SOLO: A STAR WARS STORY Is The Most Expensive Film In STAR WARS Franchise History

SOLO: A STAR WARS STORY Is The Most Expensive Film In STAR WARS Franchise History

Following the film’s extended and troubled production Ron Howard’s Solo: A Star Wars Story has become the most expensive film in the popular science-fiction franchise yet. Make the jump to find out more.

By FromACertainPOV - May 23, 2018 09:05 AM EST
Filed Under: Star Wars
Source: Variety
When Solo: A Star Wars Story finally hits theatres this Friday it will be the end of a very bumpy road for the Star Wars spin-off film. Famously midway through production of the film original directors Chris Lord and Phil Miller were fired leading to the A Beautiful Mind director Ron Howard taking over duties.

It was originally believed that Howard would be reshooting 85% of the film and while that has since been confirmed to be only 70%, the added production length has meant that Solo: A Star Wars Story has proved to be the most expensive film in the franchise yet.  

In a new report from Variety, the film's budget was revealed to have clocked in at upwards of $250 Million. Of the recent entries in LucasFilm's science fiction franchise, The Force Awakens was reported to have cost $245 million to produce while both Rogue One and The Last Jedi are estimated to be somewhere in the $200 to $219 million range.

By comparison, 1977's A New Hope had the cost of only $11 million which even adjusted for inflation to approximated $45 million places it at less than a fifth of Solo: A Star Wars Story's hefty budget. There's no doubt that the studio will make that money back, however, what with the last three films in the franchise each earning over $1 billion at the worldwide box office.

What do you think? Will Solo: A Star Wars Story be worth the cost? Are you looking forward to the spin-off film? Leave your thoughts below. 
STAR WARS: THE RISE OF SKYWALKER Comic Adaptation Finally Reveals Force Ghost Army NOT Seen In The Movie
Related:

STAR WARS: THE RISE OF SKYWALKER Comic Adaptation Finally Reveals Force Ghost Army NOT Seen In The Movie

MARVEL KNIGHTS: THE WORLD TO COME Covers Hint At More Big Twists In Marvel's White Black Panther Comic
Recommended For You:

MARVEL KNIGHTS: THE WORLD TO COME Covers Hint At More Big Twists In Marvel's White Black Panther Comic

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
Doomsday8888
Doomsday8888 - 5/23/2018, 10:06 AM
No shit, they basically filmed 2 mov-wait a minute...


:P
Buckster10
Buckster10 - 5/23/2018, 10:10 AM
After TLJ mess I'm going to pass on seeing Not Han Solo team with Pandocalrissian aboard the Millennial Falcon.
KWilly
KWilly - 5/23/2018, 10:11 AM
Lol. Talk about a waste of money.
Fogs
Fogs - 5/23/2018, 10:12 AM
Expensive Bantha Poodoo
SpideyPuffsMJ
SpideyPuffsMJ - 5/23/2018, 10:14 AM
Was it worth it folks? Haven't seen it yet, don't know if I will before Blu-ray.
Ha1frican
Ha1frican - 5/23/2018, 10:26 AM
At first I was like “How?!” But then I was like “Oh yeah.”
Forthas
Forthas - 5/23/2018, 10:31 AM
The PR team at Lucasfilm needs to be fired. They mishandled the Last Jedi criticism and have now allowed those bad feelings to affect the Solo film. Even though I am personally not enthusiastic about the creative choices they made, I think it is fine that that they try different things. But the thumbing of their nose at fans is really a bad move and I think will cost them in real money over time.
ChrisNolan
ChrisNolan - 5/23/2018, 10:44 AM
That's it? $250 million?
Less than Age of Ultron, Justice League, and Spider-Man 3?

With 70% being reshot I was expecting more like $350 million
BackwardGalaxy
BackwardGalaxy - 5/23/2018, 10:47 AM
@ChrisNolan - Sounds like fuzzy math to me
ChrisNolan
ChrisNolan - 5/23/2018, 10:57 AM
@BackwardGalaxy - If the original budget would've been around $200 mil, and 70% was reshot, 1.7 x 200 = 340.

I'm no expert obviously and just guessing here.
$340 million would still be less than Pirates 4 and Age of Ultron.
Pantherpool
Pantherpool - 5/23/2018, 11:12 AM
@ChrisNolan - I mean, the paychecks should have been much smaller the second time around and there were clearly other costs that were significantly lower. Just because they reshot 70% of it, that doesn't mean the budget ended up being 70% higher too.
ChrisNolan
ChrisNolan - 5/23/2018, 11:19 AM
@Pantherpool - Right, they would still have some of the old sets, and probably used more green screen the second time around to save money.

Still, the fact that it's cheaper than Age of Ultron and Spider-Man 3, both of which only had very minimal and planned reshoots, really surprises me. That was my main point.
Pantherpool
Pantherpool - 5/23/2018, 11:33 AM
@ChrisNolan - It's definitely surprising. Good for them managing to keep the budget in the $200M range.
ChrisNolan
ChrisNolan - 5/23/2018, 11:41 AM
@Pantherpool - Yeah definitely, the vfx has looked really great in the trailers
Chewtoy
Chewtoy - 5/23/2018, 12:18 PM
@ChrisNolan - your math assumes that all shots of the film cost the same.

I’m sure the 70% that was reshot was mostly dialog scenes and such, and the 30% that wasn’t was largely the high-cost, FX dependent shots.

Often the big special effects scenes are in production before the cameras even start to roll. Since the shift to Ron Howard was reportedly because Lord and Miller were drifting too far from the script, returning to the original script allows for them to keep to the original FX sequences that were already being worked on.
ChrisNolan
ChrisNolan - 5/23/2018, 2:13 PM
@Chewtoy - True, good point
four20smoke
four20smoke - 5/23/2018, 3:22 PM
it wasnt a 70% reshoot of a 100% done movie dumbasses....
ChrisNolan
ChrisNolan - 5/23/2018, 4:38 PM
@four20smoke - Lord & Miller filmed 5 months, with a couple weeks of filming left before being fired. So they filmed around 90% of the movie.
Then it was reported Ron Howard reshot 70% of the film.

Also if you’re going to call someone a dumbass you should probably @ them next time.
BigMikeReviews
BigMikeReviews - 5/23/2018, 10:57 AM
Well considering all the production problems, it doesn't seem that high. Remember Justice League's 300+ budget, and it still managed to look like a low budget stinker
Franshu
Franshu - 5/23/2018, 11:11 AM
All of that for such a "meh" film. Watched it on Monday. It's not terrible, but it isn't memorable either. The forced pc agenda is continued here (although it's taken to such extremes that it almost feels parodic, honestly), you don't really care much for the characters or their fates... Glover is good as Lando, definitely, but don't expect a ground-breaking performance either.

It's an OK film. Not terrible, not excellent, kinda boring.
IronMandarin
IronMandarin - 5/23/2018, 11:14 AM
I just got of seeing Solo.

How in the hell did this get good reviews? It's down there with the worst of the Star Wars Prequels for me. The only way I could see someone not saying it's one of the worst Star Wars films is if they hated the Last Jedi more.

Alden Ehrenreich was atrocious. Hayden Christiansen level bad. He ruined Han, one of the most iconic characters in Star Wars if not all of fiction. I'm going to go back and watch the original trilogy and remember him as a big bitch who keeps failing to bullshit his way out of trouble.

BloodyBed
BloodyBed - 5/23/2018, 2:08 PM
@IronMandarin - just pretend solo was a fan film
1 2
View Recorder