28 YEARS LATER: THE BONE TEMPLE Trailer Teases A Bizarre New Twist On The Zombie Franchise

28 YEARS LATER: THE BONE TEMPLE Trailer Teases A Bizarre New Twist On The Zombie Franchise

A new trailer for 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple has been unleashed, and the stage is set for a bonkers sequel that promises to take a deep dive into the minds of those infected with the Rage Virus...

By JoshWilding - Dec 03, 2025 07:12 AM EST
Filed Under: Horror
Source: FearHQ.com

Expanding upon the world created by Danny Boyle and Alex Garland in 28 Years Later—but turning that world on its head—Nia DaCosta directs 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple.

Sony Pictures has released a new trailer and poster for the movie (via FearHQ.com), and it teases the continued evolution of the horror franchise that began with 2002's 28 Days Later. It seems Dr. Kelson believes he can control or restore the infected, starting with the Alpha, Samson (something tells us that won't end well for him).

Spike, meanwhile, finds himself forced to contend with being taken under Jimmy's wing and being given the "Jimmy" moniker himself. In the world of 28 Years Later, Jimmy and his gang have based themselves on the iconic British television star, Jimmy Savile, who was exposed as a sex abuser and paedophile following his 2011 death.

DaCosta, best known to many of you for helming The Marvels, is no stranger to horror after helming Candyman, and her follow-up to 28 Years Later looks suitably twisted and gory.

Boyle has repeatedly confirmed that 28 Days Later star Cillian Murphy will make a cameo appearance in this sequel, likely to drum up further interest in where this story is going.

"In a continuation of the epic story, Dr. Kelson (Ralph Fiennes) finds himself in a shocking new relationship," reads the synopsis, "with consequences that could change the world as they know it."

"Spike's (Alfie Williams) encounter with Jimmy Crystal (Jack O'Connell) becomes a nightmare he can't escape," it continues. "In the world of The Bone Temple, the infected are no longer the greatest threat to survival - the inhumanity of the survivors can be stranger and more terrifying."

Directed by Nia DaCosta and written by Alex Garland, 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple is produced by Andrew Macdonald, Peter Rice, Bernard Bellew, Danny Boyle, and Alex Garland. Cillian Murphy serves as executive producer. 

The movie stars Ralph Fiennes, Jack O'Connell, Alfie Williams, Erin Kellyman, and Chi Lewis-Parry. It arrives in theaters on January 16, 2026, and Boyle has confirmed that he plans to helm a third instalment starring Murphy, provided Sony gives it a green light.

That's very much up in the air right now, as 28 Years Later only grossed $151.3 million worldwide on a $60 million budget. Boyle himself has said that a third movie won't happen unless the DaCosta's sequel is a hit, meaning this planned trilogy could end up being a duology.

Check out the new trailer and posters for 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple below. 

image host
image host
About The Author:
JoshWilding
Member Since 3/13/2009
Comic Book Reader. Film Lover. WWE and F1 Fan. Rotten Tomatoes-approved critic and ComicBookMovie.com's #1 contributor.
It: Welcome To Derry Season 2 Timeline Revealed; First Season 3 Story Details Tease Key Book Scene
Related:

It: Welcome To Derry Season 2 Timeline Revealed; First Season 3 Story Details Tease Key Book Scene

Scary Movie Takes Aim At Lionsgate's Michael With New Teaser: Touching Fans Everywhere June 5
Recommended For You:

Scary Movie Takes Aim At Lionsgate's Michael With New Teaser: "Touching Fans Everywhere June 5"

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

Malatrova15
Malatrova15 - 12/3/2025, 7:07 AM
A giant Big dick Indian hunting brits ITS like pottery
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 12/3/2025, 7:32 AM
It's horror so kinda fair in some ways (esp when considering the year the UK went to hell in universe with them) but the whole Jimmy Savile stuff has completely put me off watching any of these new films in a franchise I loved previously with the first two films.
lazlodaytona
lazlodaytona - 12/3/2025, 8:16 AM
@Apophis71 - the actual film itself put me off of these next 2. What a big pile of sh1t. Oh, and the Jimmy stuff is puke on top of the sh1tcake.
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 12/3/2025, 8:49 AM
@lazlodaytona - Well dunno how good or bad it was having not seen it but that view is common enough that it doesn't help make me consider watching any of the new films and happy to stick to re-watches of the first two :D
lazlodaytona
lazlodaytona - 12/3/2025, 8:58 AM
@Apophis71 - that a very wise call.
Look at my post below about my thoughts on the first two and my real thoughts on how I feel about Years Later.
JobinJ
JobinJ - 12/3/2025, 7:43 AM
Meh. Looks dumb.
SonOfAGif
SonOfAGif - 12/3/2025, 8:07 AM
28 Years Later was awful.
lazlodaytona
lazlodaytona - 12/3/2025, 8:18 AM
@SonOfAGif - absolutely time a thousand
PapaSpank54
PapaSpank54 - 12/3/2025, 9:46 AM
@SonOfAGif - I'd have been happier with it if it weren't for the decision to shoot on iPhone. The cinematography was so [frick]in grating.
lazlodaytona
lazlodaytona - 12/3/2025, 8:31 AM
What the actual f*** was 28 yrs later?!
The first one was just epic in scale. Freaking frightening, a consistent feeling of dread, the freaking score was incredible, and was a huge, Matrix-like influence on the infected/zombie genre. The sequel, while obviously not as good as the first, was still a more than solid follow up. And the opening scene in that one might very well be the best scene in the whole 28-mythology.

Years Later? Was everyone involved with that film suicidal and on crack?! I mean, a giant spit-in-the-face to the first two. Geez-us what a disaster. No music from the previous score, no sense of dread, the infected felt neutered ... and wtf was the story?

Won't even bother with the next two. If there's a preview during the next movie I see in the theater, I'm going to dunk my head in my Superman popcorn bucket (because I bring it with me everywhere) and hold my breath during that 2+ minutes. If I die from doing so? Then I went out not watching a low note.
Huskers
Huskers - 12/3/2025, 9:28 AM
@lazlodaytona - Would love to see your Superman popcorn bucket! (Big fan of the character!) I was disappointed in my Krypto bucket because of how small it turned out to be. Not really useful for actual popcorn. It’s so small I keep it on my counter and put my keys and wallet in it when I’m home. So love to see what you’re taking to theaters!
HashTagSwagg
HashTagSwagg - 12/3/2025, 8:55 AM
The infected in the last film weren't scary like the original 2 films but Boyle at least knew how to film them.
User Comment Image

This looks very been there done that, like the later seasons of the walking dead.
User Comment Image

Nothing stands out about this film, other than it now meeting the diversity quotas and the directing having a weak stomach for swinging d1ck







lazlodaytona
lazlodaytona - 12/3/2025, 9:03 AM
@HashTagSwagg - the walking dead's very first scene with Rick waking up in the hospital was literally stolen from C. Murphy's first scene in 28 Days Later. Except we didn't see Rick's pee-pee in his scene.
WalletsClosed
WalletsClosed - 12/3/2025, 2:44 PM
@lazlodaytona - No it wasn't stolen. Kirkman already confirmed this. It was written before that
lazlodaytona
lazlodaytona - 12/5/2025, 11:01 AM
@WalletsClosed - um, 28 Days came out in the Summer of '03. In the states.

It had to of been written no later than 2000/2001.
Not sure Walking Dead was even an idea at that point.
WalletsClosed
WalletsClosed - 12/5/2025, 11:40 AM
@lazlodaytona - Kirkman himself - "RK: I don’t have a leg to stand on because 28 Days Later came out in Great Britain so long before it came out here, but this whole book was planned to start in April or March of 2003 instead of October. When we pitched Image [the idea] and they accepted it, we were ready to go, and all the stuff was planned out and the opening was already written. We had already started production on The Walking Dead to a certain degree, and it would’ve debuted in March; but when we pitched it, Image publisher Jim Valentino said they were putting together a horror line for October and they wanted us to be a part of that. They wanted to hold off on the release until October. 28 Days Later came out in June, so . . . yeah, I hadn’t even seen it. I swear! The similarities – you know, Rick wakes up in a bed, he’s in a hospital – that’s pretty much it. I don’t claim that it’s the most original idea in the world, so I don’t really care. It was just something I could start the story off with the main character being as clueless as the reader so he can learn about things at the same time the reader does and there wouldn’t be any gaps I would have to go back and fill in."
lazlodaytona
lazlodaytona - 12/5/2025, 12:20 PM
@WalletsClosed - well....
User Comment Image
TheLobster
TheLobster - 12/3/2025, 9:36 AM
I dug 28 years later so I’m excited for this ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Shivermetimbers
Shivermetimbers - 12/3/2025, 11:02 AM
@TheLobster - I MOSTLY liked it as well with a few exceptions, so I too am looking forward to this.

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder