BLACK WIDOW Star Scarlett Johansson Reportedly Sues Disney Over Streaming Release

BLACK WIDOW Star Scarlett Johansson Reportedly Sues Disney Over Streaming Release

Scarlett Johansson is reportedly suing Disney for breach of contract, claiming that she was hurt financially when Marvel's Black Widow was released simultaneously in theaters and on Disney+.

By MarkCassidy - Jul 29, 2021 11:07 AM EST
Filed Under: Black Widow

Well, this could get very interesting.

The Wall Street Journal (the trades have since weighed in) is reporting that Black Widow star Scarlett Johansson has filed a lawsuit against the Walt Disney Co., alleging that her contract was breached when the Marvel Studios movie was released on Disney+ and in theaters at the same time.

Apparently, Black Widow had been guaranteed an exclusive theatrical release when Johansson signed on to reprise the role of Natasha Romanoff.

“Why would Disney forgo hundreds of millions of dollars in box office receipts by releasing the Picture in theatres at a time when it knew the theatrical market was ‘weak,’ rather than waiting a few months for that market to recover?” the lawsuit states “On information and belief, the decision to do so was made at least in part because Disney saw the opportunity to promote its flagship subscription service using the Picture and Ms. Johnasson, thereby attracting new paying monthly subscribers, retaining existing ones, and establishing Disney+ as a must-have service in an increasingly competitive marketplace.”

Black Widow actually performed very well upon release, with Disney claiming that $60 million of its opening weekend revenue came from the streaming service's Premier Access. However, it did suffer a massive second week drop, which was at least partially attributed to the Phase 4 movie being available to stream from home.

The actress also claims that Disney was aware that making the movie available to stream would dissuade theatre attendance, but "did so anyway, knowingly and intentionally."

Cate Shortland's Black Widow almost certainly marked Johansson's final appearance as Romanoff, but there was always a chance she'd still be involved with the multi-billion dollar franchise in some capacity moving forward. Obviously, that's now looking a bit less likely!

BLACK WIDOW Star Scarlett Johansson Regrets Not Exploring More Of The Avenger's History With Hawkeye
Related:

BLACK WIDOW Star Scarlett Johansson Regrets Not Exploring More Of The Avenger's History With Hawkeye

BLACK WIDOW: Saoirse Ronan Addresses Yelena Belova Casting Rumors And Whether She'd Like To Join The MCU
Recommended For You:

BLACK WIDOW: Saoirse Ronan Addresses Yelena Belova Casting Rumors And Whether She'd Like To Join The MCU

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7
bkmeijer2
bkmeijer2 - 7/29/2021, 11:20 AM
Wait, so Disney is being accused for using a global development that didn't exist at the time of writing up the contract as market opportunity?

What a surprise.

DTor91
DTor91 - 7/29/2021, 11:26 AM
@bkmeijer - Claims on her side says they reached out to Disney to reneg the contract based on the streaming release, and Disney never responded.
SonOfAGif
SonOfAGif - 7/29/2021, 11:28 AM
@DTor91 - Not even surprised. Bob Chapek is the Lex Luthor of Disney.
bkmeijer2
bkmeijer2 - 7/29/2021, 11:57 AM
@DTor91 - now thats pretty shitty, but not illegal I suppose
bkmeijer2
bkmeijer2 - 7/29/2021, 12:04 PM
@Waddles - like their whole thanking the Xiajang government thing?
Tensorpants
Tensorpants - 7/29/2021, 12:32 PM
Never feel sorry for millionaires
CorndogBurglar
CorndogBurglar - 7/29/2021, 12:40 PM
@Tensorpants - Thats a BS take. Never feel sorry for swindling scumbag millionaires. Just because someone has a lot of money doesn't mean they are sacks of crap as people.
four20smoke
four20smoke - 7/29/2021, 1:00 PM
@CorndogBurglar - I think the comment to not feel sorry for millionaires still stands depsite their being shitty ones out there. I would hope most of them feel the same way. If you cant figure out life as a millionaire then damn.....
HannibalLecter
HannibalLecter - 7/29/2021, 1:18 PM
@TyrantBossMedia - Yeah sure, those "billionaires" like ScarJo should work for free, how dare they?
The1st
The1st - 7/29/2021, 1:36 PM
@SonOfAGif - And chasing Lionel's success at that.
bkmeijer2
bkmeijer2 - 7/29/2021, 2:07 PM
@TyrantBossMedia - so shitty at best, but I don't blame 'em. I probably would've done the same
CorndogBurglar
CorndogBurglar - 7/29/2021, 2:08 PM
@four20smoke - Not true. Millionaires have problems just like anyone else. Their problems just aren't usually a lack of money. Just look at how many millionaire celebrities have committed suicide for proof. Or attempted suicide, like Owen Wilson. Or have family or marital issues.

Should we not feel sympathy for those people because they have a lot of money in their bank accounts? That's silly.
HannibalLecter
HannibalLecter - 7/29/2021, 2:09 PM
@TyrantBossMedia - I didn't say she didn't get any money did I?
bkmeijer2
bkmeijer2 - 7/29/2021, 2:10 PM
Okay, maybe I wouldn't have done the same as Disney, but they they really released Disney+ at the right them and utilized it well to their advantage here
CorndogBurglar
CorndogBurglar - 7/29/2021, 2:17 PM
@TyrantBossMedia - There's obviously more to the contract than what they paid her though. Otherwise she wouldn't be able to claim that releasing on Disney+ impacted her earnings. Although, I'm not clear how, unless she was guaranteed some kind of cut from ticket sales. The article's summary up top says she is claiming she was hurt financially, but I don't really see that claim in the article itself.
Tonic24k
Tonic24k - 7/29/2021, 3:16 PM
@Tensorpants - The only people that think this way are people that don't know how money works. Have you ever negotiated your salary? Have you ever dedicated your life to something and became so good at it that companies were willing to pay you 7 figures for your expert talents? Most people couldn't handle the pressure of managing this amount of money let alone the hard work required to achieve this level of success.
Tonic24k
Tonic24k - 7/29/2021, 3:32 PM
@TyrantBossMedia - You clearly have no idea how any of this works. Btw, how's your "Tyrant Boss Media" company coming along?

https://www.facebook.com/TyrantBossMedia/

Oh...that sucks. Looks like you have zero traction. Curious...do you actually own any filmmaking equipment? Seems odd you claim to be a "cutting edge film production company" and have no films of your own to promote...
YonnyLayna
YonnyLayna - 7/29/2021, 4:36 PM
@CorndogBurglar -
Think it's just about billionar's money problems
HannibalLecter
HannibalLecter - 7/29/2021, 4:57 PM
@TyrantBossMedia - No, I was mocking people that think rich people shouldn't ask for money they're owed lol
CorndogBurglar
CorndogBurglar - 7/29/2021, 8:07 PM
@TyrantBossMedia - Without reading the contract, it does sounds like something shady happened. If the contract itself only says she would get a cut of the box office, but it doesn't mention a 100% theatrical release only, then technically she doesn't really have any legs to stand on.

But apparently she was under the belief that it would only release in theatres. Whether that's in her contract, or something she was told by Disney is hard to say. If it's in her contract then she has every right to be owed lost money. If it isn't in the contract then she's going to have a hard proving that the studio promised a theatrical only release.

But it says she's suing for breach of contract. Which I imagine can only be done if something in the contract was broken.
SauronthePower
SauronthePower - 7/29/2021, 8:56 PM
@SonOfAGif - if Luther were a moron. Guy is a bona fide dunce.
SauronthePower
SauronthePower - 7/29/2021, 8:59 PM
@TyrantBossMedia - Chapek sucks for a lot of other reasons
HannibalLecter
HannibalLecter - 7/30/2021, 11:44 AM
@TyrantBossMedia - It's clearly specified her agreement with Disney guaranteed an exclusive theatrical release, yet they released the movie on both theaters and Disney+ and they just gave her a small fixed compensation for it.
HannibalLecter
HannibalLecter - 7/30/2021, 12:43 PM
@TyrantBossMedia - Can you link me the agreement?
HannibalLecter
HannibalLecter - 7/30/2021, 1:30 PM
@TyrantBossMedia - Then for what we know ScarJo is still losing big time, the $20 million she received as compensation pales in comparison to the B.O. royalties she could have earned had this movie did better at the B.O. (as in normal MCU numbers better). Even a portion of each Disney+ sales would have been much better, however small that amount may have been it could easily top the $20 millions they gave her. Worst of all ScarJo served as a producer for this movie, meaning she invested in its success from her own pocket.

However you want to justify it or sugarcoat it she has a strong case here and I certainly hope she wins, I'm not saying this as a fanboy but as someone that doesn't want Disney to keep doing this to its talent.
HannibalLecter
HannibalLecter - 7/30/2021, 3:30 PM
@TyrantBossMedia - Again the contract stated an EXCLUSIVE theatrical release, which didn't happen and the compensation wasn't good enough so they proceed with a lawsuit. As you said a contract is a contract, Disney didn't respect it and that's why they're going to court.
HannibalLecter
HannibalLecter - 7/30/2021, 7:24 PM
@TyrantBossMedia - It's right there in the third paragraph.
Doomsday8888
Doomsday8888 - 7/29/2021, 11:20 AM
inkniron
inkniron - 7/29/2021, 11:21 AM
Residuals from D+PA will definitely be part of contracts going forward. Even if they don't plan to use a dual release method going forward, it's better to be safe than sorry.
Footguy6449
Footguy6449 - 7/29/2021, 11:21 AM
Everytime there's an early Release on Disney+ for there's a HD cut online. You don't even have to be a Master Hacker like me to find it.



Don't pirate movies, it means all my Celeb friends cannot afford Cocaine
TheOtherOn
TheOtherOn - 7/29/2021, 3:42 PM
@Footguy6449 - Are you saying the best way to save celebs from cocaine use is to pirate their movies?

media0.giphy.com/media/Zhpvn5KvGEvJu/giphy.gif
Footguy6449
Footguy6449 - 7/30/2021, 2:58 AM
@TheOtherOn -

Nooooo, because they share it with me
TheRose
TheRose - 7/29/2021, 11:21 AM
Go get 'em Scarlett.
Origame
Origame - 7/29/2021, 2:33 PM
@Waddles - personally I doubt she'll win but this is gonna be a big red flag for anyone wanting to work with Disney moving forward. At the bare minimum, bigger names are gonna think twice about working with a company that'll be so willing to screw them over in the name of profits.
Canon108
Canon108 - 7/29/2021, 2:41 PM
@TyrantBossMedia - she'll get millions from this, on top of what she already got paid.
Battabing
Battabing - 7/29/2021, 2:47 PM
@Waddles - Yep Gadot and Jenkins walked away with millions.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
View Recorder