Princess And The Frog Live-Action Remake: Colman Domingo To Co-Write Disney Movie

@FireGunn - no one asked for obsession, back rooms, project Hail Mary, lion king remake, lilo and stitch remake, amongst others. Sometimes it’s lightning in a bottle. It’s good that it says it’s not a 1:1 remake.

@FireGunn - He didn’t compare them you misanthrope. He responded to exactly what you said. Reading comprehension. It’s a thing.

@RolandD - He responded to what I said by comparing you [frick]ing moronic lunatic. You're a [frick]ing retard of the highest order. Get off my dick and take your own advice.

@RolandD - No one cares what you think meathead.

@FireGunn - Keep telling yourself that as if people care what you think. There was a major pile on yesterday because a lot of people here are tired of your shtick, your constant trolling, but you have a good night.

@FireGunn - The way you reply back to everything, yes, I do think you care what other people think about you. Keep on trolling and I’ll keep on laughing.😂😂😂😂

@RolandD - it’s amazing how he doesn’t even know what the original comparison was about. How none of the movies mentioned were asked for. Such a low I.q. individual. Pretty pathetic 🤷‍♂️

@RolandD - yeah, and I’m a natural debater so admittedly it bothers the hell out of me which it shouldn’t lol

@Gnostic - Why?.

Just because Moana or Snow White last year failed , they aren’t gonna abandon the live action remakes since Lilo & Stitch also made a billion and was one of the highest grossing movies of last year so its not 1:1.

Unless they fail in a row , I don’t see these stopping tbh!!.

@Pathogen - Don't ever compare the two again. Colman is an actual talented actor. Glad he's getting his due

@grif - lol

@Odekahn - ok?

@TheVisionary25 - To be fair, Mark did say that it’s inspired by the movie rather than a one for one remake

@TheVisionary25 - Good point.They never do misleading headlines here do they? 😂😂😂

@epc1122 - If you enjoy what's barely a step above ai slop content, you do you. You can't ask me or anyone else to enjoy this dreck. Content like this is just that. Content. There is a massive difference between making an original film as art WHILE hoping to make a profit vs making a film FOR PROFIT ONLY. These are two wildly different things. Nobody is arguing that films are charities but Disney is, and has been, systematically mining DECADES of beloved IP's because executives know audiences already recognize the brand. These films aren't made to do anything but line the pockets of executives.

Shakespeare wasn't remaking previous plays scene-for-scene. Playing your old songs live is NOT the same as recording the exact same album again every few years because nostalgia sells. That's the true equivalent. A remix adds new arrangement, different tempo, maybe even entirely different interpretation period. Again, not at all comparable.

No one said it was a conspiracy. Saying something is corporate slop isn't me saying there's some grand conspiracy by Disney to destroy cinema. Hollywood executives openly discuss reducing financial risk through established ip. Nothing I am saying is new. What new visuals? Photorealistic animals that can't emote? Less expressive characters in general? Flatter color palettes and cinematography? Genuinely, what "new visuals" could you possibly be talking about. It all looks like absolute shit!

"But it’s not a cancer, you can just choose not to see it."

And you could've chose not to reply to my comment yet here we are. I don't watch this garbage. I'm still going to criticize it because people can criticize harmful trends. I don't buy physical discs anymore for games, yet I'm criticizing Sony for making them obsolete. When Disney spends hundreds of millions on another remake that's money, marketing, talent, dates, and other resources not being given to actual original films. Obviously I and others would criticize it.

"Art is subjective"

It doesn't matter if you think this so I won't even talk about that but it's not my point. Enjoyment is subjective. That doesn't mean every criticism becomes meaningless.

"Under no metric, based off of reviews, reception, and profit, wad lilo and stich awful or a failure."

This confuses quality with success. Blade Runner, The Thing, Iron Giant, and Fight Club all flopped and had middling reviews on release. It being a successful and even liked film does not mean it was good. I did watch this one with my little cousin and it was horrible as expected. Lilo and Stitch being successful also doesn't invalidate overall criticism. Moana flopped miserably and was panned. You can find many more examples.

If you enjoy this slop, have at it. I never thought I'd actually see someone defend this unoriginal garbage but have at it.