RUMOR: Sony Pictures Not Happy With MADAME WEB Star Dakota Johnson Following Recent Interviews

RUMOR: Sony Pictures Not Happy With MADAME WEB Star Dakota Johnson Following Recent Interviews

Dakota Johnson has been fairly upfront when it comes to her feeling on Madame Web, and if a new rumor is to be believed, Sony Pictures isn't too happy about it...

By MarkCassidy - Mar 09, 2024 11:03 PM EST
Filed Under: Madame Web

Madame Web star Dakota Johnson never seemed particularly enthusiastic when it came to promoting the movie in the build-up to its release, and once it was playing in theaters, she said certain things during interviews that could be taken as somewhat disparaging.

Following one interview in which the Fifty Shades of Grey actress admitted that she hadn't actually seen the movie yet (despite showing up to the premiere), Johnson said she "wasn't surprised" by the poor box office performance or negative reviews.

"It’s so hard to get movies made, and in these big movies that get made — and it’s even starting to happen with the little ones, which is what’s really freaking me out — decisions are being made by committees, and art does not do well when it’s made by committee," she told Bustle. "Films are made by a filmmaker and a team of artists around them. You cannot make art based on numbers and algorithms. My feeling has been for a long time that audiences are extremely smart, and executives have started to believe that they’re not. Audiences will always be able to sniff out bullsh*t. Even if films start to be made with AI, humans aren’t going to f*cking want to see those.

But it was definitely an experience for me to make that movie. I had never done anything like it before. I probably will never do anything like it again because I don’t make sense in that world."

Nothing too negative, but rumor has it that Sony Pictures execs were not best pleased about Johnson's comments.

"Lots of people at Sony are questioning her star power, and how she reacted to this failure will likely come back to haunt her," an insider tells DailyMail.com. "It is OK to joke about your movie not doing well and even lean into the bad reviews like Sydney Sweeney did on SNL with her monologue - but producers and Sony aren't laughing over Dakota's continued dragging of how she sees the fallout of Madame Web and how she isn't taking any responsibility for its lackluster results."

"Not every movie is going to work, but a lot of hard work is put towards even bad movies and for your star to s**t on it is a bad look."

While we have no problem believing that Sony would be a little miffed at Johnson, this source hasn't always been the most reliable, so the details of this report should be considered rumor for the time being.

Even if it is accurate, it doesn't sound like Joshnon is in any rush to suit back up as Madame Web in the SSU - not that a sequel is very likely, anyway.

"'Meanwhile, in another universe...'" reads the official synopsis, "In a switch from the typical genre, Madame Web tells the standalone origin story of one of Marvel publishing's most enigmatic heroines." "The suspense-driven thriller stars Dakota Johnson as Cassandra Webb, a paramedic in Manhattan who may have clairvoyant abilities. Forced to confront revelations about her past, she forges a relationship with three young women destined for powerful futures...if they can all survive a deadly present."

Dakota Johnson stars as the clairvoyant Cassandra Webb, who uses her abilities to save a group of young woman, played by Sydney Sweeney, Isabela Merced, and Celeste O’Connor, from a villainous Spider-Man lookalike known as Ezekiel Simms.

The girls Webb is doing her best to keep safe, Julia Carpenter, Mattie Franklin and Anya Corazón, are all destined to become heroes with Spider-like powers of their own, and Simms is targetting them because of what they do to him in the future.

S.J. Clarkson, who also helmed Marvel’s Jessica Jones and The Defenders, directs from a script by Matt Sazama, Kerem Sazama and Burk Sharpless. Adam Merims executive produced.

In addition to Kraven the Hunter, a third Venom movie slated for Nov. 8, 2024. These movies could well prove to be box office successes and turn things around, but if not, one has to assume that the SSU will be on its last legs.

Do you plan on seeing Madame Web on the big screen, or at all? Drop us a comment down below.

Sydney Sweeney Reportedly Agreed To Make MADAME WEB To Convince Sony To Greenlight ANYONE BUT YOU
Related:

Sydney Sweeney Reportedly Agreed To Make MADAME WEB To Convince Sony To Greenlight ANYONE BUT YOU

MADAME WEB Star Sydney Sweeney Reveals Impressive Transformation For Upcoming Role As Boxer Christy Martin
Recommended For You:

MADAME WEB Star Sydney Sweeney Reveals Impressive Transformation For Upcoming Role As Boxer Christy Martin

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3
GhostDog
GhostDog - 3/9/2024, 11:02 PM
SONY’s inability of admitting these Spiderman spinoffs are terrible and a waste for them is whats the actual problem here, not some actress.
MCUKnight11
MCUKnight11 - 3/9/2024, 11:07 PM
@GhostDog - It's infuriating to think they are in any position to negotiate adding Multiverse elements to Spider-man 4. Hopefully Feige and Holland win if that rumor is true which considering Sony's track record, I completely believe it.
HistoryofMatt
HistoryofMatt - 3/9/2024, 11:11 PM
@MCUKnight11 - Considering that No Way Home is the only great MCU movie since Endgame, Sony is doing something right there. Right now, Feige doesn't have much of a leg to stand on considering the only Disney MCU movie since Endgame to even be good, Guardians 3, had little to no input from Feige and Disney.

So you have the only two movies that were good since Endgame that were either mostly made by another studio or mostly made by a singular auteur who made the movie he wanted to make without taking notes.

Everything else, from movies to TV shows, has been terrible crap.
SethBullock
SethBullock - 3/9/2024, 11:38 PM
@HistoryofMatt - NWH was crap too, most people only loved it for the nostalgic cameos, but the writing was mostly terrible.
EskimoJ
EskimoJ - 3/10/2024, 12:20 AM
@HistoryofMatt - 😂 Marvel Studios made No Way Home, they collaborate with Sony for the MCU films.
KelvTwelve
KelvTwelve - 3/10/2024, 12:35 AM
@MCUKnight11 - Sony's LIVE ACTION track record, after they've made animated Spider-Man movies which people largely consider to be the best if not the second best Spider-Man film next to Sam Raimi's Spider-Man 2. And if you look it at it from that angle, and the fact that Sony has three successful multiversal Spider-Man films, where Marvel has done the multiverse and noone seems interested anymore - you can see why Marvel is on team Street level vs Sony's multiversal event.
Taonrey
Taonrey - 3/10/2024, 1:10 AM
@SethBullock - exactly! Are people still pretending the first hour of that movie wasn’t stupid asf
HistoryofMatt
HistoryofMatt - 3/10/2024, 1:30 AM
@EskimoJ - No, you have that backwards. You're wrong. Sony makes Spider-Man movies. They collaborate with Marvel to ensure they're not messing up the overall MCU world, but Sony makes those movies, contracts the writers, hires the director, and casts the films. It's 90% Sony and 10% Disney.
HistoryofMatt
HistoryofMatt - 3/10/2024, 1:31 AM
@SethBullock - Wrong.
MG0019
MG0019 - 3/10/2024, 1:48 AM
@HistoryofMatt - Dude, NWH is not that great. Don’t get me wrong, I was as excited as others to see the three Spideys. But is a slog to get to that point. There’s a lot of fat that could be trimmed from that movie, and it feels disjointed at parts likely due to reshoots, and the constant changing Marvel’s been plagued with recently.

I firmly believe this was was supposed to be Holland’s last role in the MCU. Why else have a spell that makes everyone in the MCU forget he ever existed. It was a good out; we had him for a while, now there’s story reason why no one mentions Spidey ever again.

But, now things changed again, and Spidey’s still in MCU. It’s a mess. And while that’s not all Sony’s fault; Sony absolutely contributes Nothing good to the situation.
eagc1995
eagc1995 - 3/10/2024, 3:27 AM
@MCUKnight11 - I mean all Sony is seeing is with the success NWH, ITSV and ATSV had and their mindset is Spider-Man + Multiverse = Money
SauronthePower
SauronthePower - 3/10/2024, 6:57 AM
@HistoryofMatt - not even remotely correct
Vigor
Vigor - 3/10/2024, 7:49 AM
@HistoryofMatt - this is from Wikipedia

Spider-Man: No Way Home is a 2021 American superhero film based on the Marvel Comics character Spider-Man, co-produced by Columbia Pictures and Marvel Studios, and distributed by Sony Pictures Releasing.
Evansly
Evansly - 3/10/2024, 9:24 AM
@HistoryofMatt - Acting like Werewolf by Night wasn't amazing! I call shenanigans!
SheepishOne
SheepishOne - 3/10/2024, 11:22 AM
@HistoryofMatt - No, Marvel Studios' creative team is entirely responsible for the Tom Holland movies. Sony has some say in which characters are used, and they use their money for marketing. But Sony is not making those movies, in the creative sense. It's an MCU product, creatively.
HistoryofMatt
HistoryofMatt - 3/10/2024, 12:45 PM
@MG0019 - Agree to disagree. Also, how could you think it was supposed to be Holland's final time in role with that ending?
Variant
Variant - 3/10/2024, 2:18 PM
@HistoryofMatt - This is very false. Marvel Studios makes the Spider-Man films. Sony is the distributor in the agreement. Marvel Studios produces the film; they are behind all creative aspects.
whoknows
whoknows - 3/10/2024, 2:35 PM
@SethBullock - thank you, you could keep NWH story and replace all the cameo actors with new actors for the roles and you’d clearly see the story didn’t make any sense, it’s really just the nostalgia that kept the blood pumping
HistoryofMatt
HistoryofMatt - 3/10/2024, 3:26 PM
@Variant - Nope. They are consulted. They are not behind creative. Sony is.
Canon108
Canon108 - 3/10/2024, 8:44 PM
@HistoryofMatt - Nope, you're wrong. It's been well documented that Marvel are the creative brains behind the Holland trilogy. Sony pays part of the bill and distribution, and they split the profits...creatively, it's all Marvel. And it's not agree to disagree, you're objectively wrong.
Slotherin
Slotherin - 3/10/2024, 11:07 PM
@whoknows -
@SethBullock -
I'm glad to see people coming around to this.
It's got aspects that work for where it brings the character, but ultimately I thought both Far From Home and especially Homecoming were better films.
SuperCat
SuperCat - 3/9/2024, 11:03 PM
JFerguson
JFerguson - 3/9/2024, 11:05 PM
Tom Rothman a little bitch

SonOfAGif
SonOfAGif - 3/9/2024, 11:23 PM
At the end of the day if she isn't afraid of the consequences of her opinions why should people continue to drag her through the mud for it? Let the Movie Studios decide if they want to work with her. But trying to silence her POV because it's a "bad look" is a pathetic attempt to shill for a studio. Let these cast and crew members speak out about how trash these companies really are.
TrentCrimm
TrentCrimm - 3/10/2024, 1:44 PM
@SonOfAGif -

I find it refreshing to see lol

I honestly feel bad for her, for everyone involved in this shit show of a movie, it seems to be her name in the headlines more than anyone elses. People rarely mention the director or producers or writers of the movie.

MisterDoctor217
MisterDoctor217 - 3/9/2024, 11:28 PM
I think the blame is on both sides.

Sony for insisting on making these spin offs no one wants.

And Dakota’s for agreeing to do the movie in the first place. If the rumors are true that she thought it was for the MCU, I cannot believe her agents or her team couldn’t make some simple research and find out this is a Sony production, not a co-production with Marvel/Disney.

And if she did know, then she also should have researched how the last few Sony spin offs were received.

But at the end of the day it was a paycheck for her , which is why she most likely did it. So yes I can see why the people who
Worked on the movie , would be upset with her.
I mean it’s not just the excecs working on it , there’s also the people on set holding the boom mics , and running the set.

But idk it’s just rich people arguing with each other lol
Evansly
Evansly - 3/10/2024, 9:27 AM
@MisterDoctor217 - Part of the issue seems to be that it was a different script than the one she read when she signed the contract. I would say more fault is on Sony since they would sue her to hold her contract but yeah seems like her agency messed up since she dropped them the day the trailer dropped
MisterDoctor217
MisterDoctor217 - 3/10/2024, 4:10 PM
@Evansly -

Well scripts change all the time. I understand being very disappointed that you sign on to a script and then it changes a lot and you get a different final product. But that’s been happening for years in comic book movies , and I’m sure to a lesser extent in other genre ones as well. It’s not something rare and I’m sure actors are aware of that when they sign on to a movie. I mean she’s been on the Hollywood scene for a while and I’m sure her parents taught her a thing or two.

So idk, I still think both are to blame. Sony has got to stop making these awful, and frankly stupid movies , and actors need to choose their projects carefully and be aware of who they are working for.
dracula
dracula - 3/9/2024, 11:44 PM
Yeah not good for studio actor relations but very refreshing to see a cast so willing to admit to failure

You know Jean Claud Van Dame, when he had his first interview for Blood Sport he actually said he would have done a better movie if he could, did not go over well. Guess nobody bothered to tell him what you are supposed to do

Andrew Garfield shit talking Amazing Spiderman 2 killed the possibility of him joining the mcu but is doing jusf fine now.

With this movie bombing they are going to be out of jobs whether they are honest or not and in isabella’s case she already has work lined ho so might as well say what you want
Taonrey
Taonrey - 3/10/2024, 1:11 AM
@dracula - Andrew wasn’t joining the mcu regardless, have a hard time believing Kevin would want to use someone else’s take on Peter
dracula
dracula - 3/10/2024, 3:20 AM
@Taonrey - amazing spiderman oscorp was almost in avengers so must have been considered at some point
SuperiorHeckler
SuperiorHeckler - 3/9/2024, 11:51 PM
Damn the incels! 😡 They've ruined another masterpiece!
AwesomePromoz
AwesomePromoz - 3/10/2024, 3:12 AM
@SuperiorHeckler - So you’re siding with incels? Nice face plant there pal.
eagc1995
eagc1995 - 3/10/2024, 3:28 AM
@SuperiorHeckler - The Incels are not in fault this time around.

Sony made a bad movie that basically a huge majority of people disliked, thus its losing money.
SuperiorHeckler
SuperiorHeckler - 3/10/2024, 9:38 AM
@eagc1995 - I'll type this slowly: I. Was. Joking. Get it??? 😳
1 2 3

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder