Abrams added:

"[This all depends on] if I, in fact, direct the Star Trek sequel. In theory, I would be available, and it would be fun to do. Since there's no script, it's hard to talk about directing a movie that the story doesn't even exist."
STAR TREK: STRANGE NEW WORLDS Season 3 Will Premiere This June
Related:

STAR TREK: STRANGE NEW WORLDS Season 3 Will Premiere This June

STAR TREK: STRANGE NEW WORLDS Season 3 Sets Course For Summer Premiere; New Teaser Trailer Released
Recommended For You:

STAR TREK: STRANGE NEW WORLDS Season 3 Sets Course For Summer Premiere; New Teaser Trailer Released

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
Boekelaar
Boekelaar - 11/18/2009, 8:17 AM
Cool, time travel could mean shatner.
stopdropandroll
stopdropandroll - 11/18/2009, 8:28 AM
You know I'm starting to think that Abrams and his team are just trying to feel out fan reaction to story ideas. He keeps stating that the script is not done and they are still ironing out ideas.

Time travel is over done in Star Trek. It was fine for the first movie to give it a reboot, but continue with the concept tells me that the ST team lost all their creativity.

Original Kirk should stay far away from the new ST. Abrams needs to consult talented sci-fi writers for new ideas, just like Gene Roddenberry did for his original series.
Betty
Betty - 11/18/2009, 8:32 AM
tea- Wha? How's that possible? You sure it wasn't Ultraviolet?


I don't think this guy is talking about time travel. I think he's talking about at what time are we plopped down into the story.
JoshWilding
JoshWilding - 11/18/2009, 8:35 AM
Whenever it comes out, I cant wait! Im not a fan of Star Trek but the movie was probably the best I've seen this year! :)
superdog
superdog - 11/18/2009, 8:35 AM
stop@ i couldnt agree more. time travel is a crutch for most writers. it was essential in the reboot to start fresh, but why do more time travel now? you rebooted and reset the whole universe, theres plenty of things to explore besides time travel.
MrJosh
MrJosh - 11/18/2009, 8:44 AM
Here's a novel idea. people may think that the Khan thing would be too much of a rehashing and creative cop-out... it wouldn't be if the crew of the Enterprise met him under circumstances that require teaming up to defeat a common threat! It would be an M. Night Shamalamadingdong worthy twist!
Weeton
Weeton - 11/18/2009, 8:45 AM
just too many flaws implicit to time travel flicks. lets explore this new universe first. i want to see the repercussions in this universe with what nero had started.
Betty
Betty - 11/18/2009, 8:59 AM
I'm more afraid of Shatner being in it than time travel.
JYCowboy
JYCowboy - 11/18/2009, 8:59 AM
I think that combining episode plots might be cool. Think about Khan trying to capture and control the Doomsday Weapon. Kirk and Spock dealing with both of those crisis. Oh and through in a love triangle with Spock, Scotty and Uhura.

Yah, Im nerd that way.
selinakyle
selinakyle - 11/18/2009, 9:28 AM
Boring and Pointless? :(
selinakyle
selinakyle - 11/18/2009, 9:35 AM
yo...that is not the title dumdum. Reading is fundamental.
PRMR77
PRMR77 - 11/18/2009, 9:55 AM
None of the old cast are necessary now. We had Spock in the first one he was cool, the film was cool we've got the new cast time to move on with something completely bran new.
ragdoll03289
ragdoll03289 - 11/18/2009, 10:04 AM
All I know is that Spock is cute I wanna see more of him.
TheBumblingIdiot
TheBumblingIdiot - 11/18/2009, 10:07 AM
Khaaaaaaaaaan !!!!!!
georgia49th
georgia49th - 11/18/2009, 10:43 AM
Boring? I take it your missus is not a sci-fi fan teabag?
would she have prefered them teaming up with the good Doctor and battle Daleks :)
Shoot call me, crazy borgs and Daleks form an alliance har har
as if the Daleks could get along with anybody LoL
Harry... Harry Potter then? stop I'm insane.
Bijous
Bijous - 11/18/2009, 10:48 AM
Woah, Abrams isn't signed on to direct yet? What are they thinking? Sign that man up!

Betty
Betty - 11/18/2009, 10:53 AM
tea-- That Shatner/kittie one from twilight zone is damn funny! and what wrong with space? she no like sci-fi?
georgia49th
georgia49th - 11/18/2009, 10:53 AM
Maybe she'd like a good Western instead, take her to see Jonah Hex in 2010 . hahahaha
georgia49th
georgia49th - 11/18/2009, 10:58 AM
What the frakk ? what movie did you see 60f13....
Those Romulans traveled back in time to destroy the Vulcan's planet changed the past, therefore creating a whole new timeline.
answer
answer - 11/18/2009, 11:11 AM
@6of13, Georgia has it right! They went back in time and created another dimension not simply into another dimension slower than Spock primes!

@Tea,

There's something on the wing (pause)
Some....(Pause)...(Longer Pause)...thing!
answer
answer - 11/18/2009, 11:33 AM
HAHA!!!

Bare with it!

TheSeb
TheSeb - 11/18/2009, 11:40 AM
Sorry, you all.. I think we accidentally left the doggy door unblocked over at the Message Boards and Logan-X got out. We're trying to tazer him back in... Again, Sorry.
luv1138
luv1138 - 11/18/2009, 11:46 AM
Get the fack out of here with your Star Trek bullshet!

Star Wars RULES!!!
ster trek SUCKS!
CorndogBurglar
CorndogBurglar - 11/18/2009, 12:00 PM
damn it. come on JJ, no more time shift nonsense either. you established a new world, make your movies take place in that world. i hope he doesn't ruin this.
georgia49th
georgia49th - 11/18/2009, 12:04 PM
Star Wars is a cult classis no doubt but 'cmon the whole Darth Vader origin left us flat and wanting we didn't even get to see Anikin's first evil doings as Darth Vader.. how lame was that?
If not for Star Trek to pave the way, there would be no Star Wars.
DDD
DDD - 11/18/2009, 12:30 PM
The new trilogy of Star Wars was pointless to me!
They hardly went into the actual history of Darth
Vader! And the acting and story lines were very
static and slow! It seemed like they were some
entirely different sci-fi world than that of Star
Wars. I don't know what they were thinking save for
just trying to make more gobs of money! Hayden
Christensen was just awful!

Like you said Georgia@, there wouldn't be any Star
Wars without Star Trek paving the way into space!
I am a huge Star Trek fan and I loved JJ's Star
Trek! Now that's the way to make an old story new
again not the way Lucas did with the new Star Wars
trilogy!
Macksimus
Macksimus - 11/18/2009, 12:32 PM
I'm sorry, but I didn't get a sense that they want to go into the future from reading that article.

All they are saying is that the audience won't ever know what the time of the sequel is in relation to the time of end of the last movie. is it 1 year later, 2 years later, or even 5 years later? ...or will it occur before the events of the first movie?
Macksimus
Macksimus - 11/18/2009, 12:35 PM
@DDD

Yeah, I was hoping to see how Vader hunted down the remaining Jedi hiding out in the furthest reaches of the galaxy, but instead, we get a ****ing cameo.
TheNameIsBetty
TheNameIsBetty - 11/18/2009, 1:00 PM
lmfao @ teabag
sausages!!!

and btw, MsKyle08, you don't like Star Trek? :(
u borin and pointless, not Trek lol

They should start the next movie very very soon after the events of the first one. These are new characters, we should be able to see a-ka-doodle-bunch of their lives and how they evolve
flames809
flames809 - 11/18/2009, 1:56 PM
there alread had time travel in the first movie but good article doe
selinakyle
selinakyle - 11/18/2009, 2:30 PM
i love star trek. Dang...why you calling me boring and pointless. Hisss....
TheNameIsBetty
TheNameIsBetty - 11/18/2009, 3:08 PM
lol cuz you said "Boring and Pointless? :("

But i misread the forum so my bad ;)
TheSoulEater
TheSoulEater - 11/18/2009, 3:21 PM
Logan-x? where....I'll send him back..........

Photobucket
ComradeX
ComradeX - 11/18/2009, 3:34 PM
How to place Shatner!
Does not matter that kirk died,leave time travel alone!
Simply have Pine take shuttle into cosmic cloud that accelerates his aging process! ta da Shatner comes back on bridge! Great entrance sequence! Just a sub plot so he can cameo quckly whilt bones corrects things! Just a thought!
Crazyhorrormovienerd
Crazyhorrormovienerd - 11/18/2009, 4:00 PM
i'll admit i had never really watch Star Trek before this movie except for a few episodes when i was little with my brother. However, this movie was incredible and actually got me interested in the series. J.J. Abram really did bring something amazing to the table for Star Trek, by not only making something enjoyable for old school fans but new fans like me and many other people i made see it.
CorndogBurglar
CorndogBurglar - 11/18/2009, 4:11 PM
@ macksimus

you're right. it doesn't mention anything about time travel whatsoever. it just says they don't know how much time will pass between the first and the sequel.
Magicfingers
Magicfingers - 11/18/2009, 4:37 PM
I never really liked the original Star Trek, but the new film is Awesome! I saw it with my dad (who is a fan of the old Star Trek) and my brother, and we all Loved it. A great film to see at the drive-in.
1 2
View Recorder