How James Gunn Is Destroying The DCU, One C-List Superhero At A Time

How James Gunn Is Destroying The DCU, One C-List Superhero At A Time

DC Studios co-CEO James Gunn's priority for the DCU is focusing on B- and C-list characters, and the filmmaker's approach to building a shared world runs the risk of derailing and destroying the DCU.

Feature Opinion
By JoshWilding - Jul 04, 2026 12:07 PM EST
Filed Under: DC Studios

Many of you will no doubt remember that Warner Bros. spent years desperately trying to catch up to Marvel Studios. Ultimately, the DCEU failed because the brand needed a long-term plan and someone with a clear creative vision steering the ship. Now it has exactly that. The problem is that James Gunn's vision may not be the one DC Studios needs.

For all of Gunn's strengths as a filmmaker, the DC Universe he's building feels like a playground for characters he personally loves rather than the franchises audiences are crying out for. That's a risky approach at a time when superhero movies are no longer untouchable at the box office. For proof of that, you need only compare the box office returns of The Marvels to Captain Marvel

Before The Flash arrived in theaters, Gunn infamously declared it one of the greatest superhero movies ever made. While there was understandable enthusiasm from a new DC Studios co-CEO trying to support a film inherited from the previous regime, those comments now make him appear disconnected from reality and clueless about what makes a good superhero movie.

It also suggests that Gunn's instincts don't always align with those of general audiences or other fans, and it now appears that Gunn's creative vision for Supergirl is what derailed that movie (lest we forget, he was also responsible for The Flash's goofy George Clooney ending).

Nobody is suggesting characters like Mister Terrific, Clayface or, uh, Jimmy Olsen don't deserve the spotlight (well, Jimmy certainly doesn't). Comic book readers know how rich DC's catalogue is, and Gunn has built much of his career making audiences care about characters nobody expected to become stars. The key difference is that he did that within a franchise that was thriving.

Guardians of the Galaxy arrived six years after Iron Man. Audiences already trusted the Marvel Studios logo, and had bought into Tony Stark, Captain America, Thor and The Avengers before Marvel asked them to take a chance on a talking raccoon and living tree. DC doesn't have that luxury.

Instead of using Batman, Wonder Woman and Superman as the foundation before branching out, Gunn seems determined to build every corner of the DCU simultaneously. That means projects centred on characters many lifelong DC fans would struggle to name are being prioritised alongside—or, in some cases, ahead of—the company's biggest icons.

Batman still doesn't have a clear place in the DCU. Wonder Woman hasn't even been cast. The Justice League feels years away. Yet we're getting Clayface and DC Crime, with the latter a series not even on the most devoted DC fan's wishlist. 

It isn't 2014 anymore. Gen Z hasn't grown up treating superheroes as appointment viewing, and younger audiences are far more selective about what they watch, choosing to instead gravitate towards viral hits like Backrooms and Obsession

Gunn's "Chapter 1" looks a lot like the MCU's Phase 4, albeit with him attempting to skip several steps. A big part of why Black Panther and Spider-Man: Homecoming succeeded is because their respective leads connected with fans in Captain America: Civil War. Gunn threw everything at the wall to see what would stick in Superman, and a 30-second Supergirl cameo wasn't enough to launch her franchise. Similarly, Mister Terrific being a scene-stealer doesn't automatically justify giving him a spin-off TV series.

By flooding the market with so many B- and C-list heroes, Gunn runs the risk of the A-listers no longer feeling special. If every obscure corner of the DC Universe is treated with the same importance as Batman and Wonder Woman, audiences will inevitably stop seeing all the characters as must-see events, and the DCU will lose its identity completely.

Creative risks aren't a bad thing, especially when so many great DC stories have put lesser-known characters from and centre. However, the priority has to be getting the big guns right first, using Batman, Superman, Wonder Woman, and the Justice League to launch this shared world, and allowing moviegoers to decide which supporting players deserve to graduate into leading roles.

Instead, it feels like James Gunn is building the DC Universe he wants to watch rather than the one general audiences are asking for. The biggest casualty from that won't be projects like Supergirl and DC Crime, it will be the DCU itself. 

About The Author:
JoshWilding
Member Since 3/13/2009
A lifelong comic book fan who grew up on Spider-Man: The Animated Series in the '90s, Josh Wilding has been contributing to ComicBookMovie.com since 2009.

While he's also written for websites like Batman-News, HeyUGuys, and WhatCulture, Josh is CBM's Rotten Tomatoes-approved critic and the site's #1 contributor with nearly two decades of experience covering film and TV news (including interviews with Tom Holland, Chris Pratt, Gary Oldman, Halle Berry, Jon Bernthal, Tom Welling, and hundreds more).

Based in the UK with his wife, Josh is also an avid WWE and Formula 1 fan and writes about those passions on CBM's sister sites, TheRingReport.com and FullThrottleHQ.com. Favourite superhero? Spider-Man. Favourite pro wrestler? CM Punk. Favourite F1 driver? Max Verstappen.
Is James Gunn's Future At DC Really In Doubt? As The WB Merger Stalls, What's Confirmed And What's Rumor?
Related:

Is James Gunn's Future At DC Really In Doubt? As The WB Merger Stalls, What's Confirmed And What's Rumor?

Pinocchio Unstrung: Robert Englund Talks Evil Cricket & Returning To Horror For 'Something Nasty' (Exclusive)
Recommended For You:

Pinocchio Unstrung: Robert Englund Talks Evil Cricket & Returning To Horror For 'Something Nasty' (Exclusive)

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3 4 5
LSHF
LSHF - 7/4/2026, 12:14 PM
It's early, with plenty of time to correct course.
UceOmega
UceOmega - 7/4/2026, 3:08 PM
@LSHF - Yeah nah. The dcu is done. Good luck with hope and dreams. Reality is very different. You’ll catch on eventually.
Malatrova15
Malatrova15 - 7/4/2026, 12:17 PM
YES YES YES MORE MORE MORE !!! HAHAHA YES THIS IS THE BEST WEEK OF ALL MY POVERTY TRANS RIDDEN LIFE MORE !!! GUNN YOU ARE DONE ..ONE MORE ARTICLE MY JOSH ONE MORE !!! YIEEEEEEES !!! I WILL CLICK ALL YOUR ADS YES YES MORREEEE
harryba11zack
harryba11zack - 7/4/2026, 12:17 PM


User Comment Image
JusticeL
JusticeL - 7/4/2026, 1:25 PM
@harryba11zack - Zack's movies were flawed but better. More rewatchable and still looks good today. Gunn's Superman by James Gunn looks like dog shit.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 7/4/2026, 1:30 PM
@JusticeL - or dog piss.
User Comment Image
JusticeL
JusticeL - 7/4/2026, 2:11 PM
@ObserverIO - 😂
fosdog
fosdog - 7/4/2026, 2:48 PM
@JusticeL - While I agree that the DCEU'S movies were better, unfortunately no one was going to see them either. Not saying it's anyone's fault on here, but ppl can't whine and gripe about a failed DCEU when probably more than half of them were complaining about it while it was around and not going to support the movies in theaters, but then complaining about what we're getting now.
TheOtherOn
TheOtherOn - 7/4/2026, 4:41 PM
@harryba11zack - I am not a "fan" of either, I do thank Zack Snyder for casting Henry Cavill as Superman but at the same time I also won't forgive Zack for giving Henry some of the worst scripts to work with. 😡

Man of Steel was a GOOD movie, which could've been GREAT if it wasn't for the last act and it only went downhill from there all the way into other movies. 🤢 🤮

He literally killed his own creation and has no one else but himself to blame...

User Comment Image
TheOtherOn
TheOtherOn - 7/4/2026, 4:52 PM
A couple of more reminders of how GREAT the "trailer" was for BvS but how dogpoo it turned out to be...

User Comment Image

User Comment Image

User Comment Image

User Comment Image
TheOtherOn
TheOtherOn - 7/4/2026, 4:59 PM
Need even MORE?

User Comment Image

User Comment Image

I think that's ENOUGH!
TheNewYorkerr
TheNewYorkerr - 7/4/2026, 5:39 PM
Gunn sees himself as a D-list character. So he focuses on them to troll everyone who loves the A-listers.
spr0cks
spr0cks - 7/4/2026, 7:08 PM
@TheOtherOn -

....and yet it still grossed just shy of a billion dollars at the box office.


Something that the soon-to-be-dead-and-buried DCU will never come close to doing in any of its movies.
Sominan
Sominan - 7/4/2026, 9:00 PM
@harryba11zack - snyderverse = worst superhero franchise in history
bobevanz
bobevanz - 7/5/2026, 9:45 AM
So this is why Nate is writing articles now? So they can play good cop and trash journalist rage-bait cop? Everyone remembers how you losers loved the GOTG trilogy. Everyone also remembers how much you liked those garbage Zack Snyder movies. The majority of the people on this website are stupid man babies, the other ones are bots. Everyday it's like the console Wars never ended. Some people eventually have to grow the [frick] up right? Snyder is so lucky that he got to make his shitty movies after Christopher Nolan made the best Batman movies of all time. James Gunn had to create a universe at the tail end of this dog shit franchise that almost killed the dc. How come people don't want to acknowledge that? How come they want to ignore how bad the last five or six dceu movies were. How come they ignore the fact that phase 4 and 5 of the MCU was mostly abysmal trash? Whataboutism is all that matters these days. Very few of us know the truth, the rest of you are just here to start shit
TheOtherOn
TheOtherOn - 7/5/2026, 9:59 AM
@spr0cks - MANY crappy MCU movies made tons of money too, remember Iron-Man 3 and CRAptain Marvel?

Even if we argue, those were released right after some of the best MCU movies, we also have Transformers and Twilight franchises that made tons of money but we all know how good those are.

I always get a good chuckle out of any comments defending with "it made money", since obviously there's NOTHING good to talk about hence the money card is played. 🤦‍♂️
TheJoker13
TheJoker13 - 7/5/2026, 2:46 PM
@spr0cks - This isn’t the flex you think it is. Pre covid vs Post covid has to be considered for all box office hauls now. If you disagree you’re either being obtuse or an idiot.

Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice grossed $874.4 million worldwide, including $330.4 million domestically in the U.S. and Canada, and $544.0 million internationally. It finished its 2016 theatrical run as the seventh highest-grossing film of that year.Despite its massive final haul, the film's financial and box-office trajectory was considered polarizing:Opening Weekend: It set records with a $166 million domestic opening ($424.1 million globally), marking the highest Easter weekend debut of all-time.Steep Drop-offs: Due to highly mixed critical reviews and word-of-mouth, the film experienced one of the sharpest second-weekend drops (-69%) for a major superhero blockbuster.Profitability: Industry analysts estimated the film needed to gross roughly $800 million to break even on its production and marketing costs, meaning it ultimately turned a solid profit for Warner Bros. even though it fell short of the billion-dollar expectations often associated with the first-ever cinematic pairing of the two iconic heroes
Bucky74
Bucky74 - 7/4/2026, 12:17 PM
Excellent article, Josh. When Guy and Terrific are more entertaining than the guy who the film is named after, that’s a real problem.

Happy 250!
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 7/4/2026, 1:33 PM
@Bucky74 - 250?! This means that the bicentennial is finally over!

Happy Valentines Day America!
User Comment Image
skyshark03191
skyshark03191 - 7/4/2026, 4:24 PM
@ObserverIO - [frick]ing Lahey 😂
ProfessorWhy
ProfessorWhy - 7/4/2026, 12:18 PM
Following up supergirl will be tough, but I'm sure they haven't hit bottom yet
Lisa89
Lisa89 - 7/4/2026, 12:19 PM
User Comment Image
TheJok3r
TheJok3r - 7/4/2026, 12:20 PM
"the DC Universe he's building feels like a playground for characters he personally loves rather than the franchises audiences are crying out for."

This right here is exactly why so many people were worried about DC when he took over; Gunn simply doesn't care about any mainstream character, only the smallest and least well known. If you are going to put together a team of filmmakers to work on your projects, Gunn is without a doubt someone you want on board, but not someone calling the shots.
tb86
tb86 - 7/4/2026, 12:21 PM
I haven’t seen it yet so what I say may not make sense but is it really fair to say the DCU is in trouble just because of one bad movie? I’m not saying the DCU might be in trouble but didn’t Clayface get positive reception from its Test Screenings? I admit I’m a little concerned for where the DCU might be heading. Lanterns small town / brown suit setting does concern me, though I remember liking the second trailer a little more and Man of Tomorrow does feel like it might get crowded like the recent Super Mario Bros. movie which I haven’t seen yet.
Urubrodi
Urubrodi - 7/4/2026, 12:40 PM
@tb86 - Clayface is a very small project in scope and quite isolated, it’s success or failure won’t impact much
TheJok3r
TheJok3r - 7/4/2026, 12:47 PM
@tb86 - "is it really fair to say the DCU is in trouble just because of one bad movie ?"

If you're a studio drowning in debt and someone decides to drop $250 million (between production and marketing) on a project that has no chance of making back a fracture of that $$$, then yes; you're very much in trouble.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 7/4/2026, 1:42 PM
@tb86 - It's not just one bad movie. The franchise has been in the toilet for years. David Zaslav decided to hire somebody to successfully reboot the franchise. James Gunn was chosen. He's obviously failed.
Superman struggled to break even, it was looking like it would flop for a second there. Yet the RT scores were good, though historically Warners has been underhanded in manipulating RT scores. So people say just wait and see. Well now we're seeing and it's worse than you can imagine.

Clayface might be good yes. It might make money, but that's not hard from a smaller production and there's also the fact that Matt Reeves is involved so I really don't think that will move the needle at all.#

And Lanterns prolly will be good but it's TV so unless it's massive like The Penguin was, that won't move the needle either. Also Gunn won't get the credit if it's good because it's been produced under HBO and he doesn't have much control there.
TheJok3r
TheJok3r - 7/4/2026, 2:13 PM
@ObserverIO - Lanterns needs to be good; they can't afford it not to be. Even if it doesn't reach the viewership numbers they want, they still need to be able to point to it and say "We can make good products; Supergirl was just a bump in the road that won't happen again". Even though Lanterns isn't entirely being handled by Gunn, it's still using characters that he's using, so how it does will impact him. Clayface however is said to be completely disconnected from the rest of the DCU and has a Reeves tone to it, so whether that succeeds or not will impact Reeves more than Gunn, so he doesn't have to worry about it.
HashTagSwagg
HashTagSwagg - 7/4/2026, 12:23 PM
User Comment Image
FireGunn
FireGunn - 7/4/2026, 12:36 PM
DC dies with Gunn. Either he's fired or he destroys the brand to an unfixable point. Choose WB

Reboot the MCU and DCU
Patient2670
Patient2670 - 7/4/2026, 3:52 PM
@FireGunn - His contract just won't be renewed. They won't fire him because of the severence clause he (or his agents and lawyers, more accurately ) would have built in to the contract - the payout would be huge.

He's currently busy on MOT and the others which are currently in production, or in post (Lanterns, Clayface, and Batman Part 2 - which he's not realy involved in). That will take him into 27 when his contract is up anyway and again, they'd simply not renew it. Unless, of course, the projects I mentioned are all monster hits, at which point they'll negootiate. But I wouldn't count on it.
MCUKnight11
MCUKnight11 - 7/4/2026, 12:51 PM
Think he sees the writing on the wall with both Sgt rock and authority being canned.
OrgasmicPotatoe
OrgasmicPotatoe - 7/4/2026, 12:54 PM
Despite a Clayface movie not being what we need right now, I'm still curious about the movie. It still shouldn't be happening though.

But yeah, everything else is whack at best.
Forthas
Forthas - 7/4/2026, 12:54 PM
When Krypto and Peacemaker feature more prominently and have more screentime than Batman, Superman and WonderWoman then you know you have F*cked up.
Bucky74
Bucky74 - 7/4/2026, 1:21 PM
@Forthas - It’s the KCU. Gunn’s Krypto Cinematic Universe, lol
Forthas
Forthas - 7/4/2026, 2:47 PM
@Bucky74 - I wonder if he arranged for payment to be made to his dog since he is using his likeness. If so then he engages in cronyism, nepotism, and pet-otism
Bucky74
Bucky74 - 7/4/2026, 2:58 PM
@Forthas - 😂😂😂

His wife, brother and dog are the foundation of the DCU, lol
ModHaterSLADE
ModHaterSLADE - 7/4/2026, 12:54 PM
I don't hate his work with more obscure DC characters, but Gunn needs to get his head out of his ass and focus more on Big Name DC characters that will make a PROFIT. I enjoyed Superman, but it seems more and more he cares more about making smaller DC characters/ franchises more of a focus.
WingDing11
WingDing11 - 7/4/2026, 12:55 PM
Imagine how much better this site would be without Josh ruining it every day
Feralwookiee
Feralwookiee - 7/4/2026, 12:59 PM
@WingDing11 - I think WB execs are probably saying the same thing about what Gunn is doing to their brand.
1 2 3 4 5

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder