RUMOR: Marvel Studios Is Moving Forward With THE FANTASTIC FOUR 2 (And We Know Who They Want To Direct It)

RUMOR: Marvel Studios Is Moving Forward With THE FANTASTIC FOUR 2 (And We Know Who They Want To Direct It)

According to a new report, Marvel Studios is moving forward with a sequel to The Fantastic Four: First Steps for the post-Avengers: Secret Wars MCU, and they already have a director in mind.

By JoshWilding - Jan 03, 2026 04:01 PM EST
Filed Under: Fantastic Four

The Fantastic Four: First Steps is "Certified Fresh" at 86% on Rotten Tomatoes, and boasts an impressive 90% on the fan-generated Popcornmeter. With $520.6 million at the worldwide box office, it isn't Marvel Studios' biggest hit, but it was still 2025's second-highest-grossing superhero movie.

Marvel's First Family will return in Avengers: Doomsday and Avengers: Secret Wars, two blockbusters in which they're expected to play a crucial role. Beyond that, it seems likely that the Fantastic Four will be brought into the present day alongside the Avengers and X-Men in a rebooted MCU.

Marvel Studios hasn't announced any movies or TV shows for post-Secret Wars, though we know Black Panther 3 and an X-Men reboot are both in the works. Now, we may be able to add The Fantastic Four 2 to that short list. 

According to @MyTimeToShineH, "Despite not being a huge box office hit, Marvel [is still planning] a Fantastic Four 2 post–Secret Wars and wants Matt Shakman back to direct. They believe the team's role in the Avengers films will draw more people to see the sequel."

Every Avengers movie has, so far, benefited the characters who appeared. All it took was a pager at the end of Avengers: Infinity War to rocket Captain Marvel to $1 billion success, while Iron Man 3, Thor: The Dark World, and Captain America: The Winter Soldier received noteworthy box office boosts after The Avengers was released in 2012.

Matt Shakman returning to direct shouldn't come as a huge surprise. The filmmaker delivered an excellent movie with The Fantastic Four: First Steps, having previously delivered a contender for the best MCU TV series in WandaVision.

In our review of The Fantastic Four: First Steps, we concluded, "The Fantastic Four is an exceptional introduction to the MCU’s First Family, and thanks to a Jack Kirby-infused feel that’s unlike anything we’ve seen before, it proves to be a quintessential superhero movie with Marvel Studios at its brilliant best.

Set against the vibrant backdrop of a 1960s-inspired, retro-futuristic world, Marvel Studios' The Fantastic Four: First Steps introduces Marvel’s First Family—Reed Richards/Mister Fantastic (Pedro Pascal), Sue Storm/Invisible Woman (Vanessa Kirby), Johnny Storm/Human Torch (Joseph Quinn) and Ben Grimm/The Thing (Ebon Moss-Bachrach) as they face their most daunting challenge yet.

Forced to balance their roles as heroes with the strength of their family bond, they must defend Earth from a ravenous space god called Galactus (Ralph Ineson) and his enigmatic Herald, Silver Surfer (Julia Garner). And if Galactus’ plan to devour the entire planet and everyone on it weren’t bad enough, it suddenly gets very personal.

The movie is now available on Digital, 4K Ultra HD, Blu-ray, DVD, and Disney+.

About The Author:
JoshWilding
Member Since 3/13/2009
Comic Book Reader. Film Lover. WWE and F1 Fan. Rotten Tomatoes-approved critic and ComicBookMovie.com's #1 contributor.
FANTASTIC FOUR Star Michael Chiklis Reveals Fox Considered HULK VS. THE THING Spin-off Movie
Related:

FANTASTIC FOUR Star Michael Chiklis Reveals Fox Considered HULK VS. THE THING Spin-off Movie

THE FANTASTIC FOUR: FIRST STEPS BTS Photos Reveal Another Amazing Practical Galactus Scene
Recommended For You:

THE FANTASTIC FOUR: FIRST STEPS BTS Photos Reveal Another Amazing Practical Galactus Scene

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3
bobevanz
bobevanz - 1/3/2026, 4:21 PM
If these next movies are good it will greatly help their box office numbers
DocSpock
DocSpock - 1/3/2026, 4:54 PM
@bobevanz -

"If these next movies are good it will greatly help their box office numbers"

Wow! That is a HOT take. If the movies are good, it will help their box office numbers. You are a true genius.
WalletsClosed
WalletsClosed - 1/3/2026, 4:21 PM
Disney is rewarding failure it seems. The movie has a 6.9 on imdb, lower than both Superflop and Thundershits. It flopped HARD at the box office as well. Pathetic company!

Reboot the MCU and DCU
EskimoJ
EskimoJ - 1/3/2026, 4:24 PM
@WalletsClosed - Doesn't matter, you'll watch it all anyway.
epc1122
epc1122 - 1/3/2026, 4:26 PM
@WalletsClosed - it didn’t flop and still made a profit. Just not as much as movies used to make but that’s consistent with most (not all) movies nowadays. Is it the company that’s pathetic or the overly sensitive haters who have nothing better to do than complain about everything on the internet? 🙃
Urubrodi
Urubrodi - 1/3/2026, 4:34 PM
@WalletsClosed - It clearly did not flop HARD lol It did not return a profit but the way you put it sounds like there was a huge financial loss. Movie was critically acclaimed and well received. Stop hating for the sake of it. Don’t like the current MCU? Just don’t watch it, quite simple.
CreateNowSlpL8r
CreateNowSlpL8r - 1/3/2026, 4:41 PM
@epc1122 - I generally dont care enough to correct you guys but FF did $520,431,599 worldwide. You are likely doing the math on the reported production budget which is never true. In fact, when financials are released its usually not even close. Secondly, marketing is not included and a safe estimate is 50% of the production budget.

Now you have to look at the $274,286,610 domestic (US/Canada) + $247,572,118 international. Disney doesnt get nearly the amount international as they do domestic. Often as low as 25% in China. There are things like credits coming back from filming in the UK but this movie might have lost more than 100m. We know they did reshoots which would not be in the original budget, and they were showing recuts during showing to try and get this out the door (probably because it was so Sue heavy).

Its very unlikely this movie was profitable at all is what I'm saying. Thats not hating, thats just math. This studio lost money on all three releases this year and both D+ series performed terribly. No one is watching Wonder Man either.


@WalletsClosed
epc1122
epc1122 - 1/3/2026, 5:16 PM
@CreateNowSlpL8r - this is straight from google: “Yes, The Fantastic Four: First Steps is considered profitable, crossing $500 million globally with a $200 million budget, making it the highest-grossing Fantastic Four film, with further revenue from streaming/merch adding to its success, despite initial box office drops and debates about true profit margins.”

While you bring up solid points, when you add merchandise and things of that nature, the movie was profitable, and is successful enough to warrant a sequel. Much like Batman begins coming after Batman and Robin, this movie had a big hole to dig out of. I personally found ff4 2025 to be a bit boring but I was never a huge fantastic four fan. Some people on here hate just to hate which I don’t agree with. This movie started slow but ended up ok. A disappointment sure, but not a flop some are making it out to be.
epc1122
epc1122 - 1/3/2026, 5:19 PM
@Urubrodi - yeah, pretty much this. It’s so annoying! I find some people’s takes to be hard to read . I’m such a glutton for punishment lol 😂 🙃
CreateNowSlpL8r
CreateNowSlpL8r - 1/3/2026, 5:24 PM
@epc1122 - Google pulls from what? Reported budgets. I just told you that doesnt include marketing AND they did reshoots.

No, I didn't include merchandise but you dont have those numbers so your statement that it wasn't a flop is not true.

Now, you can like the movie. I wrote a review of it on this site, but that doesn't make it not a flop. Based on my own math, this movie might have lost upwards of 100m. Thats a flop.
WalletsClosed
WalletsClosed - 1/3/2026, 5:35 PM
@CreateNowSlpL8r - I see no lies here. 100% correct but the fanboys will still try and argue
Bucky74
Bucky74 - 1/3/2026, 5:42 PM
@CreateNowSlpL8r - agreed. I actually enjoyed the film a lot more than I thought I would (I normally find Pascal insufferable) but that doesn’t change the numbers.
epc1122
epc1122 - 1/3/2026, 5:46 PM
@CreateNowSlpL8r - while I see some of your points as valid, at one point you wrote that it’s likely the movie lost more than 100 million and then you write that it’s unlikely the movie was profitable so im not sure if you’re math is reliable. At this point there’s not enough official numbers but the speculation is that this movie cleared enough of Disney’s benchmarks to warrant a sequel. If it was really a flop, similar to tron ares, they wouldn’t consider a sequel. One has to include merchandise sales as a factor because this movie clearly didn’t come close to a billion. There’s a difference between flop and disappointment.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 1/3/2026, 5:52 PM
@CreateNowSlpL8r - I loved the movie, but you're not wrong. Unlike google AI that gets things so gloriously wrong so often.
Simonsonrules
Simonsonrules - 1/3/2026, 6:10 PM
@EskimoJ - He will. He's very pleased with his schtick and has little else to do besides bash superhero flicks. If his wallet is really closed it's probably because he doesn't have any bread to spend. Get a new schtick, wallet boy.
Slushythrone455
Slushythrone455 - 1/3/2026, 6:15 PM
@WalletsClosed - Fantastic 4 was a decent movie. Superman was a bigger piece of crap than anything I’ve seen post Covid.
epc1122
epc1122 - 1/3/2026, 6:16 PM
@CreateNowSlpL8r - I reread some of your reviews and they were definitely well thought out and I agree with a lot of your analysis’. I also think you can enjoy a movie and it doesn’t necessarily equate it to being a success. I think you actually enjoyed ff4 more than me, I’d probably rate it a 2.5 out of 5 where you rated it at 3.5. I do think it was a disappointment at the box office but not a clear cut flop like some other movies. But either way, i enjoyed reading your reviews 👍
epc1122
epc1122 - 1/3/2026, 6:17 PM
@WalletsClosed - not agreeing with someone is different than someone lying.
WalletsClosed
WalletsClosed - 1/3/2026, 6:34 PM
@Slushythrone455 - They're both equally terrible for different reasons. Fantastic Bore is arguably worse written
WalletsClosed
WalletsClosed - 1/3/2026, 6:35 PM
@Simonsonrules - The coward blocked me to talk shit behind my back lol. Nice projection, broke boy.
WalletsClosed
WalletsClosed - 1/3/2026, 6:36 PM
@EskimoJ - Maybe, maybe not but I sure as hell won't be paying to watch this garbage
epc1122
epc1122 - 1/3/2026, 7:33 PM
@WalletsClosed - who blocked you?
dragon316
dragon316 - 1/3/2026, 10:47 PM
@WalletsClosed - don’t forget transformers one
Rpendo
Rpendo - 1/4/2026, 3:10 PM
@WalletsClosed - Superflop! Thundershits!

HA!

Boy howdy, you are a clever one!

You’re probably a huge hit with the other ten year olds.

What else you got? What other bits of wit and whimsy can you muster, and then repeat over and over again?

Fantastic BORE! Nice!

Keep ‘em coming, sport!
WalletsClosed
WalletsClosed - 1/4/2026, 3:24 PM
@Rpendo - Cry some more. I love your sweet tears
Forthas
Forthas - 1/3/2026, 4:30 PM
Great idea except for one little problem...their primary and most iconic foe is Dr. Doom. It would seem anticlimactic to use him after the next Avengers films; he is ruined for future Fantastic Four films.
Urubrodi
Urubrodi - 1/3/2026, 4:36 PM
@Forthas - Well he’s not their only villain lol Use Annihilus for example
soberchimera
soberchimera - 1/3/2026, 4:43 PM
@Urubrodi - They’re using Annihilus for the Nova show though.
Urubrodi
Urubrodi - 1/3/2026, 4:46 PM
@soberchimera - That’s far from confirmed though. I personally have him on a movie though, too big for a show
soberchimera
soberchimera - 1/3/2026, 4:52 PM
@Urubrodi - Oh yeah, the smart move would be to put him in a FF film, but when was the last time Marvel Studios made a smart move?
BrainySleep
BrainySleep - 1/3/2026, 4:30 PM
Fantastic Four-Four-F***ing-Two
CrimsonComet40
CrimsonComet40 - 1/3/2026, 4:40 PM
Shakman should direct again, he did a FANTASTIC job and if you watch interviews with him he seems like one of the only directors in the MCU who's actually read the OG comics

Don't know who the hell they're gonna fight though. MCU has wasted Doc Doom, Namor, The Skrulls, Inhumans, etc. on lesser heroes.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 1/3/2026, 5:58 PM
@CrimsonComet40 - The film felt authentic to the comics imo.

As for villains and story etc. I think a full reboot will solve all of these problems fairly easily. So any of those villains would be back on the table again. I just probably wouldn't do Doom or Galactus again so soon after the previous movies, at least not for the first one.
Spike101
Spike101 - 1/3/2026, 4:41 PM
Who are they kidding, the first movie was a souless mess. And the reason those movies did well after the first Avengers movie was they were actually decent movies in their own right and came off the back of Phase 1 that had no stinkers. Wake up and go back to solid Marvel stories and ditch the Disney influence if you want to make blockbusters again.
CreateNowSlpL8r
CreateNowSlpL8r - 1/3/2026, 4:43 PM
@Spike101 - I think part of it is they had to cut it down because it was so Sue heavy. The culture shift happened and this was basically a Sue Storm girl boss movie. Thats why the other characters dont really have a lot to do. They never shot much else for them.
epc1122
epc1122 - 1/3/2026, 5:25 PM
@CreateNowSlpL8r - i think other than thing, the rest had a lot to do just not as big as sue. But the X-men focused on Wolverine, this movie was Sues movie . I’m fine with that but for the next movie it should be centered on someone else and not make
The same mistake like the previous X-men movies. Plus I think reed is going to have a bigger role in the avengers.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 1/3/2026, 6:00 PM
@epc1122 - he damn well better have a bigger role with Doom being the villain.
1 2 3

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder