Ed Brubaker’s Cameo Revealed In CAPTAIN AMERICA: THE WINTER SOLDIER Trailer

He created the Winter Soldier...

In more ways than one...

You don't say?

That's really cool that they did that.

Stan lee should have a cameo in this one as well

Aw man! I really wanted to see the one shot. I was watching it the mid-way through it froze and I found out it got take down. Can anyone please tell me what it was about! Sir Ben Kingsley was killing it!

@Remy

Lay off the caffiene man, you're getting a little bit over-excited...

I definitely need to see this One-Shot though. When's the release date for Thor: The Dark World Blu-Ray?

@Mister

I think there are a lot of people that would disagree with you. IM3 Thor:TDW and The Wolverine were all awesome movies.

MISTERNICEGUY-your opinion, i think it was a really good year for superhero films,i really liked IM3 ( i saw the hail to the king one shot and i still really like that movie,the political commentary done with the the mandarin in that film is still valid and great) does it have flaws? yes, does the one shot bring up some questions, yes, but none derail the film for me,MOS was really good, thor was just good and the wolverine was my favorite of last year and dont presume this year is gonna be amazing, we dont know, it could be a bad year, hopefully it is an amazing year, but we do not know

@TheRealRemyLebeau Clearly my comment went over your head. I stand by what I said. Iron Man 3 was a disappontment to the franchise. No reason to even go back and watch it again. What was achieved with that movie that pushed the MCU forward? Nothing. It was just an average movie at best.

continuezero-hmmm.interesting perspective,well to each his own

This site is sending me to ''lovelinks'' and other shit add site...
Anyone with the same problem? Its really frustrating..
(i visit this site with my cellphone)

continuezero-i dont know why everything has to push forward,why does a film in the mcu have to push the universe forward, does a solo comic do that too,does it push the marvel universe forward,no,it pushes the character forward and im3 did that

@ezio619 No I am fine with a stand alone movie, what I am saying though is that since this didn't contribute to the MCU and it was more a stand alone movie it needed to be a great movie and I just didn't see it. It was well filmed and the CG was great and it had alot of action but it just didn't achieve anything. I think that as a franchise continues there is a responsibility to achieve more. This was trying to be ambitious and fell short imo. I literally watched it a 2nd time and then havent since. Feel no need to.

In terms of MOS, I loved it. I liked the quick pacing that Snyder has. I thought that he got right to the point and I think he created a very strong superman. Acting was great, Krypton finally got some real attention. I love the Zod - Jor El backstory. Smallville touched a little on relationship between Zod and Jor El and I like that dynamic. I loved the movie.

Wolverine - I thought was a good movie, again nothing totally groundbreaking for me. Wasn't blown away but enjoyed it and its one of the better X men movies. That is really a better version of a stand alone movie versus IM3. I think it really stood on its own whereas IM3 leaned alot on what momentum Avengers left.

Thor 2 - I really liked, I think Thor is a difficult character for mainstream but they've done it well. I like the Loki dynamic and I like that they have really done a good job mixing in the God aspect with the Human Aspect of the MCU.

What did you think of those movies?

Honestly when I really think about it, Iron Man 3 was a better film than Thor The Dark World. IM3 had a far better story than Thor TDW's generic BS story.

But really CA:TWS will more than likely blow both of those films out of the water.

Armoredasgardian- yeah,i think IM3 is better film then thor 2 ,it has more "meat" to it but i think what made thor 2 good for me atleast,just good,not great or bad,it was just good for me was the character/family relationships. the banter between thor and loki and that relationship besides the action was well done and the acting was great, the story was just basic but i ejoyed the scince fantasy tone the film had so yeah its one of marvel studios weaker films imo but its still good

@continuezero

"Not sure what Shane Black was going for but it was a total mess IMO. The 42 suits was equivalent to too many enemies in a CBM."

Lol what the heck? Your opinion has been rendered irrelevant with that statement.

@RamonSuarez
Thor TDW just feels like its...there. It just feels like a super-generic, by the numbers sci-fi action comedy. No real purpose other than what you said setting up Infinity saga. And the Ether was poorly explained and frankly [frick]ing stupid. A black red, idk... WHAT is it??? An energy source or living thing??? It [frick]ing screeched like it was getting hurt in one scene. And it has to "infect a living host" so its a pathogen/virus also? Its really like the writers gave ZERO SHITS.
@Ezio
Lmao that was probably one of the things I disliked the most about this movie was the sci-fi and fantasy wasn't balanced at ALL. The Dark Elves could have been the Chitauri and it would have made no difference. The Elves were simply aliens in space ships with laser guns with no mystical abilities whatsoever (other than that red pill AKA "Space Extremis" as I like to call it). The "Escape from Asgard" scene was cheesy and I felt like I was watching a Star Wars movie, not a Thor movie. And also when they announced Alan Taylor was directing, I was certain they were going to go for a more fantasy feel with less science fiction.
You can say Marvel made the Asgardian aliens to "fit with the MCU better", but I call BS on that. Its because they didn't want loony, right-wing Christian nutjobs starting shit in the media over a superhero movie glorifying Pagan gods. So now the Asgardians are a "technologically advanced race" and not GODS.