Netflix CEO Seemingly Confirms SUPERMAN's Early Digital Release Was Because It Underperformed

Netflix CEO Seemingly Confirms SUPERMAN's Early Digital Release Was Because It Underperformed

During a recent Senate hearing, Netflix CEO Ted Sarandos appeared to confirm that Superman early Digital release last summer was because it had underperformed at the box office.

By JoshWilding - Feb 04, 2026 06:02 AM EST
Filed Under: Superman

Superman was released in theaters on July 11 last year, and despite sluggish returns overseas, it was still the biggest superhero movie of 2025. 

The James Gunn-helmed blockbuster was closing in on $600 million when the DC Studios co-CEO announced, on August 12, that Superman would arrive on Digital platforms three days later. Projections of a $650 million final global haul plummeted, and the DCU movie finished its run with $616 million worldwide.

A Digital release just 35 days after its big screen debut hurt Superman's momentum and was widely criticised by those who support the theatrical experience (exhibitors were also unhappy). 

Gunn was eventually asked to explain the decision and said, "Well, it's very complicated, but the truth is it is because of Peacemaker. I originally thought Peacemaker was going to be coming out next month. There was a lot of things that are beyond our control, so that Peacemaker is coming out now."

At the end of the day, I wanted everyone to be able to see Superman that wanted to," he added, "even those people who couldn't get to a theater before Peacemaker. And that's really the reason for it."

Peacemaker Season 2 premiered on August 21 with an opening episode that had little to nothing to do with Superman. Now, the truth of that early Digital debut may have been revealed by Netflix CEO Ted Sarandos (who, if the merger pans out, will soon be in charge of Warner Bros. Pictures and DC Studios).

Appearing at a Senate Hearing, the executive was pushed on Netflix's commitment to keeping movies in theaters and replied, "[45 days] is the industry standard for self-enforcement. However, routinely, movies that underperform, the window moves a little bit. Superman was a little shorter window."

This has caused quite a stir on social media, with many of Gunn's detractors declaring this proof that Superman got an early Digital release because it was underperforming in theaters. Others, meanwhile, have argued that Sarandos was using it as an example. 

Despite some conflicting reports, Superman's budget is believed to be around $325 million ($225 million for production, $100 million for marketing). While it might have broken even and ultimately turned a profit thanks to ancillaries like promotional partners and merchandise, it seems likely that Warner Bros. decided to pull the trigger on a Digital debut because there's more money to be made there than from declining ticket sales. 

Ultimately, Superman was a big enough hit to warrant a sequel in next summer's Man of Tomorrow. Still, you have to believe Warner Bros. (and Netflix) will be keeping a close eye on how that and the likes of Supergirl and Clayface perform.

About The Author:
JoshWilding
Member Since 3/13/2009
Comic Book Reader. Film Lover. WWE and F1 Fan. Rotten Tomatoes-approved critic and ComicBookMovie.com's #1 contributor.
Warner Bros. Discovery Reveals Superman Day 2026 Plans - Including Supergirl And Krypto
Related:

Warner Bros. Discovery Reveals Superman Day 2026 Plans - Including Supergirl And Krypto

Avengers: Armageddon #1 Covers And Preview Reveal First Look At This Generation's Avengers: Disassembled
Recommended For You:

Avengers: Armageddon #1 Covers And Preview Reveal First Look At This Generation's Avengers: Disassembled

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3 4 5
CyberNigerian
CyberNigerian - 2/4/2026, 6:08 AM
An extended cinematic window on a case-by-case basis sounds fair.

If the audience don't care, then a 45 day window it is...
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 2/4/2026, 6:48 AM
@CyberNigerian - Considering the drop off rate for blockbusters a 45 day window isn't entirely unreasonable with the current state of the market. There IS an argument that if the standard exclusive release window was longer ticket sales would be higher but seeing little statistical proof that that is or would be the case currently. Maybe in part cos expectations ARE that the online release with only be a couple months even when that isn't always the case but hard to say with certainty but always LONG been the case that most the money is made in the first two weeks for big budget films, it tend to only be small budget ones that can make more over a far longer period outside of the rare exceptions like Avatar, Titanic and Top Gun Maverick which had legs WAY beyond normal expectations.
mastakilla39
mastakilla39 - 2/4/2026, 7:53 AM
@CyberNigerian - nowadays its 14 days if it flops, then 30 days if its a hit. 45 days is usually just to avoid pirating before it hits the bigger markets like asia. if we base it soley on US even 30 days is too long because if people don't see a film within the 1st 2 weeks they aren't going to go on the 3rd week.
bobevanz
bobevanz - 2/4/2026, 8:50 AM
Multiple factors contributed to this. Let's see: Joker 2 literally killed the DCEU, the streak of losses since JL were immense, Marvel released their FOURTH cbm in 7 months two weeks after Superman (don't say that's a coincidence), and saying this underperformed is just an easy shit take. If it had the same release window at Minecraft it would've stayed for the same 90 days. Most people on here don't have the mental capacity to figure these things out. They just say wOkE and flap their chicken feathers
jasonvoorhees
jasonvoorhees - 2/4/2026, 6:13 AM
Finally somoene, whos not an imbecile fangirl, got it.
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 2/4/2026, 6:41 AM
@jasonvoorhees - Did they though? Seems more like some reading between the lines
Bucky74
Bucky74 - 2/4/2026, 8:19 AM
@jasonvoorhees - Agreed. I saw it with my family and we all found it entertaining but very disappointing. Gunn got way too political, turned Superman into a whiny screaming man-child, gave us an overall bad suit (although I do like the cape and bright colors), and made the side characters the scene stealing stars. The choppy editing was also inexcusable for a major production
bobevanz
bobevanz - 2/4/2026, 8:51 AM
@jasonvoorhees - how many Jason movies underperformed lmao
jasonvoorhees
jasonvoorhees - 2/4/2026, 1:04 PM
@bobevanz - Whiny fangirl. Grow some balls loser.
MGSSnake1988
MGSSnake1988 - 2/4/2026, 6:13 AM
Having it compete against the new Fantastic Four film at a time when most comic book films are underperforming is not exactly a great idea. And a mistake for both studios.

It's not the late '10s anymore.

With Nrtflix acquiring DC, it remains to be seen if the DCU can outperform the MCU's 37 film box office earnings of $32.5 billion with the limited theatrical release windows.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 2/4/2026, 5:24 PM
@MGSSnake1988 - DCs pretty much dead if that happens. Batman II will get a two week window, all the rest will be straight to Netflix and the comics arm will be shut down with some of it's characters licensed out to IDW, Boom and Dynamite.

Bye bye DC.
MGSSnake1988
MGSSnake1988 - 2/8/2026, 11:59 AM
@ObserverIO - Wake Up Dead Man only earned like $2 million compared to Knives Out's $300 million.

298 times lower, and it's bad for the theater owners. Even if everyone involved are paid, this is bad news.
SteviesRightFoo
SteviesRightFoo - 2/4/2026, 6:16 AM
Gunn was the wrong hire. The only worse choice would've been getting snyder back
mastakilla39
mastakilla39 - 2/4/2026, 8:02 AM
@SteviesRightFoo - was he though? movie had great reception globally and it was a hit. thats kinda what you need to revive a dead franchise. box office was good enough because the DC brand killed itself, so making 600 mil+ is already a good sign.

People forget that Batman Begins underperformed too but due to its positive reception the next film was a massive hit. It came after the Schulmacher films like the DCEU that ran the brand to the ground too.

You have to bet on the long game not just 1 offs like the DCEU where every 1st film was a hit then every solo after it flopped.
SteviesRightFoo
SteviesRightFoo - 2/4/2026, 8:13 AM
@mastakilla39 - great reception? Also please don't mention batman begins in the same breath as gunns garbage, even for the sake of argument
bobevanz
bobevanz - 2/4/2026, 8:51 AM
@SteviesRightFoo - just because YOU didn't like it lol main character syndrome
SteviesRightFoo
SteviesRightFoo - 2/4/2026, 10:27 AM
@bobevanz - grazie, bob
krayzeman
krayzeman - 2/4/2026, 11:45 AM
@mastakilla39 - Excellent comp point about Batman Begins. After the Schumacher film(Snyder) audiences soured on Batman films. Plus the film didnt look too action pack at the time either which may have been another thing. But enough folks seen it on DVD that by the time The Dark Knight came out it justified the change in direction for the franchise.
1 2 3 4 5

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder