J.K. Simmons Opens Up On The Amazing Spider-Man 3 Rumors And Batgirl's Test Screenings

J.K. Simmons Opens Up On The Amazing Spider-Man 3 Rumors And Batgirl's Test Screenings

Invincible star J.K. Simmons has broken his silence on rumours he was being lined up to play J. Jonah Jameson in The Amazing Spider-Man 3 and reflects on the "unreleasable" Batgirl.

By JoshWilding - Jul 09, 2026 10:07 AM EST

J.K. Simmons first played J. Jonah Jameson in 2002's Spider-Man, and later reprised the role in 2004's Spider-Man 2 and 2007's Spider-Man 3. Sam Raimi had plans for a fourth movie that ultimately never came to fruition; instead, we got a reboot in 2012 with The Amazing Spider-Man.

That set out to put a modern spin on Peter Parker, meaning he was no longer a freelance photographer for an "old-fashioned" newspaper like The Daily Bugle. In fact, that was completely absent from the short-lived Amazing Spider-Man franchise, but there were rumblings about Simmons returning for the unmade third chapter.

Talking to Josh Horowitz, the Invincible star confirmed he was never asked to reprise his role as JJJ in those movies. "The only conversations I was aware of were the ones that people would call my attention to on the internet," he stated, before reflecting on joining the MCU in 2019's Spider-Man: Far From Home.

"That was a complete shock, and a very last-minute decision, which I still think is why JJJ doesn't have hair in the Tom Holland Spider-Man universe," Simmons recalled. "They literally called my agent, we had a meeting the next day, and it was a day or two later, I was shooting in some executive's office because there was no set. They were well into editing the film when they went, 'What if we stuck a little JJJ in here?'"

Talk then turned to Batgirl, the DCEU movie scrapped by Warner Bros. Discovery CEO David Zaslav as a tax write-off in August 2022. After playing Commissioner Jim Gordon in both versions of Justice League, Simmons was supposed to reprise the role in a Gotham City where Michael Keaton's Bruce Wayne was Batman (a result of The Flash rewriting the franchise's timeline).

Asked how he feels about the experience, the actor said Batgirl is "in a vacuum" and confirmed he never got to watch the so-called "unreleasable" movie. "Apparently, one test audience saw it, and you know, it wasn't a bad score from the test audience," Simmons revealed. "It was a, whatever, business decision obviously."

"Justice League was a very small part [and] had its own drama attached to it, but then Zack Snyder's cut came out, which the DC fans really love. It's a lot of fun. When Batgirl came along with Adil El Arbi and Bilall Fallah, it was an exciting prospect to be part of the origin story of Batgirl. It was a good experience. We really had a good time making it and thought it was going to be a fun superhero movie."

Simmons recently confirmed that he won't return as Jonah in Spider-Man: Brand New Day, and we've seen nothing to suggest that he'll be the DCU's Jim Gordon. Sadly, we never really got to see what he could do with that character, as Ben Affleck's Batman movie was also scrapped.

You can hear more from Simmons in the player below. 

About The Author:
JoshWilding
Member Since 3/13/2009
A lifelong comic book fan who grew up on Spider-Man: The Animated Series in the '90s, Josh Wilding has been contributing to ComicBookMovie.com since 2009.

While he's also written for websites like Batman-News, HeyUGuys, and WhatCulture, Josh is CBM's Rotten Tomatoes-approved critic and the site's #1 contributor with nearly two decades of experience covering film and TV news (including interviews with Tom Holland, Chris Pratt, Gary Oldman, Halle Berry, Jon Bernthal, Tom Welling, and hundreds more).

Based in the UK with his wife, Josh is also an avid WWE and Formula 1 fan and writes about those passions on CBM's sister sites, TheRingReport.com and FullThrottleHQ.com. Favourite superhero? Spider-Man. Favourite pro wrestler? CM Punk. Favourite F1 driver? Max Verstappen.
Spider-Man: Brand New Day Actor Reveals Full Look At Ramrod; Says Recognized Actors Were Cut
Related:

Spider-Man: Brand New Day Actor Reveals Full Look At Ramrod; Says "Recognized" Actors Were Cut

Spider-Man: Brand New Day Ending Explained: What That [Spoiler] Really Means For Peter Parker
Recommended For You:

Spider-Man: Brand New Day Ending Explained: What That [Spoiler] Really Means For Peter Parker

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

Nonameforme
Nonameforme - 7/9/2026, 11:04 AM
Batgirl should have been released
BadgerThorkin
BadgerThorkin - 7/9/2026, 11:15 AM
@Nonameforme - ya, they should at least make it available on a streaming platform.
SurfinSuperman
SurfinSuperman - 7/9/2026, 11:25 AM
@Nonameforme - likely would've gotten the same reception Supergirl did, if not worse.
FinnishDude
FinnishDude - 7/9/2026, 11:49 AM
@SurfinSuperman - Doesn't matter, should have been released
SurfinSuperman
SurfinSuperman - 7/9/2026, 12:55 PM
@FinnishDude - Why?
FinnishDude
FinnishDude - 7/9/2026, 1:57 PM
@SurfinSuperman - Because shelving a movie for a tax write-off is just inherently disgusting, everyone who worked on the movie deserves to have the fruits of their labor shared and it should be decided by the audience if a piece of art is any good, not business suits
SurfinSuperman
SurfinSuperman - 7/9/2026, 3:26 PM
@FinnishDude - They don't deserve that. They deserve to get paid what they negotiated for their contract, and they were. It's the studio's property and they have the right to do what they want with it.
Nonameforme
Nonameforme - 7/9/2026, 3:37 PM
@BadgerThorkin - it would do serious numbers
PartyKiller
PartyKiller - 7/9/2026, 7:23 PM
@Nonameforme - WB was wise to not shit it out.
FinnishDude
FinnishDude - 7/10/2026, 1:40 AM
@SurfinSuperman - Why are you such an anti-art bootlicker?
SurfinSuperman
SurfinSuperman - 7/10/2026, 1:47 AM
@FinnishDude - Lol really guy? I'm just telling you how it is. Movies like this are not primarily art. They are products first, art second. You know this. You aren't that foolish, are you?

If I wanted to buy a painting for my living room, am I not later allowed to change my mind about what to do in my own home? Or is the artist a victim because I chose not to display his work?
bkmeijer1
bkmeijer1 - 7/10/2026, 2:20 AM
@FinnishDude - the one good thing Paramount can do when they own WB, is release Batgirl. Or leak it. I'm fine with that too. I'm sure it's in a vault somewhere
TheAmericanHero
TheAmericanHero - 7/9/2026, 11:19 AM
I still don't understand how a "made" but unreleased film can be sold as a tax write off or whatever. I don't understand, who's holding onto the film and not allowing the public to see it because money issues took place behind the scenes. My mind just can't grasp how that's a thing. Is there like some government agency that keeps abandoned films locked away due to tax write offs? Do the prints locked way ever become public domain and get released to the public for historical purpose? Or when the film is ceased,do they just immediately destroy all of the prints? My brain just can't really grasp why or how an unfinished film can be sold or leveraged away for tax reasons or whatever like Batgirl was.
TheAmericanHero
TheAmericanHero - 7/9/2026, 11:25 AM
Like... how is 'spending millions on a film then promising to stop making it, developing it or to ever release it's is something of value that can be sold off to the government. What does the government gain from getting an unreleased movie, or shutting down it's production permanently? How is an unreleased movie something of value comparable to getting a massive tax break or whatever
... I just can't understand this process fundamentally.
Patient2670
Patient2670 - 7/9/2026, 12:56 PM
@TheAmericanHero - I think what you're missing, is that it wasn't "Sold" as a tax writeoff. The government gets nothing. The person or entity paying taxes, pays less as a result of showing a loss of profit remember, WB ( or DC Studios, or whoever)pays taxes as a whole, and not each movie individually. Bit that tax forgiveness only applies, if the product doesn't generate income of any kind. If the studio were to release it after getting the waiver, it would affect the taxes for the whole corporation, rather than simply forcing them to pay takes on that film.
In their eyes, there's no version of this where WB was making any type of money off this movie. The comparison is this - After seeing the movie, weighing the cost of production, marketing, etc. and projecting what they believe the returns on that investment. They could lose the just $90 mil they reportedly spent on production and save money on taxes, or they could lose closer to double that, by releasing, marketing and distributing it and the damage it could also cause to other movies in the brand.

I hate that that was the decision they made and I would love to get to see it one day. Who knows, As this Paramount merger goes through, perhaps there's some loophole as new ownership, that can make that happen (but I wouldn't hold my breath).
SurfinSuperman
SurfinSuperman - 7/9/2026, 12:57 PM
@TheAmericanHero - As far as I'm aware Batgirl has been completely erased and no longer exists. Or at least, was supposed to be.
TheAmericanHero
TheAmericanHero - 7/9/2026, 1:26 PM
@SurfinSuperman - damn really? It's like burning paintings and books... That art can't be reproduced... It's just gone now? Forever?

As a musician,I can relate. I've forgotten more songs that Ive written than songs I can remember. Those songs are just gone forever now. Had their moments in time, lived an unremarkable life and faded away never to be sung again...

Crazy how art has a shelf life, no matter what really. Eventually everyone forgets, no matter what it was. Eventually people will discuss it for the last time and it's forgotten. Lost to time.
TheAmericanHero
TheAmericanHero - 7/9/2026, 1:27 PM
@Patient2670 - that was the best way I've ever had it explained to me. I sorta understand that. Thanks.
Patient2670
Patient2670 - 7/9/2026, 1:29 PM
@TheAmericanHero - no worries at all. Happy to help.
Thing94
Thing94 - 7/9/2026, 11:19 AM
J. Jonah Jameson!
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 7/9/2026, 11:49 AM
That’s a hell of a beard haha.

Also while i wish JJJ had more to do in the MCU thus far , i have enjoyed the small bits we have gotten and i still remember seeing him at the end of FFH was crazy since some people gasped in my theater.

?is=IJcEUS0I4dzHRZRB

Also still wanna see Adil & Bilal’s Batgirl but that won’t happen so oh well!!.
PartyKiller
PartyKiller - 7/9/2026, 7:22 PM
There are enough videos floating around to totally undo the idiotic Hollywood crap about women being "badasses". Top women athletes getting owned by average male athletes. Videos of 1 male loser overpowering multiple female cops. Videos of highly trained female fighters getting destroyed by males who have never fought.


All of that makes it harder to suspend disbelief. I'm not just picking on women either. People stopped buying into the one man army crap as well. And Hollywood has still not adjusted their fight choreography to appear more legit to audiences who have seen a lot of MMA and videos of real fights.

Things have changed and the entertainment industry is way behind the times.

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder