Wait, Has DC Studios Really Ghosted Gal Gadot After Promising Her Wonder Woman 3?

Wait, Has DC Studios Really Ghosted Gal Gadot After Promising Her Wonder Woman 3?

Recent comments from Justice League star Gal Gadot appear to confirm that DC Studios co-CEOs James Gunn and Peter Safran ghosted the actress after promising her Wonder Woman 3 in 2023.

Feature Opinion
By JoshWilding - Aug 29, 2026 11:08 AM EST
Filed Under: Wonder Woman

What happened between Gal Gadot and DC Studios? That's becoming an increasingly difficult question to answer, particularly after some recent comments from the Wonder Woman star about whether she has a future in the DCU.

Gadot previously made it sound like her return as Wonder Woman was pretty much guaranteed. In 2023, shortly after James Gunn and Peter Safran took charge of DC Studios, she revealed that she had met with both executives and was told they wanted to develop Wonder Woman 3 with her.

"I had a meeting with [DC Studios CEOs] Peter Safran and James Gunn, and they both told me that they're going to develop a third Wonder Woman with me," the actress told Flaunt. "They said, 'You're in the best hands, you've got nothing to worry about.' Time will tell."

Well, it turns out Gadot's final sentence was rather prophetic.

Speaking to ScreenRant this week, the actress said she hasn't had "any specific conversations" with Gunn or DC Studios about either reprising her role as Wonder Woman or following Jason Momoa's example by playing another character in the DC Universe. According to Gadot, her last major discussions with the studio happened when "they came to the studio, and they really wanted to develop the third one."

Patty Jenkins has confirmed that DC Studios "axed" the movie, while Supergirl writer Ana Nogueira is now penning a fast-tracked reboot. The trades previously reported that Jenkins' proposed story for the threequel "did not fit in with the [studio's] new plans," and thus far, the only characters to make the leap from the DCEU to DCU are those Gunn previously worked on (Peacemaker, for example).

The Superman director later muddied the waters, saying of The Hollywood Reporter's story, "Some of it is true, some of it is half-true, some of it is not true, [and] some of it we haven’t decided yet whether it’s true or not." 

Still, Gadot's latest comments raise a big question: Did DC Studios change its mind, or did it leave one of the franchise's biggest stars hanging?

In fairness, Gunn and Safran were under no obligation to develop any DC projects already in development. They inherited a franchise in desperate need of a creative reset, and deciding that Wonder Woman 3 didn't fit their plans is perfectly understandable. Gadot also comes with a lot of baggage, and most fans had soured on her Diana Prince after Wonder Woman 1984, Shazam! Fury of the Gods, and The Flash.

If Gadot's recollection is accurate, there's something decidedly awkward about telling an actress that you're developing another movie with her and that she's "in the best hands," only for her to later reveal that there have been no meaningful conversations about what comes next.

That leaves us with two possibilities, neither of which are particularly flattering. Perhaps DC Studios genuinely intended to make Wonder Woman 3 with Gadot in 2023 before its plans changed. If so, why wasn't she kept more closely informed? Or is Gadot trying to force their hand by putting a positive possible spin on a conversation that never progressed beyond an early-stage idea?

Either way, the optics aren't great. DC Studios didn't just cancel Wonder Woman 3; it seemingly went from telling Gadot that she had "nothing to worry about" to not even discussing what her future in this universe might look like.

All the while, after years of frustrating radio silence from Gunn—who was happy to comment on and debunk countless other rumours—he casually mentioned plans for a new Wonder Woman movie, seemingly without ever letting Gadot know that she wouldn't be coming back (a courtesy he did extend to Henry Cavill and Dwayne Johnson).

Perhaps she spoke out of turn in 2023? It certainly felt like she upset someone at DC Studios, given that her comments about a return were followed by blistering pieces in the trades with insights from insiders who essentially made her out to be a liar.  

There's often more to these kinds of stories than we'll ever know, because Hollywood remains a strange town that handles these situations in its own, often hard-to-fathom ways. Either way, with it looking increasingly like that Man of Tomorrow star Adria Arjona is the new Wonder Woman, few fans are likely to mourn Gadot's abrupt ousting.

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3
Irregular
Irregular - 8/29/2026, 11:30 AM
Simply put, they had notes, Jenkins wanted full creative control and was not a good fit for James Gunn to not have a say or overstep in anyway...so WW3 was cancelled.

This was obvious when it was announced...no need for clarification.
TheAmericanHero
TheAmericanHero - 8/29/2026, 3:28 PM
@Irregular - honestly the thought of Patty and James arguing over a movies over all tone seems spot on. I can't see them ever seeing eye to eye creatively. Patty would probably object to Gunn forcing in scenes with male genitals flopping about for a joke in the middle of her feminist power fantasy movie.
Arthorious
Arthorious - 8/29/2026, 11:30 AM
Big studios screw over people all the time. Look at Mahershala Ali and Disney
Bucky74
Bucky74 - 8/29/2026, 11:35 AM
Doesn't come close to how dirty they did Cavil by bringing him back only to not bring him back.

Maybe Gunn was entertaining a future multiverse cross over with the Snyderverse. In all fairness, DC was always more known for that with Crisis.
IronSpider101
IronSpider101 - 8/29/2026, 12:30 PM
@Bucky74 - I think too there was just the unfortunate fact that when Gunn/Safran took over, there were still a handful of DCEU movies to come out. It would be studio/financial suicide if they've already invested the time and money into those movies being made to try to completely bury them; so those two were put in this weird position where they kept trying to suggest that more shit might carry over. I remember it being implied by Gunn and Safran that Shazam, Flash and Aquaman could all remain in continuity depending on if their last films did really well at the box office.

It seems like that was never the case and that the studio actively tried to bury several of these movies as best they could, probably just even-out on profit.
Bucky74
Bucky74 - 8/29/2026, 12:42 PM
@IronSpider101 - That sounds spot on actually. If any property was fit for multiverse crossovers, it’s DC. Sadly, Marvel has exhausted that, I believe
UltimaRex
UltimaRex - 8/29/2026, 12:48 PM
@Bucky74 - Cavill could be Batman for all you know.
Nonameforme
Nonameforme - 8/29/2026, 12:50 PM
@Bucky74 - that's not at all what happened
Bucky74
Bucky74 - 8/29/2026, 1:22 PM
@UltimaRex - I’d like that, actually
RolandD
RolandD - 8/29/2026, 4:15 PM
@Bucky74 - Gunn didn’t bring Cavill back. That was a Dwayne Johnson power play before Gunn and Safran headed the studio. I still do think it’s a shame what happened to Cavill. They should’ve paid him something reasonable to come back and do a man of steel too or whatever movie under the past regime. His Superman was wasted.
Bucky74
Bucky74 - 8/29/2026, 4:47 PM
@RolandD - Agreed
dragon316
dragon316 - 8/29/2026, 5:27 PM
@Bucky74 - marvel did same with majors singed with other projects only drop him after his court situation
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 8/30/2026, 4:37 AM
@IronSpider101 - Studios should just rip the band-aid off with things like this. It lets the fans know what's happening so they can get all their complaints out before inevitably giving the reboot a try anyway and it also lets the creatives (including the studio heads) have more clarity with what they're creatively doing.

It shouldn't matter if one of your film franchises is still popular, if you are rebooting then reboot and let everybody know this is what's happening.
IronSpider101
IronSpider101 - 8/30/2026, 5:27 AM
@ObserverIO - Agreed. If a movie is good enough, it should be able to stand on its own too even if it's guaranteed to not be leading to anything. I don't understand why it's so difficult for them to say like "Hey, there's not going to be an Aquaman 3 or a Shazam 3, but we're happy with the movies the filmmakers delivered and it'll be a good time at the movies". If anything, it could give the movies a little freedom to take big swings since they don't have to set up future projects.
Fanmar16
Fanmar16 - 8/29/2026, 11:37 AM
Gal Gadot is one of the worst actresses I've ever seen in my life, everyone should ghosted her
Bucky74
Bucky74 - 8/29/2026, 12:43 PM
@Fanmar16 - I thought she was great in the first WW. Charming, adorable, and fierce. The sequel sucked for many reasons but she was not one of them
ledis7
ledis7 - 8/29/2026, 12:45 PM
@Fanmar16 - Kal-El noooo
SuperiorHeckler
SuperiorHeckler - 8/29/2026, 12:58 PM
@Fanmar16 - Gal was a great looking Wonder Woman. Even her natural accent was a positive IMO. And although she had a few notable cringy moments with her line-delivery, I personally think that overall, she was an adequate actress for what was asked of her. 🤓
JusticeL
JusticeL - 8/29/2026, 1:45 PM
@Bucky74 - 💯 agree.
ganicoga
ganicoga - 8/29/2026, 3:20 PM
@ledis7 - dammit, you beat me, i was coming here to say that!
ledis7
ledis7 - 8/29/2026, 5:49 PM
@ganicoga - it's ok,post the gif of it brother!
Batmangina
Batmangina - 8/29/2026, 6:01 PM
@Bucky74 - Agreed. She was NOT a contributor to the Great DCEU Bed Shitting.

That [frick]ing sequel was so [frick]ing bad it was an insult to shitty movies.
Bucky74
Bucky74 - 8/29/2026, 6:11 PM
@Batmangina - It’s amazing how bad it was especially considering that the first was really solid IMO
Batmangina
Batmangina - 8/29/2026, 8:46 PM
@Bucky74 - Right?!? It was basically CA: TFA with tits in WWI but that's okay and Gal Gadot was solid.
Bucky74
Bucky74 - 8/29/2026, 9:03 PM
@Batmangina - Lol, it was!
Spike101
Spike101 - 8/30/2026, 3:50 AM
@Bucky74 - I would agree. With the first one they successfully introduced a difficult character and did really good job of it. The second one was poorly written and directed.
Bucky74
Bucky74 - 8/30/2026, 11:07 AM
@Spike101 - I actually lived the first one. The second had a villain straight out of the 90s (I get it took place in the 80s) and a very weak plot.
ParStorm
ParStorm - 8/29/2026, 11:42 AM
@JoshWilding - Respectfully can we please have a review of Batman: Knightfall Part 1? I think that movie was awesome and deserves some respect on this site.
harryba11zack
harryba11zack - 8/29/2026, 11:47 AM
@ParStorm - best dc film we've had in years,
JoshWilding
JoshWilding - 8/29/2026, 12:04 PM
@ParStorm - I should be interviewing producer Jim Krieg and supervising producer Rick Morales next week, so stay tuned.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 8/30/2026, 4:39 AM
@JoshWilding - Jim Krieg is a funny guy. That should be fun.
JoshWilding
JoshWilding - 8/30/2026, 10:46 AM
@ObserverIO - Absolutely! I’ve spoken to him at least once before, ICYMI. 🤓 Just waiting on confirmation for Knightfall, so 🤞🏻

https://comicbookmovie.com/justice-league/justice-league-animated/crisis-on-infinite-earths-writer-jim-krieg-talks-kevin-conroys-final-line-and-scrapped-cameos-exclusive-a212431

TheJok3r
TheJok3r - 8/29/2026, 11:44 AM
Did these two really think they would get another chance after putting out what many consider to be one of the worst comic book movies ever made ? Why would they even bother asking; surely they knew what the answer would be in advance ?
Patient2670
Patient2670 - 8/29/2026, 11:51 AM
What really matters is, thank goodness we've gotten so many speculative articles about this, so long after it happened. "This is Pulitzer stuff".
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 8/29/2026, 11:55 AM
@Patient2670 - any reason to possibly hate on Gunn , Josh will take it.
Patient2670
Patient2670 - 8/30/2026, 11:39 AM
@TheVisionary25 - Clearly.
tRuckRogers46A
tRuckRogers46A - 8/29/2026, 11:53 AM
Slow news day?
cyclopstb
cyclopstb - 8/29/2026, 12:00 PM
Well I don't approve their decision. It's one of the reasons I can't support the DCU.
1 2 3

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder