RUSH HOUR 4 Reportedly Considered A “Terrible Idea,” As Massive $100 Million Budget Is Revealed

RUSH HOUR 4 Reportedly Considered A “Terrible Idea,” As Massive $100 Million Budget Is Revealed

A new report detailing the behind-the-scenes of Rush Hour 4 has come out, claiming that the film is seen as a bad move by many in the industry.

By DanielKlissmman - Dec 03, 2025 07:12 PM EST
Filed Under: Action
Source: Puck (via ActioNewz.com)

The entertainment industry was taken by surprise last month when it was revealed that Rush Hour 4, the long-in-development chapter in the action-comedy series, was officially moving forward. This occurred following a report claiming that Donald Trump had asked Larry Ellison, the father of Paramount Skydance CEO David Ellison, to revive the property with another installment. 

X-Men: The Last Stand helmer Brett Ratner is set to return behind the director's chair, after helming all three previous installments. Chris Tucker and Jackie Chan, on the other hand, are expected to reprise their roles as James Carter and Yan Naing Lee, respectively. Now, new information has come out regarding the project, which appears to not be perceived as a good move for some. In a new report detailing the behind-the-scenes of the upcoming feature, Puck stated that many Hollywood figures see Rush Hour 4 as a "terrible idea." 

The outlet further said that Paramount attached itself only as a distributor to avoid criticism regarding its involvement in the project. While Brett Ratner is said to have long hoped for Rush Hour 4 to be his next directorial effort, many studios reportedly passed on it—including Paramount. Per Puck, one of the executives who rejected the film when Ratner was shopping it around called it a "geriatric money play."

The movie is reportedly seen as a financial risk for those within the industry, particularly given its $100 million budget. According to Puck, the film will have a massive $100 million budget, which will be partially covered by Saudi Arabia. In the original announcement, Variety stated that Paramount would not handle the movie's marketing costs. Puck's Kim Masters revealed a text communication she had with the Tower Heist director, who informed her that, "The budget is over 100m."

Rush Hour was a relatively successful franchise. The first film made $244 million; Rush Hour 2 then made $347 million, while Rush Hour 3 brought in $256 million. However, it's been 18 years since the last installment in the series released. By the time Rush Hour 4 comes out, the project will likely be 20 years removed from its predecessor. As such, it's difficult to estimate whether the movie will find an audience once it releases. 

Puck also spoke to a studio executive who previously worked with Ratner. According to him, Rush Hour 4 could end up working, but still cautioned that the gap between installments makes things more complicated to assess: 

"There are certain franchises that are dead and gone and finished, but I think the passage of a significant amount of time between installments does change the calculus." Per the executive, the answer lies in whether or not, "there's reason to believe people still have fond feelings about characters. 'Does the global audience care?' is a different question."

Rush Hour 4 does not currently have a release date. 

About The Author:
DanielKlissmman
Member Since 8/28/2021
Daniel Klissmman is an entertainment journalist who's written for Movie Pilot, CBR.com, Cinemark and AMC Theatres. He loves superheroes with a passion and really wishes he'll one day get to hang out with Moon Knight.
Thunderbolts* & Avengers: Doomsday Star David Harbour Joins John Rambo Cast As Colonel Trautman
Related:

Thunderbolts* & Avengers: Doomsday Star David Harbour Joins John Rambo Cast As Colonel Trautman

Marvel Comics' Most Iconic Heroes Gear Up For A Summer Of Soccer On Fun New Variant Covers
Recommended For You:

Marvel Comics' Most Iconic Heroes Gear Up For A Summer Of Soccer On Fun New Variant Covers

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3 4 5
Irregular
Irregular - 12/3/2025, 7:28 PM
Not like "Sleeping in Chief" is going to be awake to watch it anyways. So I don't see a point.
thedrudo
thedrudo - 12/3/2025, 7:29 PM
These budgets are ridiculous
Irregular
Irregular - 12/3/2025, 7:38 PM
@thedrudo - Promise you both Chris Rock & Jackie Chan combined is over $35 million.
skyshark03191
skyshark03191 - 12/3/2025, 9:07 PM
@Irregular - you mean Tucker? He’s great but wouldn’t think he’d be worth that much these days.
newhire13
newhire13 - 12/4/2025, 1:56 AM
@skyshark03191 - He’s worth that much if they want to make the movie. They need him. His chemistry with Jackie is the whole selling point of the franchise.
Rokhorn
Rokhorn - 12/4/2025, 8:41 AM
@skyshark03191 - same, Tucker's a fine actor but his last movie was RH3. So not a name that draws in the ticket sales.
WalletsClosed
WalletsClosed - 12/3/2025, 7:33 PM
The budget shouldn't be anymore than 50 million

Reboot the MCU and DCU
TheVisionary26
TheVisionary26 - 12/3/2025, 8:41 PM
@WalletsClosed - If Trump says this needs to be $100m+ budget, who the [frick] are you to disagree? Wokey…
WalletsClosed
WalletsClosed - 12/3/2025, 9:19 PM
@TheVisionary26 - 100 million? Why not 1B???
MuadDib
MuadDib - 12/3/2025, 7:37 PM
It’s a mistake to make movies bc those in power are fond of certain franchises. Unless the story makes sense they should not be moving forward. Very few movies can come back 20 years later and still capture the audiences attention. Top Gun is a great example of the very rare types of movies that can. Plus they didn’t just push out a turd. If RH4 was passed on previously it was for a reason
99OPTIMISTPRIME
99OPTIMISTPRIME - 12/3/2025, 7:39 PM
Two semi-retired actors and nostalgia, does not require 100 mill.🤣
Irregular
Irregular - 12/3/2025, 7:41 PM
@99OPTIMISTPRIME - Bro Chris Rock literally made $25 million plus 40% of the box office for Rush Hour 3. YES. I promise you, this shit requires $100 million.
SurfinSuperman
SurfinSuperman - 12/3/2025, 8:20 PM
@Irregular - I question the accuracy of your info when you can't even get the right actor.
TheFinestSmack
TheFinestSmack - 12/3/2025, 8:24 PM
@Irregular - Chris Rock? "Do you understand the words that are coming outta your mouth?"
Irregular
Irregular - 12/3/2025, 8:27 PM
@SurfinSuperman - LMFAO That's my bad. Chris Tucker!

But here you go 😁😁
https://variety.com/1999/film/news/tucker-gets-a-real-rush-to-20-mil-1117760063/
https://variety.com/2006/film/news/so-what-s-the-rush-1200505941/

Question that accuracy, thanks 👍
Irregular
Irregular - 12/3/2025, 8:31 PM
@TheFinestSmack - User Comment Image
TheFinestSmack
TheFinestSmack - 12/3/2025, 8:43 PM
@Irregular - same energy 😂
?si=34h__PbIfvZS4gJz
Irregular
Irregular - 12/3/2025, 8:59 PM
@TheFinestSmack - LMFAO exactly what I thought about too. Been a long day I'll say that.
TheFinestSmack
TheFinestSmack - 12/3/2025, 9:12 PM
@Irregular - to be fair, I spent my whole childhood thinking Dennis Quaid and Patrick Swayze were the exact same person.
Irregular
Irregular - 12/3/2025, 9:42 PM
@TheFinestSmack - Man they do look like they could have past as brothers lol.
TheFinestSmack
TheFinestSmack - 12/3/2025, 10:14 PM
@Irregular - thank you for saying that!
LenSpiderman
LenSpiderman - 12/3/2025, 11:00 PM
@TheFinestSmack - but… they are the same person. Their name is Kurt Russell.
TheRevelation
TheRevelation - 12/4/2025, 1:52 AM
@99OPTIMISTPRIME - They already made one Lethal Weapon too many...guess the lesson was learned.
IAmAHoot
IAmAHoot - 12/4/2025, 4:29 AM
@Irregular - Rush Hour 3 also made about $90 million less than Rush Hour 2. It also wasn’t reviewed nearly as favorably as the previous two movies; and at best it would be released 20 years after Rush Hour 3. By the time filming could start, at earliest, they would be 72 and 55 respectively. Uphill battle written all over it; get a grip.
KennKathleen
KennKathleen - 12/4/2025, 5:15 AM
@TheFinestSmack - User Comment Image

User Comment Image

User Comment Image
TheFinestSmack
TheFinestSmack - 12/4/2025, 7:52 AM
@KennKathleen - I LOVE that Chris Rock gif!
Irregular
Irregular - 12/4/2025, 12:08 PM
@IAmAHoot - So you just prove my point? Um OK LMAO

So, NO to Rush Hour 4. I think the one who needs a grip here is you lol.
IAmAHoot
IAmAHoot - 12/4/2025, 12:24 PM
@Irregular - Was your original comment made in jest? Because on paper it can fall either way.
Irregular
Irregular - 12/4/2025, 12:46 PM
@IAmAHoot - While I have messed up the names on accident last night since it was a long day, the fact still remains that Tucker did get $25 million for RH3 which was a financial disappointment. Large investment, very little to no reward.

Mind you, I promise, both those actors are going to ask for a lot more with that $100 million dollar price tag. Eddie Murphy made $20 million for Axel F. Especially since the 3rd movie is what killed any chance for a fourth one....and they paid Eddie....$20 million. A guy with a string of BO disasters....and they paid him $20 million........
THEKENDOMAN
THEKENDOMAN - 12/3/2025, 7:42 PM
Oh [frick] right off with this bullshit.

“Rush Hour 4 is a terrible idea”? Are you lot [frick]ing serious? With half the garbage that’s been dumped into cinemas over the last few years, this is the one you’re calling a risk?

Rush Hour is a proven franchise. First film made $244M, second blew up with $347M, third still pulled $256M, and that’s without any of today’s global streaming leverage or viral marketing. Tucker and Chan still have global name power, and with the right [frick]ing script, a smart comedy director, and some modern punch, this could easily slap.

And don’t even start with the “geriatric money play” bollocks, the same people green lighting tired reboots and $200M blue-CGI-flop-fests are now acting like Rush Hour’s the problem? Nah mate, hypocrites.

And yeah, Trump might’ve whispered the idea to Ellison, who gives a [frick]? Good ideas can come from weird places. Doesn’t make the project invalid. If anything, it’s Hollywood being exposed again: quick to talk “inclusion” and “nostalgia,” but panicking the second a legacy franchise with Black and Asian leads dares to make a comeback.

Give us a good writer. Tight direction. Real chemistry. And Rush Hour 4 will [frick]ing explode. Don’t let the industry bullshit fool you, fans do still care about Carter and Lee.

For [frick]s Sake
TheFinestSmack
TheFinestSmack - 12/3/2025, 8:26 PM
@THEKENDOMAN - it's only a "terrible idea" because it was Trump's idea. If Trump said to fire Gunn from DC, most people here would suddenly support the DCU.
NicolausCopernicus
NicolausCopernicus - 12/3/2025, 8:37 PM
@THEKENDOMAN - the last one came out like 20 years ago

its a different world now, different marketplace

should be direct to streaming at best
Matador
Matador - 12/3/2025, 8:50 PM
@THEKENDOMAN - I think it's terrible idea not because of Trump or the age of the actors but because of Chris Tucker in Rush Hour 3. I saw that movie and he did not look like he even wanted to be there his expression looked like Ray Fisher forcing his booyah phrase. And then there's Brett Ratner horrible director the guy who destroyed X-Men.

User Comment Image

If they were to do a new Rush Hour 4 they should get new actors and soft reboot the franchise like the Fast franchise.
epc1122
epc1122 - 12/3/2025, 8:54 PM
@THEKENDOMAN - this reeks of coming to America 2 with Eddie Murphy who’s a far bigger star than Jackie Chan and Chris Tucker. Tucker is a nobody and does not draw anything. He’s the equivalent of sisqo who has one hit. Karate kid legends also came off of cobra Kai which was a hit and did absolutely nothing. This also reminds me of basic instinct 2, and Wall Street 2, where to me, rush hour 4 has flop written all over it. There’s really nothing going for it.
Irregular
Irregular - 12/3/2025, 8:56 PM
@TheFinestSmack - No. It's not even "Trump's idea." There's been talk of a fourth movie for awhile until Brett Ratner was exposed for being a piece of shit. I wouldn't put a dime in this picture because there is no money to be made.
TheFinestSmack
TheFinestSmack - 12/3/2025, 9:11 PM
@Irregular - it's been talked about for twenty years but had zero movement until the day after Trump mentioned it. Unless I'm understanding the chain if events wrong. But that's what it seemed like when the story broke. I think it COULD be successful if the budget was $40-50 mill. Not $100m.
WalletsClosed
WalletsClosed - 12/3/2025, 9:17 PM
@epc1122 - Right? Neither are box office draws anymore (especially Tucker) and all signs are pointing to this being a massive flop
epc1122
epc1122 - 12/3/2025, 9:21 PM
@WalletsClosed - agreed 😊😊😊
Irregular
Irregular - 12/3/2025, 9:37 PM
@TheFinestSmack - That's not true. Before COVID there was a lot of talk of Rush Hour 4. The producer even wanted to make it "grittier" instead of more epic in scope like the last two.

Honestly we don't know when Trump may have said this though. He probably said it montthhhhs ago probably at a dinner with the Ellison's. Probably right before Trump got paid by Paramount. I don't doubt the timing that Trump "wanted" it and suddenly there's an announcement with Paramount onboard and not New Line (another interesting factor here)

But $40-50 mill I guarantee is paying out both Jackie Chan & Chris Tucker. Doubt Brett is getting a big-pay and watch the locale not include tax credits either. If the way this Puck story is being framed...then all they have is a guaranteed package deal if someone bites....which I highly doubt because there's nothing lucrative like before. And no way they'll take a budget similar to the first film.
TheFinestSmack
TheFinestSmack - 12/3/2025, 10:18 PM
@Irregular - word. The news cycle was making it out like Trump said it last week and then BOOM, preproduction is underway. You're right that the timeline could be going back months or years ago. I wonder where this one would film? Each movie had a vastly different location IIRC. They'll find the place with the best tax breaks and just write a story around that lol
1 2 3 4 5

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder