Zach Cregger’s New Resident Evil Seemingly Sets A Record For The Franchise

Zach Cregger’s New Resident Evil Seemingly Sets A Record For The Franchise

The newest addition to the Resident Evil franchise from the Barbarian and Weapons filmmaker, appears to hold down the shortest runtime yet.

By JabbaTheSus - Jul 17, 2026 08:07 AM EST
Filed Under: Horror
Source: Screen Rant

 Screen Rant is reporting that the upcoming reboot by filmmaker Zach Cregger might have the shortest runtime in the franchise. Scheduled to hit theaters on September 18th, some theaters have already announced the runtime for this highly anticipated reboot of the beloved video game franchise. 

The report states:

Listings on Cinemark and Regal Cinemas have Cregger's reboot set for 89 and 90 minutes, while AMC Theatres has the survival horror movie set for a 95-minute runtime. Screen Rant has reached out to Sony Pictures for clarification on the validity of the differing runtime and has not received a response at the time of writing.

Regarding run times, this report suggests that the new installment may either be the shortest in the franchise or among the shortest. The current shortest runtime in the original Milla Jovovich-led series is held by the first sequel, "Extinction," released in 2004, at 93 minutes.

However, this new entry isn't the first time we've seen a reboot attempt of the Resident Evil franchise. 

    Resident Evil: Welcome to Raccoon City was released in 2021 and received reviews similar to the original film from 2002. It has a critics' score of 30% and an audience score of 65% on Rotten Tomatoes. The official synopsis reads:

Set in 1998, this origin story explores the secrets of the mysterious Spencer Mansion and the ill-fated Raccoon City.

Once the booming home of pharmaceutical giant Umbrella Corporation, Raccoon City is now a dying Midwestern town. The company's exodus left the city a wasteland... with great evil brewing below the surface. When that evil is unleashed, a group of survivors must work together to uncover the truth behind Umbrella and make it through the night.

 The first installment of the franchise, titled Resident Evil, was released in 2002. Directed by Paul W.S. Anderson, it starred Milla Jovovich as Alice and Michelle Rodriguez as Rain Ocampo. The film received mixed reviews, currently holding a critic score of 36% and an audience score of 67% on Rotten Tomatoes. Subsequent installments in the franchise have generally received even worse receptions. Now, in 2026, we are seeing a second full reboot of the series.

    It remains to be seen what the fan base thinks of this new installment from Zach Cregger. While it appears to draw more on the horror roots of the beloved game, it has also faced criticism for not following any of the characters or story lines from the games. At least, from what has been shown so far. However, Zach Cregger has stated that this movie takes place parallel to the events of the first game.

Do you think a shorter runtime is a good sign? Keeping it tight and focused could be a good sign for the franchise.

About The Author:
JabbaTheSus
Member Since 4/3/2018
Jennifer's Body Star Megan Fox Unleashes Her Demonic Side In New Photoshoot Ahead Of Sequel Return
Related:

Jennifer's Body Star Megan Fox Unleashes Her Demonic Side In New Photoshoot Ahead Of Sequel Return

Crystal Lake Teaser Trailer: Pam Voorhees Is On A Bloody Quest For Revenge In First Look Footage
Recommended For You:

Crystal Lake Teaser Trailer: Pam Voorhees Is On A Bloody Quest For Revenge In First Look Footage

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

Kiba
Kiba - 7/17/2026, 10:09 AM
Why is it such a struggle for them to give us a faithful adaptation of the games? Have they ever given a legitimate reason? Did they say why they keep changing so much, or is Capcom putting restrictions on what filmmakers are allowed to do?

Aside from Pokémon, the Resident Evil franchise has probably had more movies than almost any other video game series. Yet somehow, not a single live-action adaptation has managed to be even 80% faithful to the source material.
JabbaTheSus
JabbaTheSus - 7/17/2026, 10:19 AM
@Kiba - Completely agree. I truly don't get it. Cregger said this one runs parallel to the events in Racoon City, so my hope is maybe this one is just to world built for the general audience and then the next installment will take over the game storyline perhaps.
TheFinestSmack
TheFinestSmack - 7/17/2026, 10:20 AM
@Kiba - I think this movie will serve as a prequel that could lead directly into the events of the first game. If a sequel gets made I could it going that direction.
philinterrupted
philinterrupted - 7/17/2026, 10:21 AM
@Kiba - Wasn’t Racoon City the closest? It wasn’t good but they had a lot in there.
Irregular
Irregular - 7/17/2026, 10:28 AM
@Kiba - Looking back, it seems it's a mixture of creative decisions and also what Capcom thinks.

Back when Romero was working on his adaptation for RE, he was taking way too long with the drafts because they kept chopping at the budget and changing what would be required. Meanwhile, RE2 became a blockbuster for gaming on the PS1 and increased in popularity. By the time the first RE was decided on, Code Veronica was the last big RE game to release and so much had changed. So at the time, Capcom wasn't too thrilled about Romero and were more excited at someone taking a different approach to RE. Because they "liked" Anderson's approached, they championed his script. And of course if Constantin sees they are happy, then why not? And overall while I dislike them...they are moneymakers.

Fast-forward to the reboot, and now they FINALLY want to adapt the games. However the choice they had, had both good intentions but also the wrong set. His script was jam packed with characters and was trying to squeeze in RE1-3 all in one movie. While that stuck, so did a lot of character changes and more tropes added to RE to make it more digestible. Simply if the pitch was "We are adapting RE1" then whatever budget they had in mind, would make sense. But he wanted 15 cast members, several different monster designs...it would have ballooned to $100 million and Constantin, saw the work needed, and vetoed it to what we got instead.

FAST FORWARD AGAIN! Resident Evil is going BACK to the way they approached the first movie. No character from the games, put it in that setting and make your own story. The only major, major difference is that Zach Creggar joining Resident Evil, is the director equivalent of Christopher Nolan wanting to direct Mortal Kombat. It's a DREAM to even think that type of director would consider Resident Evil. Regardless of what people feel for his movies, he is a critic darling, and now commercially successful with just his name. So because this type of director, with this type of clout, is pitching Resident Evil...why the hell would they ignore? Theoretically and financially....this is the most amazing decision for the Resident Evil "movie" franchise.

The less said about the Netflix show, the better. Overall it was the exact approach how Paul W.S. Anderson saw it, do something different, slap Resident Evil on it, and call it a day. If Capcom felt off about it though, I'm sure we would have all known. The days for how much influence Capcom has though, are over. And it's only because the first six movies did so well at the BO that it made no sense to dictate what needs to be done if it's only enriching the franchise further. RE4, is proof of that "enrichment" to go more action oriented rather than full on horror and action as just the sub-genre.

Overall I do find it very telling how a lot of pitches shaft the first game are never ever mentioned or hell even RE2 with the franchise star Leon. I'm sure it was attempted, but I'm also sure that same director for WTRC, wanted to have his cake and eat it too (his sequel would have been Code Veronica...which again...just rushing through it all....)
Irregular
Irregular - 7/17/2026, 10:29 AM
@philinterrupted - Close but no cigar. In fact it's not even a cigar, it's the candy cigarettes you get at the store...
Irregular
Irregular - 7/17/2026, 10:30 AM
@TheFinestSmack - The snow setting defeats the "prequel to the games" idea IMO.
Irregular
Irregular - 7/17/2026, 10:31 AM
@JabbaTheSus - They are never going to bother again with adapting a game storyline as a movie. Maybe a TV show because I do think there is still a chance. Hell since exploring "lore" is so important in story-telling nowadays, 1960's to 1998...has some crazy ass lore in RE that could be explored in a TV show easily.
TheFinestSmack
TheFinestSmack - 7/17/2026, 10:19 AM
Jabba on the home page! 👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾
Irregular
Irregular - 7/17/2026, 10:33 AM
I said my peace with this movie as you can see from above lol.

Overall, I feel it's going to be a great horror movie just by the sound of it, but it's only going to be Resident Evil in name. Should I just call Event Horizon "DOOM" now since both have some similarities?

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder