DC CAN make great movies... This is how!

DC CAN make great movies... This is how!

DC constantly fails us at the box office. Is it possible for DC to make a decent live action film (other than Batman)? I think so... and this is how.

Editorial Opinion
By Woodinator - Jun 28, 2011 12:06 PM EST
Filed Under: Fan Fic

I have been meaning to write this article for some time but with the recent comments from Mark Millar ("Batman works because he's more human for the big screen and more empathetic, but I fear The Flash and others would just meet the same fate as Green Lantern. They're just too outrageous to provide tension in a live action format and I'd love to see them done, Pixar style, as brilliant, theatrical animated movies.")I couldn't wait anylonger.
DC constantly fails us at the box office. Is it possible for DC to make a decent live action film (other than Batman)? I think so... and this is how.

Ok, let's look at what the recent history of CBM film making has been. Ever since the first X-men trilogy we have seen a steady rise in the credibility of great characters from Marvel while DC was busy with... well, Batman. But really we did not see the shift that has made Marvel the CBM powerhouse that it is today until Iron Man. Marvel introduced a level of continuity in their films that had only be dreamed of prior to all the Avengers talk that Iron Man ended with.



Since then continuity has become a buzz word associated with CBMs at large.

THIS IS WHERE I THINK DC CAN BREAK THE MOLD!
And Actually I think that they already have. We all know that Marvel is dominating the live action market... but you were be hard pressed to convince me that Marvel is even touching DC's greatness in the Animated film Market!


Why is Dc winning in this market?

DC has dominated the animated market because they have thrown continuity to the wind and just given us great films based on already successful story lines that are unattached to each other.


Why not follow this model into the live action market?

DC will never defeat Marvel at their own game. The intensely tied together Marvel movie universe will not be matched in the cinema anytime soon. So why go that route? Why not follow the DC animated model onto the big screen? If you think about it the most successful live action DC films have been one shots based on awesome books.



Why this idea is AMAZING!

If DC decides to go this route we will have the opportunity to see some of our greatest fantasies come true on the big screen. Books that we all love, story lines that we all want to see but could never see in a continual DC movie universe would have the opportunity to reach the Silver screen!






We won't have to worry about the aggravation of actor changes (hey that's not Rhodey!). There would be no need to worry about that because in an unattached film universe Nathan Fillion could play Hal Jordan in "Emerald Twilight"

while Chris Pine could play him in "Blackest Night".


This will take some getting used to...

Will this transition be easy? No. At first (non Comic Book) people will be confused. (I still remember arguing with a (non Comic Book) friend after seeing "Batman Begins" because they thought it was a prequel to the Jack Nicholson Joker.)

But over time I think people will catch on. In the end I believe movie goers will appreciate the absence of another boring origin story every time something is rebooted.

...in the end DC could make reboots obsolete
About The Author:
Woodinator
Member Since 5/9/2010
DC & Marvel Team Up In Awesome Fan-Created Infinite Crisis Video
Related:

DC & Marvel Team Up In Awesome Fan-Created "Infinite Crisis" Video

Bill Cosby Says He Wants To Be In A Superhero Film
Recommended For You:

Bill Cosby Says He Wants To Be In A Superhero Film

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

Ethic
Ethic - 6/28/2011, 12:43 PM
Well put together dude, and I think it could be successful personally!
I would love things to go this way but I don't see this kind of thing happening for a lonnnnngggg time. Your absolutely right about origin tales.
There's no denying the DC animated films are qualityyyy.
CorndogBurglar
CorndogBurglar - 6/28/2011, 12:50 PM
lol

any company CAN make a good movie. they just usually don't.

but i do like you're idea.
PaulRom
PaulRom - 6/28/2011, 12:54 PM
I think it's an interesting idea that has some potential, but it'll be confusing for a lot of people (since they're usually accustomed to sequels and occasionally reboots). It works for animated films because most people don't pay near as much attention to continuity in animated films as they do to theatrical live action films. Plus, the consistent shuffle of actors in a role with every other movie gets boring after a while.
yankeemanf
yankeemanf - 6/28/2011, 2:33 PM
that would be a terrible idea cuz when they just do random storylines the general audience whom the movie is made for them to enjoy just as much as the fanboys will hate it cuz they will be super confused origin movies followed by sequels is the only way to go
Checkmate
Checkmate - 6/28/2011, 2:46 PM
That sounds like a great idea! The only thing that would be difficult is getting the general audience to know who's who.
But I'd definitely be down for that, good article!
LP4
LP4 - 6/28/2011, 2:52 PM
Look I'm a DC fanboy and all but even I have to admit that when it comes to making CBMs DC just can't do it. They don't know how.

The only character they seem to really ever GET is Batman.

But back to your article you have a GREAT idea going on here. I LOVE it actually. Making one-shot CBMs based on each hero's most legendary and iconic exploit. That is a great idea!

But again we're talking about DC/WB here. ;D

golden123
golden123 - 6/28/2011, 3:27 PM
You say that Batman is the only DC character to get a decent movie then you contradict yourself by saying V for Vendetta, Watchmen, and The Losers were good?
golden123
golden123 - 6/28/2011, 3:43 PM
Oh and, Why can't DC beat Marvel at their own game? That statement holds no water. I think that DC could make great movies by simply doing it the way they are (making movies/series based on one character that isn't connected to their other movies). I don't think continuity matters that much when making a quality movie.
LP4
LP4 - 6/28/2011, 3:46 PM
@golden- In case you can't remember I said before they were good but DC only does well with their ONE SHOT STANDALONE STORIES that are made into films. Those you listed aren't part of the mainstream DCU.

Nice try
LP4
LP4 - 6/28/2011, 3:48 PM
I said it before and i will say it again to those so dense they cannot hear-

WB has [frick]ed up-

Batman in 2 films, Superman in 3 films, Jonah Hex, Steel and now Green Lantern.

That is 8 films they've butchered. Enough is enough already, WB needs to stop making CBMs before they kill another character and be forced to reboot it again.

Warner Bros should just stick with Loony Tunes crap. They do better with that. I [frick]ing LOVED the Space Jam movie back in the day. They should stick to stuff like that...oh but that's right they already [frick]ed up Loony Tunes too with that latest film- 'Loony Tunes Back in Action' garbage.

I tried to be patient with WB...I really did try hard. But when they continually [frick] up year after year after year after year it starts to really gripe me that they just have ZERO respect for the comics or the fans.

CBMers will log on here and call me negative and insult me for speaking the TRUTH. But if telling the truth makes me negative or makes you all HATE me then fine, keep hating me. But until WB makes a good DC film...from the MAINSTREAM DCU, I will continue to be this "negative monster" that everyone seems to hate.

Woodinator
Woodinator - 6/28/2011, 3:51 PM
I appreciate everyone's input!

Dane - I think general audiences will do fine after the first few are released. No one had an issue with all of the James Bond movies (that until Casino Royale)had NO continuity as well as various actors playing the lead role.

Golden123 - No, I said that when X-men hit and Marvel started flooding Hollywood with Movies the only thing DC was doing was Batman. I then pointed out that their successes have followed (to an extent) the formula that I lay out in this article.
dmm5
dmm5 - 6/28/2011, 4:06 PM
The Losers are not DC :P
Woodinator
Woodinator - 6/28/2011, 4:18 PM
@DMM5 - That's funny because on the back of the Losers Bluray it says VERTIGO/ DC just like the comic does.
ALmighty1080
ALmighty1080 - 6/28/2011, 4:54 PM
you can make a good movie out of anything.
BigK1337
BigK1337 - 6/28/2011, 6:19 PM
@LP4 and TheGODDAMNSUPERGUY

In retrospect, you guys are a bit too [frick]ing negative. And here I thought people like LEE are negative about a movie company (him and Fox, anyone?).

Any way, I don't see anything wrong with how they make their movies; they came out with some good one (Superman, Superman 2, Batman, Batman Returns, Green Lantern (not bad, but script could have been better), V For Vendetta, The Losers, and Watchmen). While it maybe a "fact" that a lot of the CBM made by WB is bad; you can't just ignore the good movie they have made.
golden123
golden123 - 6/28/2011, 8:24 PM
@LP4: Who said anything about the mainstream DCU not counting as DC? I sure didn't. The writer of this editorial sure didn't. Also, that first sentence of your comment mad no sense to me. I do hope you know that neither of my other two comments on this article were directed at you. They were meant for the writer of this editorial.
golden123
golden123 - 6/28/2011, 8:36 PM
@Woodinator: I'm just sayin' that the following statement appears twice: "Is it possible for DC to make a decent live action film (other than Batman)?" We know that they have had good films that aren't Batman, and apparently you know that to. I don't see your point. Also, when you say, "when X-Men hit and Marvel started flooding with Movies", That's such a broad time frame. I have no idea exactly when your talking about because if your talking about when X-men was released the I'm pretty sure the only other thing Marvel was working on was the Blade series.
LP4
LP4 - 6/28/2011, 8:38 PM
@BigK- Yeah all those movies you listed WERE very nice but like i said...they only do better with the one-shots. Superman 1 and 2 were back in the early 80's so i ignore those.

I'm talking about MODERN cbms and only the mainstream ones...Batman is the only one who got his due.

But i respect your attempt to make WB seem less shitty then they really are. But yeah i think me and GDSuperguy are the WB equivalents of LEEE and his fierce hatred of FOX, LOL i just noticed that.

;P

@golden- My sincerest apologies. =( I had no idea dude.
95
95 - 6/28/2011, 9:32 PM
Have Robert Zemeckis direct a full CGI DC film...

Especially if anyone has seen his take on 'The Polar Express'.

I want DC to make good live action, but they got a good thing going with their animated universe.

Woodinator
Woodinator - 6/28/2011, 9:57 PM
@Golden - I'm sorry that I didn't make myself more clear in my article. I am referring to other mainstream DC heros i.e. - Green Lantern , Flash, JLA, etc...

X-men was the start of a landslide of Marvel CBMs i.e. - Daredevil, Elektra, Ghostrider, FAntastic 4, Spiderman, etc...
View Recorder