How James Gunn Is Destroying The DCU, One C-List Superhero At A Time

How James Gunn Is Destroying The DCU, One C-List Superhero At A Time

DC Studios co-CEO James Gunn's priority for the DCU is focusing on B- and C-list characters, and the filmmaker's approach to building a shared world runs the risk of derailing and destroying the DCU.

By JoshWilding - Jul 04, 2026 12:07 PM EST
Filed Under: DC Studios

Many of you will no doubt remember that Warner Bros. spent years desperately trying to catch up to Marvel Studios. Ultimately, the DCEU failed because the brand needed a long-term plan and someone with a clear creative vision steering the ship. Now it has exactly that. The problem is that James Gunn's vision may not be the one DC Studios needs.

For all of Gunn's strengths as a filmmaker, the DC Universe he's building feels like a playground for characters he personally loves rather than the franchises audiences are crying out for. That's a risky approach at a time when superhero movies are no longer untouchable at the box office. For proof of that, you need only compare the box office returns of The Marvels to Captain Marvel

Before The Flash arrived in theaters, Gunn infamously declared it one of the greatest superhero movies ever made. While there was understandable enthusiasm from a new DC Studios co-CEO trying to support a film inherited from the previous regime, those comments now make him appear disconnected from reality and clueless about what makes a good superhero movie.

It also suggests that Gunn's instincts don't always align with those of general audiences or other fans, and it now appears that Gunn's creative vision for Supergirl is what derailed that movie (lest we forget, he was also responsible for The Flash's goofy George Clooney ending).

Nobody is suggesting characters like Mister Terrific, Clayface or, uh, Jimmy Olsen don't deserve the spotlight (well, Jimmy certainly doesn't). Comic book readers know how rich DC's catalogue is, and Gunn has built much of his career making audiences care about characters nobody expected to become stars. The key difference is that he did that within a franchise that was thriving.

Guardians of the Galaxy arrived six years after Iron Man. Audiences already trusted the Marvel Studios logo, and had bought into Tony Stark, Captain America, Thor and The Avengers before Marvel asked them to take a chance on a talking raccoon and living tree. DC doesn't have that luxury.

Instead of using Batman, Wonder Woman and Superman as the foundation before branching out, Gunn seems determined to build every corner of the DCU simultaneously. That means projects centred on characters many lifelong DC fans would struggle to name are being prioritised alongside—or, in some cases, ahead of—the company's biggest icons.

Batman still doesn't have a clear place in the DCU. Wonder Woman hasn't even been cast. The Justice League feels years away. Yet we're getting Clayface and DC Crime, with the latter a series not even on the most devoted DC fan's wishlist. 

It isn't 2014 anymore. Gen Z hasn't grown up treating superheroes as appointment viewing, and younger audiences are far more selective about what they watch, choosing to instead gravitate towards viral hits like Backrooms and Obsession

Gunn's "Chapter 1" looks a lot like the MCU's Phase 4, albeit with him attempting to skip several steps. A big part of why Black Panther and Spider-Man: Homecoming succeeded is because their respective leads connected with fans in Captain America: Civil War. Gunn threw everything at the wall to see what would stick in Superman, and a 30-second Supergirl cameo wasn't enough to launch her franchise. Similarly, Mister Terrific being a scene-stealer doesn't automatically justify giving him a spin-off TV series.

By flooding the market with so many B- and C-list heroes, Gunn runs the risk of the A-listers no longer feeling special. If every obscure corner of the DC Universe is treated with the same importance as Batman and Wonder Woman, audiences will inevitably stop seeing all the characters as must-see events, and the DCU will lose its identity completely.

Creative risks aren't a bad thing, especially when so many great DC stories have put lesser-known characters from and centre. However, the priority has to be getting the big guns right first, using Batman, Superman, Wonder Woman, and the Justice League to launch this shared world, allowing moviegoers to decide which supporting players deserve to graduate into leading roles.

Instead, it feels like James Gunn is building the DC Universe he wants to watch rather than the one general audiences are asking for. The biggest casualty from that won't be projects like Supergirl and DC Crime, it will be the DCU itself. 

About The Author:
JoshWilding
Member Since 3/13/2009
Comic Book Reader. Film Lover. WWE and F1 Fan. Rotten Tomatoes-approved critic and ComicBookMovie.com's #1 contributor.
7 Canceled DCEU Projects We Wish Had Happened (And Which Ones Need To Be Resurrected By DC Studios)
Related:

7 Canceled DCEU Projects We Wish Had Happened (And Which Ones Need To Be Resurrected By DC Studios)

DC Crime Casting And Shooting Update: Jimmy Olsen TV Series Is Eyeing Comedic Actors For Gorilla Grodd
Recommended For You:

DC Crime Casting And Shooting Update: Jimmy Olsen TV Series Is Eyeing Comedic Actors For Gorilla Grodd

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

LSHF
LSHF - 7/4/2026, 12:14 PM
It's early, with plenty of time to correct course.
Malatrova15
Malatrova15 - 7/4/2026, 12:17 PM
YES YES YES MORE MORE MORE !!! HAHAHA YES THIS IS THE BEST WEEK OF ALL MY POVERTY TRANS RIDDEN LIFE MORE !!! GUNN YOU ARE DONE ..ONE MORE ARTICLE MY JOSH ONE MORE !!! YIEEEEEEES !!! I WILL CLICK ALL YOUR ADS YES YES MORREEEE
harryba11zack
harryba11zack - 7/4/2026, 12:17 PM


User Comment Image
Bucky74
Bucky74 - 7/4/2026, 12:17 PM
Excellent article, Josh. When Guy and Terrific are more entertaining than the guy who the film is named after, that’s a real problem.

Happy 250!
ProfessorWhy
ProfessorWhy - 7/4/2026, 12:18 PM
Following up supergirl will be tough, but I'm sure they haven't hit bottom yet
Lisa89
Lisa89 - 7/4/2026, 12:19 PM
User Comment Image
TheJok3r
TheJok3r - 7/4/2026, 12:20 PM
"the DC Universe he's building feels like a playground for characters he personally loves rather than the franchises audiences are crying out for."

This right here is exactly why so many people were worried about DC when he took over; Gunn simply doesn't care about any mainstream character, only the smallest and least well known. If you are going to put together a team of filmmakers to work on your projects, Gunn is without a doubt someone you want on board, but not someone calling the shots.
tb86
tb86 - 7/4/2026, 12:21 PM
I haven’t seen it yet so what I say may not make sense but is it really fair to say the DCU is in trouble just because of one bad movie? I’m not saying the DCU might be in trouble but didn’t Clayface get positive reception from its Test Screenings? I admit I’m a little concerned for where the DCU might be heading. Lanterns small town / brown suit setting does concern me, though I remember liking the second trailer a little more and Man of Tomorrow does feel like it might get crowded like the recent Super Mario Bros. movie which I haven’t seen yet.
Urubrodi
Urubrodi - 7/4/2026, 12:40 PM
@tb86 - Clayface is a very small project in scope and quite isolated, it’s success or failure won’t impact much
TheJok3r
TheJok3r - 7/4/2026, 12:47 PM
@tb86 - "is it really fair to say the DCU is in trouble just because of one bad movie ?"

If you're a studio drowning in debt and someone decides to drop $250 million (between production and marketing) on a project that has no chance of making back a fracture of that $$$, then yes; you're very much in trouble.
HashTagSwagg
HashTagSwagg - 7/4/2026, 12:23 PM
User Comment Image
FireGunn
FireGunn - 7/4/2026, 12:36 PM
DC dies with Gunn. Either he's fired or he destroys the brand to an unfixable point. Choose WB

Reboot the MCU and DCU
MCUKnight11
MCUKnight11 - 7/4/2026, 12:51 PM
Think he sees the writing on the wall with both Sgt rock and authority being canned.
OrgasmicPotatoe
OrgasmicPotatoe - 7/4/2026, 12:54 PM
Despite a Clayface movie not being what we need right now, I'm still curious about the movie. It still shouldn't be happening though.

But yeah, everything else is whack at best.
Forthas
Forthas - 7/4/2026, 12:54 PM
When Krypto and Peacemaker feature more prominently and have more screentime than Batman, Superman and WonderWoman then you know you have F*cked up.
ModHaterSLADE
ModHaterSLADE - 7/4/2026, 12:54 PM
I don't hate his work with more obscure DC characters, but Gunn needs to get his head out of his ass and focus more on Big Name DC characters that will make a PROFIT. I enjoyed Superman, but it seems more and more he cares more about making smaller DC characters/ franchises more of a focus.
WingDing11
WingDing11 - 7/4/2026, 12:55 PM
Imagine how much better this site would be without Josh ruining it every day
Feralwookiee
Feralwookiee - 7/4/2026, 12:59 PM
@WingDing11 - I think WB execs are probably saying the same thing about what Gunn is doing to their brand.
FireGunn
FireGunn - 7/4/2026, 12:59 PM
@WingDing11 - Being objective is "ruining" the site?
WingDing11
WingDing11 - 7/4/2026, 1:00 PM
@Feralwookiee - because they had one really good massive success and then a flop with mixed reviews….?? Do you know how this stuff works?
WingDing11
WingDing11 - 7/4/2026, 1:01 PM
@FireGunn - “objective” is objectively NOT a word you can use to describe Josh Wilding’s writing skills
HashTagSwagg
HashTagSwagg - 7/4/2026, 1:10 PM
@WingDing11 - "they had one really good massive success"
So massive it got released on digital just after 35 days of it's threatical release.


Feralwookiee
Feralwookiee - 7/4/2026, 1:10 PM
@WingDing11 - Superman 25 barely turned a profit making around just $600 million on a $225 million budget and Supergirl is one of the biggest flops of all time.
Yeah. That's a pretty terrible start.
Mrnorth1921
Mrnorth1921 - 7/4/2026, 12:56 PM
Dude! Give it a chance!
TheJok3r
TheJok3r - 7/4/2026, 12:58 PM
WB made the same mistake they did with the DCEU: hiring a director to do a producer's job. Zack Snyder and James Gunn are not producers and studio heads; they are filmmakers. The reason the MCU is successful (or was successful) is because Kevin Feige is an actual businessman who knows what products the audience wants and knows how to get the best people to deliver said products. What does Snyder or Gunn know about selecting directors or understanding audience patterns ?
WingDing11
WingDing11 - 7/4/2026, 1:05 PM
@TheJok3r - Feige is a figurehead for a board. He is the face of an operation, NOT a creative.
BackwardGalaxy
BackwardGalaxy - 7/4/2026, 12:58 PM
Your objectivity signed a DNR.
SonOfAGif
SonOfAGif - 7/4/2026, 1:00 PM
It has been on movie. This site glazed "The Suicide Squad" and the same ones spelling Doom & Gloom glazed Peacemaker, Creature Commandoes, and Superman. Now suddenly it's the end of the DC brand because of one mid to bad movie? A lot of you guys would never make it in culinary school.
WingDing11
WingDing11 - 7/4/2026, 1:11 PM
@SonOfAGif - Exactly this.
M3T4LL0
M3T4LL0 - 7/4/2026, 1:06 PM
This may just be the best article you've ever done Josh. Very valid points made all across the board.

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder