Is WONDER MAN A Mutant? Showrunner Confirms Discussions About X-MEN Connection

Is WONDER MAN A Mutant? Showrunner Confirms Discussions About X-MEN Connection

Much has been said about the possibility of Wonder Man's Simon Williams being a mutant, and showrunner Andrew Guest has now addressed the possible X-Men link.

By JoshWilding - Jan 30, 2026 08:01 AM EST
Filed Under: Wonder Man
Source: The Direct

Wonder Man has generated heaps of speculation among MCU fans, particularly when it comes to the source of Simon Williams' powers. Unlike his comic book counterpart, this version of Simon mysteriously gained his abilities aged 13.

Baron Zemo didn't experiment on him; there was no exposure—that we know of—to magical artefacts or alien technology, so could Simon be a mutant? That's the prevailing theory, and Wonder Man showrunner Andrew Guest has now chimed in.

"You know, it's a very good question," he said when The Direct asked him outright if that's the case. "And it's one we discussed and it's one we decided we weren't going to answer. So I'll leave it up to the people who make those kind of mutant questions."

Guest later confirmed that the answer "is" out there, and added that "one of the things we wanted to do was make sure that the powers for Simon Williams served his character." 

Despite stopping short of confirming Simon's mutant status, the Wonder Man writer further linked the Disney+ series to the X-Men by revealing that he turned to the team's big screen franchise for inspiration.

"I look back at that first X-Men movie and how those powers that all those teenagers [had] felt so psychological," Guest mused. "They felt like it was about all these life changes we go through. And Simon, felt like it was it was some part of him that sort of happened to him as opposed to something that he was A., excited about, or B., wanted to even get to know."

"He doesn't have any curiosity about them. They're just really kind of a hindrance," he continued. "And that felt like it helped us tell the story we were trying to tell about Simon. So, I wanted to make sure we didn't do the first moment of seeing superpowers when he was a kid that we might have [done]."

Ultimately, where Simon's powers come from doesn't matter too much in the context of the story being told. Having access to mutants allows Marvel Studios to avoid convoluted origin stories where needed, and the actor being one of Zemo's science experiments because his brother was defrauding the family business wouldn't have fit into this series at all. 

Plus, with a reboot looming for the post-Avengers: Secret Wars MCU, it may not matter that much soon, anyway. As of now, Ms. Marvel and Namor are the franchise's only confirmed mutants on the Sacred Timeline.

Wonder Man follows aspiring Hollywood actor Simon Williams, who is struggling to get his career off the ground. During a chance meeting with Trevor Slattery, an actor whose biggest roles may be well behind him, Simon learns that legendary director Von Kovak is remaking the superhero film "Wonder Man."

These two actors, at opposite ends of their careers, doggedly pursue life-changing roles in this film as audiences get a peek behind the curtain of the entertainment industry.

All eight episodes of Wonder Man are now streaming on Disney+.

About The Author:
JoshWilding
Member Since 3/13/2009
Comic Book Reader. Film Lover. WWE and F1 Fan. Rotten Tomatoes-approved critic and ComicBookMovie.com's #1 contributor.
Wonder Man Star Yahya Abdul-Mateen II Breaks Silence On Season 2 Renewal And Excitement To Return
Related:

Wonder Man Star Yahya Abdul-Mateen II Breaks Silence On Season 2 Renewal And Excitement To Return

The Punisher: One Last Kill - Frank Castle's MCU Special Presentation Officially Rated TV-MA
Recommended For You:

The Punisher: One Last Kill - Frank Castle's MCU Special Presentation Officially Rated TV-MA

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
ProfessorWhy
ProfessorWhy - 1/30/2026, 8:35 AM
I just want Wonder Man to springboard WCA. All of the pieces are there with the exception of Tigra . Since the MCU seems to be moving towards teams and team ups, not doing WCA would be a huge missed opportunity, especially if they want to go a while longer without Rodgers and Stark
slickrickdesigns
slickrickdesigns - 1/30/2026, 8:37 AM
@ProfessorWhy - we might get those factions started in Doomsday and Secret Wars.
lvcl
lvcl - 1/30/2026, 8:04 PM
@ProfessorWhy -
Disney really doesn’t seem to know how to sell Wonder Man.

First they strip the character of what made him unique, and now they’re trying to use the word “mutant” as a marketing hook — complete with X-Men imagery — as if that somehow makes the series more appealing.

The problem is… Wonder Man has never been a mutant.

In the comics, Simon Williams is an ionic-powered being, not an X-gene carrier. His powers come from scientific experimentation, not mutation. He’s never been part of the X-Men mythos — he’s been an Avengers character for decades.

And apparently they can’t even sell the show with Ben Kingsley attached. If your marketing needs to pretend Wonder Man is something he’s not, that doesn’t scream hype — it screams insecurity.

What makes this even more frustrating is that Wonder Man has been working in the comics for over half a century, precisely because of his long-term evolution as a character. He’s had decades to grow, change, and develop a distinct identity within Marvel lore.

For sure, if Disney had respected that original origin and personality instead of discarding what made him compelling, they wouldn’t be scrambling now to rebrand him at the last minute.

Slapping an X on the marketing won’t fix a lack of confidence — or a misunderstanding of the character.
ProfessorWhy
ProfessorWhy - 1/31/2026, 1:37 AM
@lvcl - why is this a reply to my comment? Completely irrelevant to my statement
lvcl
lvcl - 1/31/2026, 7:25 PM
@ProfessorWhy -

Because using Wonder Man as a springboard for WCA depends on understanding the character beyond just the name.

In the comics, Wonder Man’s relationships and long-standing connections are a core part of who he is — just as important as his personality, origin, and history. Those dynamics were built first with the Avengers, and later expanded with the West Coast Avengers.

Characters like Tigra, Hawkeye, War Machine, Mockingbird, Visión, etc., aren’t optional extras; they’re fundamental to how Wonder Man functions within team dynamics.

All of those relationships have been stripped away in the series, which leaves the character feeling hollow — a version that has very little to do with the actual Wonder Man from the comics.

Doing a Wonder Man series without those connections is like doing Daredevil without Foggy Nelson, Elektra, or Bullseye — or like Deadpool in X-Men Origins: Wolverine. You may keep the name as a comercial brand, but you lose the character.
slickrickdesigns
slickrickdesigns - 1/30/2026, 8:36 AM
I watched the whole thing. It might be the worst series Marvel has done so far. Falcon and Winter Soldier & She Hulk held my attention better than this show. Can’t even call the show a slow burn, it’s just a trash fire.
I haven’t had one real person say they’ve liked the show. I’m guessing Disney paid bots to praise this thing as much as possible to get viewers to watch.
ProfessorWhy
ProfessorWhy - 1/30/2026, 8:43 AM
@slickrickdesigns - absolutely insane take that betrays your own lack of good taste and a short attention span. I would recommend to you old episodes of the Superfriends to satisfy your infantile appetites and predisposition to shiny things. Or FOX News
Urubrodi
Urubrodi - 1/30/2026, 8:58 AM
@slickrickdesigns - A lot of bots around here then lol What a retarded take. It's an excellent show.
Clintthahamster
Clintthahamster - 1/30/2026, 9:30 AM
@slickrickdesigns - Define real person. Dozens of users on here, including myself, have talked at length about how excellent the show is.
slickrickdesigns
slickrickdesigns - 1/30/2026, 9:31 AM
@ProfessorWhy - just by your comment I can tell you think you’re smart but you come off as a jackass.
My opinion stands this show was slow garbage burning. Maybe you like boring cbm’s but i like mine with a good plot and plenty of action. This had neither.
Agree to disagree. And have fun watching your Fox News.
Clintthahamster
Clintthahamster - 1/30/2026, 9:32 AM
@ProfessorWhy - The Venn diagram of people that hated Andor and people that hate Wonder Man is a circle. This is what happens when adults never move past watching entertainment for children.
WhatIfRickJames
WhatIfRickJames - 1/30/2026, 9:38 AM
@Clintthahamster - hating Andor is like hating happiness. Also, Wonder Man is fantastic.

Signed,

A real person
slickrickdesigns
slickrickdesigns - 1/30/2026, 9:39 AM
@Urubrodi - that’s ok if you think that. I find it to be beautiful cinematically but a garbage plot.
This show was far from excellent. Glad someone enjoyed it but it’s just not that interesting.
slickrickdesigns
slickrickdesigns - 1/30/2026, 9:41 AM
@Clintthahamster - I’m referring to the rave reviews that make no sense.
You nerds and your opinions don’t count like the advertised reviews from fake/paid people.
Good to know you enjoyed it, it was just too pointless for me to like.
slickrickdesigns
slickrickdesigns - 1/30/2026, 9:49 AM
@Clintthahamster - “ This is what happens when adults never move past watching entertainment for children.”

You do realize all cbm’s are basically children’s and immature adult shows. Don’t be pretentious on a website we’re grown men argue about their favorite childhood characters, I would hope you’re better than that. Don’t be a vector.
Urubrodi
Urubrodi - 1/30/2026, 9:58 AM
@slickrickdesigns - Going into this expecting an action focused show was probably one of your main mistakes. From the trailers and promotional material they made it clear as day it was a character piece and something different than their usual content. Of course I love my action heavy CBMs but I know how to appreciate other genres as well.
ProfessorWhy
ProfessorWhy - 1/30/2026, 10:05 AM
@slickrickdesigns - sounds like you need a fruit roll up and a nap
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 1/30/2026, 10:22 AM
@slickrickdesigns - IF all you want is action then, yes, this series was never for you and unlikely to enjoy it much.

THAT however does NOT mean it is trash simply due to not giving you what you want from a comic related series. Perhaps your expectations that it WOULD be full of action (even when ALL marketing suggested it wouldn't) you were thus too busy waiting for the big bangs to appreciate what qualities the series did have.

All in all however anyone STATING a show it TRASH, rather than in my opinion if wasn't good or IMO wasn't for me makes you (rather than those responding) come across as the jackass, but a maybe less than smart one at that but insults on either side are never a good idea and undermine valid points. I don't actually think you are a dumb jackass, just that this series was never going to be to your specific tastes but the way you worded you initial comment didn't paint you in a good light at all.

I though the show was great for what it was trying to be, about two unlikely friends finding each other and dealing with their past issues to grow as humans within the context of a cinematic Star is Born sort of a narrative. The lack of action however does mean many will find it boring, but again that doesn't make it trash, just not to their tastes which is fine and fair.

As for being paid bots I was here commenting on CBM's long before Disney made a single one of them and have praised non-Disney comic related content as well as heavily critiqued Disney and Sony Marvel films and shows. IOW very much a real person and very much enjoyed the show and actually found the lack of over relying on action refreshing for the genre.
Clintthahamster
Clintthahamster - 1/30/2026, 10:30 AM
@slickrickdesigns - "You do realize all cbm’s are basically children’s and immature adult shows." I do know that, yes. I used to be a pretentious cineaste in college and just after, and that still burbles up from time to time.

But when I hear people complain that a TV show is bad or boring because "it's just people talking" or "not enough action," I can't help but think of the fact that that's most movies and TV shows, and especially most great ones. And yes, I love a good dumb-ass blow-em-up as much as the next guy. I actually seek out films by trash auteurs like Niko Mastorakis, Andy Sedaris, Russ Meyers, and Hershel Gordon Lewis, and I love early Michael Bay stuff, action comedies from the 80s and 90s, etc. But there's too much great film and television out there to limit one's self to that kind of flick, for me, anyway. Sometimes I feel like Nightmare at Noon, sometimes I feel like My Dinner With Andre.
Lucasberg
Lucasberg - 1/30/2026, 10:58 AM
@Clintthahamster - Watch Hard Boiled. Early 90s John Woo. Insane bone cracking action dude.
slickrickdesigns
slickrickdesigns - 1/30/2026, 11:23 AM
@Urubrodi - the part where you don’t think I appreciate other genres outside of action is wrong. But it’s ok if you like it. It doesn’t make it any better. Most people I’ve talked to about this IRL say the same as me. I at least finished watching it before I said it wasn’t that good. I know others that said they couldn’t get past the first 3 episodes.
To each their own. All of our opinions suck to somebody.
slickrickdesigns
slickrickdesigns - 1/30/2026, 11:29 AM
@ProfessorWhy - lol at you thinking a nap and a fruit roll up is a deep burn. 75% of adults would love either or both. 🤦‍♂️
slickrickdesigns
slickrickdesigns - 1/30/2026, 11:30 AM
@Apophis71 - not reading that. Maybe you can summarize it in a sentence. But based on the first part I can tell you were hurt by me calling it trash. Don’t worry, it’s still trash to me. It one man’s trash is another man’s treasure. 👍
ProfessorWhy
ProfessorWhy - 1/30/2026, 11:34 AM
@slickrickdesigns - you're burning yourself every time you pipe up
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 1/30/2026, 11:57 AM
@slickrickdesigns - Well you proved every point in it with that response, but not hurt by anyone calling something I enjoy trash, tastes differ.
Patient2670
Patient2670 - 1/30/2026, 12:10 PM
@slickrickdesigns - The Blade Trillogy, The Dark Knight Trillogy, Snyder's 3 movies for the DCU, Constantine, Dredd, Matt Reeves The Batman, The Crow, The Boys, Logan and a hundred others. Not for Children.
Clintthahamster
Clintthahamster - 1/30/2026, 12:46 PM
@Lucasberg - Oh yeah, I was in my peak Foreign Film Aficionado form when the John Woo moment happened in the states in the 90s. Hard Boiled, A Better Tomorrow, The Killer . . . great stuff.
Lucasberg
Lucasberg - 1/30/2026, 12:51 PM
@Clintthahamster - that is awesome. His American made stuff does not have nearly the FORCE of his Hong Kong stuff before it.
slickrickdesigns
slickrickdesigns - 1/30/2026, 1:48 PM
@ProfessorWhy - Don’t worry dude, I’ll still call this show useless trash to the MCU regardless of how much you want people to think it’s good.
pucrepeap
pucrepeap - 1/31/2026, 2:27 AM
@slickrickdesigns - I liked this show. She hulk is garbage, especially compared to this.
slickrickdesigns
slickrickdesigns - 1/31/2026, 8:02 AM
@pucrepeap - that’s the funny thing. You four people are the target audience who like shows like that. She Hulk might’ve had a dumb finale but the show itself was more entertaining than watching an actor act like an actor who’s not good at acting but has self confidence and anger issues.
The productions fine it’s just a boring friggin show.
Glad you liked it but it’s not for everyone.
Lucasberg
Lucasberg - 1/30/2026, 11:39 AM
@TheJok3r - thats a dicey prospect. If you know that a group is premeditating to commit a crime and join up with them to "film" it (and to propogandize on behalf of those breaking the law) I wouldn't be surprised if the law holds you liable as well.

The point is, these protestors clearly violated the first amendment and now there's legal action in response to it.

The situation does not reek in the slightest of "rights" being lost or given away, just saying.
TheFinestSmack
TheFinestSmack - 1/30/2026, 11:57 AM
@TheJok3r @Lucasberg - Livestreaming and speaking on camera in a church during service is still in violation of the law. That can easily be defined as "interference" and "intentionally preventing someone from performing a lawful religious act" as stated by law. Apparently state law (Minn. Stat. § 609.28) explains that interfering with religious observance and obstructing people from exercising their First Amendment rights is illegal. Now I'd say those protestors should get the brunt of the punishment over Lemon since they seem to have started it. But Lemon was there, either following them in, or waiting for them with the knowledge they would be there.
Clintthahamster
Clintthahamster - 1/30/2026, 12:51 PM
@Lucasberg - I can't see what you're responding to, but I assume you're talking about the DOJ arresting black journalists for the crime of . . . reporting on things that are happening? It is a WILD assertion that protesting at a church where the pastor is part of the secret police is a violation of the first amendment.
Lucasberg
Lucasberg - 1/30/2026, 2:05 PM
@Clintthahamster - Yeah I can't see the initial comment now either - maybe it was deleted by the website? lol - anyhow, I think the clearest most specific answer is to just quote this comment:

"Livestreaming and speaking on camera in a church during service is still in violation of the law. That can easily be defined as "interference" and "intentionally preventing someone from performing a lawful religious act" as stated by law. Apparently state law (Minn. Stat. § 609.28) explains that interfering with religious observance and obstructing people from exercising their First Amendment rights is illegal. Now I'd say those protestors should get the brunt of the punishment over Lemon since they seem to have started it. But Lemon was there, either following them in, or waiting for them with the knowledge they would be there."

Also, the race of lemon is entirely irrelevant except to try to scare people away from disagreeing I guess with the person claiming they're on the side of *black* journalists.- since you brought the topic up, any journalist can get in trouble with the law when they break it (regardless of skin color).

Just to mention it, that guy is one of 8 pastors at that church and is NOT the lead pastor there. There is no evidence of political or government operations at that church. Just Bible studies, prayer, song - ya know, worship.

So yeah, those protestors and lemonhead deserve accountability:

1. For being so dumb as to terrorize a church gathering imagining it would have any effect or relation at all to ICE. LOL!
2. For violating the LAW regarding our first amendment.

Jeeze. The protest being in the middle of a worship gathering is a blatant violation of the first amendment and is a slam dunk of a case.

Lemon might - maaaaybe, (MAY!) be able to weasel his way out of accountability under the guise of JoUrNaLiSm but we all know. He was there egging this on and propping it up to throw whateever momentum behind disrupting a worship service that he could. Which again, is illegal.



Clintthahamster
Clintthahamster - 1/30/2026, 3:16 PM
@Lucasberg - "Apparently state law (Minn. Stat. § 609.28) explains that interfering with religious observance and obstructing people from exercising their First Amendment rights is illegal."

You don't have to rely on what's apparent. You can find out for yourself through the power of Google. That statue prohibits preventing someone from exercising their religion via "threats or violence, or from obstructing someone from entering or exiting a house of worship. It's not relevant here unless you believe that Don Lemon was threatening or committing violence.

"the race of lemon is entirely irrelevant . . . any journalist can get in trouble with the law when they break it (regardless of skin color)."

Any journalist can be subject to law enforcement actions. But so far, only Black ones have been. That said, I agree that it probably is unrelated to his race, other than the extent to which his race (and sexuality) played a roll in Trump having a hard on for Lemon for years.

"For being so dumb as to terrorize a church gathering"

Terrorize? A group of people in winter coats and stocking caps chanting about ICE at a church that employs a high ranking ICE official is terrorism? You can't really mean that.

"The protest being in the middle of a worship gathering is a blatant violation of the first amendment and is a slam dunk of a case."

Not remotely. They'd have to demonstrate that the intention of the protest was to target and silence the free exercise of religion through violence or the threat thereof. Setting aside the fact that neither threats nor violence transpired, and, best I can tell, no one blocked anyone's egress from the building (in fact, the video shows people leaving freely during the protest) they'd have to prove that the protesters were motivated by the religion being practiced and not the church employing an ICE official.

I lived in Minneapolis for five years and have lots of friends there. ICE's presence is intended to intimidate the citizens of Minneapolis. Just like it was in Portland, Chicago, LA, etc. These are nakedly political acts, designed to both terrorize people in "blue" cities and to set a precedent for federal law enforcement actions against citizens in the leadup to the midterms, full stop.
Lucasberg
Lucasberg - 1/30/2026, 3:37 PM
@Clintthahamster - dude the intention of the first amendment (and at the heart of the Constitution) is that you cannot interfere with or prevent people from free assembly to worship.

Showing up at a church gathering and chanting and yelling and cussing at attendees obviously disrupts, interferes and shuts down the practice of worship in such gatherings.

And yes absolutely it was terrorizing these moms and kids emotions gathered at church that day. I'm not even arguing legally, I'm just saying they obviously frightened lots of moms and children that day as they were yelling obscenity and chants at people who had gathered to *worship* but were *prevented* from doing so.
Clintthahamster
Clintthahamster - 1/30/2026, 3:50 PM
@Lucasberg - "the intention of the first amendment (and at the heart of the Constitution) is that you cannot interfere with or prevent people from free assembly to worship."

The intention of the first amendment is to guarantee speech rights and free practice of religion for all people, not just conservative Christians. The protesters were exercising their first amendment protected speech rights by protesting peacefully at the church, just as much as the congregation was doing so by attending worship services.

Setting all of that aside, civil disobedience is a form of protest that involves breaking laws. It's brought attention to the issue, which was the point. And arresting the protesters could very well be legitmate. But arresting journalists covering the event is almost certainly not.

Anyway, have you seen the video of the president shitting his pants in the oval office? That's fun.
Lucasberg
Lucasberg - 1/30/2026, 4:20 PM
@Clintthahamster - I guess we disagree about the word "civil" and where it applies. Once your "protest' starts invading and disrupting sacred spaces of worship and family gatherings, you have left the civil protest space and entered the Barbaric space.

Okay, your last comment made me laugh and I had to google it. Unfortunately, it appears that he did not in fact dump his pants - But still hilarious:

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-poop-white-house-kennedy/

Clintthahamster
Clintthahamster - 1/30/2026, 4:58 PM
@Lucasberg - Oh, I was talking about this week. It's conjecture, but there's a little sound, followed by his staff immediately clearing the room while the woman closest to her wipes at her nose.

https://www.threads.com/@marknforrest/post/DUJBBu-DB0J/media

"Once your "protest' starts invading and disrupting sacred spaces of worship and family gatherings, you have left the civil protest space and entered the Barbaric space."

It's possible that you and I have different degrees of reverence for the practice of religion. I don't consider a single church service being disrupted to be a hinderance to the practice of religion. But then I live in a part of the country where the church infringing on the state is a far more clear and present danger.
1 2

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder