(((X-MEN 4--PARTIAL REBOOT)))

DDD @ For someone that said he wasn't doing anymore, your not doing a bad job lol! ; D

Great casting dude, though the WHITE QUEEN looks like that SPOCK chic in STAR TREK lol.

HELL YES to ANGEL dude!! An CLOPS, X, MR SIN, etc etc, not sold on DUSHKA as ROGUE but thumbs up from me man an P.S, you forgot CABLE!! : p

Hell CABLE'S gotta be in it to right all the wrongs in X3 lol! : D

Don't like Cyclops, Shadowcat, Ice-Man, or Nightcrawler, but the rest are very solid.

Your best is Franco as Gambit.

But I don't know your White Queen pick.

Kenny@ Wolverine is a mutant and his aging process is slowed down because of his healing factor. It seems to
me like Logan would not look very old is all. Maybe in his mid to late 30's.

Jackman is getting old and he has always been a giant by comparison!

Tyler@ my White Queen was the Vulcan on Star Trek
Enterprize. She was the only good thing on there.

And you don't like the Cyclops from the original
movies? Interesting 'cause I thought he did a fine
job. It was the script that had him as an a-hole
that portrayed him wrong.

I myself really hated Cummings Nightcrawler. It was
a silly portrayal. Nightcrawler is not a religious
freak or timid! I thought the potrayal was hammy!
But it was Singer's way!

I see where you're coming from Tyler@!

Tyler@ that is the way Singer and his scriptwriter
wrote Cyclops. That is how James was supposed to act
like. It wasn't Marsters fault.

Hey guys whats a reboot anyway? please tell me!!!!!!!!!!

TYLER @ CYCLOPS was [frick]ing perfect nearly, the guy was SCOTT SOMMERS, sh1t you want [frick]ing SUPERNATURAL boy playing CLOPS wtf is that lol, now that would be sh1t from carboard boy JARRED himself! : D

thanks!

@MTL- They can play other characters, especially when they'd do a great job.

@TheMyth- Exactly, if Murphey is good for either role (with I think he is) I don't see any problem in casting him.

It's good to see you around man ;)

@Tyler- I prefer him as Toad

Hey, Great to see you TheMyth@.
MYTH@ & RYDEN@ that's what i thought.
Its OK for Cillian to play both parts.
I like him for NITGHTCRAWLER for reasons
I already stated.

Monaghan seems too weasely to play
Nightcrawler. Both Monaghan and Serkis
would be good for Toad, though I think
Serkis would do a better job.

Ryden@ I know its probably best to totally
reboot the X-men but I really like Patrick
Stewart as Xavier. Stephen Moyer is too
skinny and narrow-built to play Wolvie, IMO.

Shelee@ Jared Padalecki is just a little too
young-looking to play Cyclops but he does
have a better leadership presence than Marsden.
But he is 6'4" tall and Scott Summers is listed
on his Marvel bio as 6'3" so he has the
physical attributes of Cyclops. I like Jared
as an actor so I would have no problem with him
playing Cyclops.

Naomi Watts is too flat-chested to play
Emme Frost. Odette Yustman has too much of
a nicey-nicey persona to play Cajun thief
Rogue I believe. That's why I chose Eliza
'cause she has a more dangerous bad-girl
persona. Plus I just like looking at her!
:D

Sweet cast dude. Its really good. I like all of them except for Wolverine and even him I can deal with.

Ryden@ Moyer is 5'10" tall which is a bit too tall for
Wolverine in my opinion and he's slight-built.
Even if he bulks up he'll never be Logan size.

I'm a bodybuilder and have trained with one of
the Mr. Americas. He said you can't make a thin-build look
thick, heck he said I could never be a
bodybuilder competitor 'cause my muscles are too
long in the biceps to ever get that cut look.
At least he was honest with me and kept me from
wasting any more of my time trying for competition.

Christian Kane is an actor too and has done all kinds
of different parts. But the main reason I chose him
was not for typecasting but because I know he can
play Logan 'cause he's a good enough actor and also
he's physically built like Logan. Moyer is also 40 years
old and I think he's a little too old to do a new X-men
trilogy.

Why is it everyone thinks that casting someone who
looks and can act a certain superhero is wrong to
play that character? I think they need to typecast
a little bit because comic book characters have such
specific physical and personality characteristics.

Dogs@ I don't know about everyone else but it was
totally evident to me that the actor was too tall for
Logan the first time I saw X-men. The whole dynamic of
Wolverine is his dynamite in a small package! That is
what makes him unique, that and his adamantine skeleton
and claws.

But Wolverine is a very specific character! Jackman is
the same height as everybody else or even taller. They
didn't even do much to disguise it! Marvel lists Logan
at 5'3" for a very narrow specific PURPOSE!!! It's what
makes him way cool. Small but very deadly!!!

Jackman (6'2") is almost a foot taller than Logan
should be (5'3"). I can see using camera angles but
that is just ridiculous to me! Not that I didn't enjoy
Hugh's performance 'cause I did! But of all the
superheroes out there Wolverine is the one known runt...
well maybe there's some dwarfs out there like PUCK
but Logan's a very short yet normal guy. That's what
makes him so cool, able to take giants down with his
short height!

Myth@ I really like Jackman as Wolverine myself!
I just wanted a shorter guy than 6'2" to play a 5'3"
Logan!