STAR TREK: William Shatner Trolls Stephen Miller After STARFLEET ACADEMY Backlash

STAR TREK: William Shatner Trolls Stephen Miller After STARFLEET ACADEMY Backlash

As Star Trek: Starfleet Academy draws backlash from Stephen Miller and right-wing commentators, William Shatner offered the perfect response to demands that he take creative control of the franchise.

By MattThomas - Jan 21, 2026 08:01 AM EST
Filed Under: Star Trek
Source: SFFGazette.com

Star Trek: Starfleet Academy debuted on Paramount+ last week to mostly positive reviews from critics. But like all modern Star Trek projects, the general audience remains divided on the latest series. 

While Starfleet Academy currently boasts an 87% among critics on Rotten Tomatoes, it sits at just 43% on the Popcornmeter. Of course, the Popcornmeter isn't always the best way to judge a new series, especially as its susceptible to review bombing, which is exactly what is happening to Starfleet Academy.

One of the most vocal critics leading the war against wokeness is U.S. Deputy White House Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, who took to social media to share his displeasure with the series. Sharing a brief clip from the premiere episode, Miller described the current state of the Star Trek franchise as “tragic” and called on Paramount+ to save the franchise by reconciling with William Shatner and giving him full total control.

Much of the backlash from right-wing pundits and online commentators appears to stem from the presence of three women on the bridge of a starship set in the far future of the 32nd century.

William Shatner, best known for portraying Captain James T. Kirk in Star Trek: The Original Series, responded in the best possible way. Rather than engaging with Miller’s misguided political critique, Shatner deflected with humor, offering a tongue-in-cheek complaint of his own.

"The fact that they have not cure Hyperopia by the 32rd Century is an abysmal oversight on the writers," Shatner joked. "Also Paramount Plus needs to up the budget because I’m sure that a well oiled organization like Starfleet in the distant future could afford more than one pair of glasses for at least this hyperopic bridge crew."

"That is what you meant, right‽" he added sarcastically.

Not everyone in Shatner’s replies caught on to the mockery, but it was clear the legendary captain had no interest in wading into America’s partisan political divide.

Star Trek has long been renowned for its progressive ideals, so it’s unclear why right-wing commentators have suddenly taken issue with the latest series. The franchise has always presented an optimistic vision of the future, one in which humanity has moved beyond racism and sexism while promoting diversity and inclusion. Of all the scenes and storylines someone like Stephen Miller could take offense to, this feels like one of the least objectionable.

The first two episodes of Star Trek: Starfleet Academy are now available to stream on Paramount+. Episode 3, "Vitus Reflux," is set to arrive on Thursday.

This thrilling new chapter follows a fresh class of cadets as they train under the watchful, demanding eyes of Starfleet’s finest. Together, they’ll face the highs and lows of academy life: forging unbreakable friendships, clashing in explosive rivalries, experiencing first loves, and stepping into their destiny as the next generation of Starfleet officers. When a mysterious new enemy threatens both the Academy and the Federation itself, these cadets must rise to the challenge or risk losing everything they’ve just begun to fight for.

Have you seen Star Trek: Starfleet Academy? What are your thoughts on the latest series?

About The Author:
MattThomas
Member Since 10/11/2017
Paramount Confirms New Star Trek Movie, But Details Remain A Mystery
Related:

Paramount Confirms New Star Trek Movie, But Details Remain A Mystery

Rogue Trooper Teaser Trailer Released For Duncan Jones' 2000 AD Adaptation As Full Cast Is Revealed
Recommended For You:

Rogue Trooper Teaser Trailer Released For Duncan Jones' 2000 AD Adaptation As Full Cast Is Revealed

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3 4
bkmeijer1
bkmeijer1 - 1/21/2026, 8:06 AM
Shatner really seems like a good guy. I will forever despise Bezos (amongst other things) for undercutting Shatner's speech after returning from space by spouting champagne in his face, while Shatner is a former alcohol.
dragon316
dragon316 - 1/21/2026, 8:15 AM
@bkmeijer1 - maybe meeting him convention wasn’t that special I saw fan ask him if he wanted phaser he shook his no for photo fan was holding his own phaser for photo with shatner it’s prop from tv show you where in and movies really I’m more fan of next generation Star Trek
Bucky74
Bucky74 - 1/21/2026, 8:32 AM
@bkmeijer1 - Shatner would do a better job, honestly. Janway was an example of how to do a female Captain right. Aside from Picard season 3, modern Trek is hot garbage. Watch Wrath Of Kahn and then any modern Trek to see how far the franchise has fallen. It’s in the gutter
Feralwookiee
Feralwookiee - 1/21/2026, 8:48 AM
@bkmeijer1 - Idk about Shatner being a "good guy".
There are countless stories from co-stars of his claiming he was an insufferable twat on a daily basis.
He's apparently not on the level of douchebags like Chevy Case, but it seems he's not far off.
bkmeijer1
bkmeijer1 - 1/21/2026, 10:38 AM
@Feralwookiee - okay yeah. Still, on the ladder of dislikeable, Bezos is way farther down that Shatner
TheRevelation
TheRevelation - 1/21/2026, 11:58 AM
@Bucky74 - You know, it's funny. In fields like sports, for example, they throw former athletes into management positions. Sometimes earned, sometimes not, with the understanding they get the assignment, even if they were mediocre when they played. You don't see that in Hollywood, and the results more often than not speak for them selves. Witwer should be running SW, any number of former Trek alums could or should have input into the various series, but Hollywood apparently, rather consistently, does not work that way. Sure there are diamonds in the rough creatively, but...passion, and knowledge, is key. If I read one more comment about how production team was instructed "not to read the source material" I....I....

User Comment Image

Also, @JoshWilding..."Rather than engaging with [insert name here]'s misguided political critique". Words to live by. I wish it happened here.
Bucky74
Bucky74 - 1/21/2026, 2:32 PM
@TheRevelation - Excellent and spot on. There are so many passionate folks who are talented and knowledgeable about the source material, but instead they go with the worst possible choices again and again and then blame the fans or “right-wingers” when their take on the IP predictably fails.
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 1/21/2026, 5:43 PM
@TheRevelation - The Star Trek franchise is the HUGE exception to your perceived norm. As in from the original cast films onwards they HAVE given many, many, many of their stars behind the camera jobs including both Shatner and Nimoy directing films (William went massively over budget and ran out of cash prior to the big end scene which is why HIS movie is oft cited as the worst original cast movie).

After the show returned with TNG they actually developed a training program for the cast to learn all aspects of production leading to many of them taking on the role of directing episodes and pitching story ideas. Name any cast member from TNG, DS9 or Voyager and odds are they did direct episodes plus also may have pitched stories and taken on exec roles either on their own series or one or more of the other shows. Heck Kate Mulgrew (Janeway) wrote a Voyager novel that almost every aspect of then were used to create episodes and made a major shift in Tuvok's backstory for instance leading to the serial killer storyline.

You picked the wrong franchise to claim they don't give their stars a chance at taking on bigger roles on the production/direction/writing side, they have been VERY open to it and actively encouraged it for decades thus NOT a reason for any perceived issues in regard to quality you have. I actually feel the bigger problem for the franchise was being TOO weighed down by established history restricting creativity without breaking canon hence the attempts at other verse narratives through time wars or whatever in order to create a semi-blank slate and got too carried away with trying to diverge TOO much when it has gone wrong having made those decisions or TOO convoluted trying to insert complex prequel narratives with the whole forgotten/forbidden history concept when trying to fit into the original canon.

TLDR With many other franchises you may have a point, not even close when it comes to Trek, other reasons for issues but not giving 'former athletes management positions' isn't one of them.
TheRevelation
TheRevelation - 1/21/2026, 8:07 PM
@Apophis71 - Great, and I read all of that, but I meant at the top...like Orci's Job, Filoni's Job, Moore's job on Galactica, and now GOW. I'm well aware of Trek actors behind the camera, on Trek and other shows. Although...I wasn't aware of the "training" program with TNG. I mean, it's kinda the norm with a lot of shows now though. I agree they tried to update Trek though. The stuff we saw on TOS and the TNG shows is in our homes now, it doesn't seem that futuristic anymore. That's why with TNG we got the holodeck, DS9 the holohail, etc. I also agree canon is something that they, and many other studios, either pay too much attention to or, in most cases, not enough attention to. For example, there's the two-toned alien episode on TOS. They said in that episode those 2 were the only ones left, but in subsequent new Trek shows they've shown up multiple times, the most recent being the academy show. Anyway, my point was that creative vision at the top always feels hit and miss for me lately. You get SNW, but you also inexplicably get Section 31.
McMurdo
McMurdo - 2/6/2026, 10:26 AM
@Bucky74 - Picard S3 is the only reason im even slightly interested in that Vision show from Matalas.
Bucky74
Bucky74 - 2/6/2026, 11:20 AM
@McMurdo - Season 3 was pure nostalgia bait, but it worked, and they had me at "Recommissioned Enterprise D." A few tears might have flowed down my cheek at one point, and it ended nicely with Picard's son and the "New" crew.
Lisa89
Lisa89 - 1/21/2026, 8:06 AM
Classic.
TheRevelation
TheRevelation - 1/21/2026, 12:54 PM
@Lisa89 - Cowboy diplomacy.
vectorsigma
vectorsigma - 1/21/2026, 8:11 AM
SNW is great.
bobevanz
bobevanz - 1/21/2026, 11:03 AM
OF COURSE THERE'S PEOPLE ON HERE DEFENDING THIS PIECE OF SHIT. Anyone who defends Goebbels or this nazi regime is also a nazi. I'm sure they think taking Greenland is good and deporting legal people is also "cool". It's also hilarious seeing people like Tate and Fuentes who according to Hitler "have dirty blood" cheer for him. They were singing that Hitler Kanye song. They'd be signing thar song on the way to the camps. Broo that's so funny brooooo. Stupid ass mush brain dumb [frick]s run this country and make money grifting from these pea brain morons. I CANT [frick]ING WAIT FOR MIDTERMS.



Remember all those dumbasses who wouldn't vote for Kamala because of gAZa????????? It's a thousand times worse now, and guess what? Drumpf doesn't give a [frick] about Gaza either so these [frick]ing no-vote idiots are the reason were here in the first place!

I can't wait for Nuremburg 2.0. Hegseth, Noem, Bondi, Trump, the whole lot isn't getting out of this scott free. I have my 500 dollar bottle of whiskey ready for this occasion.
TheRevelation
TheRevelation - 1/21/2026, 12:56 PM
@bobevanz - And...your actual reasons for not liking SNW are?
spr0cks
spr0cks - 1/21/2026, 1:37 PM
@TheRevelation -
I don't think he's talking (ranting?) about SNW.

He seems to be aiming his anger at Stephen Miller and this administration.
TheRevelation
TheRevelation - 1/21/2026, 1:39 PM
@spr0cks - Yeah, those better help ads seem to make more sense then ever lately.
TheRevelation
TheRevelation - 1/21/2026, 1:43 PM
@spr0cks - User Comment Image
slickrickdesigns
slickrickdesigns - 1/21/2026, 8:15 AM
Miller is literally a more racist Mr Burns from the Simpsons. Why anyone thinks his ideas and policies are good for anyone is high on bath salts.
Bucky74
Bucky74 - 1/21/2026, 8:39 AM
@slickrickdesigns - Everyone is racist to you folks, lol. You’ve destroyed the meaning of the word. What specifically do you find “racist” and what specific policies do you not like? Seriously, give factual details.
billnye69
billnye69 - 1/21/2026, 8:46 AM
@Bucky74 - Miller doesn't know you or care about you. Lol
slickrickdesigns
slickrickdesigns - 1/21/2026, 8:55 AM
@Bucky74 - Are you serious about Stephen Miller? The dudes an open racist. Have you never seen him talk?

Are we not talking about the same guy?
What other Stephen Miller is there besides the guy who hates immigrants and despises people of color?
Bucky74
Bucky74 - 1/21/2026, 9:01 AM
@slickrickdesigns - Hates “Illegal” immigration does not mean “hates immigrants.” And what specifically has he said that’s racist. Seriously, give me an exact statement. Can you? Or is it more of a “feeling” because he’s bluntly honest about things you disagree with. Name one verbatim statement that is racist.
Bucky74
Bucky74 - 1/21/2026, 9:06 AM
@billnye69 - I don’t care if he does. He’s working hard to protect American citizens and is right about Shatner. Bill knows Trek better than the untalented hack activists they currently have writing it.
Rosraf
Rosraf - 1/21/2026, 9:09 AM
@slickrickdesigns - There's the racist and the midnight toker. Those are the only two I know.
bobevanz
bobevanz - 1/21/2026, 10:53 AM
@Bucky74 - you're defending bald goebbels, guess what that makes youuu
Bucky74
Bucky74 - 1/21/2026, 11:11 AM
@bobevanz - Give one specific example. You made a stupid statement. Guess what that makes you.
slickrickdesigns
slickrickdesigns - 1/21/2026, 11:32 AM
@billnye69 - at this point, Old Racist Bucky over there seems like Millers biggest and only fan. Maybe they do know each other.
slickrickdesigns
slickrickdesigns - 1/21/2026, 11:33 AM
@Natebest whatever happened to being able to block ignorant people who we just don't want to deal with?? I see no "block racists" button.
NateBest
NateBest - 1/21/2026, 12:00 PM
@slickrickdesigns - I think the "block" button will work just fine for blocking anyone you want, for any reason...
billnye69
billnye69 - 1/21/2026, 12:27 PM
@Bucky74 - Star Trek has always been a Liberal progressive show Day1.

Have you even seen TNG? Lol

Apparently The average conservative doesn't seem to know what an allegory is.
TheRevelation
TheRevelation - 1/21/2026, 12:58 PM
@slickrickdesigns - Lol, bath salts.

User Comment Image
TheRevelation
TheRevelation - 1/21/2026, 12:59 PM
@NateBest - You still see their comments referenced though, albeit indirectly.
NateBest
NateBest - 1/21/2026, 1:43 PM
@TheRevelation - If you can think of a solution that fixes that, other than blocking the entire thread, let me know!
TheRevelation
TheRevelation - 1/21/2026, 1:45 PM
@NateBest - True, fair enough.
LordCanterbury
LordCanterbury - 1/21/2026, 3:44 PM
@billnye69 - exactly what I thought was so hilarious about this.

And how did I know that emotionally fragile Bucky guy was gonna get totally triggered by this. 😅
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 1/21/2026, 5:50 PM
@TheRevelation - True but at least if they START a discussion thread you don't see replies UNLESS it then runs into multiple pages, be nice if THAT loophole was closed but likely tricky to code. I have MORE issues however with users I finally give in and block being able to get around ALL blocks by posting an articles to put out their questionable views instead, an option to block authors may be a nice option to include for some but understand why @NateBest my feel that could cause too many issues (ie if too many blocked Josh the hit on clicks funding the site could kill it).
NateBest
NateBest - 1/21/2026, 11:11 PM
@Apophis71 - I highly doubt that adding the ability to block user articles would do anything to the site traffic... The vast majority of traffic is from non-registered users.

That being said, the entire point of my adding the username's to the headline listings was so that users *could* filter what they click to read... There was a big uproar when I turned it off for a few days 😬 (nevermind the years and years before where they *weren't* shown).

I'll add it to my possible list of upgrades, especially if enough users want it. Right now I the big ones are adding the ability to follow different categories, as well as different users (i.e. get an alert, and maybe even an email, when a new post pops up for "X-Men", or a specific user posts a new article).
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 1/22/2026, 4:43 AM
@NateBest - Your priorities ARE far better, we shouldn't need a block for article authors as we SHOULD be able to use self restraint and take a second to see who the author is and consider if it is an article we actually WANT to read before clicking :D Our own issue if we voluntarily decide to read something from someone we don't like reading comments or articles from and/or about things we don't like/have no interest in.
1 2 3 4

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder