Ror Reviews: Green Lantern

Ror Reviews: Green Lantern

In brightest day, in blackest night, is Green Lantern really THAT shite? Click and see if I go any easier on the poor git. There will be some spoilers towards the end..

Review Opinion
By MarkCassidy - Jun 19, 2011 07:06 AM EST
Filed Under: Green Lantern



As I was on my way home from seeing Green Lantern a friend of mine txt me to ask how it was. I replied "It was ok, not quite as bad as I was expecting" or some such, and he replied; "So it was shite then?". I laughed because he is such a miserable git and then thought about it. Is there any room for mediocrity in the world of the big budget, special effects driven "blockbuster"? Any real grey area? Is a movie like Green Lantern, despite having some redeeming features, destined to be lumped in with the forgettable rubbish simply because it failed to impress as much as it's Summer competition?

I'll start out the review by saying that although GL is pretty bad at times, I don't think it's QUITE as bad as some of the reviews you may have read suggest it is. The thing is that any of the stuff it does well is overshadowed because the main problem with the movie is the story, and when your story is a bad one, all the good performances, special effects and ring slinging action isn't going to save you. But For a good 45 minutes I actually thought that the critics had it wrong. I was really enjoying the movie. Sure a few scenes were a bit silly(Jordan's little dance when he sees himself in the suit for the first time is about a 9 on the eye-rollameter) but generally I was suitably entertained and engrossed. Kilowog was calling Hal a poozer, Sinestro was being awesome..all was looking good. Then Hal goes back to Earth and the movie literally get's hijacked by some very inept people. Who? I have no idea..maybe director Martin Campbell had an aneurysm, maybe the editor they had been using took sick..one way or another, the remaining hour or so of the movie is, for the most part, awful.

It's not just because we leave Oa behind and are thrust back into Hal and Carol Ferris'(Blake Lively) will they, won't they, who gives a shit sub plot. Well, I say sub plot but really that is THE plot. We had heard previously that WB were going to attempt to get the ladies interested in the movie and thus focus strongly on the relationship between Hal and Carol. Ok, fine, I get that. I understand. This is Hal's origin story after all. But if you are going to do that then you better make it WORK. Here we have scene after scene of cringy, cliched, uninvolving tripe. Harsh? No! It's truly awful. The dialog these poor actors are asked to spout is criminal. And your frustration is increased by knowing you could be back on Oa with the cgi aliens, all of whom have more screen presence that Blake Lively bless her and her fine ass. But that's not all. Scenes just begin out of nowhere and end completely arbitrarily. At one point Hector Hammond(Peter Sarsgaard) is being all evil with his Father(Tim Robbins) when Jordan burst in out of nowhere. People were looking around going "Where the [frick] did he come from?". Then I remembered that about 10 minutes previous we got a glimpse of him flying back to Earth as his ring gave off a little beep as a sign of trouble. Emm, that isn't a sufficient link to the scene guys. This is film school stuff for God's sake. Following that Hammond and Jordan lie on the ground beside each other for a few minutes. It's actually bizarre.

But, believe it or not there are high points. The performances are generally pretty good. Ryan Reynolds comes out as the biggest casualty of all this because he is actually great as Hal Jordan. It's such a shame that he was forced to act the clown so much because when he is allowed to play Hal with a bit of fire and intensity he is very impressive indeed. Likewise Mark Strong as Sinestro. He's not in it nearly enough but when he is he commands the screen. I wasn't impressed by Blake Lively as I have already mentioned but she wasn't terrible either. Peter Sarsgaard will take some stick for his performance but he is actually pretty good while he is normal..well, normal looking! When he transforms into the most ridiculous looking villain in movie history and begins screaming like a girl you will be hiding your face in your hands. And the support from the likes of Tim Robbins and Angela Basset as DC's (potential) Nick Fury type character is fine too. Some of the action scenes are also pretty awesome. We get to see some very creative constructs and the short amount of time we spend on Oa is impressive, if not mind blowing. Which brings me to the 3D. I may as well have been watching this movie with a pair of real sun glasses on for all the extra the 3D brought to the movie. It's in 3D because that's what happens with special effect movies these days and that seems to be about the limit of thought and effort that was put in. Save your cash. In saying that, I saw a trailer for Captain America in 3D before the movie and that looked incredible. I really hope it wasn't just for the trailer.

Green Lantern does make an attempt to pull things together at the end and we do get a somewhat exiting finale. It's not helped by the fact that the villain is a cgi head with poo for tentacles. Parralax is about as threatening as a two year old with a water pistol. That hasn't been filled. Who's asleep. But Hal Jordan himself accepts his role as hero with some aplomb and it's pretty cool to see. This really only makes the movie's failure more disappointing though because you can see how much potential there was. There may be a cut of Green lantern out there that rectifies the problems. I hope we see it some day. And a (hopefully much better) sequel too. Going back to my opening point, I'm afraid that an "ok" movie like this is just not going to be good enough. It's a shame because what the movie does well it does very well, but when your competition is Thor and X-Men: First Class you will be buried. Oh, and what about the "real fans"? The Green Lantern comic fans, will they enjoy it? I sincerely [frick]ing hope not. This argument confuses the Hell out of me. I hear it so much on this site; "Oh, maybe they just didn't get it because they aren't real fans". Excuse me, shouldn't fans of these characters be MORE annoyed that they didn't get the best big screen treatment they should have? Is it enough for these people that Hal Jordan wears green and flies? Gimme a break. Oh, and I have to talk about that after credit scene. If you still haven't seen or heard about it stop reading now. Basically the scene shows Sinestro put on a yellow ring, created to match the power of Parallax, and become all evil and stuff. Pretty cool right? Well, no. Because it makes no damn sense at all. Before this, Sinestro had gone to The Guardians(crap looking by the way) to ask their permission to make a yellow ring to harness the power of fear. But when Hal overcomes his fear and uses courage to save the day, Sinestro is shown the error of his ways and comes to understand that fear can always be over come. He even accepts Hal as a member of The CORPS..he almost smiles! Then says "ah [frick] it" and puts the ring on anyway. Ass.

In summing up, despite the bashing I have given this movie I do recommend you go see it for yourself. There is half a pretty good flick in there and I doubt you will hate it. Yes, that's about the nicest thing I can say. Not good enough WB/DC/Campbell.







By: TwitterButtons.com

By TwitterButtons.com



2011's GREEN LANTERN Starring Ryan Reynolds Is Actually A Great Movie — Here's Why
Related:

2011's GREEN LANTERN Starring Ryan Reynolds Is Actually A Great Movie — Here's Why

GREEN LANTERN Director Martin Campbell Reveals The One Change That Would Have Made 2011 DC Movie Great
Recommended For You:

GREEN LANTERN Director Martin Campbell Reveals The One Change That Would Have Made 2011 DC Movie "Great"

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3
Sentrybob
Sentrybob - 6/19/2011, 7:11 AM
its just the cgi to me
Sentrybob
Sentrybob - 6/19/2011, 7:11 AM
great movie tho
Dmon
Dmon - 6/19/2011, 7:13 AM
"creaming like a girl" I think you meant Screaming. LOL I thought the screaming was kind of funny in the movie and fit with Hector's character. I think it was a fun film and entertaining. Not everything has to be overly serious. Try watching it again not as a critic.
Superheromoviefan
Superheromoviefan - 6/19/2011, 7:19 AM
good review
kidz3r0
kidz3r0 - 6/19/2011, 7:22 AM
Saw it last night. It was ok. Not great, nor was it horrible. I'll give is 6.5/10.

So far between Thor, X-Men and GL... X-Men wins. Waiting to see what Captain America has to offer.
LibertySeaOtter
LibertySeaOtter - 6/19/2011, 7:26 AM
@videocolor

I watched you
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 6/19/2011, 7:26 AM
haha, cheers Dmon. I proof read it but must have missed that! And I never watch anything as a critic. I watch a movie and take it for what it is. And what Green lantern was is not very good imo. If you enjoyed it great, I'm just giving you guys my take.
kidz3r0
kidz3r0 - 6/19/2011, 7:27 AM
@DCF: Agreed. I pretty much negate the negative criticism and see for myself. Now I after seeing it, I can say Reynolds did a great job. However, I don't see GL as being a character that possesses Reynolds humor/delivery. I thought it would have been better if it were just a LITTLE bit more serious. What I mean is, did they write the role of GL or did they write the role of GL for Reynolds?

Now I'm going into this as a movie watcher, not a comic reader, so if GL is portrayed in the books like he is in this movie, then I stand corrected.
Fantine
Fantine - 6/19/2011, 7:36 AM
I totally agree, there was moments in the movie, I really enjoyed, I was sitting in the theater at times going now that wasn't horrible. There were major problems however, the linking of scenes and editing as well as the script were all weak. And as for the performances Ryan Reynolds was the perfect Hal Jordan, and Blake Lively was not as bad as a expected her to be. I would give it 3 stars.
Hellsing
Hellsing - 6/19/2011, 7:37 AM
Thats exactly my point the thing makes this movie worse is the fact that it has POTENTIAL to be really good, but it gets [frick]ed over by some seriously messed up dialogue and the story which doesn't make sense especially sinestro's decision in the end. and If your gonna show up his family why not spend some time on fleshing them out that would have been more interesting then the crappy romance plot.

Honestly they should have spent most of the movie in Oa help flesh the world out so IF it does get a sequel you don't have to explain much because people would be invested in it.
Hellsing
Hellsing - 6/19/2011, 7:39 AM
There are some moments that feel like there from another movie entirely because there so bloody good but over all a massive dissapointment. and this just be happy because your favourite characters on screen(GL isn't my favourite character)screen philosophy is bullshit why should you be happy if it isn't any good
Dmon
Dmon - 6/19/2011, 7:45 AM
@Ror About some of the editing and the scene where his ring gave off a little beep as a sign of trouble and he shows up. Well I would say that this movie is made just like a comic book is written. Probably closer then any other CBM has attempted. That's the way they do it in the comics I guess it does not work so well for some in movies. Though in the comics you catch every detail better and there is inner monologue also the ring talks. But would that stuff work in a movie?
GUNSMITH
GUNSMITH - 6/19/2011, 7:46 AM
I WATCHED GREEN LANTERN...



I WATCHED GREEN LANTERN..IT DID HAVE A FEW PROBS BUT ALL IN ALL IT WAS ENTERTAINING..WILL IT HAVE A SEQUEL? YES..WILL IT HAVE THE SAME DIRECTOR? NO. WHY SINESTRO GOES YELLOW AFTER THE MOVIE WHEN HAL JORDAN PROVES WILL POWER CAN BEAT FEAR?..... HELL IF I KNOW!...



...BUT WHEN ALL IS SAID AND DONE THERE'S GONNA BE A BETTER SECOND ONE CAUSE NOW ALL THE GROUNDWORK HAS BEEN LAID DOWN. SO YEAH FEEL FREE TO TEAR IT DOWN JUST TO TEAR IT DOWN BUT YOU CAN'T PLEASE EVERYBODY..END OF THE FIRST LEAVES GREAT OPPORTUNITY FOR THE SECOND.

Coldblood6
Coldblood6 - 6/19/2011, 7:50 AM
Please folks DO NOT go and see this to 'judge for yourself'.

Let this cinematic diarrhoea die at the boxoffice and get flushed down the toilet like it deserves.

Financially supporting this movie will only be a waste of your hard earned money and encourage WB to make more insulting filth.
Superman75
Superman75 - 6/19/2011, 7:50 AM
It was pretty good. 7/10 for me. I dont understand why its getting so much hate. I think some just want this film to fail.
LibertySeaOtter
LibertySeaOtter - 6/19/2011, 7:50 AM
This is my favorite review yet. It speaks to me unlike anyone on this website.

http://comics.ign.com/articles/117/1177116p1.html
Superman75
Superman75 - 6/19/2011, 7:53 AM
Coldblood6- If a sequel happens it could be a lot better. This was just the first.
GUNSMITH
GUNSMITH - 6/19/2011, 7:56 AM
GOOD "ROR-VIEW" ROR
tracydavis001
tracydavis001 - 6/19/2011, 7:57 AM
The movie was ok , I enjoyed it and I don't think warners should depend on this to see if they will make more movies, my opium I would have went with the Flash first not GL
Coldblood6
Coldblood6 - 6/19/2011, 8:03 AM
You can 'see it for yourself' on burn-DVD or something.

We should not be financially supporting insulting crap that will encourage the studio to make more.

What guarantee do you have that the sequel will be better???
Superman75
Superman75 - 6/19/2011, 8:04 AM
If Martin doesnt return they could get a better director for green lantern sequel. It comes down to box office now.
Superman75
Superman75 - 6/19/2011, 8:07 AM
Coldblood6- New director, writer and Sinestro being the main villian in the sequel. It could be better.
Dmon
Dmon - 6/19/2011, 8:08 AM
@Ror Also if you were as fit as Reynolds, just got a suit that showed off your physique and you thought you were alone in front of a mirror you know you would do that too. I would. LOL
WordofCROD
WordofCROD - 6/19/2011, 8:10 AM
I iked this movie as much as First Class, Glad i didnt listen to the reviews because Green Lantern was alot of fun and everyone i went with loved it too.

Hopefully theres a sequel!!!
Ryguy88
Ryguy88 - 6/19/2011, 8:13 AM
Very good review Ror, that is basically what I was expecting from this movie. Sounds like they just were way of focus on what could have made this character into a good movie.....That and a solid story.

And, although I haven't seen it yet, I don't think Campbell is the biggest problem here, he is a pretty hit or miss director but when he has a good story to work with he comes through. I doubt he will be back though as he stated before the movie was even released that he didn't want to come back, never a good sign.

DCF that's a sample of only 250 people and averages out to be a mediocre "B."
JoshWilding
JoshWilding - 6/19/2011, 8:18 AM
Great review ROR! :) Looks like we agree on most things...just a shame they screwed things up so badly. There were some great moments and glimmers of hope scattered throughout but it could have been a much, much better movie. Wish I knew where it all went wrong, lol. Still, it's thankfully far from the worst CBM.
Moron
Moron - 6/19/2011, 8:28 AM
A Tredful, awful, abysmal movie
CapFan79
CapFan79 - 6/19/2011, 8:29 AM
@DCF

That's a BS fan rating. First they barely have like 200 votes and second that rating was already an A prior to the release so GL fanboys voted before seeing it.

The rotten tomato fan rating is down to 65% and there are 66,000 votes. It was 72% with 65000 so you can tell everything since it was 72% is negative.

I went to the drive in theater here in Phoenix last night (Kung Fu Panda 2 and Super 8 double feature) and there were more people there for Pirates 4 and my movie than GL. I couldn't hear anything but I did look over at the GL screen a lot and all I kept seeing was Reynolds and Lively talking. Fail.
cgrass5150
cgrass5150 - 6/19/2011, 8:32 AM
DCeeeya!!! Marvel rules...nuff' said!
SHO1138
SHO1138 - 6/19/2011, 8:34 AM
I think it was the worst idea ever to hire Martin Campbell a director who hates CGI to do this movie.
1 2 3
View Recorder