RUMOR: James Gunn Wants To Fast-Track THE BATMAN 3 So He Can "Move On" To THE BRAVE AND THE BOLD

RUMOR: James Gunn Wants To Fast-Track THE BATMAN 3 So He Can "Move On" To THE BRAVE AND THE BOLD

According to a new rumour, James Gunn is eager to get Matt Reeves' The Batman 3 over and done with so he can move on to the DCU-set The Brave and the Bold as quickly as possible.

By JoshWilding - Feb 19, 2026 12:02 PM EST
Filed Under: The Batman 2

James Gunn is an experienced filmmaker, but a first-time studio head. There have been a few occasions when his inexperience has shown, and, for many fans, the DC Studios co-CEO's handling of Batman is a major problem. 

Over three years since the DCU slate announcement—at least half of which hasn't come to fruition—there's still no indication that Gunn is anywhere close to casting the Caped Crusader. Christina Hodson is said to be working on The Brave and the Bold's script, and The Flash director Andy Muschietti remains loosely attached. 

When Clayface arrives in theaters this Halloween, chances are a Batman cameo is off the table because the DCU still won't have its Bruce Wayne. All the while, Matt Reeves is forging ahead with The Batman Part II, his "Elseworlds" sequel to the 2022 hit.

Despite fan demand, it's been made clear on several occasions that Robert Pattinson's Batman will not be joining the DCU. 

According to insider Daniel Richtman (via The Direct), The Brave and the Bold is "not coming for years." Instead, "Gunn is pushing to get The Batman 3 out faster...he wants that trilogy over...he wants to move on. [He] doesn’t want two Batmans."

While it would admittedly be odd to have Pattinson's Batman in theaters at the same time as The Brave and the Bold's version, provided they're different enough, you'd think the two franchises could co-exist. Gunn wanting to avoid confusion makes sense, but trying to rush Reeves to get his threequel done seems ill-advised.

Plus, with The Batman Part II scheduled for a 2027 release, this could mean we won't see the DCU's Batman until the end of the decade. For that reason, we'd recommend taking this rumour with a pinch of salt. We're sure Gunn will chime in on social media to address this if he sees fit, too.

Back in January, Gunn said of The Brave and the Bold, "I’m dependent on when there’s an actionable script ready. Also, frankly, we’re well into Batman 2, and I wouldn’t want to cloud the Batsphere until after that." This new report seems to line up with his comments, to some extent. 

Directed by Matt Reeves from a script by him and Mattson Tomlin, The Batman: Part II stars Robert Pattinson (The Batman), Scarlett Johansson (Jurassic World Rebirth), Sebastian Stan (Avengers: Doomsday), Colin Farrell (The Penguin), Andy Serkis (The Lord of the Rings), and Jeffrey Wright (What If...?).

The Batman Part II is set to be released in theaters on October 1, 2027.

About The Author:
JoshWilding
Member Since 3/13/2009
Comic Book Reader. Film Lover. WWE and F1 Fan. Rotten Tomatoes-approved critic and ComicBookMovie.com's #1 contributor.
The Batman Part II Eyes Game Of Thrones Star Charles Dance To Play Two-Face's Father
Related:

The Batman Part II Eyes Game Of Thrones Star Charles Dance To Play Two-Face's Father

The Batman - Part II: Scarlett Johansson's Deal May Not Be Finalized Yet; Will Robin Appear?
Recommended For You:

The Batman - Part II: Scarlett Johansson's Deal May Not Be Finalized Yet; Will Robin Appear?

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3 4
Vigor
Vigor - 2/19/2026, 12:13 PM
Its been a thorn in his side. You can tell
Rexotron
Rexotron - 2/19/2026, 12:13 PM
Well I'm calling bullshit on that one given many things that have been indicated and said in the past. But Daniel Richtman said something so CBM has a gosh darn obligation to write about it!
EscapeMySight
EscapeMySight - 2/19/2026, 12:47 PM
@Rexotron - Agreed. Having two Batmen makes no difference and its part of what Gunn has said he wants to do with having an Elseworlds brand alongside the DCU continuity.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 2/19/2026, 2:32 PM
@EscapeMySight - Having too many Batmen, Jokers, etc actually seems to have made a big difference in DC's recent cinematic history.
LenSpiderman
LenSpiderman - 2/19/2026, 3:10 PM
@EscapeMySight - I don’t know if it’s a problem for audiences keeping them straight or wanting to see either film. But I do think it will give people major creative rock bottom vibes from Hollywood. Like, I understand the circumstances that would lead to two Batman movies in the same year, but I also want these studios to greenlight some new stuff.
InfinitePunches
InfinitePunches - 2/19/2026, 12:16 PM
Me personally, I "moved on" from Brave and the Bold when they announced the writer.
Would love to see Matt Reeves take on World's Finest, though.
ProfessorWhy
ProfessorWhy - 2/19/2026, 12:18 PM
Who needs Batman when you have 1000 characters at your disposal? Just fill that Batman sized hole with Gleek or Apache Chief, no problem.
All hail Gunn, thank you Gunn, etc
JackDeth
JackDeth - 2/19/2026, 12:42 PM
@ProfessorWhy - "The GUNN never misses !!"
UnderBelly
UnderBelly - 2/19/2026, 12:21 PM
just put Batman on HBOMax as a series. Let the elseworld movies play out until then.

this should allow him the space to expand the DCU with those Gotham centric character. I doubt there'll be a Penguin season 2, so why not. Batman doesn't even need to be the central character, let it be about the Robins and Batgirl(s) with him as a mentor (more so than the episode and 1/2 we got in titans though...please.

There's more than enough charaters he can use (aside from the core 3 or 4) that he can use without conflict the Pattinson movies.
spr0cks
spr0cks - 2/19/2026, 12:34 PM
@UnderBelly -

RE : >>>"this should allow him the space to expand the DCU with those Gotham centric character. I doubt there'll be a Penguin season 2, so why not. Batman doesn't even need to be the central character, let it be about the Robins and Batgirl(s) with him as a mentor (more so than the episode and 1/2 we got in titans though...please."


This sounds like that time Sony decided to build out a Spider-verse/Spider-Man centric universe with side characters from the Spider-man rogues gallery and world.......BUT......without Spider-Man himself in any of them (either Parker or Morales).

It worked out great.
A total treat.

/s
UnderBelly
UnderBelly - 2/19/2026, 12:39 PM
@spr0cks - That's because at the time SONY started all that ish, Spider-Man was on loan to the MCU with Civil War and they had a 4 or 5 picture deal so they couldn't use his character (or something like that). and then it got renewed etc.

DCU/WB owns all of it's character's ( atleast that's what i'm aware of) and if there was any issue then Gunn wouldn't have announce a seperate Batman or Robin project when he did.

It's quite a different scenario.

UnderBelly
UnderBelly - 2/19/2026, 12:43 PM
@spr0cks - Also, they did this in theatres, not on a streamer. The episodic format and marketing will make it a very different beast.
InfinitePunches
InfinitePunches - 2/19/2026, 12:45 PM
@UnderBelly - It's crazy to think that the only live action Batman show is Adam West's version. They'll do "almost Batman" shows like Gotham, Birds of Prey, Titans, Pennyworth, Batwoman, Gotham Knights, and Arrow. Never really understood why Superman gets shows but Batman doesn't.
McMurdo
McMurdo - 2/19/2026, 1:06 PM
@UnderBelly - you cant have the Bat family without the Bat, bud.
epc1122
epc1122 - 2/19/2026, 1:08 PM
@InfinitePunches - I think the movies make more money, at least it used to and they generally don’t want more than one version out at a time. Years ago you had the Nolan trilogy which was popular and you didn’t want to step on any toes and then you had Snyder’s Batman and now Reeves. I guess the they think the general audience will get confused. But at the same time, Gunn has said that they would do an elseworld branch of dc studios. Guess not with the Batman property.
UnderBelly
UnderBelly - 2/19/2026, 1:17 PM
@McMurdo - I never said he shouldn't be in it, but he doesn't need to be the main focus.

He could and should be the mentor/father figure looking out for the rest of the guys with maybe Damien and Tim being the main characters. I would have said Grayson, but would be too close to Titans.

Alternatively, they could always do the story line of Battle for the Cowl though. Doing individual character episodes giving each their backstory with some involvement of Batman until he comes back ( when Reeves is done with his 3)
PS118
PS118 - 2/19/2026, 2:25 PM
@UnderBelly -

That’s actually a good idea. Make a DCU Batman show in the mean time so we can get him casted and his world fleshed out and cameo Supes and others. Then the audience will know him before they do a big Worlds Finest film.
SuperZeroCustmz
SuperZeroCustmz - 2/19/2026, 11:33 PM
@UnderBelly - Battle for the Cowl would absoulutely not work being there would not be an established Bruce Wayene to get rid of and then have the few sub characters around battle for the mantle. It would be too small and a waste of that run.
Damien also can not really be the focus of Brave and the Bold because he completly changes the dynamic of any family friendly thing that they have going . It just wouldnt work to suddenly cap a child assasin that doesnt want to not just kill his enemies.
Brave and Bold would only work pre Damien unless you really change him or make him an assasin in training as well that doesnt listen and thats why he gets gfiven to Bruce and the truth comes out that Damien is his son. It would have to be changed and kept a secret . Damien could just be someone that Talia and Ras offer up to become a possible Robin . But who knows. I'm just another everything Batman fan like you sound like yourself.
Good idea on the Battle story being used to usher in sub charcters into the spotlight and give them more focus time. Flesh them out in Bruces abscense
UnderBelly
UnderBelly - 2/20/2026, 6:35 AM
@SuperZeroCustmz -

I would disagree, I think if he weren’t around the absence of him in the universe will be more effective if he’s a legend of sorts at the point, and if Damien is in the picture, he would have been as he’d have gone through 3 or 4 sidekicks at that point.

Dick could be running Wayne tech with Tim and Alfred, and Damien could be moving aound causing a ruckus with Tahliah with them pretending or emulating being the Bat legend making Dick having to step up. We’ll get the reference to Bruce/Batman etc every so often, with Seaosn 1 ending with Dick finally picking up the mantle to carry on the legend of the Bat. Batman doesn’t need another origin, and Reeve’s and Snyder have shown. And by the time Reeve’s is done they can cast and put an actual face to Bruce, then leading to Brave and the Bold (if it will still be called that)

I mean it’s just an idea. But hopefully Gunn finds a way to work through it. The audience are smart enough to tell the difference.


JustAWaffle
JustAWaffle - 2/19/2026, 12:25 PM
Yes. Let’s rush the art of film making. It usually turns out something worthwhile.
SuperZeroCustmz
SuperZeroCustmz - 2/19/2026, 11:26 PM
@JustAWaffle - I don't think he means the film rushed in a care free manner. He means get it out so he can start his films that he was hired to do and not end up shelved and left around to get stale.
A good film can be made in a timely manner and still be good as long as its cohesive. Doesnt mean its going to be horrible
Iports
Iports - 2/19/2026, 12:25 PM
Absolute nonsense that !! Don’t believe it for a second
AgentofSH1ELD
AgentofSH1ELD - 2/19/2026, 12:26 PM
Gunn needs to stop being a bitch and just absorb Reeves Batman and let that move forward. The Batman stand alone movies can have their own dark tone and Batman would be perfect to offset Gunn's living comicbook world he intends to create.
Its a dick thing though. He can stand to have something in "his world" that isnt his.
UnderBelly
UnderBelly - 2/19/2026, 12:31 PM
@AgentofSH1ELD - Disagree. Reeve's Batman is it's own thing and shall remain so. If i was Matt i would also want to make sure to keep it seperate. Pattinson aint down for those Gunn shenanigans either.

The two can exist seperatately.
TheJok3r
TheJok3r - 2/19/2026, 12:35 PM
@AgentofSH1ELD - What happens with Batman and DC as a whole is up to WB, not Gunn.
TDKRnry88
TDKRnry88 - 2/19/2026, 12:45 PM
@AgentofSH1ELD - Or Reeves set his Batman up to be grounded & realistic, a mismatch to Gunn's more fantastical DCU where superhumans are part & parcel... Reeves put it in place before Gunn even got the DCU job, so put the blame on him. Gunn's simply respecting Reeves's creative decision.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 2/19/2026, 2:38 PM
@UnderBelly - I think Pattinson is down for it, I can't remember where I heard it but he's said in interviews before that he's totally down for his Batman joining the DCU.
UltimaRex
UltimaRex - 2/19/2026, 2:53 PM
@TheJok3r - WB gave Batman to Gunn when DC Studios started.

It's his decision. Like it or not.
TheJok3r
TheJok3r - 2/19/2026, 3:13 PM
@UltimaRex - Gunn literally said a couple years ago that integrating Pattinson's Batman into the DCU isn't up to him.
UltimaRex
UltimaRex - 2/19/2026, 6:25 PM
@TheJok3r - because he respects Reeves. Not because WB is making that decision for him.

He's studio head. You take those kind of decisions away and we're back to a Jon Peters situation.
hue66
hue66 - 2/19/2026, 12:26 PM
Why don't they do a live action Brave and Bold series with a good budget. Done well it can succeed and would be a first. MARVEL has taken risks with their properties. Why not Batman. Look how well Penguin did. It could run concurrent to Batman 2 and 3 and tie into the Gunn universe.
PS118
PS118 - 2/19/2026, 2:27 PM
@hue66 -

This is a good idea. Pattinson can be movie Batman for a bit but in the mean time give us the DCUS Batman via HBO. We already DCU heroes on the small screen: CC, PM, and soon LANTERNS.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 2/19/2026, 2:41 PM
@hue66 - When Superman went to back to TV he stopped being a marquee character. Batman will have a second TV series when all his movies start flopping one after the other.
FireCanon
FireCanon - 2/19/2026, 12:27 PM
We need to hurry up and get the good Batman movies over with so we can move on to bad Batman movies.
HelloBoysImBack
HelloBoysImBack - 2/19/2026, 12:30 PM
How hes not in the Epstein files is beyond me
UltimaRex
UltimaRex - 2/19/2026, 2:06 PM
@HelloBoysImBack - how about dealing with the guys who ARE in the files over wishing someone was?
HelloBoysImBack
HelloBoysImBack - 2/19/2026, 2:18 PM
@UltimaRex - how you coping with whoopi being in it
UltimaRex
UltimaRex - 2/19/2026, 2:50 PM
@HelloBoysImBack - just fine thanks.

Ghost was a long time ago.
RolandD
RolandD - 2/19/2026, 10:20 PM
@HelloBoysImBack - How about he’s never had any allegations of sexually abusive behavior, just very poor taste in humor around 20 years ago?
TheJok3r
TheJok3r - 2/19/2026, 12:34 PM
It's good to know that what I've been saying since Gunn announced his fake slate turned out to be accurate: there was no way WB would allow two Batman franchises to compete with one another. The DCU Batman will be limited to team up movies until Reeves is finished with his trilogy.
1 2 3 4

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder