Disney Looks Likely To Succeed In Proxy Battle With Nelson Peltz's Trian Fund Management

Disney Looks Likely To Succeed In Proxy Battle With Nelson Peltz's Trian Fund Management

It's looking increasingly likely that Disney will emerge triumphant over Nelson Peltz's Trian Fund Management in his battle to join the company's board of directors. Find the latest after the jump...

By JoshWilding - Apr 03, 2024 06:04 AM EST
Filed Under: Disney
Source: Bloomberg

In recent months, Disney has found itself under attack from billionaire Nelson Peltz's Trian Fund Management. He wishes to make a number of sweeping changes to the company by inserting himself and former Disney CFO Jay Rasulo into the board of directors. 

They have a fair bit of support behind them (including controversial former Marvel Entertainment Chairman Ike Perlmutter) but in Disney's corner are everyone from George Lucas to Walt Disney's grandchildren and ex-Disney CEO Michael Eisner. 

Shareholders have been casting their votes and an official decision is expected later today. In the meantime, Bloomberg is reporting that with more than 60% of votes counted, it's looking highly likely that Disney will emerge triumphant by blocking Peltz. 

Peltz's sole aim appears to be increasing Disney's profits, even if it's to the detriment of the company's theme parks and movie offerings. Blackwells Capital, another hedge looking to nominate three board director candidates, is also thought to have failed. 

Current Disney CEO Bob Iger is in the midst of trying to turn Disney's fortunes around, with a big focus on the film and TV decisions after Bob Chapek's most disastrous time in that role. 

Peltz, meanwhile, has confessed to knowing nothing about the movie business but, with Perlmutter in his ear, recently suggested he'd consider firing Marvel Studios President Kevin Feige, the executive who turned the MCU into a $30 billion franchise. 

"People go to watch a movie or a show to be entertained," he said. "They don’t go to get a message. Why do I have to have a Marvel that’s all women? Not that I have anything against women, but why do I have to do that? Why can’t I have Marvels that are both? Why do I need an all-Black cast?"

"They say we know nothing about the movie business - we don’t claim we do - but I don’t think they do, with five big losers in a row. They’ve lost first place in animation, they’ve lost first place in features. Maybe it’s time to change management in those divisions."

Disney shares have gained nearly 50% in recent months as the company continues making big investments, including an ESPN streaming service and a stake in Fortnite creator Epic Games. 

On the movie front, we've seen a big effort to return to franchises which can deliver guaranteed hits. For Marvel Studios, that's meant cutting back on pricey streaming content and less time spent focusing on sequels. 

Disney Hack Now Confirmed To Have Taken Place; New Details On Compromised Data And Why Studio Was Targeted
Related:

Disney Hack Now Confirmed To Have Taken Place; New Details On Compromised Data And Why Studio Was Targeted

SPIDER-MAN 4: Marvel Studios President Kevin Feige Reveals Whether Jon Watts Will Return As Director
Recommended For You:

SPIDER-MAN 4: Marvel Studios President Kevin Feige Reveals Whether Jon Watts Will Return As Director

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3
DrReedRichards
DrReedRichards - 4/3/2024, 6:27 AM
Let the seething and coping from the usual suspects commence.
soberchimera
soberchimera - 4/3/2024, 9:07 AM
@DrReedRichards - The usual suspects in this case being the shareholders who have been losing money for the past few years...
DrReedRichards
DrReedRichards - 4/3/2024, 10:34 AM
@soberchimera -

Respectfully, I don't think any of the users whining or dog-whistling here hold any Disney stocks.
UniqNo
UniqNo - 4/3/2024, 6:29 AM
I guess that's a good thing? 🤷🏾‍♂️
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 4/3/2024, 7:00 AM
@UniqNo - Should only depend on if a shareholder or not cos from a viewer POV all we should care about is the quality of products they make and maybe prices for themeparks etc likely to spend money on those.

That isn't to say there haven't been quality issues, just don't see someone like Peltz as likely to fix that. If anything would think someone so money centric would slash budgets and staff, go more formulaic and less creative if given any degree of control which ISN'T the way to improve quality.

I mean if we like a companies products we don't want them to go bankrupt, so not like a viewer has ZERO interest in profit margins just as we should want films in general to have bigger ave box office returns than they have the last few years to secure the future of theatres.

Again not saying changes are not needed, there have been issues but have been saying all the right sort of things about adressing that which we will only likely start seeing the fruits of this year onwards (as almost everything last few years was still after effects of COVID and prior management decisions). I just can't see Peltz or for that matter Ike being the answer to those quality issues or indeed firing Feige.
mountainman
mountainman - 4/3/2024, 7:03 AM
@UniqNo - If I were a Disney shareholder, I would be very upset with the current leaders who are destroying the stock price due to bad creative decisions.

Doesn’t mean this guy is the answer. But the people in charge now are failing in an epic manner.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 4/3/2024, 7:57 AM
@mountainman - The people who WERE in charge were destroying the stock price and failing. They're not in charge anymore. The problem is already solved. Chapek is gone. Iger's back.

In terms of Marvel movies, the divide between Chapek as CEO and the return of Iger is the space between The Marvels and Deadpool and Wolverine.

That's where we are now, so you might not see the differences yet.

Since Iger left (around Endgame) it all went downhill.

Getting rid of Chapek, getting rid of Perlmutter, these are all good things. These were weighing Marvel down. Feige has more control now and we're really gonna see some shit happen.

Deapool and Wolverine is gonna blow all of our.... minds.
Origame
Origame - 4/3/2024, 8:06 AM
@ObserverIO - chapek was only there for a few years. What did he do that wasn't already greenlit by iger beforehand?
vectorsigma
vectorsigma - 4/3/2024, 8:16 AM
@ObserverIO - ill believe this if we get a good cap 4, thunderbolts, ironheart and agatha, at least 50% of that list.

Deadpool and Wolverine is relatively easy (to make successful) because of these characters alone with reynolds and jackman.
bobevanz
bobevanz - 4/3/2024, 8:17 AM
@mountainman - you mean the stock that is almost back to 2022 highs? Lmao
mountainman
mountainman - 4/3/2024, 8:19 AM
@ObserverIO - I understand all the behind the scenes that occurred, but I need a few quality releases to have faith.

If X-Men 97 maintains its quality throughout the season, that’s win #1.

If Deadpool & Wolverine is good, that’s number #2.

Too bad there are some stinker shows before Daredevil that may muddy the waters a bit, but I can forgive those for being greenlit under the old regime.

Daredevil will be win #3 if it’s good.

Those three projects will tell us a lot about the future of Marvel. I’m honestly ok if they continue producing stuff I don’t like, as long as I get SOMETHING good too.

Star Wars seems to be in a different place and it seems like they are farther from righting the ship than Marvel is, but that’s a topic for another thread on another day.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 4/3/2024, 8:21 AM
@Origame - Greenlit means nothing. I could green light a film called Superman and then step down as CEO. Then much later a story is developed and changed and a script is written and rewritten and a cast and director is hired, decisions are made, etc, etc.

If Iger greenlit any movies called Shang Chi, Black Widow, Eternals, Doctor Strange 2, Thor 4 or whatever that doesn't mean we automatically get bad versions of those movies.


Everything from Phase 4 until The Marvels was overseen by Bob Chapek.

The Infinity Saga was overseen by Iger. He even bought Marvel in the first place. He's back.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 4/3/2024, 8:29 AM
@vectorsigma - See that's the real thing right there.

There's a saying in Hollywood: "It's easy to make a bad film out of a good script but it's hard to make a good film out of a bad script".

In name only, an Eternals movie and Doctor Strange sequel, a Thor sequel, a Black Widow movie, a Black Panther sequel... those are good ideas. But bad or underwhelming movies were made.

Now the real challenge is gonna be how projects greenlit by Chapek like Agatha, Thunderbolts and Ironheart can be turned into something so quintessentially unmissable that it stands toe-to-toe with the best of the Infinity Saga.
Origame
Origame - 4/3/2024, 8:59 AM
@ObserverIO - most of those movies you listed were in post production when chapek was in charge.

On top of that, Thor 4 had waititi hired with iger and he was given complete free reign on the production.

The only example you have that can be blamed on chapek is dr strange 2, since he did call for additional changes, but that also includes the good in bringing in raimi. Not to mention that's the only not Sony related phase 4 movie to make basically a billion.
soberchimera
soberchimera - 4/3/2024, 9:03 AM
@UniqNo - The evil billionaire backed by the other evil billionaire doesn't get to replace the people who have been bad at their jobs basically.
vectorsigma
vectorsigma - 4/3/2024, 9:36 AM
@mountainman - this is a good barometer. For my own, id add having at least 2 good outputs from these projects

- cap 4
- thunderbolts
- ironheart
- agatha
vectorsigma
vectorsigma - 4/3/2024, 9:45 AM
@ObserverIO - im not really paying attention on what projects were greenlit by who.

I guess what's important is that ALL projects moving forward will have some improvements that will signify the "marvel learning from mistakes" phrase.

Tbh, Deadpool really feels like a banger but whenever i think about the next projects after that, the hype diminishes for me. But getting surprised is always welcome
vectorsigma
vectorsigma - 4/3/2024, 6:36 AM
I wouldve preferred a change in scenery.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 4/3/2024, 8:03 AM
@vectorsigma - so go outside and touch grass.
😛
vectorsigma
vectorsigma - 4/3/2024, 9:39 AM
@ObserverIO - i swear i replied on this a while ago and cant see it
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 4/3/2024, 9:54 AM
@vectorsigma - did you get signed out maybe? Sometimes the website signs you out when you don't comment in a while and then your comments don't show up when you post them.
vectorsigma
vectorsigma - 4/3/2024, 9:58 AM
@ObserverIO - did not get signed out.

Maybe it's just too short with just a "lol!"

Anyway, all good
Origame
Origame - 4/3/2024, 6:37 AM
...you mean he wants to make the company profitable? Oh the horror!
DrReedRichards
DrReedRichards - 4/3/2024, 6:49 AM
@Origame -

User Comment Image
Odekahn
Odekahn - 4/3/2024, 8:13 AM
@Origame - I was thinking the same thing. I was expecting something horrible the way it was described Walt’s grandchildren and George Lucas were against it.

Nope, just trying to ditch the woke nonsense.
Origame
Origame - 4/3/2024, 8:54 AM
@Odekahn - exactly.

Also, I wouldn't take what they say as meaning anything. Lucas basically said he was getting paid to say what he did, and Walt Disney's grandchildren also publicly shamed Walt over being a "bigot".
comicfan100
comicfan100 - 4/3/2024, 9:40 AM
@Origame - If you want an out and proud racist, misogynist bigot to have that much power and control over a company that's supposed to entertain millions, then that looks pretty bad on you. You aren't the only demographic.
Origame
Origame - 4/3/2024, 10:36 AM
@comicfan100 - please, calling people racist, misogynistic, AND a bigot?

Thanks to people like you just throwing out those terms all willy nilly, you might as well say he got the high score on whose line is it anyway.
Origame
Origame - 4/3/2024, 10:38 AM
@comicfan100 - also, the only demographic that matters for marvel are the superhero fans. All they've been doing are appealing to very niche groups that don't normally care about the genre. Which, considering the reception to Thor 4 and the box office for quantumania and the marvels, really shows how much that paid off for them 🤣
comicfan100
comicfan100 - 4/3/2024, 10:43 AM
@Origame - I'm not throwing out that term all willy nilly. If it walks like a duck and talks like a duck.

Also, comic book fans, you, me and everyone on this site, I'm assuming, ARE a small a niche audience. Most people who watch these movies first introduction to these characters are through these films, not the books. So they're going to appeal to a wider audience. That's just how things go. I want the movies to be better, but not by alienating entire groups of people based on assumptions about their race, gender and sexuality. It's reductive.
Origame
Origame - 4/3/2024, 10:59 AM
@comicfan100 - funny, I literally said superhero fans instead of comic book fans. Meaning people who like the GENRE, not necessarily the books.

And I can tell you, people who like the genre are interested in fun superpowers, cool action, and likeable characters actually being heroes. Not race or gender based grievance sessions featuring characters who would be the villain in any story from someone with a moral compass that aligned with most audiences.
Origame
Origame - 4/3/2024, 11:01 AM
@comicfan100 - also, you're one to talk about not alienating people. All we want are fun superhero movies that don't care about skin color or gender. Meanwhile you've been totally ok with these movies constantly making assumptions about people based on their race, gender, or sexuality. Just as long as you agree with those assumptions.
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 4/3/2024, 6:48 AM
User Comment Image

No more racist & sexist old white dudes please.
FireandBlood
FireandBlood - 4/3/2024, 6:52 AM
Nobody actually thought that racist [foo foo] was going to win right?
DrReedRichards
DrReedRichards - 4/3/2024, 6:54 AM
@FireandBlood -

Many thought, even more hoped, and I can only pretend to wonder why.
FireandBlood
FireandBlood - 4/3/2024, 7:02 AM
@DrReedRichards - Talk about deluding themselves. At some point, these [frick]tards really need to get a grip.
DrReedRichards
DrReedRichards - 4/3/2024, 7:08 AM
@FireandBlood -

There are two CBM scenes that come to mind.

Alfred telling Bruce "they turned to a man they did not fully understand", and Vision's "our very strength invites challenge".

Those people live by rivalry. And when they don't have it their way, they'd rather ruin the playing field than admit defeat.

Petty and pathetic, frankly.
SonOfAGif
SonOfAGif - 4/3/2024, 8:41 AM
@DrReedRichards - Because they were raised and lived a certain way. Their parents were raised and lived a certain way. But since they can no longer control the narrative and more and more multicultural people and companies are emerging and living amongst them, They feel they lost control. That's why they behave the way they do to try and silence who they consider the "opposition".
DrReedRichards
DrReedRichards - 4/3/2024, 8:47 AM
@SonOfAGif -

I usually try to refrain from insulting one's heritage. One does not choose the house they're born in. It's the whole nature vs nurture narrative.

But I cannot in good faith pretend you're not on to something. Those people's upbringing played a huge part on how their values were shaped, so there's a great blame on parenthood.

That said, one's inherrent nature should eventually decide whether these people end up living the rest of their lives blindly following said values or choosing to discard them instead.
clintthahamster
clintthahamster - 4/3/2024, 10:33 AM
@SonOfAGif - A very succinct summation of the reactionary mindset.
1 2 3

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder