VIDEO: Zack Snyder (Director/Writer & Producer) Sucker Punch Interview!

VIDEO: Zack Snyder (Director/Writer & Producer) Sucker Punch Interview!

Zack Snyder (Superman: Man of Steel) talks all about his new action/fantasy Sucker Punch blockbuster movie thats out now...

By LEEE777 - Mar 25, 2011 03:03 PM EST
Filed Under: Fantasy
Source: comicscontinuum



A young girl is institutionalized by her wicked stepfather. Retreating to an alternative reality as a coping strategy, she envisions a plan which will help her escape from the facility.




Starring: Emily Browning as Baby Doll

Abbie Cornish as Sweet Pea

Jena Malone as Rocket

Vanessa Hudgens as Blondie

Jamie Chung as Amber

Carla Gugino as Dr. Vera Gorski

Oscar Isaac as Blue Jones

Jon Hamm as High Roller


LEEE777 - I for one cannot wait, everything Snyder does is pure gold, judge for yourself and go and see it this weekend!
RED ONE Looks Set For A Disastrous Opening Weekend After Taking In Just $3.7M From Thursday Night Previews
Related:

RED ONE Looks Set For A Disastrous Opening Weekend After Taking In Just $3.7M From Thursday Night Previews

RED ONE Star Dwayne The Rock Johnson Mocked For Sharing Bizarre Story About Watching OPPENHEIMER In IMAX
Recommended For You:

RED ONE Star Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson Mocked For Sharing Bizarre Story About Watching OPPENHEIMER In IMAX

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 3/25/2011, 3:57 PM


; )
PartyHard
PartyHard - 3/25/2011, 4:11 PM
Too bad this movie sucked. This makes me nervous for Superman. Hopefully he won't have much creative control over it. Chris Nolan better straighten his shit out fast.
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 3/25/2011, 4:16 PM
PartyHard @ Too bad you know nothing lol... this guy did the best CBM ever made!

WATCHMEN!!!



SUPERMAN is in good hands!

:)
PartyHard
PartyHard - 3/25/2011, 4:21 PM
@LEEE Yeah, Watchmen was good because it was an already good story that he adapted panel for panel. This is Snyder when he's in complete control, and it sucked. He sucks at making an interesting story. He is purely visual, and I want Superman to be more than that. Superman deserves an actually good story.
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 3/25/2011, 4:24 PM
PartyHard @ Bud... all I can say is...

DOOMSDAY!!!


: P
PartyHard
PartyHard - 3/25/2011, 4:26 PM
@LEEE Good argument, bro. Sucker Punch still sucked and it reflects poorly on Snyders abilities as a director.
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 3/25/2011, 4:30 PM
Lol, he's a great director... anyways David S. Goyer doing the SUPERMAN screenplay right??

Thats good enough for me, that guys awesome!

And with CAVILL onboard as Supes, we've got a masterpiece in the making!

Pretty much like what THOR's going to be!
RickMorris
RickMorris - 3/25/2011, 5:02 PM
I haven´t seen the movie yet, but I´m confident, I´ll be watching this one as it is!! entertainment!! this is not The Shawshank Redemption!!
ROMSpaceknightisGOD
ROMSpaceknightisGOD - 3/25/2011, 5:08 PM
uh, how can you call this a BLOCKBUSTER, are you a moron?????? When it makes 300 mill plus then maybe you can call it that, until then I think you better read up on that word!
ROMSpaceknightisGOD
ROMSpaceknightisGOD - 3/25/2011, 5:12 PM
And I've seen Watchmen and it wasn't all that, it was colorful and all, but be real the acting was pretty bad.

I've seen a few of Snyder's movies and have only been impressed with 300, the others are way over the top, but if that is what most you are into, then so be it
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 3/25/2011, 5:35 PM
Darkmatter @ Lol... cheers, [frick]ing hate critics lol, half of them talk out their ass! ; P

ROM @ Lmao... luv the avatar and yes WATCHMEN was near perfect!

You don't like X-movies from FOX by any chance do you?

: D
GrayFox1025
GrayFox1025 - 3/25/2011, 5:45 PM
I love how people [female dog] about a director puts out onebad movie he loses all credibility he on e had from his past successes. If a band puts out one bad album it doesn't make them a bad band nor does is nullify their previous successful albums. Zack Snyder is a wicked good director, so what if he missed the mark on this one, I still have faith in him and his future work
ROMSpaceknightisGOD
ROMSpaceknightisGOD - 3/25/2011, 5:52 PM
um....not really a Fox supporter, they kinda make my skin crawl under my armor

speaking of ROM, this was an awesome comicbook back in the 80's, I used or maybe still do have all the issues somewhere in boxes, they should make a movie on him, he kicked ass

CapFan79
CapFan79 - 3/25/2011, 5:59 PM
You guys can say critics don't matter, but you laud them when they're positive on TDK or Iron Man & X-Men. Hell often times they're more positive about CBM movies than you guys.

I liked Snyder's Dawn of the Dead, but I haven't been impressed with anything since as they all have the same slo-mo hyper stylized look but no real story. I wasn't impressed with 300 or Watchmen. He is by no means a great director. Especially compared to Nolan, Vaughn or Branagh.

Superman could be fine despite him since Nolan is producing and Goyer did the script.
marvel72
marvel72 - 3/25/2011, 6:09 PM
i'm still gonna see it,f*ck the reveiws it all comes down to personal taste.

the worse film i've seen this year is the green hornet.

it can't be worse than that.

@ leee777

watchmen best cbm ever ? i think so.

up there with iron man,superman the movie,spider-man 2,the incredible hulk,batman,300,v for vendetta,the crow,blade & sin city.

your right about watchmen best comic pannel to film frame to date.

@ darkmatter

have you seen "this is spinal tap",they do fake album reveiws at the begining of the film.

the album "shark sandwich" got a two word reveiw "shit sandwich"

it sort of reminds me of the sucker punch reveiws.
marvel72
marvel72 - 3/25/2011, 7:20 PM
@ darkmatter

yeah,your right.

i did with the green hornet,i saw the bad reveiws & took their word for it.

but when it came down to something i actually liked the look of i.e sucker punch,i think they don't know what they're talking about.

some of the reveiws for sucker punch did make me laugh.
Nix
Nix - 3/25/2011, 8:09 PM
Just saw it and they're right it did suck. I think its one of the biggest disappoints in a film I've ever had.
ender
ender - 3/25/2011, 9:07 PM
I can't believe you tards claim to care about comic book movies and don't understand the significance of this movie or the brilliance it had. I and furious about the fact that people are not getting this movie. Seriously every one of you should be ashamed of yourselves for not likening this movie. I hope you have a stroke the next time you try to pick up a comic book or a video game controller.
ender
ender - 3/25/2011, 9:24 PM
I could go into some serious depth about this, but I'm just gonna stick with one of the main reasons that this movie should be respected, especially on this site. The stylized nature of this movie, and the legitimacy it brought to presenting these fantastical scenario's, is enough to put a large swell of hope into anyone who thinks that the art of comic's and video's can be professionally presented on screen without compromise. That's just one major significance that this movie provides. I still haven't heard anyone here or any other site, explain in a legitimate way, what was bad about this movie. Tell me what your problem was and I'll explain my take on it.
itzayaboy
itzayaboy - 3/25/2011, 9:33 PM
guys 300 and watchmen were both awesome...every director has a bad movie....sucker punch has nothing to do with Superman OR DC comics.
Ranger14
Ranger14 - 3/25/2011, 10:03 PM
I never give any individual critics much attention being everyone has their opinion, but when the vast, overwhelming majority all say a movie sucks...I do pay attention:

"Sucker Punch" is what happens when a studio gives carte blanche to a filmmaker who has absolutely nothing original or even coherent to say."

"It's so bad that the Director's Guild should revoke Snyder's membership and he should never be allowed to direct again."

"Zombie soldiers, dragons, cyborgs, doesn't matter: Snyder is just a big boy with lots of toys. These, unfortunately, include his actresses."

"Zack Snyder's storytelling skills remain in question in his latest CGI spectacular."

...and those are from sources like THR, NYT, SFC, etc.

"In the end, Snyder confuses going ugly for getting serious, and he destroys his movie completely."
militantcharles
militantcharles - 3/25/2011, 10:36 PM
Just saw it, disappointed, HOWEVER in a visual aspect MIND-BLOWING, Superman is gonna be AMAZING not to mention that the story line is basically the same as the original just through diffident eyes.
Radsavage1
Radsavage1 - 3/25/2011, 11:38 PM
I just saw the movie and it made me feel like I had a lobotomy
NeoBaggins
NeoBaggins - 3/26/2011, 1:32 AM
So, I just watched this really long and expensive music video called SUCKER PUNCH. When I wasn't cringing from the dialog and looking for the story, I was trying not to blow a load in my pants- a problem that most of you WILL NOT have a problem with. I understand the lot of you only blow your load to male superheroes.

The biggest problem I have with this film is the INCEPTION style, 3 level dream world shit. There isn't really a narrative going on and then they have this unnecessary plot device. But it's used to bring the film into it's special FX action scenes which don't really hit because theirs no emotional weight to the reason WHY asses are being kicked. The goals are like the goals of a video game and they are executed as such. It's like someone took a short story and tried to make a feature length film out of it and expected the visuals to fill in the blanks.

The directing is fine, it's the story telling that failed. Disposable characters too.
ender
ender - 3/26/2011, 1:34 AM
Seriously, if you haven't seen this movie, your opinion is moot and I really don't feel like debating the issue until you have. You can say that it's hilarious that critic's dislike this movie. While I, who have seen it and formed an opinion on my own, am very perturbed that critics are bashing this movie. Beyond that, it's one thing for critic's to not be ready for the style that this movie plucks from the pages of our beloved comics and games, but it's a whole other thing to see people on this site, who read story's like this all the time and see this kind of fantastical presentation in the culture that we are familiar with, also bash on it. This movie whether you realize it or not, truly brings to life the extraordinary and over the top character of these art forms.
NeoBaggins
NeoBaggins - 3/26/2011, 1:44 AM
ender You're right in the regard that this film is a wet dream of comicbook action come to life. But a lot of the books and graphic novels we read are based on really solid writing. The story is put before the action and artwork- because the flashy part is EASY. Sucker Punch would be enhanced by better story telling and/or structure. It would have blown away anything from DC or MARVEL had it had a solid foundation.
ender
ender - 3/26/2011, 1:52 AM
" this film is a wet dream of comicbook action come to life" Ok then you agree with me. I never tried to pretend that this movie had some highly thought out plot that explored the depths of writing that something Inception did. The point I'm trying to make is that we should be excited about this movie because of what it does for comic and video game art. To me, the story was decent and coherent enough to showcase this level of over the top style that has been absent from all the comic book and video game movies to date. Except perhaps, The Watchmen.
HeyVanity
HeyVanity - 3/26/2011, 2:28 AM
Oh [frick] the critics. When you see a trailer for a movie like Sucker Punch you know exactly what you're getting yourself into. Anyone who could go to this movie (or any other) and come out complaining about what it isn't, and what it didn't TRY to be to begin with, is nothing but a pretentious idiot. If you're going to judge a movie judge it according to how well it accomplished (or didn't) its goals. As for me, I knew what I was going to see when I saw the trailer, and I thoroughly enjoyed it. Some of the most amazing visuals I've seen on the big screen. Story lacked, but I wasn't under the illusion that it mattered in a film like this. Just take it for what it is and stop [female dog]ing about how it didn't stack up to the all time greats. /rant
SomCin
SomCin - 3/26/2011, 4:46 AM
Visually amazing film... the story and the plot were weak... and the acting was painful most of the time. All in all, I was disappointed.
NeoBaggins
NeoBaggins - 3/26/2011, 5:56 AM
HeyVanity I'm not buying the whole "you know exactly what you're getting yourself into" speech. It's no more than an insult. You want to imply that people were expecting something incredibly deeper than what the previews presented. I'm sure everyone who saw the film saw it with the intent to be visually dazzled. So, when one points out it's narrative flaws, don't come back with a cliche response because you were fine with the flaws. And who's comparing it to "the all time greats"? Anyway, this movie could have blown most CBM's away with more attention to story structure and character development IMO. The only way I would feel the same as you do, is if the film was in 3D. I hate how everything is in 3D for no good reason, but a film like this would be unbelievable. Any short-comings in the narrative would be ignored- Because, then, you would truly "know what you're getting yourself into" Cause with 3D, the film is already telling you it's not taking itself too seriously, which is ironic considering the film that increased the trend, takes itself very seriously.

I was literally Sucker Punched.
NotThatGuy
NotThatGuy - 3/26/2011, 7:27 AM
HA HA HA!!! Whimpy Kid will do better then this shit!!!
PartyHard
PartyHard - 3/26/2011, 10:57 AM
@Ender This is more like the wet dream of a thirteen year old nerd. Just a whole bunch of things that he thinks sound awesome, but when you actually put it together, it sucks a lot. This is not the direction I want comic book movies to go. All style and no substance. Making comic book movies character stories is the way to go in my opinion. This movie has nothing new visually any way.
HeyVanity
HeyVanity - 3/26/2011, 12:12 PM
@NeoBaggins - You're right, it is an insult. That was my intent. However, my comment was obviously directed toward critics who can't take something for what it is; the ones who always feel the need to compare everything to Shakespeare. Also, I'm implying just the opposite of what you say I am. I said that everyone who saw the trailer KNEW to expect a very visual film. Anyone with half a brain knew going in that there wouldn't be any depth to it. Whether it's in 3D or not doesn't change that in the least bit. That's exactly why I said judge it for what it is and what it means to accomplish. Now, faults in the narrative? Fine. If those faults ruined it for you then go ahead and be upset about that. I'm just tired of critics judging films based on completely unrealistic expectations that they will accomplish something that they never set out to to begin with.
Ranger14
Ranger14 - 3/26/2011, 2:15 PM
HeyVanity@ Sounds like you have an inaccurate stereotype of who a critic is and what they do. I believe there are few, if any, critics who look at things from a "Shakespearean" viewpoint. Many are people like you and me, but they get paid money (some don't) that have a passion for films and based on watching films on a daily basis have a framework developed as to what they expect and what makes a good movie. If critics were as bad as you and others make them out to be, then they wouldn't have rated one of my favorite movies, Big Trouble in Little China, as high as they did. Most wouldn't expect a movie like that to be liked by the critics as much as it was.

As to Sucker Punch, based on the trailer, I expected that the film would have much more than visual. It sounded like it could be an interesting story and could offer some solid character development of the young women in the facility that were using fantasy to escape their mental state. There's some promise there that apparently wasn't delivered on. Another film with a similar premise (The Fall) was given much better reviews than what Sucker Punch is and probably falls way short on the visual side of things. I think it is insulting to say that people should expect a movie with great visuals to be lacking in other areas. I don't care how great the visuals are, I still expect a solid plot, character development, pacing and underlying stories to a film. Sure, sometime you need to watch a movie like the Expendables and know that it is strictly going to be a good action flick and nothing more. Sucker Punch promised to deliver more and apparently doesn't. I will find out when I can watch it for free.
NeoBaggins
NeoBaggins - 3/26/2011, 3:14 PM
Ranger14 Let me add to that by saying; if you're familiar with the Directors work and you like his movies in general which a lot of people do, it is completely logical to expect more than Zombies, Dragons and Robots. Oh my.

HeyVanity I missed the obviousness that your "comment was obviously directed toward critics". In that context, I have to agree to a large degree. I thought you were saying that people like us here, who watch these types of movie, have some distorted anticipation going into them. Some of us do, but I think for the most part we know that there can be substance AND fireworks at the same time.

I have indeed witnessed reviews by critics who review EVERY FILM as if it were made to be an Oscar contender. This is retarded. I have very little respect for them and the notion that they are doing some skilled job- a job that is no more than what the average person does; watch a movie and take away from it what they want. They are giving a [frick]ing opinion like anyone else and most the time they are unprofessional and the reviews sound PERSONAL. Making a movie is art, so it doesn't have any elements in the film making process that can be categorized as being done right or wrong. That fact alone renders the profession of critiquing, laughable.

Some times I agree with the bottom line of a review, some times I consider them with films I'm not sure I want to see in the first place. But you should never let them guide your experience, which they run the risk of doing with their douchebag early reviews. A trailer should provide enough information to garner any level of interest. So, my outlook on them is a typical one; they're bad guys and they sound like they wish they were making movies.

And with all that said, if I were to see Sucker Punch again, knowing exactly what it is now(an expensive dick-hardening music video... game), I bet I could enjoy it fully and freely despite it's narrative flaws.
HeyVanity
HeyVanity - 3/26/2011, 3:38 PM
@NeoBaggins - "they're bad guys and they sound like they wish they were making movies." lol, totally agree.
HeyVanity
HeyVanity - 3/26/2011, 4:03 PM
"Let me add to that by saying; if you're familiar with the Directors work and you like his movies in general which a lot of people do, it is completely logical to expect more than Zombies, Dragons and Robots. Oh my."

This is where I'd have to disagree. While I do generally like Snyder's work, none of his films have been much more than style. Damn cool style, albeit, but certainly lacking depth. Aside from Watchmen I haven't been able to watch any of them more than once. Probably won't watch Sucker Punch again either to be perfectly honest, lol.
NeoBaggins
NeoBaggins - 3/26/2011, 4:49 PM
Yeah, I probably won't be seeing it again either.
1 2
View Recorder