AVENGERS 5: Rumored New Details Emerge About How Marvel Studios Plans To Replace Kang With [SPOILER]

AVENGERS 5: Rumored New Details Emerge About How Marvel Studios Plans To Replace Kang With [SPOILER]

Some additional rumoured details about Marvel Studios' plans for Kang moving forward have been revealed, including how he'll likely be replaced as the Multiverse Saga's big bad. Read on for details...

By JoshWilding - Dec 27, 2023 09:12 AM EST

Marvel Studios currently finds itself in a major (no pun intended) predicament. With Jonathan Majors found guilty on one count of intentional assault in the third degree and aggravated harassment in the second degree by a New York jury, his time as Kang the Conqueror has ended. 

On the one hand, all that really needs to be done is finding another actor to fill the role. The problem is, as great as Majors was in Loki, the Conqueror's defeat in Ant-Man and The Wasp: Quantumania has seen many fans write Kang off as a serious threat, an issue when he's meant to be the Multiverse Saga's big bad. 

Some believe Loki season 2 offered Marvel Studios an out, but the series was shot before Majors' legal issues and the ending explicitly mentioned that a Kang Variant had been dealt with in the Quantum Realm, confirming the villain's Variants are still out there. 

Conveniently, they're all assembled at the Council of Kangs, making it simple for another big bad to just, oh, wipe them all out of existence in one go. 

According to The Cosmic Circus' Alex Perez, the idea now is to pull a Kaguya with Kang; that's a reference to Naruto, a manga series which saw a character named Madara introduced as a serious threat and big bad. However, Kaguya was then introduced, with Madara unceremoniously killed - proving he wasn't the threat everyone thought - and Kaguya was established as the true villain. 

So, in this scenario, Kang is Madara and Kaguya is likely The Beyonder. 

We believe the original plan was for the Ant-Man threequel's Kang the Conqueror to return as The Beyonder, but with Avengers: The Kang Dynasty and Avengers: Secret Wars both being rewritten by Michael Waldron, it seems the plan has changed. 

However, Marvel Studios isn't giving up on Kang entirely. @Cryptic4KQual claims, "They won't [explicitly]m present him as Beyonder Kang until the aftermath of the 616 collapse, when he will then go on to establish Battleworld." 

This presumably means all those other Kangs were lesser Variants, with The Beyonder using them to recreate the Multiverse so he could return. 

There's probably a way to make this work, but all these rumours are pretty confusing and it's hard not to wonder whether Marvel Studios would benefit from just going back to the drawing board and starting over. That may well be what they're doing, of course, but we're sure most of you will agree The Beyonder being a Kang Variant could be ill-advised, especially when regular moviegoers have likely never even watched Loki.

Avengers: The Kang Dynasty is currently scheduled to arrive in theaters on May 1, 2026, with Avengers: Secret Wars to follow on May 7, 2027.

From A RICK AND MORTY Overload To Robert Downey Jr.'s Return - Charting The Multiverse Saga's Wild Evolution
Related:

From A RICK AND MORTY Overload To Robert Downey Jr.'s Return - Charting The Multiverse Saga's Wild Evolution

RUMOR: AVENGERS: THE KANG DYNASTY Would Have Effectively Served As SHANG-CHI 2
Recommended For You:

RUMOR: AVENGERS: THE KANG DYNASTY Would Have "Effectively Served" As SHANG-CHI 2

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
HumanRubiksCube
HumanRubiksCube - 12/27/2023, 9:44 AM
TODAYS NEWS: RUMOURS RUMOURS AND MORE RUMOURS
Sephiroth
Sephiroth - 12/27/2023, 9:52 AM
I’m convinced these “scoopers” just make stuff up. It’s weird that this stuff even gets reported.
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 12/27/2023, 10:49 AM
@Sephiroth - That or leaking stuff from brainstorming sessions which is equaly as meaningless as making stuff up but gives scoopers the out of 'well they DID consider it for five seconds so I wasn't wrong' line even if they never proceed with any of the ideas at all, lol.
bobevanz
bobevanz - 12/27/2023, 10:56 AM
@Sephiroth - it's all made up. Most rumors are so simple that it seems possible, and they're also so generic it would seem likely. Other times they do it to start a controversy, like Pedro Pascal which still isn't actually 1000% confirmed lol
Fares
Fares - 12/27/2023, 9:53 AM
Can we get a live-action movie about What If's 80s Avengers instead?
harryba11zack
harryba11zack - 12/27/2023, 9:53 AM
I guess Rent is due
GhostDog
GhostDog - 12/27/2023, 9:56 AM
Josh owes money to these scoopers for real
HashTagSwagg
HashTagSwagg - 12/27/2023, 9:57 AM
Christ, more rumours? can you just back to posting skimpy cosplayer articles like the golden years. At least there was some prehistoric form of honour and dignity in that.
bobevanz
bobevanz - 12/27/2023, 10:57 AM
@HashTagSwagg - seriously lol give me the booba, I'm tired of the current situation
SouthernNeo
SouthernNeo - 12/27/2023, 11:25 AM
@HashTagSwagg - For real! I remember those days lol
HulkisHoly
HulkisHoly - 12/27/2023, 12:58 PM
@HashTagSwagg -


“ At least there was some prehistoric form of honour and dignity in that.”

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
That got me good.
HammerLegFoot
HammerLegFoot - 12/27/2023, 9:58 AM
The only thing we can do is sit back and wait for the movies to come out and either love them or not. I cant wait to see what happens.
harryba11zack
harryba11zack - 12/27/2023, 10:50 AM
@HammerLegFoot - nah, nothing worse then having paid to watch a film that turned out to be a massive pile of wet dog sh1t, and in the end to know that you helped pay for it's box office success. Fcuk that.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 12/27/2023, 9:59 AM
Kaguya Doom ftw.
S8R8M
S8R8M - 12/27/2023, 10:00 AM
I hope they stick with Kang. I do think the Beyonder should be it's own thing. Not a Kang variant.
marvel72
marvel72 - 12/27/2023, 10:01 AM
@S8R8M -

lazlodaytona
lazlodaytona - 12/27/2023, 10:01 AM
I don't see the big deal in just getting another actor. Worked with Rhodie.
CerealKiller1
CerealKiller1 - 12/27/2023, 10:01 AM
“There's probably a way to make this work, but all these rumours are pretty confusing”

Imagine being this bloody unself aware. It’s only confusing because you post so many every day and can’t keep them straight
DocSpock
DocSpock - 12/27/2023, 10:01 AM
Wonky time.

Too many rumors to even guess what is real.
marvel72
marvel72 - 12/27/2023, 4:22 PM
@DocSpock - Do you believe at least one of these are going to end up being true? If you start so many different scenarios up as rumours the odds are one of them could be true.
DocSpock
DocSpock - 12/27/2023, 4:43 PM
@marvel72 -

You know you just described Josh.
santoanderson
santoanderson - 12/27/2023, 10:02 AM
I don’t see why recasting Kang would be such a problem. Comic Kang is a guy in a purple suit of armor with a blue robotic face. Just bring back the character but make him stay in blue face mode all the time. Marvel Studios already dealt with a similar recasting issue with Red Skull, and that worked out fine.
bkmeijer1
bkmeijer1 - 12/27/2023, 10:33 AM
@santoanderson - Rhodey, Cassie, Red Skull and Ross were all explained without reason, and now they actually have a reason (calling it a variant). I don't see why they couldn't just replace Majors
marvel72
marvel72 - 12/27/2023, 10:03 AM
Keep Kang and The Beyonder as two separate characters.

Beyonder Kang

Spoken
Spoken - 12/27/2023, 10:06 AM
Why don't they just introduce Molecule Man, and he ends up killing every single Kang Variant? I mean both Beyonder and Molecule Man are somewhat connected, more so than Kang and Beyonder.
litobirdy
litobirdy - 12/27/2023, 10:14 AM
ugh, this website is a shell of itself, i mostly come back for the comments section these days
Forthas
Forthas - 12/27/2023, 10:16 AM
Maybe the smart thing to do is build off of what is already established namely Tiamut in the Etrenals. Have the presence of that celestial somehow get the attention of Galactus...then have his Heralds serve as the big bads (with one or more of course turning good) then set up the next saga that sees Galactus and the Celestials square off against each other.
bkmeijer1
bkmeijer1 - 12/27/2023, 10:34 AM
@Forthas - I like that. I could see Galactus as a rogue Celestial that acts as a way to keep Celestials in check by devouring worlds with Celestial eggs in them
Forthas
Forthas - 12/27/2023, 1:13 PM
@bkmeijer1 - I am not sure that would work. Galactus has a very specific origin which has nothing to do with the celestials. I would rather that his origin be tied to the end of his universe as it is in the comic and perhaps it was the result of something the celestials did and as a result Galactus becomes an enemy of theirs.
bkmeijer1
bkmeijer1 - 12/27/2023, 2:25 PM
@Forthas - that could work as well. Either way, I'm definitely expecting Galactus to be tied to the Celestials in one way or another. Especially after Ego was one too
Se4M4NSt4ine
Se4M4NSt4ine - 12/27/2023, 10:17 AM
Marvel pre-Endgame replacing actors to play established characters:



Marvel post-Endgame replacing actors to play established characters:

1 2

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder