The Lord Of The Rings: The Hunt For Gollum Director Andy Serkis Says AI Will Be Used To De-Age Characters

The Lord Of The Rings: The Hunt For Gollum Director Andy Serkis Says AI Will Be Used To De-Age Characters

Andy Serkis has confirmed that AI will be used in The Lord of the Rings: The Hunt for Gollum for "a little bit of de-aging for some of the characters."

By MarkCassidy - Jul 14, 2026 07:07 AM EST
Filed Under: Lord of the Rings
Source: Via SFF Gazette.com

When The Lord of the Rings: The Hunt for Gollum was announced, director Andy Serkis indicated that AI may be utilized for the movie, and the filmmaker has now confirmed that, "There’s a little bit of de-aging for some of the characters and machine learning is part of the process."

The actor/director, who will also reprise the title role of Gollum, compared the use of AI in this film to Peter Jackson's MASSIVE program during an interview with Variety, while also revealing that he's been shooting for just over a week.

"When you think about it, in the original Lord of the Rings films, Peter created MASSIVE, which was a program which allowed 1000s of orcs to all have their own individual mindset. So that is a brilliant example of an incredible use of AI. But we’re not creating AI shots in our movie, every shot is created in a traditional way. One of the things actually that I really wanted to do with this film was to bring back all of the great filmmaking skills, from miniatures to prosthetics and marry them up, because that’s my taste. I like it when you mix up different filmmaking techniques."

Serkis declined to reveal which characters will be de-aged, but we assume it'll be Smeagol (Serkis), Gandalf (Sir Ian McKellen) and Frodo Baggins (Elijah Wood).

Last month, Warner Bros. officially announced that Anya Taylor-Joy (Dune: Part Three, Furiosa, The New Mutants) had joined the cast as Seren. This character is described as a "Sindar Elf of the Woodland Realm and a trusted, lethal agent of King Thranduil." 

Seren doesn't appear in any of J.R.R. Tolkien's works, and was likely added to the movie as a new ally to join Aragorn on his quest. Other new cast members include Kate Winslet as Marigol, Jamie Dornan as Strider/Aragorn and Leo Woodall as Halvard.

Taylor-Joy recently addressed her casting for the first time, though she didn't share any new details about her character.

"I mean, I feel like I've been an Elf my whole life, so it feels very validating to go and actually do it as a job," she joked. "I'm a huge fan of Lord of the Rings, I'm a huge fan of Andy Serkis. I think he's a wonderful man and a wonderful, innovative creator. So I think just being able to be a part of this world and inhabit this character is a dream come true."

“It is an honour and a privilege to travel back to Middle-earth with our good friend and collaborator, Andy Serkis, who has unfinished business with that Stinker – Gollum!,” Jackson, Boyens and Walsh said in a statement when the film was announced. “As life long fans of Professor Tolkien’s vast mythology, we are proud to be working with Mike De Luca, Pam Abdy and the entire team at Warner Bros. on another epic adventure!”

“Yesssss, Precious. The time has come once more to venture into the unknown with my dear friends, the extraordinary and incomparable guardians of Middle Earth Peter, Fran and Philippa,” added Serkis. “With Mike and Pam, and the Warner Bros team on the quest as well, alongside WETA and our film making family in New Zealand, it’s just all too delicious…”.

“For over two-decades, moviegoers have embraced the Lord of the Rings film trilogy because of the undeniable devotion Peter, Fran and Philippa have shown towards protecting the legacy of Tolkien’s works, and to ensure audiences could experience the incredible world he created in a way that honors his literary vision,” WBD film chiefs Pam Abdy and Michael De Luca added. “We are honored they have agreed be our partners on these two new films. With Andy coming aboard to direct Lord of the Rings: The Hunt for Gollum(*WT), we continue an important commitment to excellence that is a true hallmark of how we all want to venture ahead and further contribute to the Lord of the Rings cinematic history.”

About The Author:
MarkCassidy
Member Since 11/9/2008
Mark Cassidy is a writer, photographer, amateur filmmaker, and Rotten Tomatoes-approved critic from Dublin, Ireland.
The Lord Of The Rings: The Rings Of Power Season 3 Will Start With A Prologue And Time-Jump To Win Back Fans
Related:

The Lord Of The Rings: The Rings Of Power Season 3 Will Start With A Prologue And Time-Jump To Win Back Fans

The Lord Of The Rings: The Rings Of Power: Sauron Battles Simon Pegg's Balrog In Season 3 Featurette
Recommended For You:

The Lord Of The Rings: The Rings Of Power: Sauron Battles Simon Pegg's Balrog In Season 3 Featurette

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
TheNewYorkerr
TheNewYorkerr - 7/14/2026, 7:09 AM
Reeallyyy?! That’s surprising.
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 7/14/2026, 7:16 AM
Honestly I would rather AI be used as a creative tool by actual artists rather then be the creator itself so I think this is fine tbh…

I’m assuming besides Frodo & Gandalf , the other characters being deaged will be Thranduil & Serkis himself as Smeagol when we go into his backstory.

Even though I’m still not much excited for this film , I do hope it turns out well and Serkis proves he is a better director then his last couple of projects imo have shown him to be tbh!!.
Clintthahamster
Clintthahamster - 7/14/2026, 7:50 AM
@TheVisionary25 - I'd agree with you if the results are better. Hopefully things have come a loooooong way since Luke's last appearance in Mandalorian.
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 7/14/2026, 7:56 AM
@Clintthahamster - honestly visually I have an issue with it but it was the more monotone voice delivery that felt odd even if it was Jedi-esque.

Plus that’s a somewhat different scenario where you aren’t deaging someone but essentially face replacing a different actor.
OrgasmicPotatoe
OrgasmicPotatoe - 7/14/2026, 7:17 AM
As if I needed any more reasons to not watch this shit.
Floke
Floke - 7/14/2026, 7:25 AM
Why would anyone complain over this? As long as AI makes it better than what Disney did in Star Wars, it's fine.
I miss the days when people said machine learning and no one cared instead of some people going bananas as soon as someone even mention AI.

I dont recall anyone crying when Asobo Studio created a 3D-model of the whole planet by using ai for Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020.
Fogs
Fogs - 7/14/2026, 8:20 AM
@Floke - Wxactly. It's a [frick]ing tool.

This is like complaining over CGI, color grading and photoshop filters.
Killuminatic
Killuminatic - 7/14/2026, 9:02 AM
@Floke - It’s because people don’t know the difference between Gen AI and utilising machine learning as a tool to enhance preexisting elements.

The usual uproar is when gen ai is used go create things out of thin air causing a whole ethical dilemma, which I’m also against within the arts. But stuff like this is necessary and has been beneficial to everyday life.
Killuminatic
Killuminatic - 7/14/2026, 9:02 AM
@Fogs
Odekahn
Odekahn - 7/14/2026, 9:20 AM
@Killuminatic - how is it unethical though? Because people are able to view content that was created by AI instead of a person? If they enjoy it, what’s it matter? Is the AI video fight between Tom Cruise and Brad Pitt unethical? If people don’t want to watch it, that’s their prerogative. But shitting on OTHER people who do want to watch it is so weird and reeks of insecurity.
FireGunn
FireGunn - 7/14/2026, 9:59 AM
@Odekahn - Any use of a billion dollar corporation cheapening out and using ai is and always will be unethical
FireGunn
FireGunn - 7/14/2026, 9:59 AM
@Floke - These comparisons you make are so wildly different that it's baffling you'd make them
FireGunn
FireGunn - 7/14/2026, 10:00 AM
@Fogs - Except, humans do CGI, color grading, and photoshop. Not even remotely the same
Fogs
Fogs - 7/14/2026, 10:38 AM
@FireGunn - Sure, because the evil AI will decide to wake up and rejuvenate people just because. Just because the tech is more advanced it doesn't change the principle of it being a tool.

Anti-tech people will (should) be really ashamed of their positions regarding the use of AI, in the future.
Fogs
Fogs - 7/14/2026, 10:38 AM
@Killuminatic - can't see the image...
FireGunn
FireGunn - 7/14/2026, 10:53 AM
@Fogs - I never said the ai was sentient. Now you're doing a strawman. My point is, a tool isn't automatically ethical because it's a tool. Spyware is a tool as well and there's limits and regulations on it and rightfully so.

Also, saying that "Anti-tech people will (should) be really ashamed of their positions regarding the use of AI, in the future." is asinine considering the vast majority of people, both audiences and those in the industry, agree with me. You're in the extreme minority. Maybe you'll be ashamed when ai takes your job next.
Fogs
Fogs - 7/14/2026, 11:04 AM
@FireGunn - Lol, look at you comparing image enhancement tools to spyware and I'm using the strawmen rhetoric.

Listen, I'm not in the mood right now, all I'm going to say is every innovation has its ludists, it's only natural.

Time will tell who's clinging to the past and who is accepting and preparing for it.

I can tell you I have zero fears of losing my job to tech.
Fogs
Fogs - 7/14/2026, 11:07 AM
BTW either you don't know how CGI, color grading, and even photoshop filters are used, or don't know how digital AI assisted rejuvenation is performed, or even neither of those, for that matter. It's precisely the same method, with different tools. If that's the case, let's just forget about it.
FireGunn
FireGunn - 7/14/2026, 12:06 PM
@Fogs - Lol ok dude we'll see how people react to this garbage in 10 years time. Comparing this to CGI or photoshop couldn't be more disingenous
FireGunn
FireGunn - 7/14/2026, 12:06 PM
@Fogs - Lol ok dude we'll see how people react to this garbage in 10 years time. Comparing this to CGI or photoshop couldn't be more disingenuous
Fogs
Fogs - 7/14/2026, 2:03 PM
@FireGunn - You're right in one thing: we'll see.
Odekahn
Odekahn - 7/14/2026, 6:15 PM
@FireGunn - was the Industrial Revolution unethical in your opinion?
FireGunn
FireGunn - 7/14/2026, 6:19 PM
@Odekahn - This question is so silly that it's not even worth answering
Odekahn
Odekahn - 7/14/2026, 6:25 PM
@FireGunn - you don’t want to answer it because you can see the parallels in a machine doing the job that a human used to do…

It’s a perfectly valid question. Nothing silly about it.
FireGunn
FireGunn - 7/14/2026, 6:52 PM
@Odekahn - The industrial revolution didn't replace humans. It also didn't use generative work that steals from others and drain countless amounts of water.

Next question.
Odekahn
Odekahn - 7/14/2026, 11:31 PM
@FireGunn - Wrong.

Countless people lost their jobs or were entirely displaced during the Industrial Revolution. As machines were introduced, they replaced highly skilled artisans and craftsmen (like the Luddite weavers), pushing many into poverty. Meanwhile, mechanized agriculture led to mass evictions of rural tenant farmers, forcing them to migrate to crowded cities to find work.
Floke
Floke - 7/15/2026, 4:15 AM
@FireGunn - Using machine learning to train an ai to create a 3d-model of a house instead of using a 3d-artist - or using machine learning to train an ai to deage and model a persons face instead of using a cgi-artist is wildly different?
Floke
Floke - 7/15/2026, 4:17 AM
@FireGunn - Color grading and photoshop are used in CGI - it is not three different things.
Ai is also a tool used in making CGI.
Floke
Floke - 7/15/2026, 4:28 AM
@Odekahn - I guess Im an unethical engineer for using 3D-models and CAD to make drawings instead of using pen, paper and a ruler.
And sometimes, I even just click a button to create a photorealistic model instead of hand-paint it! 😱
FireGunn
FireGunn - 7/15/2026, 4:30 AM
@Floke - Yes it's wildly different or else they wouldn't be doing it/making the switch
FireGunn
FireGunn - 7/15/2026, 4:31 AM
@Floke - Do you waste water and destroy the environment when you 3d print?
FireGunn
FireGunn - 7/15/2026, 4:32 AM
@Odekahn - Yes, the industrial revolution replaced a few obsolete jobs. That's not what AI will do.
Floke
Floke - 7/15/2026, 7:40 AM
@FireGunn - 3D-printing is mostly using plastics and consume energy so yes. Im not sure what 3d-printing has anything to do with this though.
Floke
Floke - 7/15/2026, 7:46 AM
@FireGunn - Both made the same switch. The game developer switched to an ai-generating the 3d-enviroment instead of having people making it.

And did you boycot LOTR for using the MASSIVE program? Why is using ai software to de-age some characters vastly different?
Floke
Floke - 7/15/2026, 7:53 AM
@FireGunn - Yes, let's keep making +300 millon dollar movies and then have to close the studios because they are not making any money.
Do you think any billion dollar corp will dare to take chances with wild ideas concidering how much it cost them to make a special effects heavy movie nowdays? No - they will keep chasing trends and keep making the same old BigMac.
The (west) movie and gaming industry HAVE to change - or they will be so far behind the rest of the world. It is already happing for games.
FireGunn
FireGunn - 7/15/2026, 7:59 AM
@Floke - I didn't know the only alternative was to have 300 million dollar movies or use ai. Lmao
Odekahn
Odekahn - 7/15/2026, 8:11 AM
@Floke - I don’t think you’re unethical at all. Nor do I think the Industrial Revolution was unethical, nor do I think use of AI is unethical.
Odekahn
Odekahn - 7/15/2026, 8:18 AM
@FireGunn - Wrong again.

The Industrial Revolution replaced many jobs across key sectors, not just “a few obsolete” ones. It triggered large scale technological unemployment in certain occupations, even as it created new roles and drove long-term economic growth.

This wasn’t trivial or limited to isolated “obsolete” roles. It was structural change affecting a meaningful share of the workforce, often causing hardship, poverty, and social unrest in the short-to-medium term.

Saying it “replaced a few obsolete jobs” minimizes the scale of disruption. It was a profound transformation with real human costs alongside massive gains, much like debates today about automation and AI.

I’ll ask you again…

Was the Industrial Revolution unethical? I say no, but according to your logic, it was unethical and we should still be living in a pre-Industrial Revolution society.
FireGunn
FireGunn - 7/15/2026, 8:36 AM
@Odekahn - I don't care anymore. You're not only wrong, but confidently wrong at that
Odekahn
Odekahn - 7/15/2026, 9:04 AM
@FireGunn - I’m wrong? A simple google search will prove me right. I can provide sources to backup my statements.

Stop talking out of your ass.
1 2

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder