SPIDER-MAN: NO WAY HOME Hot Toys Action Figure Offers Detailed Look At Green Goblin's Final Costume

SPIDER-MAN: NO WAY HOME Hot Toys Action Figure Offers Detailed Look At Green Goblin's Final Costume

A new Spider-Man: No Way Home action figure offers a closer look at the Green Goblin's "Upgraded" suit, including many of the modifications Norman Osborn made while on Earth-616. Check it out here...

By JoshWilding - Oct 24, 2022 06:10 AM EST
Filed Under: No Way Home

Willem Dafoe first played the Green Goblin in 2002's Spider-Man, a movie many of you may not have even been old enough to watch in theaters. The actor reprised the role in last December's Spider-Man: No Way Home, and quickly cemented Norman Osborn as the MCU's best villain. 

Nearly a year on from when the threequel was released, Hot Toys has now revealed a new look action figure featuring the Green Goblin's "Upgraded Suit."

Based on Osborn's maniacal portrayal in Spider-Man: No Way Home, the movie-accurate figure features a newly developed head sculpt of Willem Dafoe with separate rolling eyeballs, realistic wrinkles, and a detailed hair sculpt.

His upgraded costume is painted in a metallic green colour with battle-damaged effects, a distressed poncho, highly-detailed accessories including goggles, pumpkin bombs, attachable blades, his trademark Goblin Glider in one-sixth scale with an LED light-up design and articulated functions. 

While some fans were disappointed that the Goblin didn't have his mask for this final battle, Dafoe perfectly sold the twisted villain's terrifying expressions with his face alone. In an earlier version of the script, we also would have learned that the villain took those goggles from Doctor Octopus and used Stark tech to update his gear. 

By the time all was said and done, Osborn had been cured and freed of his Goblin persona. Clearly remorseful for his actions, he was sent back to the world inhabited by Tobey Maguire's Spider-Man, though we don't anticipate seeing him again. Spider-Man: No Way Home also confirmed that there is no Variant of Norman in the Marvel Cinematic Universe (Earth-616). 

Despite that, the upcoming Spider-Man: Freshman Year animated series will feature a Norman Variant who serves as a mentor to Peter Parker, outfitting the web-slinger with an Oscorp costume. 

Take a closer look at this Green Goblin Hot Toys action figure below. 
 

312479794-480542737443077-3985983278901157018-n


312500747-480542604109757-7983166868868224220-n


312551768-480542767443074-8135590432840201146-n


312562827-480542984109719-6129154157306389748-n


312583804-480542524109765-6662971740079404494-n


312587894-480543020776382-5088756806283584369-n


311778896-480542514109766-1435488021917188682-n
Tom Holland Shares Disappointment With SPIDER-MAN: NO WAY HOME - I Might Have Done Three Days On Location
Related:

Tom Holland Shares Disappointment With SPIDER-MAN: NO WAY HOME - "I Might Have Done Three Days On Location"

SPIDER-MAN: NO WAY HOME Star Charlie Cox Recalls Cut Reference To 2003's DAREDEVIL During His MCU Debut
Recommended For You:

SPIDER-MAN: NO WAY HOME Star Charlie Cox Recalls Cut Reference To 2003's DAREDEVIL During His MCU Debut

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

AC1
AC1 - 10/24/2022, 6:51 AM
"Spider-Man: No Way Home also confirmed that there is no Variant of Norman in the Marvel Cinematic Universe (Earth-616)."

As pointless as it is for me to keep harping on about this - the movie DOESN'T confirm there isn't an MCU variant of Norman. All it confirms is, as of 2024 when NWH is set, OsCorp doesn't exist and someone else lives in the house that this version of Norman lived in in the Raimi-verse.

It's very clear that they were intentionally ambiguous about all of it so that they could still leave the door open to explore it in the future.
BraveNewClunge
BraveNewClunge - 10/24/2022, 7:18 AM
@AC1 - you're right but it's a tough act to follow though. Willem was great and this Goblin killed MCU Peter's aunt. I'm not sure how another Norman Osborne/ GG can make a bigger impact on Peter's life than Raimis one did.

But as always I'm interested to see where they may take it.
AC1
AC1 - 10/24/2022, 7:25 AM
@ClungesForever - oh yeah, I'm not sure how they could possibly follow up that Goblin storyline without it feeling like a rehash or being underwhelming, just pointing out the article is inaccurate in stating that the movie confirmed something that it didn't.
bkmeijer1
bkmeijer1 - 10/24/2022, 7:29 AM
@AC1 @ClungesForever - my guess is Osborn does exist in the MCU as well, just not as head of Oscorp or as future Green Goblin.

Instead, I kinda expect him to show up as the director of HAMMER and as the new Iron Patriot. Definitely not a rehash of what we've seen before.
AC1
AC1 - 10/24/2022, 7:40 AM
@bkmeijer1 - Yeah I'd imagine something similar would happen too. A Daily Bugle tie in was released alongside NWH and an article implied Norman was recognised by witnesses at a party as a "failed CEO" suggesting Oscorp may have previously existed but gone out of business and that there is an MCU version of the character who possibly even resembles the Dafoe version to some degree.

So yeah, could be that he moves on to HAMMER like in the comics, could be that he starts a mayoral campaign like in the PS4 game, maybe he takes over what's left of Stark Industries and rebrands that as Oscorp; there's quite a lot they could do.

And if they did do another Goblin arc I'd assume it would be very different to what we've seen with the Raimi-verse version of the character. Taking some cues from the first Hobgoblin arc in the comics would be a good start, making the identity of this new Goblin a mystery Peter has to solve, maybe have his natural suspicions of Norman be something of a misdirect, maybe have multiple people behind the mask, etc.
Spoken
Spoken - 10/24/2022, 7:41 AM
@AC1 - Yeah Osborn probably does exist, but doesn't mean he is the head of a company just like Quentin Beck isn't an effects movie maker and is now more interwoven into the MCU. I'm sure they are out there somewhere.

Which is what I am guessing here that if Feige were to bring back any of these characters and had moved on from the idea of not recasting, I do sense their origins would change a bit to hone in more in spirit of the character rather than literal interpretation (which is what I gather from what they were trying to do with MCU Spider-Man villains)
bkmeijer1
bkmeijer1 - 10/24/2022, 8:16 AM
@AC1 - I kinda hope they don't connect him to Stark at all, but otherwise I can them definitely see it change his origins up in the movies.

Wonder if we'll see any native MCU version of any Goblin in the MCU though. Whether that is with Norman, Harry, Roderick or maybe even Ned.
AC1
AC1 - 10/24/2022, 3:17 PM
@bkmeijer1 - I really hope Ned never becomes a villain, I think that'd be such a depressing direction to take such a fun and optimistic character, but I'd be fine with any of the other 3 as long as it made sense for whatever story they were telling.
bkmeijer1
bkmeijer1 - 10/24/2022, 5:38 PM
@AC1 - that's exactly the reason why I can see them making Ned an actual villain.

Just don't really see the need if we also get a similar story with Harry Osborn (who I can hope becomes Venom, like in the Ultimate Spider-Man show).
Slotherin
Slotherin - 10/24/2022, 6:13 PM
@AC1 - I'm not sure about it all being intentionally ambiguous but you're right that it doesn't explicitly confirm his non-existence
Twenty23Three
Twenty23Three - 10/24/2022, 7:23 AM
Whilst I understand why it was done, and it paid off financially for them, I still think taking in these characters from other universes before establishing this universes versions of them was a mistake narratively. Peter is instantly going to be suspicious of any of these people in his world, hell if he had any sense he’d look them all up to keep an eye on them
bkmeijer1
bkmeijer1 - 10/24/2022, 7:31 AM
@Twenty23Three - I think that makes it narratively interesting. Especially if we get a new Ock.

Peter probably trusts him because he knows how it was the tentacles that corrupted variant Ock, which can lead to MCU Ock betraying that trust and be actually evil.
IcePyke
IcePyke - 10/24/2022, 7:25 AM


MisterDoctor217
MisterDoctor217 - 10/24/2022, 7:43 AM
This is incredible! Wish I had the money to buy this lol


Dafoe’s Green Goblin has been one of the MCU’s best villains, so glad he came back 🎃 😈
Spoken
Spoken - 10/24/2022, 7:46 AM
Probably my favorite live-action Spider-Man movie, and one that I felt truly felt like a comic book come to life on the big screen. Yeah it wasn't any particular story, but it def had all the makings of a truly great Spider-Man story.
TheVandalore
TheVandalore - 10/24/2022, 8:54 AM
Unpopular opinion: Willam Dafoe's acting wasnt good at all in No Way Home. It was over the top dramatic with no subtly or nuance. I swear they picked awkward takes. I think Dafoe is a master class actor, his mirror scene in the first Spiderman was masterfully pulled off and from what i remember was actually filmed in a single take with him switching between terrified Norman and demented Goby. And his filmography speaks for himself. I love Dafoe. I have no motive to shine shade on the man..... but my honest opinion is all of the villians acting in No Way Home felt off and not quite the right tone to me, but Willam was the most unenjoyable to me. It just didnt feel like a real person, his Norman nor his Goby. All the villians just felt like recycled cameo bait to me.

The whole movie was nostalgia and little else in the way of substance, but its all good. its fun. and movies are allowed to be just fun. It was worth it to get the 3 Spidermen on screen together, and 100% worth it to get resolution to Andrew Garfield's Peter saving MJ.
Slotherin
Slotherin - 10/24/2022, 6:16 PM
@TheVandalore - while I don't agree on it being unenjoyable, I see what you mean on certain things being forced, villains not feeling like themselves, etc. It definitely got by on nostalgia.
JFerguson
JFerguson - 10/24/2022, 9:10 AM
This rolling eyeball thing they added on the newer figures really suits this one well.
DCasAhobby
DCasAhobby - 10/24/2022, 9:32 AM
Movie was a masterpiece
AgentSmith
AgentSmith - 10/24/2022, 10:08 AM
The smile is just creepy enough... Hot Toys puts out some amazing collectors items. They are expensive, but very much worth it if you are into it!
Slotherin
Slotherin - 10/24/2022, 6:20 PM
That cod piece though?

View Recorder