Paramount's Plans For Warner Bros. Discovery, HBO Max, AI Production, And DC Studios Revealed

Paramount's Plans For Warner Bros. Discovery, HBO Max, AI Production, And DC Studios Revealed

Paramount Skydance's plans for Warner Bros. Discovery have been revealed, and with Netflix no longer part of the bidding process, big changes are indeed coming to the iconic studio.

By JoshWilding - Feb 27, 2026 05:02 AM EST
Filed Under: DC Studios

Yesterday, the news broke that Netflix will not match Paramount Skydance's offer for Warner Bros. Discovery, leaving the Ellison family-owned studio to acquire the company's film, television, and cable network assets. 

According to Bloomberg, Paramount intends to keep much of the company intact, with chief executive officer and controlling shareholder, David Ellison, set to keep the creative teams of both Warner Bros. Pictures and HBO in place. That likely bodes well for DC Studios co-CEOs James Gunn and Peter Safran.

The biggest change would be a consolidation of marketing and distribution teams. 

Interestingly, Ellison plans to merge HBO Max into the existing Paramount+ streaming platform. So, HBO Max will be no more, creating one service featuring the libraries of both companies to "make Paramount+ more compelling for subscribers."

The report also reveals that Ellison will leverage artificial intelligence to produce more movies and TV shows and intends to release 30 films a year from the combined companies. He's a big supporter of the theatrical experience. However, there are still some concerns about David and his billionaire father, Larry, and their close ties to President Donald Trump (as Paramount will soon own CBS News and CNN).

Interestingly, Netflix CEO Ted Sarandos visited the White House yesterday to discuss the merger. Shortly after, Warner Bros. Discovery issued a statement saying Paramount's bid "constitutes a 'Company Superior Proposal," only for Netflix to immediately pull out rather than attempt to match it. 

Many believe that Sarandos got bad news from the Trump administration, as the President was always expected to back Paramount and didn't seem to appreciate Netflix's refusal to fire one of its board members who spoke out against him.

Warner Bros Discovery Chairman David Zaslav, meanwhile, has had quite the change of tune. "Netflix is a great company and throughout this process Ted, Greg, Spence and everyone there have been extraordinary partners to us. We wish them well in the future," he said in a statement. 

"Once our Board votes to adopt the Paramount merger agreement, it will create tremendous value for our shareholders. We are excited about the potential of a combined Paramount Skydance and Warner Bros. Discovery and can’t wait to get started working together, telling the stories that move the world."

Zaslav's stint in charge of Warner Bros. Discovery has been hugely controversial. Whether it's scrapping near-completed movies as tax write-offs or the belief he's looking to line his pockets rather than do what's best for the studio with this merger, he's not exactly a popular figure in Hollywood. 

As for what the likely merger of Paramount Skydance and Warner Bros. Discovery means for the average Joe...well, that's very much TBD.

About The Author:
JoshWilding
Member Since 3/13/2009
Comic Book Reader. Film Lover. WWE and F1 Fan. Rotten Tomatoes-approved critic and ComicBookMovie.com's #1 contributor.
DC Studios Branded A CinemaCon Loser By Hollywood Trade Following Underwhelming Presentation
Related:

DC Studios Branded A CinemaCon "Loser" By Hollywood Trade Following Underwhelming Presentation

Sydney Chandler Is Joining Her Father In The DCU - But Not As The Character She Tested For!
Recommended For You:

Sydney Chandler Is Joining Her Father In The DCU - But Not As The Character She Tested For!

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3 4
Titan417
Titan417 - 2/27/2026, 6:00 AM
Paramount app sucks due to how slow the actual app is. They need to make it run
WarMonkey
WarMonkey - 2/27/2026, 6:19 AM
@Titan417 - Yup. I have been watching Deep Space Nine at a pirate site lately cause the picture at paramount's site looked terrible.
jst5
jst5 - 2/27/2026, 6:58 AM
@Titan417 - There was just a huge investment in the app because of the UFC...I don't think they've updated it yet but it's coming.
Irregular
Irregular - 2/27/2026, 7:08 AM
@WarMonkey - Absolute dogshit quality with DS9 & Voyager. Granted, they never remastered it like TNG or TOS because no one really bought into those editions.

And btw, Bajor should have built a statue in Gul Dukat's name!
Irregular
Irregular - 2/27/2026, 7:12 AM
@Titan417 - The app, is whoreshit! Literally one of the worst streaming app and yet they want to focus on adding more to it? Yeah, stretch the bandwidth out...that always works 🙄
AgentofSH1ELD
AgentofSH1ELD - 2/27/2026, 7:25 AM
@Titan417 - Id say thats your internet provider. I live in the middle of bum[frick] nowhere with comcast shit internet and I dont have that problem at all. P+ runs better than Shitball Netflix who always buffers and lags out.
WEAPONXOXOXO
WEAPONXOXOXO - 2/27/2026, 7:41 AM
@WarMonkey - Deep Space Nine was never remastered. It looks bad on Netflix too.
FrankTheTank87
FrankTheTank87 - 2/27/2026, 9:36 AM
@Irregular - thank you! Agreed!
WarMonkey
WarMonkey - 2/27/2026, 11:10 AM
@Irregular - They never appreciated him and all he did for them! LMAO

Between their site and the pirate site it was like a difference between watching it in 480p where everything is so dark and pixelated and a nice 1080p picture. I wish they would remaster it. Hopefully fans will do it with AI if the company doesn't care.

WarMonkey
WarMonkey - 2/27/2026, 11:14 AM
@WEAPONXOXOXO - Ya, I saw it over there too, like a couple years ago or so. The movies looked pretty decent though. I had just watched all of them before restarting DS9 recently. And I do love what they did with TMP, it looks beautiful
SteviesRightFoo
SteviesRightFoo - 2/27/2026, 6:06 AM
Gunn likely staying.....damn
TheJok3r
TheJok3r - 2/27/2026, 6:09 AM
@SteviesRightFoo - It's a business, so it will all depend on how well Man of Tomorrow does next year. If it under performs like Superman did last year, then chances are he'll be out.
SteviesRightFoo
SteviesRightFoo - 2/27/2026, 6:18 AM
@TheJok3r - it would be great if we got a change ASAP
UltimaRex
UltimaRex - 2/27/2026, 6:45 AM
@TheJok3r - 1, Superman didn't underperform. It did exactly what WB wanted at the box office and was shunted to streaming for more money. Didn't set the world on fire, but didn't underperform either.
2, if it did, we wouldn't even be getting MOT in the first place.
jst5
jst5 - 2/27/2026, 6:50 AM
@SteviesRightFoo - This is TBD....the DCU needs a big year and needs the next Superman movie to be a hit.
TheShape9859
TheShape9859 - 2/27/2026, 6:52 AM
@TheJok3r - Superman didn't underperform lol
jst5
jst5 - 2/27/2026, 6:53 AM
@TheShape9859 - It broke even pretty much once you really get into the numbers.
TheJok3r
TheJok3r - 2/27/2026, 7:05 AM
@TheShape9859 -
@UltimaRex -

A Netflix official literally said the reason it went to streaming as soon as it did was due to it not performing as well as it was expected to. I'm not saying it failed, it just didn't do as well as they would've liked, but clearly well enough to justify giving Gunn another chance. If a Superman sequel next year is still stuck in the $600 million range while a Batman sequel either makes a billion or comes close to it, then Gunn is not going to last. I liked Superman, so I hope the second one does well enough to justify a third movie to close out the trilogy, but Gunn has his work cut out for him.
HashTagSwagg
HashTagSwagg - 2/27/2026, 7:23 AM
@UltimaRex - "Superman didn't underperform"



User Comment Image

SpideyQuad
SpideyQuad - 2/27/2026, 7:47 AM
@jst5 - Or you mean they played with the numbers enough to get them where they wanted.
captainwalker
captainwalker - 2/27/2026, 8:13 AM
@SteviesRightFoo - pedos stick together apparently.
jst5
jst5 - 2/27/2026, 8:23 AM
@SpideyQuad - I'd say it's fair to say it ended up breaking even.I'm no fan of the movie at all...it was a turd but it was a break even type of movie.The DCU doesn't look any better than the DCEU at this point.
Wilks
Wilks - 2/27/2026, 8:30 AM
@SteviesRightFoo - Gain taste. Cry more.
Wilks
Wilks - 2/27/2026, 8:30 AM
@TheJok3r - You're a complete dunce. Keep crying and failing.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 2/27/2026, 8:44 AM
@UltimaRex - It didn't flop. It did underperform. Even Netflix said so. Sure Gunn was happy with it breaking even, but it was supposed to be the big fix for DC and yet was outperformed by the soon-to-be sequelled other DC universe franchise The Batman and that came out during covid.

It didn't even make as much as MOS over a decade ago and THAT was said to have underperformed. And don't tell me that's an unfair comparison because of Nolan's name as a producer in the credits, James 'Guardians of the Galaxy' Gunn's name was all over Superman. Both were solo Superman movies starting new DC franchises with all the pomp and ceremony and both had big names attached.
HashTagSwagg
HashTagSwagg - 2/27/2026, 8:55 AM
@ObserverIO - Claiming Gunn's "Super""man" didn't underperform and that it did exactly what WB wanted at the box office is comb-over level delusion.
User Comment Image
FrankTheTank87
FrankTheTank87 - 2/27/2026, 9:41 AM
@TheJok3r - it’s definitely been an up hill battle for Gunn. Superman was a great move and it’s one I definitely can rewatch and not get tired of. He found a way to bring a comic book to life and made the world feel alive and lived in. Saturation and Hate from Snyderverse fans were causes on why this movie didn’t hit close to a billion. I don’t think people wanted to rush to the theaters to see another Superman movie. Plus more movie theaters suck anyway. I’d stay home and stream and pay the $20 plus dollars then be stuck in a room with some people who want to see the movie and the rest who want to talk and be obnoxious.
UltimaRex
UltimaRex - 2/27/2026, 10:59 AM
@TheJok3r - I told you about the Netflix guy.
UltimaRex
UltimaRex - 2/27/2026, 11:02 AM
@HashTagSwagg - man was facing an antitrust suit from the same administration that wanted Ellison to win.

What did you expect him to say?
UltimaRex
UltimaRex - 2/27/2026, 11:09 AM
@ObserverIO - apparently break even was 500m.
Underperform would thus be around 450m.
Superman made 600m+.

Thus, it did not underperform. No matter WHO says it did.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 2/27/2026, 11:26 AM
@UltimaRex - flop would be around 450m.

You can break even and still underperform.

So like if Avengers: Doomsday broke even but only earned a billion or just less than $1.5 billion then it would still have underperformed.
HashTagSwagg
HashTagSwagg - 2/27/2026, 11:35 AM
@UltimaRex - User Comment Image
UltimaRex
UltimaRex - 2/27/2026, 11:51 AM
@ObserverIO - underperformed is under break even. Always has been.

Underperformed *relative to* other entries in a series is more about risk than box office.

And Superman 25 is first in the series anyway. Even if you went to another series for a comparison (you shouldn't), how did Marvel do last year?
UltimaRex
UltimaRex - 2/27/2026, 11:55 AM
@HashTagSwagg - post as much GIFs as you like.

Superman still did well.

It's still getting a sequel.

That sequel is going to get a sequel.

Then, after x amount of movies over more than a decade, Gunn will do Kingdom Come.

And you'll STILL be salty.
TheShape9859
TheShape9859 - 2/27/2026, 7:09 PM
@TheJok3r - yeah because Netflix officials know everything lol
OrgasmicPotatoe
OrgasmicPotatoe - 2/28/2026, 9:24 AM
@UltimaRex - Gunn himself said it wasn't a sequel. Get with the times, already !
UltimaRex
UltimaRex - 2/28/2026, 2:27 PM
@OrgasmicPotatoe - gotta keep it simple around here...
bkmeijer1
bkmeijer1 - 2/27/2026, 6:29 AM
Folding HBO into Paramount+ is dumb as fuсk. HBO is a far more recognizable name and a mark of quality. Internationally especially. Wonder what this means for SkyShowtime though.

Anyway, maybe Netflix isn't making another bid because they expect it to be a sinking ship. Few years from now and they can scoop up Skydance WB for half the price.
jst5
jst5 - 2/27/2026, 6:52 AM
@bkmeijer1 - There was no way they were going to have content on two different apps....Netflix wasn't even going to do this.As far as "sinking ship" Paramount now is just as power as Disney...so no there won't be any "sinking ship" anytime soon if ever.
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 2/27/2026, 6:54 AM
@bkmeijer1 - agreed…

Paramount+ should be folding into HBO Max and not the other way around around.
1 2 3 4

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder