OPPENHEIMER Star Cillian Murphy Could Return For Danny Boyle & Alex Garland's 28 YEARS LATER

OPPENHEIMER Star Cillian Murphy Could Return For Danny Boyle & Alex Garland's 28 YEARS LATER

We recently learned that Danny Boyle and Alex Garland are set to re-team for a long-awaited follow-up to horror classic 28 Days Later, and it sounds like Cillian Murphy may be set to reprise his role.

By MarkCassidy - Feb 02, 2024 06:02 AM EST
Filed Under: Horror
Source: Via FearHQ

We recently learned that the director and writer behind 2002’s "zombie" classic 28 Days Later will join forces yet again for at least one sequel (possibly a trilogy), and we now have a (potentially) very exciting update.

Though we're not sure why they decided to skip 28 Months, Danny Boyle and Alex Garland will reunite for 28 Years Later, which has now found a home at Sony Pictures after what's being described as "a protracted bidding war to win the rights to the sequel package."

According to THR, Cillian Murphy, who played the lead in the original movie, is on board as an executive producer, and could also reprise his role for the new movies (or the first one, at least).

Murphy is nominated for a Best Actor Academy Award for his performance in Oppenheimer, so a win might end up swaying his decision! An Oscar winner is going to be in a much better position to negotiate a fee, after all.

28 Days Later was a massive success, and is still seen as an incredibly influential film in the horror genre. It's already spawned one less well-regarded (but still well worth watching) follow-up in 2007's 28 Weeks Later. Boyle and Garland were only involved as executive producers on that project, however, so a lot of fans are sure to view this new movie as the first true sequel.

Boyle is attached to direct the first instalment, while Garland would write all three. The budget for each movie is said to be in the $75 million range.

The first film starred Murphy as a nameless man who wakes from a coma after a bicycle accident to find that England has been overrun by "The Infected." The virus turns its victims into raging killers, but unlike the usual "zombies" from Night of the Living Dead and other genre classic, these creatures can move with frightening speed.

The man then sets out to learn what's been going on, meeting fellow survivors played by Naomie Harris and Brendan Gleeson along the way, as well as a deranged army major played by Christopher Eccleston.

Plot details for 28 Years Later are still under wraps, but the timeframe would suggest that it will take place in a near-future setting, which means the movie could include some sci-fi elements. There was no mention of the surviving characters (played by Murphy and Harris) in the previous report, but it had been assumed that Boyle and Garland would enlist a new cast.

What do you make of this news? Would you like to see Murphy return as the first movie's protagonist? Drop us a comment down below.

TERRIFIER 3: Art The Clown Returns For Festive Frights In Gory New Trailer
Related:

TERRIFIER 3: Art The Clown Returns For Festive Frights In Gory New Trailer

BEETLEJUICE BEETLEJUICE: Michael Keaton's Ghost With The Most Returns In Batsh*t New Trailer
Recommended For You:

BEETLEJUICE BEETLEJUICE: Michael Keaton's Ghost With The Most Returns In Batsh*t New Trailer

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

DocSpock
DocSpock - 2/2/2024, 6:17 AM

I am interested.

Cillian Murphy is the right kind of weird seething burning energy. Excellent actor.

Guilty pleasure: Red eye. Get wasted and watch it again.
MaxPaint
MaxPaint - 2/2/2024, 6:39 AM
@DocSpock - I'll add that movie to my watchlist, one of my guilty pleasure" flicks is: End Of Days..its a little bit silly but I find it entertaining. Or if you're looking for a more thriller oriented theme, you have movies like Cape fear or Copycat. Both good movies.
GeneralChaos
GeneralChaos - 2/2/2024, 6:39 AM
@DocSpock - I've always felt his Scarecrow was lame.
MarvelZombie616
MarvelZombie616 - 2/2/2024, 6:46 AM
@DocSpock - I have seen Red Eye maybe a dozen times, great movie.

@MarcCassidy Cillian Murphy's character was named "Jim".

Personally i think both movies were great and probably better than George A. Romeros original trilogy, even if i do like Dawn of the Dead best of all zombie movies.
At least finishing out a trilogy is much welcome and i am looking forward how Garland will make a world almost 3 decades into the zombie apocalypse look.

Imo most zombies would be dead, especially with it being infected humans with the rage virus.

Also most humans would be dead or immune to the virus so long after it's outbreak and nature would have reclaimed the World.
lazlodaytona
lazlodaytona - 2/2/2024, 6:55 AM
@GeneralChaos - I liked it a lot in the 1st movie. 2nd and 3rd films were mostly cameos and both mega-lame.
lazlodaytona
lazlodaytona - 2/2/2024, 6:56 AM
@DocSpock - I'll watch the film on the Red Eye, after i get high, then step in the street and say bye-bye
lazlodaytona
lazlodaytona - 2/2/2024, 6:57 AM
@DocSpock -
?si=DebXcdIlLnb9CngR
dragon316
dragon316 - 2/2/2024, 8:42 AM
@DocSpock - you like it who cares there are people who like hood and bad movies I like bad movies there others who like bad movies disagree with critics every movie have it’s fan who cares what others think you like it you like it you not impressing no one you keep doing you be yourself I like series I know that doesn’t count.

Since internet people stop taking chances in life tell people how they feel in person they do that with online dating now really sad use computer screen meet people not go out house do it face to face
DocSpock
DocSpock - 2/2/2024, 12:28 PM
@MaxPaint -

I like all of those, particularly Copycat. I saw them all in the theaters when they came out.

DocSpock
DocSpock - 2/2/2024, 12:30 PM
@MarvelZombie616 -

That's too much thinking. I'd better get drinking.

DocSpock
DocSpock - 2/2/2024, 12:31 PM
@lazlodaytona -

Our new poet Laureate!
DocSpock
DocSpock - 2/2/2024, 12:32 PM
@lazlodaytona -

LOL!
GeneralChaos
GeneralChaos - 2/2/2024, 6:37 AM
You're not sure why they decided to skip 28 Months Later? Because if Cillian's character is involved, he's decades older.
lazlodaytona
lazlodaytona - 2/2/2024, 6:53 AM
Since the summer of '03 I've been wondering what happened to the last trio. It'd be sweet if they could all return.
MuadDib
MuadDib - 2/2/2024, 8:40 AM
So there’s 28 Days Later, and 28 Weeks Later. The rumors have been for a while that a 3rd movie would be made, presumably 28 Years Later. But the article makes it seem like there could be a whole other trilogy? Making it 5 in total?
MosquitoFarmer
MosquitoFarmer - 2/2/2024, 10:36 AM
Look at the year when Boyle’s original movie came out, and look at when these movie(s) will come out. Maybe then you can figure out why they jumped 28 years later…
marvel72
marvel72 - 2/2/2024, 10:50 AM
I haven't seen that movie in ages.
grif
grif - 2/2/2024, 1:03 PM
could put alot of butts in seats after OPPENHEIMER
RedFury
RedFury - 2/2/2024, 4:40 PM
I've never seen any of these movies for some reason... and as a big zombie fan it sounds like I've missed out.

I fear watching them now though might not hit in the same way, since they've inspired a lot in the genre, and might feel a little too familiar for a first watch.

Should I give them a go still?

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder