The Spider-Man Reboot

The Spider-Man Reboot

Yes, the controversial topic sticks it's head up again!

Editorial Opinion
By The4thWall - Sep 12, 2010 06:09 PM EST
Filed Under: Spider-Man

Everybody's favorite topic returns! Now, I go through this site and I look at all the different editorials of people saying "[frick] THE REBOOT!!" and "Give it a chance!!" and so on and so forth. Well, I've decided to make my own editorial as an answer to all of you boys and girls. Let's start at the begining, shall we?



Spider-Man 3 is released to mixed reviews from critics, but box office success. When I saw it, I think the reason I enjoyed it so much was because I was with the BEST crowd for a moive. We cheered when Peter punched Mary Jane. As time went on and the hype died a bit, I realised "Wow, that movie actually sucked". It dissapointed me a little, since I was a huge fan of Spidey 1 and 2. I actually grew up on those movies and became a Spider-Man fan from those films. It was only after Spider-Man 2 that I started to look at the actual comics.



So, after the box office success of Spider-Man 3, a sequel was (as one critic put it) "as inevitable as death and taxes." Well, he was right and Spider-Man 4 was announced with the whole gang returning. Fans who were dissapointed by 3 thought that this was Raimi's time to redeem himself after he gave in to the studio heads. You see, Raimi didn't want Venom in the movie. As far as I'm concerned, he didn't even want a New Goblin. Raimi always invisioned Spider-Man 3 with Sandman and Vulture. But he had to put in New Goblin because the audience was expecting him and the studio wanted Venom. So, he did what anyone would do at that point: appeal to both parties. And that's when Spider-Man 3's ship hit the iceberg.



So, production begins on Spider-Man 4. Raimi is told that the audience wants Lizard, and he is intrigued, but doesn't want to give in again and decides to do what he wants. Thus, Vulture is added into the film. Then, along the line, things got pretty hectic with Felicia Hardy becoming the Vultress (WTF?!) and Spider-Man having a kid while Mary Jane just "went away". Now, ask yourself this, haters, did you really want that? The production becomes more and more troubled until the bomb drops and Raimi leaves the project along with Maquire. So, Sony decides to cancel the film, but at the same time decide to reboot the series. Yes, they could have waited, but it seems like they were thinking about this for a while, since the script for Spider-Man 5 is the one being used for the reboot.



So, with all the trouble about Spider-Man 4, Sony decides that the reboot will be a much "smaller" blockbuster film. So that means that the film will have a $70 million budget and have a cast of relative unknowns. In order to keep costs down, they hire Marc Webb, fresh off the success of (500) Days of Summer, to direct the film. Now, here is a little pet peeve of mine. Most of the haters of this film (LEEE in particular) hate the fact that Webb is a fan of the Ultimate universe...SO WHAT?!! Just because he is a fan of the Ulitmate universe doesn't mean the movie is gonna be in the Ultimate universe. And I think he only said that he was a fan in one interview. So now everyone assumes that he is Ultimate universe's biggest fan and the reboot will be shit. And I know what you are thinking: "It's gonna be based off Ultimate because Brian Michael Bendis made all those tweets about meetings with Sony". Now, I may be wrong, but weren't those found out to be false? I can't really remember but I think they were. And also, the script was written BEFORE Webb was hired. Just think about that.



Then, we were introduced to our new Spider-Man: Andrew Garfield. That is really when the reboot started to get more supporters. People saw that Sony was actually trying to get someone talented to replace Tobey. I mean, come on, you can't see Peter Parker in that picture?! But, alas, the haters continued with "He looks just like Robert Pattinson!!" and " No one can replace Tobey!!"



And now, we have rumors that Teresa Palmer will be playing Gwen Stacy. Yet there are still haters. Really, were you glad by the Gwen Stacy we saw in Spider-Man 3 (No offense towards Bryce Dallas Howard, it was not her fault)? What will it take for you guys to be happy?



BTW, thanks to EditNija for the above picture. Where was I? Oh, yes. Whether you like it or not, the reboot is happening. Why don't you try to remain positive instead of crying like a little baby. You guys keep saying that it will fail because it is not the original crew or because it will be more about his feelings or that it's going up against Star Trek 2 (yeah, I'm looking at you, claybo4131). First off, people will go to see it even it isn't the original crew (remember Incredible Hulk?). Second, the best Spider-Man stories are about his conflicts and all the pain he goes through. So, you would rather a big, dumb action movie with no heart? And, just because it's going up against Star Trek 2 doesn't really mean anything. Sony can change the release date if they really think it will be a problem.



Before I end this article, I need to address one of the biggest problems haters have with this movie:It's being shot in 3D. Many of the haters (LEEE, once again, in particular) think that the only CBM to benefit from 3D is Green Lantern. You mean to tell me that you wouldn't find swinging through New York in 3D at least remotely cool? And, another thing, you don't have to see it in 3D. Just putting that out there.

Well, that's all I have to say. I will admit that the reboot sucked if it does and I will apologize. But for now, try to think positive and don't be ready to hate it with every little bit of news that comes out with it.

Tell me what you think in the comments below. ;)

RUMOR: Sony Pictures Has Paused All Its SPIDER-MAN Spin-offs - Including One Revolving Around Knull
Related:

RUMOR: Sony Pictures Has Paused All Its SPIDER-MAN Spin-offs - Including One Revolving Around Knull

THE ODYSSEY: HD Version Of Leaked Teaser Now Online Along With New Theatrical Poster
Recommended For You:

THE ODYSSEY: HD Version Of Leaked Teaser Now Online Along With New Theatrical Poster

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

sweetre15
sweetre15 - 9/12/2010, 6:56 PM
I completely agree but the reported budget is actually said to be in the 80 mil budget RANGE. Which doesn't mean that it's going to be only 80 mil exactly.

http://heatvision.hollywoodreporter.com/2010/01/marc-webb-to-direct-spiderman.html

They never said that it would focus on his "feelings" necessarily but It was said to be about him coming to grips with his powers and dealing with contemporary problems of today. It's also going to focus on the fact that his uncle Ben died and he had the power to stop it.

http://hollywoodinsider.ew.com/2010/01/11/spider-man-reboot/

Which just means that it's about his life as a teen,him getting himself into trouble and accepting the consequences of his own actions.

Which sounds like a similar premise to Ultimate Spider-Man vol.1,if you ask me. Anyway,will it be a play by play of USM? Hell No

Will it to pay homage to multiple incarnations and canons ala Spectacular Spider-Man? From the sounds of it, I'd say yes.

The Bendis tweets weren't fake at all but Bendis DID deny accusations such as rumors that he would write the reboot and rumors that he said the reboot would follow Volume 1 of USM verbatim
Unreal2k9
Unreal2k9 - 9/12/2010, 7:48 PM
Well said, very well said
Denn1s
Denn1s - 9/13/2010, 12:42 AM
it is not the whole script from 5 that is used. it is some bits of it because it is the same scriptwriter. and i liked 3. flawed but good. still not sure for the reboot. i would be happy if they rebooted it incredible hulk-style. no origin. but not gonna happen
The4thWall
The4thWall - 9/13/2010, 2:39 PM
@Denn1s How do you know that they're gonna do another origin stroy? I heard that they are starting in college since Garfield is almost 30
sweetre15
sweetre15 - 9/13/2010, 3:55 PM
@The4thwall: That was a rumor from Hitfix but according to The Hollywood Reporter it's still grounded in high school. at least that's what they said when they revealed the contenders for the main love interest.(who is most likely Gwen Stacy)
The4thWall
The4thWall - 9/13/2010, 6:13 PM
@Sweetre15 Well, it would seem weird to see a guy that's almost 30 to be in high school
sweetre15
sweetre15 - 9/13/2010, 6:26 PM
@The4thWall: Tobey was about the same age when he played in Spider-Man 1 plus Garfield can look as young as a 17 yr old at most.

Just look at this recent pic, he easily can look like a teen judging from this(especially with a little bit of make up):

Image and video hosting by TinyPic
Apocalypse2001
Apocalypse2001 - 9/28/2010, 6:12 PM
This reboot schit is really testing my patience. Sony's childish behavior is really pissing me off. The only reason ANY reboot is happening is because the studios would rather have less quality and big money that good
quality and a little less earnings.
Raimi never wanted Spider-Man 3 to be the way it was, BUT THE STUDIO FORCED HIM TO WRITE IT ANOTHER WAY!!
Sony got greedy, and they [frick]ed up. So now because they are angry about Raimi supposedly 'not listening to them', they throw a tantrum, make a reboot, and are basically saying to Raimi, "this is what happens when you refuse to listen to us".
The same shit happened with Hulk. Ang Lee's Hulk was prefect! Every professional and amateur who bitched and complained about Ang Lee's film, now praise it endlessly for how it was written and presented after seeing the utter garbage that Letterier and Norton pulled with their version!
Letterier's Incredible Hulk disrespected the origin story of the Hulk, they rushed through it as if it wasn't important.

2) Norton made Bruce Banner like this goofy ass, horny, comedic scientist.
3) they completely changed Hulk's trigger by saying a high heart rate changes him (wtf happened to the emotions?! they just threw that out the window; another piece of evidence that shows that the studio - and Arad - think they know better than the creators.
4) The studio made the mistake (because they wanted to) of doing what Ang Lee did with Mission Impossible 2: one big, long, meaningless action sequence with the Abomination....

I know I'm talking about Hulk, but my point with all of these examples is, to point out, that Sony's behavior is following the same God damn patterns!!!
And besides, their childish behavior toward Raimi, as I mentioned above, disrespects AAAAL the work the cast and crew did with Raimi's films.
Bottom line: the reboots (of any films) are happening because the studios are acting out with tanrums like petulant children who want their way; and to hell with quality.
Apocalypse2001
Apocalypse2001 - 9/28/2010, 6:25 PM
This reboot schit is really testing my patience. Sony's childish behavior is really pissing me off. The only reason ANY reboot is happening is because the studios would rather have less quality and big money that good
quality and a little less earnings.
Raimi never wanted Spider-Man 3 to be the way it was, BUT THE STUDIO FORCED HIM TO WRITE IT ANOTHER WAY!!
Sony got greedy, and they [frick]ed up. So now because they are angry about Raimi supposedly 'not listening to them', they throw a tantrum, make a reboot, and are basically saying to Raimi, "this is what happens when you refuse to listen to us".
The same shit happened with Hulk. Ang Lee's Hulk was prefect! Every professional and amateur who bitched and complained about Ang Lee's film, now praise it endlessly for how it was written and presented after seeing the utter garbage that Letterier and Norton pulled with their version!
Letterier's Incredible Hulk disrespected the origin story of the Hulk, they rushed through it as if it wasn't important.

2) Norton made Bruce Banner like this goofy ass, horny, comedic scientist.
3) they completely changed Hulk's trigger by saying a high heart rate changes him (wtf happened to the emotions?! they just threw that out the window; another piece of evidence that shows that the studio - and Arad - think they know better than the creators.
4) The studio made the mistake (because they wanted to) of doing what Ang Lee did with Mission Impossible 2: one big, long, meaningless action sequence with the Abomination....

I know I'm talking about Hulk, but my point with all of these examples is, to point out, that Sony's behavior is following the same God damn patterns!!!
And besides, their childish behavior toward Raimi, as I mentioned above, disrespects AAAAL the work the cast and crew did with Raimi's films.
Bottom line: the reboots (of any films) are happening because the studios are acting out with tanrums like petulant children who want their way; and to hell with quality.
View Recorder