VIDEO: Superman (1978) Movie Mistakes

VIDEO: Superman (1978) Movie Mistakes

A fun look at just how many mistakes they made during the production of the original Superman.

Feature Opinion
By hovis5818 - Oct 30, 2010 01:10 PM EST
Filed Under: Superman
Source: YouTube

I found this on YouTube and thought I would share as it had only 2,000(ish) views. Just a bit of fun for the weekend. Enjoy!

SUPERMAN: Jimmy Olsen Actor Skyler Gisondo On The Casting Process And Bonding With David Corenswet
Related:

SUPERMAN: Jimmy Olsen Actor Skyler Gisondo On The Casting Process And Bonding With David Corenswet

SUPERMAN: Bizarre Plot Rumor Points To SuperSh*t Hate Campaign And Mutant Monkeys - SPOILERS
Recommended For You:

SUPERMAN: Bizarre Plot Rumor Points To "SuperSh*t" Hate Campaign And Mutant Monkeys - SPOILERS

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

Angelus
Angelus - 10/30/2010, 3:02 PM
The only mistake with this film is that Christopher Reeve is the SUPERMAN of all time! Nobody could portray him after Reeve. He is the bar. Actually, he sat the bar. No one can reset it. Escpecially not that hack Tom Welling.
Christopher Reeve made us all believe that a man could fly. I highly doubt any film after it will make us believe so intently, so deeply. Christopher Reeve is, was and will always be Kal El, the Last Son of Krypton: Superman.

BMP!
hovis5818
hovis5818 - 10/30/2010, 3:04 PM
I agree that Christopher Reeve will always be my generations Superman
LP4
LP4 - 10/30/2010, 10:33 PM
@Angelus- I WOULD agree with you normally...except that YOU'RE the one who made an article practically BEGGING to bring Routh back. -_-

You obviously sit on the opposite side of the fence as I do.

Now most people may shit on Dean Cain's Supes all they want but I actually like him as Supes and I loved the show. Yeah the show had its corny moments but overall it was a good, modern and believable live-action interpretation of Supes. Chris Reeve was great...but I can't say i preferred him over Cain's. I loved both for different reasons because they each offered up something different for me as a kid to enjoy. Chris Reeve showed us everything SUPERMAN can be, while Dean Cain showed us everything CLARK KENT could be- not being a bumbling retard and actually growing a pair and marrying Lois Lane. Like I said- I respect and admire the Reeve interpretation but I personally really liked the Cain version too. I never think about Kirk Alyn or George Reeves...I'm too young (born in 1986) to have possibly enjoyed their versions. But I did grow up with the Reeve films, the Cain series and STAS (animated superman) and loved them all. And of course growing up reading all the Supes comics as a kid couldn't hurt either with my critique ;)
marvelguy
marvelguy - 10/31/2010, 2:36 AM
I have seen a lot of other movies with more egregious mistakes.

Reeve vs. Welling: It is still apples and oranges. Welling was set to portray teenage Clark growing in to Superman. I think he has pretty much done it. And he has not had the most consistent writing. Reeve portrayed Superman as Superman who does care immensely for Lois, et al. His Clark was his cowl.

Routh: as I stated in my op ed piece, he was handcuffed. He was hired to portray Reeve as Superman. So, essentially he did a good impression and wasn't supposed to do otherwise.

***The real mistake they showed (in this clip as well) teenage Clark is scene by eight or nine year old Lois. Fast forward, Lois is already at the Planet and seems set to be at least two or three years ahead of Clark. Even if they're the same age because Clark traveled before going to the Planet, the running scene screws with continuity.***
Angelus
Angelus - 10/31/2010, 4:57 AM
@ LP4 - Thats because I and most of the sane world knows Routh to be more of a "Superman" than Welling. But no one can fill Reeve's shoes.

BMP!
Nerdman3000
Nerdman3000 - 10/31/2010, 5:35 AM
While I was born in the 80's, I grew up with Christopher Reeve as Superman, see when I think of Superman, I think of Christopher Reeve.
Oceandeep
Oceandeep - 10/31/2010, 10:48 AM
*heh heh* Nice find. Funny!
Tenaciousbt
Tenaciousbt - 10/31/2010, 2:22 PM
One of the "mistakes" is wrong. The one about Zod and Ursa being on oposite sides. There is no mistake there. In the scene Jorel is walking around them in a circle. Even though they don't nesessarily show it. It is implyed that as he walked around them they would turn to face Jorel and then ofcourse they would appear to be on opposite sides. So there really was no mistake there. Only a mistake in the editing.
LP4
LP4 - 10/31/2010, 9:31 PM
@Angelus- First off- saying routh is more of a SUPERMAN than welling isn't a really fair comparison because welling has yet to become Superman yet. Routh was Superman in ONE failed film...not very impressive nor was his portrayal, he simply portrayed Christopher Reeve...NOT Superman.

Secondly, I and most of the sane world understand that a REBOOT is a REBOOT. Therefore it makes little to ZERO sense to bring in an old actor. A reboot is basically what Nolan did with Batman- new actor and completely new EVERYTHING. That's what Supes deserves- a fresh, new start. I and most of the sane world understand that Routh at this point is a sales-risk. Much of the general audience won't wanna see the new film if it has routh because they will think it's connected to Superman Returns and most of them got pissed at that film. Routh is too risky. Would you really rather risk the new film failing because of lack of ticket-sales just so you can have your boy routh back in the role? I and all the other SUPERMAN FANS would rather Supes have a fresh, new actor to work with and of course- NO CONNECTION WITH THE PREVIOUS FILMS ie- NO ROUTH.

I love Supes and I want his new film to be a success. God knows we're long overdue for an actually GOOD Superman film...or at least one that is sub-par. Last good Supes film was way back in 1980. Superman 3, 4 and Returns all failed. It doesn't matter whether or not Returns failing was Routh's fault or not. It's not about pointing fingers. It's about doing what is best for SUPERMAN and more about WB making some better profit this time around. The best way they will profit is to have NO CONNECTION to Bryan Singer's failure- "Superman Returns" and so why then would it make sense to bring back the LEAD ACTOR from that film for the REBOOT???

BALE, REYNOLDS and HAMM= JLA!!

HAMMBOOT!
cbostont102
cbostont102 - 11/1/2010, 11:23 AM
I think so much of it has to do with who you watched growing up. My favorite Clark is George Reeves followed Dean Cain and Tom Welling. I guess its a personal thing that I just never enjoyed Christopher Reeve's bumbling fool Clark Kent. Routh did a great job for what he was hired to do which was pick up where Christopher Reeve left off...
LP4
LP4 - 11/1/2010, 10:26 PM
@cbostont102- See in terms of LIVE-ACTION Supermen, I grew up more with Christopher Reeve and Dean Cain. But I really personally favored Cain's version the most. Very modern, believable and fun to watch. Reeve I loved as a kid but as I grew older it got really painful on my eyes to always watch his Clark falling and bumbling and getting trapped in spinning doors. Yeah I understand the idea behind hiding his secret identity, EVERY Supes-fan can understand THAT. But it just gets too painful to on the eyes to watch after years and years. But I wouldn't say Routh did a "great" job even for what he HAD to do.

So far in my eyes, Cain was THE BEST live action Supes. Reeve was great too. Welling and Routh...blech!

HAMMBOOT!!
Knightstalker
Knightstalker - 11/3/2010, 1:38 PM
LP4--You said it!! I couldn't agree with you more. Chris Reeve was outstanding as Superman (hated his CK). Dean Cain brought something fresh and believable to the role. If it hadn't been for the poor writing and ridiculous bad guys (Luthor had hair? WTF?)that show would have been the standard by which all other TV Supermen wold have been set. I liked that fact that Cain's Superman learned about the superhero gig as he went (calling his mom to get help getting a bomb stain out of his suit).
LP4
LP4 - 11/3/2010, 5:07 PM
@Knightstalker- Thanks man =)

Yeah I loved Cain's interpretation- my all time favorite Superman/Clark. Reeve's Clark is too painful on the eyes- constantly watching him fall down and get stuck in spinning doors and all kinds of stupid crap.

John Shea was a great Lex Luthor though for the show- yeah the hair thing bugged me too but i loved how his Lex was very classy and was just what i always wanted a live-action Lex to be- rich, powerful and corrupt but at the same time a "savior" in the eyes of the Metropolis citizens. =) he was waaaaaay better than stupid Hackman and Spacey's portrayals, lol.

But yeah i still don't get all the Dean Cain-hate from fellow Supes-fans. I agree with you "Knightstalker" it was the poor writing and some of the bad guys were just lame. The show was a bit corny but damn i still loved it as a kid. It was fresh. Plus Cain's Clark Kent was more confident and not clumsy or retarded like Reeve's Clark Kent. In a way- Cain was just cooler ;)
cbostont102
cbostont102 - 11/4/2010, 8:43 AM
@Knightsalker - Always liked the relationship between Cain's Clark and his mom. The one thing that ALWAYS bothered me however, was the fact the Johnathan was still alive. Although, I think Martha becoming some kind of Senator or whatever she's supposed to be on Smallville might bother me even more!

@LP4 - I just watched the latest episode of Smallville "Harvest" and maybe because I've been reading these posts lately I could just imagine the whole episode being done 17 years ago as an episode of Lois & Clark! And for once I don't think they called him the fkn BLUR!!! (yes that one more piece of artistic license I'm not very fond of!).

Like I said before George Reeves it right there at the top of the list for me and the more I think about it Cain's "Lois & Clark" could almost be viewed as much of a continuation of Reeves' "Adventures of Superman" Clark/Lois as "Superman Returns" was of Donner's creation.

"Lois & Clark" just took it to such a higher level finally showing the true potential of both characters (Lois and Clark that is...). Showing how much of a team they could be, having them fall in love, live together, get married, etc.



cbostont102
cbostont102 - 11/4/2010, 8:57 AM
Oh and one more thing...

It didn't hurt Lois and Clark that Teri Hatcher was and is HOT AS HELL...Superman finally had someone worthy of his, um, Superness!!! I mean come on, did anyone EVER believe Superman could fall for Margot freakin Kidder???? The best part of Kidder's Lois Lane was when she was dead and finally shut the heck up!!! (that is until Supes did that whole reverse the rotation of the earth thing...why Superman, why???)

I've gone so off topic of the original point of the video above but what actually got me posting is this:

@Angelus - for me Christopher Reeve isn't the Superman of all time. I liked it however, it wasn't Reeve that made me believe a man could fly. It was George Reeves jumping out a window. Heck it was even Jackson Bostwick as Captain Marvel in 1974.
LP4
LP4 - 11/4/2010, 2:24 PM
@cboston102- I agree with ya man, I've been saying it for years- MARGOT KIDDER IS [frick]EN UGLY!!!!!

I never understood why they chose her to be Lois Lane in the first place. Too rat-faced and blech!

Terri Hatcher got me happy in the pants as a kid. lol
View Recorder