100 Days of Superheroes- Day 10: Superman 3 (1983)

100 Days of Superheroes- Day 10: Superman 3 (1983)

A movie that teaches us never to drink and fly.

Review Opinion
By ToDandy - Jul 15, 2011 09:07 AM EST
Filed Under: Superman




Trailer:



“I ask you to kill Superman, and you can’t even do that one simple thing.”


Oh…so this where the curse of the third superhero film began. Ten days in and we are reunited with the character of Superman once again. I wish it was a happy reunion, but Superman 3 is one giant mess of a movie.

While we are conveniently on the topic of reunion let’s get down to this poor excuse for a plot. Remember that awesome opening credit sequence in the original as it flies through space. It gave a since of the giant scope of that film. The credit sequence in this film also gives an accurate depiction of the scope of the movie with people walking around blindly running into walls. I find it to be very metaphorical of the direction they chose to take.



After we get through the opening shenanigans we move on to meet Gus Gorman (Richard Pryor), a bum who cannot hold a job when he suddenly realizes that with no previous training, he’s actually a computer genius. Happy day! Next thing he knows he gets recruited by a corrupt family business hoping to use his skills to control the coffee and oil trade. How will they do this? Well by using a weather monitoring satellite to create weather of course. This just gave me full confidence that in 1983 people still didn’t quite understand the extent of what a computer could and could not do.



Anyways the title is Superman, right? Well sure, but a more accurate one would be The Further Adventures of Superman and Richard Pryor. Being on the rise as a popular comedian at the time, much of the film (and the character of Superman) was sacrificed in order to create more screen time for their big name comedian who is horribly misused anyways. Pretty much all that Pryor does is walk around the entire film acting like a bumbling idiot in clumsy slapstick scenes.

Back to the title character though. Superman decides to head off to Smallville to attend a high school reunion where he bumps into his old crush Lana Lang (Annette O'Toole, who also plays Clark's mother in Smallville). Then pretty much Clark Kents scenes deteriorate into a series of dances and picnics. I was really at the edge of my seat during this part (<-please note sarcasm).



Finally we get to the part where Superman is somehow turned evil by Kryptonite, rather than being killed by it. From there the film falls apart into Superman doing such horrific things as straightening up the Leaning Tower, Drinking in a Bar, and arriving to accidents late. HOW DARE HE?! All this builds up to him somehow fighting his “evil” doppledanger in a scene that makes zero coherent sense. I wasn’t sure if it was trying to be metaphorical, an illusion, or some weird krypton magic of some sort.



Overall throughout the film there is really no threats from the villains at all, that don’t pose any real menace to superman. The final battle with the living supercomputer consuming all the worlds’ energy was satisfying considering the lousy build up to it. All this compounds into the film lacking any emotion at all. The relationships between characters are stale and there is no real sense of drama.

In the end Superman 3 is just the beginning though in both a series of mediocre to horrible sequels and as the first film to kick start the curse of the third superhero sequels. So thanks for nothing, I feel no guilt blaming any superstition on this disaster.


FINAL RATING: 2/10- 20%



Previous DAY 9: http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/100superherodays/news/?a=41779


NOTE: polls used in ranking the films later on PLEASE VOTE if you have seen it.

New SUPERMAN Promo Reveals First Look At The Hall Of Justice
Related:

New SUPERMAN Promo Reveals First Look At The Hall Of Justice

SUPERMAN: 5 Biggest Spoilers From The First Junket Interviews (Including Who Owns The DCU's Hall Of Justice)
Recommended For You:

SUPERMAN: 5 Biggest Spoilers From The First Junket Interviews (Including Who Owns The DCU's Hall Of Justice)

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

Superheromoviefan
Superheromoviefan - 7/15/2011, 10:51 AM
Yet another awesome review. Just keep this coming!
LP4
LP4 - 7/15/2011, 12:33 PM
Actually believe it or not I didn't hate this movie too much. I liked the junkyard fight scene between good clark and evil 'druggie' Superman.

Gus Gorman was a total waste and I hated his character...I don't know why the [frick] he was added since he contributed absolutely NOTHING to the film.

Hard to believe this movie even had more action than Superman Returns and yet look how old it is- 1983 compared to 2006. That is sad. Probably one of the reasons why i respect this movie so much.
ar8898
ar8898 - 7/15/2011, 12:33 PM
This movie was absolute garbage, the script writer must have been on crack. The film was just cheesy and idiotic.
Maggott
Maggott - 7/15/2011, 1:03 PM
this movie sucks so bad. i cant even watch it all the from start to finish anymore. great review again though.
superman78
superman78 - 7/15/2011, 4:43 PM
This was quite simply a Richard Pryor and Christopher Reeve buddy movie. It doesn't take too much research to find out that no on attached to this movie (including Reeve and Pryor) were proud of it. C'mon LP4- I know how much you hate Returns- and I agree with some of your points of view on that. But, really? You really liked this better? I don't believe that.
LP4
LP4 - 7/15/2011, 7:46 PM
@superman78- Yes, I mean it. I liked this better than Superman Returns. In this crappy film, at least we got to see more of Clark's background in Smallville...we got to see him fight a little bit.

The only weak things i admit were the Websters. I hated them, Ross Webster= watered down Lex Luthor but for some reason Webster was a better Lex Luthor than the Gene Hackman one because Hackman was just a petty land-grabber. Webster on the other hand was actually a corrupt CEO of his own company and never/rarely ever joked. That's why i thought he was a better villain and overall a better Lex even than Hackman.

@BaneKill77- Yeah, i'm cool with the guy being a diehard Supes fan. But I just don't get why he was in the film. I think he was just there as comedy-relief but it was horrible. It would be the same as Snyder putting Dave Chapelle in the Superman reboot film as comedy relief. That's how bad it was. Dave Chapelle doesn't belong in a Superman film nor should Richard Pryor.

That was completely unnecessary.

LP4
LP4 - 7/15/2011, 7:50 PM
I mean I wouldn't even have minded much if Pryor was maybe a small guest appearance in SupermanIII but the simple fact that they made Richard Pryor the MAIN character of the movie, even overshadowing Superman himself was sad. Richard Pryor was the main antagonist/guinea pig/protagonist in the film. He created the evil super-computer AND he's the one who ends up saving Superman's life. AND they made him seem like some kind of super-genius. Come on...silly to think that Pryor's character was somehow smarter than both Superman AND Webster.

But ah those were just some of my minor nitpicks on the film.
Knightstalker
Knightstalker - 7/15/2011, 10:02 PM
I saw Superman 3 in the theater when I was a teenager and, being a Superman fan back then, I think that was the first time I actually facepalmed. They had so much potential to work with and blew it.

@LP4...I agree, Robert Vaughn's villain was ten times more menacing than Hackman's Lex. However, they had the chance to make Brainiac the main villain and instead we got the robot woman and the Kryptonite Ray. Sad, just sad. BTW I noticed you've been given the Troll symbol. Sorry man, IMHO it is undeserved. People should not mistake passion for negativity.
LP4
LP4 - 7/16/2011, 1:02 AM
@Knightstalker- Thanks man, yeah brainiac would have been better. When the chick became roboticized and stuff...yeah just not very good at all.

And yeah thanks man, i emailed Jim Littler about it. He agreed my comment didn't even deserve that troll icon. The comment that got reported didn't merit a troll badge because it didn't meet any of the criteria for one. I didn't cuss anybody out, I didn't whine and I didn't post any nudity or whatever. Just to name a few.

Jim agreed it was a false-report on me and so he told me he was going to shoot a warning to THAT individual who filed the false report.

THAT individual is now in danger of their account getting disabled. And...they now have a whiner badge.

=)

Thanks again man, glad we agree on most just about everything. I agree, Superman III= major facepalm. It was just sad that that was actually a better film than Superman Returns...in some aspects. lol
Knightstalker
Knightstalker - 7/16/2011, 8:31 AM
At least Superman got to duke it out, even if it was with himself. I'm not a big Donner-head, but I liked the way Reeve played Superman most of the time. If Snyder can take a lesson from Reeve's Superman and Dean Cain's Clark Kent, MOS might actually be worth watching.
LP4
LP4 - 7/16/2011, 9:31 PM
@Knightstalker- Agreed. Superman III was horrible. But at least Supes got to actually got to hit something this time.

People who are fans of the boring Superman are going to be sorely disappointed in the upcoming reboot and there are a NUMBER of people on this site who I can list that are fans of that horrifying excuse of a film- Superman Returns.

I won't list them by name because that will attract the trolls.
LP4
LP4 - 7/16/2011, 9:44 PM
In fact to further elaborate. I'm thinking the trolls who keep bugging me on my articles and keep reporting me are just bitter and PISSY about their boy Routh not being in "Man of Steel" LMAO

Kinda sad really...

But hey routh-fans, fear not. Routh's still got a chance to revive his career...I mean yeah all the reviewers of "Dylan Dog" agreed that Routh's stale acting hurt the film majorly but maybe he can get a sequel off of that piece of garbage. Or better yet...bring him back for a possible Scott Pilgrim sequel as "evil douchebag #3" again. That was wooden-acting at its finest!

Can't wait for the trolls on this site to report me to the CBM highlords for speaking my mind about Routhy-boy. They act as if Routh is their cousin or brother or... *illegitimate father* like his particular portrayal of Superman...oops hahahaha.

From the start I maintained that I wanted a COMPLETE and FRESH reboot with a brand new cast. I'm really happy Snyder is doing just THAT. And bringing in an all-star cast with it! That is how a Superman film should be done and SHOULD have been done back in 2006.

View Recorder