Citizen's Report: CLASH OF THE TITANS

Citizen's Report: CLASH OF THE TITANS

Was it a clashing success? Or a titanic failure?

Review Opinion
By 2cents - Apr 03, 2010 06:04 PM EST
Filed Under: Sci-Fi

Well like most of you here, I also loved the Hamlin version because when I was younger that is what Imagined what the Greek Myths will look like, much thanks to Harryhausen's vfx.

So does that mean it doesn't need a remake? Well remakes are a staple of hollywood, we couldn't stop it even if we want to. If it made an impact with the previous generation chances are hollywood execs wants to have that lightning hit twice.

Problems with remakes are these if you are a person who have watched the original, and loved the original, whatever improvement they did with the new one will always fall short. You're over hypercritical mature self will always try to bring down the new movie in order to remain intact the movie of your over romanticized young self's.

Getting back to the movie, was it good, I'll say yes. Did it match-up with the original, I'll just leave that answer with me.

I'll say vfx now is lightyears away from the stopmotion of '81, but hey the effects now will be infantile 30 yrs from now as well. So, I guess this kind of movies is sort of milestones on the movie industry's technology. Though I have to say that in some areas the cg felt a bit clunky, compared to other cg movies of this generation, but it is indeed serviceable.

Let's go in to the story. I'll just have to say that it is the same and different with the original version. This sort of I felt was a parallel universe with the Hamlin version. It's the same movie with the lead character just making different choices. This I felt was what the moviemakers was pushing a lot, let the character just make drastically different decisions from what their classic counterparts made. This holds true on the other side of the lens as well. I just feel like Leterrier made choices to make changes in the movie just for the sake that it will come of as a different movie from the original. Is that wrong? Well, in my opinion it is not but for me it just felt so unorganic.

Acting wise, I'll say the gods are amazing Liam Neeson and Fiennes especially. and I really dig their looks. I can't comment more, I just think this is one of the aspect of the movie that they really have done well. Though sad to say Worthington is a piss-poor actor, he gets me out of the movie everytime he delivers a dialogue, and if they've done an almost perfect job in the looks of the gods, they went the other way with Perseus(Worthington) who looks so despicable. God It's difficult looking at the character with the buzz cut and the skirt, he looks like a reject for a low budget MTV rock video. God its awful, I hoped they had gone with any of the 300 actors. Good thing Arterton was there, she has that ethereal quality which fits her character well, and she's really easy o nthe eyes and she balances out the horridness of Worthington's character.

Well, Leterrier still delivered what I felt was a solid movie, with some missteps here and there. (I'll still watch this frenchman's Avengers if he ever gets the gig).

I'll still recommend that you watch this. If you've watched the original, just don't raise your hopes that high. If you haven't watched the original, watch this new movie first and then watch the original and laughed at how ridiculous that one looks now.

-#Citizens stay Astig!

THE OLD GUARD 2 Rotten Tomatoes Score Revealed As First Reviews Land
Related:

THE OLD GUARD 2 Rotten Tomatoes Score Revealed As First Reviews Land

X-MEN: AGE OF REVELATION Tie-Ins Reveal First Look At New Sabretooth, The Future X-Men Team, And More
Recommended For You:

X-MEN: AGE OF REVELATION Tie-Ins Reveal First Look At New Sabretooth, The Future X-Men Team, And More

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

mativ16
mativ16 - 4/4/2010, 11:49 AM
This movie SUCKED! Not even comparing it to the original 1981 movie. If you just compare it to greek mythology(the source material, which I know no one cares about, but want film makers to keep to it.) it doesn't hold up. I completely agree with the acting. Worthington is pure crap. I don't know why people keep putting him in films. The story was so jumbled with this & that, that I lost interest right after the scorpions. I couldn't even enjoy the medusa scene cause I was so bored by that point. Plus how many times was he gonna say "I'm gonna do this as a man." I swear if I had to hear that line for another second I was gonna punch a baby. This movie was blah. I think Leterrier is a decent director, but the direction wasn't the problem with this movie.
BJD
BJD - 4/4/2010, 1:59 PM
The movie sucked!!!!!!!!!! Legendary pictures just went down 3 notches in my book.
48and2
48and2 - 4/4/2010, 2:15 PM
Very well written review. I'll still watch it.
BryEL
BryEL - 4/4/2010, 2:40 PM
@Mativ 16 - dude, totally agree.

It wasn't a bad movie directing-wise cause come on, it still LOOKED sweet but it's a bad movie for strolling away from its source material which isn't that hard to follow, there's only ONE Perseus story, right? Blame the writers of this atrocity.

Adding to a remake is fine to a point, but taking away is far worse of a crime. (I weep for Bubo..)
MadDizzle
MadDizzle - 4/4/2010, 3:34 PM
This movie ruled, your all little pussies, its just a movie. Enjoy it and quit cryin!!!
Maculis
Maculis - 4/4/2010, 5:25 PM
i just came back from the movies, and yes it sucked. And i dont understand how it makes me a pussy. it just sucked, period. it made little sense, and was completely rushed through. he went from being a fisherman to a prisoner to the greatest warrior ever, literally in like 15 min. with very little explination. bottom line, i think if youre a moron, you'll enjoy this movie. but if you have a brain, that requires some semblance of reasoning, you wont enjoy this. i think letterier blew his chance with avengers.
Maculis
Maculis - 4/4/2010, 5:42 PM
by the way, I didn't get this article as well. The auther kept saying he wanted to keep his opinion to himself, or something like that. Well what the hell did he/she write the article for?
BrownTornado
BrownTornado - 4/4/2010, 10:49 PM
I was a little disappointed in the acting and writting. The effects were darn good and the action was pretty intense. Yeah I have a soft spot in my heart for the original, but this one could have been better in my opinion. Not the worst, and certainly not the best.
TheJester
TheJester - 4/5/2010, 5:55 AM
Did we see the same movie? Amazing acting?

Weak.

View Recorder