New Promo Still Featuring Andrew Garfield As THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN Released

First! Haha. Looks cool, though. Can't wait for the movie and the game. Though I hear that Andrew Garfield will not be reprising the role, but rather our hero will be voiced by Josh Keaton.

I just don't like him, even the way he moves in the costume bothers me. But I accept that this is a set of Spiderman movies for a new generation. They wanted that particular look to appeal to a particular crowd. And it'll probably be successful. Maybe I'll be wrong and it'll actually be good. Who knows?

I wishb garfield had just a tiny bit more muscle not too much where he looks buff but where he's the right ammount of skinny and lean. Honestly even though Tobey wasn't the best spidey my favorite part of the trilogy was in spidey 2 when he held that train and his muscle mass in his arm expanded so that he could slow the train down. I mean if garfield could do that as a skinny guy it would make all the more difference in this reboot and im sure as hell it would look bad ass.

He looks like a pancy faggot. Meh.

"Garfield if only you were 5 years younger, you could actually look like a teenager in the next films for a little while longer. You will be 30 when the sequel comes out. A 30 year old playing a 18-20 year old is not... just mehh"

That's one of my challenges with it currently is he does not look like a teenager. He should be 16 in this film and looks nothing like a high schooler. They are casting a bunch of mid-upper 20's high schoolers to make him look in place, so it will be a high school full of a bunch of "held-back" students. :-P

He will be 29 in August, so more around 31 when the sequel is released and after the next one it will be time to reboot again. Had they cast someone around 20, they could take this franchise into 6 films where we could see some of Spidey's cool villains come to fruition. Now we will get a small taste once again and have to start things over again before you can develop the whole rogue gallery, unless they just recast and continue forward...which they should have done this time around given casting an older person for the part.

Gay

" You should turn off your bigot switch."

Bigot switch? What does a not wearing a mask and casting an older actor have to do with bigotry?

And just because Hollywood chooses to cast older people to play high schoolers doesn't make it right. You missed the point that it shortens the length of time that Garfield will be able to return in future films. He does not look near high school age to me, but to each their own.

There have been, at least, 3-4 scenes shown in the trailer where Parker is doing his Spidey thing and doesn't have his mask on. THAT is what the mask issue is. Of course, they want to promote the actor under the mask in photos. The combination of the suit and no mask does make his neck even longer than it is, so not sure how well that is making their star look.

@Durf6199

You're fooling yourself if you don't think that Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone aren't bigger draws to sell tickets than anyone from that film. You are talking about two of the most talented and hot actors out there, sir. Look how much of a draw Bale or Brady are with their other films.

The Amazing Spider-Man will be a huge blockbuster, you like it or not. All this has to have is good reviews and WOM, and regardless of your poor attempts to dismiss this, it's Spider-Man, and just like The Avengers before him, he can take these coward attacks and come out swinging.

@ Durf6199
You're just a nit picky whinner.
You're one of those type of people who looks to criticize anything, because it's never good enough for you. If Peter looked nerdier, you'd probably say "Oh, nice job Hollywood, you've turned Peter into a stereotypical nerd".
Peter is NOT an ugly guy. Do you not remember every time Mary Jane or Gwen would call him handsome? They didn't call him that just because he jerked it a lot. Seriously, the hate this movie is getting so repetitive. Just admit it, you're angry that it's a reboot. That's why so many people complain about it. Because it's a reboot. That's why they always look for flaws. You know what kind of flaws Sam Raimi's movies had? In the first movie Robbie Robinson mentioned Eddie Brock in the first scene at the Daily Bugle, even though Eddie didn't even show up 'til the 3rd movie. Watch it he says "Eddie's been on it for weeks! We can barley get a glimpse of him!". It may seem minimal, but thats only when you dont think about it. That shows the lack of attention in the movie. I could criticize those movies all day. So stop trying to looking for anything to cpmplain about. Goomba Lizard, it's not funny or clever, it's just annoying, childish and cheap. Spidey's costume, you can still clearly tell it's Spider-Man, so what's the big deal? Bane looks a lot less like Bane than in the comics, yet no one seems to have a problem with that, because so many people are so biased towards TDKR. Andrew's hair, look at any comic picture of Peter Parker and he has a similar hairstyle, spiked up and a little messy. Adding stuff to the origin, did Nolan not change and add stuff to Batman's origin? So why can't Webb add stuff to it? Or is it just a double standard? Seriously, there's so much biasness here.

Backhanded remarks for people that keep coming back day after day to hate on this remembers me a lot what happened with The Avengers. Some people have their own agenda against this and are not realizing this movie is getting buzz and momentum fast as hell after The Avengers. This from the trailers alone looks better than anything that came before. The Amazing Spider-Man will rule the box office this July. And you wanna know why? People are clever enough to read into your crap. They don't care how much people complain about The Avengers and they sure as hell love Spider-Man. Your crusade against this will be worthless. Just like the one before that was worthless too. ;)

There's a certain crippled that isn't looking so sure box office wise as it looked before. Butthurt much? ;)

His head looks like a guitar pick. They should've toned down the fro a little bit. I don't mind the suit though, from what I've seen it looks absolutely amazing in certain shots.

@ Just1Superguy
Someone sounds defensive...

Andrew Garfield is the most inspired casting for a comic book character I've seen in a long time. He has shown nothing but LOVE and RESPECT for the Spider-Man mythos. He's not only a skillful actor with a shitload of awards and just nominated for a Tony, the Oscar when it comes to theaters. He is a Spider-Man FAN. He's a geek, like all of us, and most of all, he is a hardcore comic book fan, that's why when I see him playing Peter Parker or Spider-Man in the trailers it looks so real, that's why I'm so confident with this reboot.

There's respect and love behind this project, ladies and lads. And that's something that money can't buy.

And this is for anyone saying that his hair doesn't look perfect. This dude is the closest we could ever get to the perfect despiction of Peter Parker AND Spider-Man.

@AmazingHipsterMan lol. I'm glad you're a good sport. :)

@Durf I'm with you on the fact that I [frick]ing hate 3D but this one was going to be 3D from the get go, and you basically get to be Spiderman in some shots so I gotta do it.

@ Durf6199
I'm an idiot? You're the one who said it. You said you never made a comment about Andrew Garfield and his looks, when in fact you did. You said he was a pretty boy that appeals to the Twilight crowd, which means you think he looks like the guy from Twilight.
You're completely contradicting yourself and saying you didn't say what you did in fact say.
The comment is right there. You're implying that Andrew Garfield was hired because of his looks. Stop trying to act like I read it wrong. It was clearly stated. I am not a Webbite. I am a Spider-Man fan, I've never even seen 500 Days of Summer. It's so stupid that people complain about Andrew Garfield's looks when he LOOKS like Peter Parker from the comics.
Of course, I could post dozens of pictures of comic Peter Parker, and people would just come up with more excuses as to why Garfield shouldn't be playing him, or isn't the right guy to play him. If you're going to constantly complain about him, then who do YOU think would be better? Would you have rather it be Josh Hutcherson? Because he was considered for the part for awhile. At least Garfield is an acclaimed actor who won as BAFTA for acting and is nominated for a Tony for best actor, and was nominated for a Golden Globe for best supporting actor in The Social Network. I swear, this movie could have matched as close as possible to the comics, but then people would say things like the director wasn't very original, or he should have done something etc.