Kevin Feige On Casting "Amazing" Tom Holland As SPIDER-MAN, Deciding On The Villain And More

Kevin Feige On Casting "Amazing" Tom Holland As SPIDER-MAN, Deciding On The Villain And More

The head of Marvel Studios now talks about how he and Sony are deciding which villain Spider-Man will take on in the new standalone movie, and he also praises the reboot's new star, Tom Holland.

By DCMarvelFreshman - Jun 30, 2015 08:06 AM EST
Filed Under: Spider-Man
Source: Los Angeles Times, Io9, Fandango


It's been all but official that Spider-Man will be making his Marvel Cinematic Universe debut in Captain America: Civil War next year, but the L.A Times recently asked Kevin Feige whether or not he could tease the Webslinger's role in the superhero-packed movie. "No," he replied before adding that, "Everyone takes for granted that he's in it, but I don't want people to have false expectations." The Marvel Studios president then discussed how the new Spider-Man incarnation will be different from the previous. "Well, you see the casting right away," he said, referring to the recently announced English actor Tom Holland. "He's younger by I think five or six or seven or eight years than either Tobey [Maguire] or Andrew [Garfield] when they were cast and that's very intentional. You look at the early comic books of Spider-Man and what was so great about what Stan Lee and Steve Ditko did was they said what if one of the most powerful heroes we have is a high school kid who also has to do homework and isn't a billionaire, or isn't a genius scientist, or isn't a trained assassin, or isn't another scientist who had an accident but is a kid?"

Kevin Feige added that Spider-Man's relationship with other superheroes of the broader Marvel Universe is also what makes this new interpretation different from the previous. "To go back to those Stan Lee, Steve Ditko origin tales of having him be younger and that dichotomy with dealing with the rest, and also in Brian Michael Bendis' Ultimate Spider-Man," he explained. "That the younger he was, the more truer he was to the original Spider-Man comic book stories and also the more unique and different he would be in comparison to the other Marvel heroes."

In a separate interview with Fandango, the Marvel Studios producer elaborated on his and Sony's collaborative decision in casting Tom Holland as Peter Parker. "It was a universal decision," said Feige. "We do a lot of tests and a lot of meetings so we can really try to find someone who becomes a unanimous choice. And in this case, it was Tom. He's just amazing! And he can do his own flips, which is just an added bonus. We didn’t cast him for that reason. We cast him because he’s an amazing actor and he’s going to have all of those flavors Peter Parker needs to have." It was previously said by Kevin Feige that the new standalone Spider-Man movie will feature a villain that has never graced the big-screen before, but the producer was asked in another interview (via Io9) about the status of who or what villain that will be. "He’s got an amazing Rogue’s Gallery and bench and we’re honing in on who will get the call to be in that standalone movie," he replied. 
SPIDER-MAN 4 Is Reportedly Being Described By Insiders As The Wall-Crawler's Biggest Movie Yet
Related:

SPIDER-MAN 4 Is Reportedly Being Described By Insiders As The Wall-Crawler's "Biggest" Movie Yet

SPIDER-MAN 4: Does A Sony Pictures Japan Press Release Confirm Plans For Tom Hardy's VENOM To Appear?
Recommended For You:

SPIDER-MAN 4: Does A Sony Pictures Japan Press Release Confirm Plans For Tom Hardy's VENOM To Appear?

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
Wannabe
Wannabe - 6/29/2015, 4:49 PM
"Amazing"

Garfield's return confirmed.
Reasonnnn
Reasonnnn - 6/29/2015, 4:50 PM
Lol at the Sony/Marvel "riff".

Sneider dropped that tidbit as a rumor on Meet the Movie Press and everyone lost their minds.
SauronsBANE
SauronsBANE - 6/29/2015, 4:50 PM
"Amazing"

Garfield's return confirmed.

Wannabe
Wannabe - 6/29/2015, 4:51 PM
@SauronsBANE

Jollem's gonna freak.
SauronsBANE
SauronsBANE - 6/29/2015, 4:53 PM
@Wannabe That poor kid, we shouldn't be giving false hope! He's suffered enough.
LEVITIKUZ
LEVITIKUZ - 6/29/2015, 4:56 PM
I can't wait for The Rise Of The Dawn Of The Age Of The Return Of The Not Amazing But The Marvelous Avenging Spider-Man

That's what the new Spider-Man movie should be called.
LEVITIKUZ
LEVITIKUZ - 6/29/2015, 4:59 PM
@DrDoom

But why would they called it Hellboy 3 when Hellboy 3 may have been confirmed......

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/hellboy/hellboy_3/news/?a=122238
Wannabe
Wannabe - 6/29/2015, 5:00 PM
Hellboy should join the Avengers as their janitor.
MonsterSquad35
MonsterSquad35 - 6/30/2015, 8:02 AM
ClumsyToaster
ClumsyToaster - 6/30/2015, 8:10 AM
Pobably best not to use the word "Amazing" around you new Spider-Man.
SuperiorMrGod
SuperiorMrGod - 6/30/2015, 8:12 AM
@Doom

LMAO!!
batz11
batz11 - 6/30/2015, 8:12 AM
Not so fast Levi, sorry...

ClumsyToaster
ClumsyToaster - 6/30/2015, 8:13 AM
@Wannabe
I get that that was a joke but I hope you don't A: Think the Hellboy movies are bad and B: Think that Hellboy is a Marvel character.
MercwithMouth
MercwithMouth - 6/30/2015, 8:18 AM
I have nothing against Tom Holland. I hear he's a good actor. His look suits the character. I trust Marvel as well as Sony. I would have preferred an older, maybe post-college Spider-Man, but I'm not upset about the age. Holland has his work cut out to put in a performance like Garfield did, but the rest of the movie is likely in better hands with Feige's team and Sony collaborating.
Nickk
Nickk - 6/30/2015, 8:20 AM
MercwithMouth
MercwithMouth - 6/30/2015, 8:21 AM
@TheCommander

He doesn't have the mole anymore. It's been removed.
Nickk
Nickk - 6/30/2015, 8:22 AM
slickrickdesigns
slickrickdesigns - 6/30/2015, 8:22 AM
I can't wait for Ironman 4…

LEVITIKUZ
LEVITIKUZ - 6/30/2015, 8:24 AM
@batz11

SuperiorMrGod
SuperiorMrGod - 6/30/2015, 8:28 AM
@AlexanderLykins

No he got it removed look at some of the pic above your comment.
Invictor
Invictor - 6/30/2015, 8:28 AM
Damn, Feige's been talking up a storm about these movies; is Marvel sure they didn't want a panel or anything like that?
PantherKing
PantherKing - 6/30/2015, 8:29 AM
@Nickk who are those beauties?
Invictor
Invictor - 6/30/2015, 8:31 AM
But, who gives a shit, Feige is the man.
batz11
batz11 - 6/30/2015, 8:32 AM
lmao

marvelstudios
marvelstudios - 6/30/2015, 8:34 AM
I've got faith in Marvel's casting decisions. It's pretty cool that Tom Holland will probably take over RDJs position as the face of the MCU within the next decade.
McGee
McGee - 6/30/2015, 8:36 AM
That boy got sum amazingly purrdy lips on his mouth hole face.

McGee
McGee - 6/30/2015, 8:38 AM
@Superior

But, who gives a shit, Feige is the man.


I'm glad someone else here agrees with me. I'm looking forward to the Ghostbusters reboot.
1 2
View Recorder