Andy Serkis' MOWGLI Moves To Netflix; Now Expected For A 2019 Release

Andy Serkis' MOWGLI Moves To Netflix; Now Expected For A 2019 Release

Warner Bros. has sold the worldwide rights to the Andy Serkis-directed Mowgli to Netflix, meaning it will no longer open in theaters this October and will launch on the streaming giant sometime next year.

By RohanPatel - Jul 27, 2018 03:07 PM EST
Filed Under: Action
Source: Deadline
In a surprising development, Netflix has acquired the worldwide distribution rights to Mowgli, Andy Serkis' much darker take on Rudyard Kipling's The Jungle Book, from Warner Bros. for an undisclosed sum. 

The film was previously slated to hit theaters on October 19, but has now been removed from WB's release schedule and will debut on the streaming giant sometime next year. There will also be a theatrical release of some sort to coincide with the film's streaming 
debut, so that audiences can experience the 3D version of the film that Serkis is in the midst of completing. 

Speaking on the move, Serkis tells Deadline, “What excites me most is the forward thinking at Netflix in how to present this, and the message of the movie. They understand this is a darker telling that doesn’t fit it into a
four quadrant slot. It’s really not meant for young kids, though I think it’s possible that 10 or above can watch it. It was always meant to be PG-13, and this allows us to go deeper, with darker themes, to be scary and frightening in moments. The violence between animals is not gratuitous, but it’s definitely there. This way of going allows us to get the film out without compromise.

Blending live action and performance capture, the story follows the upbringing of the human child Mowgli (Rohan Chand) raised by a wolf pack in the jungles of India. As he learns the often-harsh rules of the jungle, under the tutelage of a bear named Baloo (Andy Serkis) and a panther named Bagheera (Christian Bale), Mowgli becomes accepted by the animals of the jungle as one of their own. All but one: the fearsome tiger Shere Khan (Benedict Cumberbatch). But there may be greater dangers lurking in the jungle, as Mowgli comes face to face with his human origins. The other story's central animal characters are: Kaa, the snake (Cate Blanchett); the leader of the wolf pack, Akela (Peter Mullan); the scavenging hyena, Tabaqui (Tom Hollander); Nisha, the female wolf (Naomie Harris), who adopts the baby Mowgli as one of her cubs; Nisha's mate, Vihaan (Eddie Marsan); and Mowgli's Brother Wolf (Jack Reynor).

GLADIATOR II's Rotten Tomatoes Score Revealed As First Reviews Suggest It Falls Short Of 2000's GLADIATOR
Related:

GLADIATOR II's Rotten Tomatoes Score Revealed As First Reviews Suggest It Falls Short Of 2000's GLADIATOR

THE STOIC Interview: Filmmaker Jonathan Eckersley On Being Inspired By DARK KNIGHT RETURNS (Exclusive)
Recommended For You:

THE STOIC Interview: Filmmaker Jonathan Eckersley On Being Inspired By DARK KNIGHT RETURNS (Exclusive)

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
Stinkor1
Stinkor1 - 7/27/2018, 3:07 PM
So was this the second or third Jungle Book movie coming out?
NinnesMBC
NinnesMBC - 7/27/2018, 3:11 PM
I heard about this, found it odd. But at least this also means there is no way that I will miss it now.
Zoinkberg
Zoinkberg - 7/27/2018, 3:15 PM
Redlettermedia did a whole video on hollywood moving films to netflix.
BigMikeReviews
BigMikeReviews - 7/27/2018, 3:44 PM
@Zoinkberg - Very cool! My fav film channel on youtube by far
MasterMix
MasterMix - 7/27/2018, 3:20 PM
Well that's... stupid
L0RDbuckethead
L0RDbuckethead - 7/27/2018, 3:21 PM
Like I tweeted this morning, this was a great acquisition by Netflix. This take, while necessarily won't be better than Favreau's (that one was pretty damn good), it will definitely be darker and more faithful to the Kipling novel.

Plus, the kid that plays Mowgli is hilarious in Bad Words:


Ghostnuzzler98
Ghostnuzzler98 - 7/27/2018, 3:58 PM
@L0RDbuckethead - Love that movie!
Spidey91
Spidey91 - 7/27/2018, 3:33 PM
maybe the movie kinda sucks? I don't know. going straight to Netflix sometimes is indicative of the movie's quality (Cloverfield Paradox for example).
99OPTIMISTPRIME
99OPTIMISTPRIME - 7/27/2018, 3:33 PM
TRANSLATION: The movie was likely to bomb, if released in theaters, so WB decided to cut their losses.
ArkhamClown
ArkhamClown - 7/27/2018, 3:37 PM
Maybe they thought audiences wouldn’t take to the darker iteration, so they decided to cut their losses?
Spidey91
Spidey91 - 7/27/2018, 3:40 PM
@ArkhamClown - sounds like typical WB behavior to me.
MrDandy
MrDandy - 7/27/2018, 3:39 PM
Damn. The studio must have zero faith in this thing to send it straight to Netflix.
marvel72
marvel72 - 7/27/2018, 3:41 PM
Why? I thought this movie looked awesome,maybe its just me.
ChangAlang
ChangAlang - 7/27/2018, 8:17 PM
@marvel72 - Not just you. I was hoping to see it on the big screen. A bit of a shame really🤷🏽‍♂️
Pathogen
Pathogen - 7/27/2018, 8:21 PM
@ChangAlang - Me too. Buuuuut...I do have a 110" projector screen, so its still kinda big?
ChangAlang
ChangAlang - 7/27/2018, 8:27 PM
@Pathogen - Hahaha..now that’s how you do it😊

Shall I bring the popcorn?
Pathogen
Pathogen - 7/27/2018, 8:29 PM
@ChangAlang - Only if you cut a hole in the bottom of the bucket, big boy ;)

kidding.


or...am i.....
ChangAlang
ChangAlang - 7/27/2018, 8:43 PM
@Pathogen - 😘
BigMikeReviews
BigMikeReviews - 7/27/2018, 3:42 PM
Interesting, I already saw posters up at my local theater for this. I'm assuming WB is anticipating a bomb so they sold it to Netflix for one dollar above cost and moved on
Pantherpool
Pantherpool - 7/27/2018, 3:50 PM
It could just be that Warner Bros. wants to avoid any financial comparisons to Disney's Jungle Book remake.

Buckster10
Buckster10 - 7/27/2018, 3:52 PM
I read this as Mogwai. I thought Serkis was doing mo-cap for a Gizmo prequel
ScionStorm
ScionStorm - 7/27/2018, 4:26 PM
@Buckster10 - THAT might have actually gone to theaters. lol
E4Nigma
E4Nigma - 7/27/2018, 4:00 PM
Smart move, WB. Mowgli doesn't stand a chance beating Disney's Jungle Book at the box office.
Oberlin4Prez
Oberlin4Prez - 7/27/2018, 4:03 PM
I'm actually sad by this because I was genuinely interested in this take. I wasn't in love with Disney's just because felt it didn't capture what I loved about the animated version. Oh well, I'm still excited to see it.
CrazyJ
CrazyJ - 7/27/2018, 4:19 PM
Feel bad Andy Serkis's movie's been shuffled onto Netflix, though I can understand from a business perspective, Much like Warner Bros Pan "Peter Pan" Legend of Tarzan, weren't performing critically or commercially as they wanted needed to and weren't confident that Mowgli would've done well on a box office level, it possibly could have, we'll never know now.

Kind of weird that Disney may also do Live Action remakes of Disney's Peter Pan and Disney's Tarzan. They've monopolized brands to the point it put some what of an unfair comparison to any other studio attempting a new adaptation of a pre-exhisting source material. At the same time it puts up a standard that any studio should just make the best movie they can if they want it to be a success.
ScionStorm
ScionStorm - 7/27/2018, 4:39 PM
@CrazyJ - I wish Disney would do Pellucidar instead of remaking Tarzan. Or anybody would do Pellucidar. John Carter could have been good had they stuck closer to the plot of the first book but they tried too hard to set up the future and so changed the entire third act sacrificing the original plot for something that was decidedly weaker.

Then again, with Disney folding over on it's past stories right now would be the best time for other studios to go looking to adapt stories Disney hasn't done and is too preoccupied with remakes to focus on instead of trying to compete with Disney's adaptations. That's how animated fairytales like Thumbelina and Anastasia had been able to stand out. The studio went after something that Disney wasn't working on.
1 2
View Recorder