Nonsensical and Atrocious - What Went Wrong in Batman v. Superman

Nonsensical and Atrocious - What Went Wrong in Batman v. Superman

A wasted cast and a clueless director are just two of the reasons why this film was an abomination. But, like any good trainwreck, people can't stop watching. Find out what caused the crash here!

Review Opinion
By TheSchemer - Mar 26, 2016 07:03 AM EST
Filed Under: Batman vs. Superman
Source: Haunted By Humans

I’m not saying this film is the worst thing I’ve ever seen. I enjoyed parts of it for sure. Some parts were simply fantastic. But it wasn’t what it should have been, and that’s what makes things that much worse. If you liked the movie, great! I liked the original Ghost Rider film, but I’ll be the first to admit that it is not artistically a good movie. There’s a difference between personal opinion and objective truth. Batman v Superman was far from what we’ve grown to expect from comic book films. It just wasn’t a good movie. Here’s some of the reasons why. And yes…BIG SPOILER ALERT!

1) Character motivations are never clear.

40cakes_4996

This caper makes as much sense as his plan in Batman v Superman.

The film’s strength is the cast. Ben Affleck gives us the best on-screen Batman yet, with some amazing fight scenes akin to those we’ve seen in the Arkham video games. Jesse Eisenberg is a great Lex Luthor, when his character isn’t being poorly written, and Jeremy Irons is a perfect Alfred. But we really have no clue what motivates these characters because either it’s never shown, or it’s changed throughout the film.

Why does Lex want Superman dead? To protect the Earth? In the comics, Lex is really an awful human being, but his hatred of Superman stems from his pride. He thinks he, not an alien, should be Earth’s savior. If that’s really the case here, why does he unleash a troll from Lord of the Rings Doomsday, who will certainly be just as big a threat as Superman, and why is he so happy that Darkseid is coming? Either way…no savior card for you, Mr. Luthor. Lex is a genius, and we get some awesome moments in the film (the Senate bombing was done so well, classic Luthor). But he changes mid-film to a cookie cutter baddie. There is no way his plan is going to result in anything other than a trip to jail, something that Superman has always had a notoriously hard time accomplishing.

Luthor isn’t the only one written poorly. Throughout the film, a common question is basically if men are truly good or evil. I’d like to tell you which characters think which option is true, but they change their minds so much I can’t tell. First Batman says they are evil, which is understandable. Except he is somehow both inspired by his parents death to be Batman, because lives are worth living, and haunted by their words about how bad people usually are, so they deserve nothing. Superman then starts brooding and starts thinking the same, and Lois Lane has to convince him otherwise. Then Wonder Woman tells Batman that she left the world of men because she didn’t think they deserved her protection, and BATMAN convinces her that men are worth saving, so then she changes her mind.

Head spinning yet?

2) Everything is surface level, and the deeper things don’t work.

1200

There’s a lot of dream sequences. We even get the classic “I had a dream about a character I don’t even know exists.” None of the dreams add anything to the plot that wasn’t there already. I’m not sure how bats levitating a young Bruce Wayne or a Man-Bat bursting out of a grave serve as good symbolism. Its like the writers wanted us to think profound things, but didn’t add any meaning to find. The lone exception is the painting in Lex’s office, which really did add a layer of fear and premonition to the plot.

Of course, this all leaves the plot paper thin. It completely revolves on getting Superman to fight Batman. Usually plot points advance a story or a moral, they get from Point A to Point B. But the plot here isn’t linear, its orbital. Batman and Superman need to fight. Everything orbits that. Nothing needs to make sense, the characters can act completely different from one scene to the next, as long as we can get to the fight! For example…

  • Superman lets a bunch of terrorists go so he can tell Batman to stop being mean to criminals.
  • Gotham is close enough to Metropolis that every person in Superman’s city can see the Batsignal. If that were the case, and Superman dislikes Batman’s brand of justice so much, he would have long ago starting cleaning up the streets of Gotham. He flies around the world to save people, of course he could go right across the bay!
  • Superman finally decides to ask Batman for help, but gives up way too easily on the whole “Maybe I should just refuse to fight this guy and mention that we have a common enemy that you are also really concerned about.” Honestly, all he has to do is say “Lex Luthor wants me to kill you or else he’ll kill my mom.”
  • Speaking of Lex, he orchestrates this gladiator match for no reason. He wants Superman dead, right? Why send him to Batman when you already have Doomsday?
  • Superman can hear when Lois is in danger from thousands of miles away, but his mom gets kidnapped and he can’t tell that she’s probably within 30 miles of where he is. We saw in the beginning of the film that Superman is truly faster than a speeding bullet. He could have saved his mom easily, but no, he had to go get Batman’s help.

Oh, and even the plot points that don’t necessarily revolve around making the two icons duke it out are clearly afterthoughts. They don’t make any sense.

  • Lex goes though a huge conspiracy plan to make it look like Superman was responsible for a bunch of deaths somewhere in Africa. Except all those deaths were caused by bullets. We’re not talking Iron Man here, Superman doesn’t use a gun. So he saves Lois, but it’s pretty clear that Superman didn’t do any of the killing. But it creates tension…so…there’s that. Oh, and accusations fly that Superman somehow saw the bomb at the Capitol but chose to do nothing to save everyone. Except its not common knowledge to these people that Superman has x-ray vision, so why would they suspect he could have known the bomb was there?
  • Lex somehow needs government permission to transport a chunk of kryptonite into the U.S. Maybe I’m wrong, but are there really laws that prohibit new minerals from being transported? He’s not even selling it to anyone. If I had a small chunk of kryptonite and I wanted to get in the U.S. with it, I’d put it in my suitcase and fly home. If I was rich and had a big chunk of kryptonite, I’d just put it on a ship in a big crate, or fly it in on a private jet. I wouldn’t tell the government about it until I actually had the dang thing, and maybe not even then!
  • Speaking of kryptonite, Batman puts a tracker on the transport truck, but still physically chases the bad guys. This is only going to get people killed. Just wait until the tracker stops moving, you know, like Spider-Man does in comic books from 50 years ago!
  • And as long as we’re talking Spider-Man, when did Perry White turn into a J. Jonah Jameson clone? The character was really solid in Man of Steel, but here it feels like they are trying too hard to make him a jerk. Stern is fine, but it was a bit much, especially when he says “nobody cares about Clark Kent taking on the Batman.” C’mon man, the Batman is obviously front page news if it’s a big TV story. I’d totally want to see Clark Kent taking on the Batman.
  • Why does Lex have his head shaved when he goes to jail? That’s usually not standard operating procedure. It just feels like the writers wanted us to have another AHA! moment.
  • This one is nitpicky, but when Lois gets to the Capitol, two security guards have to check her credentials. But she isn’t going to the interior, she’s just going near the protesters. She obviously didn’t need credentials for that.

3) We don’t care about these people. 

snyder2

Probably in an attempt to get to an expanded universe faster, DC opted to throw a bunch about all these characters at us at once. So much has happened before the events of the film, but we weren’t along for the ride, so we don’t have anything invested in any of these characters.

Lois and Clark’s romance is all of a sudden there, which is fine, but we didn’t see its progression, so we don’t care about it like we care about Pepper and Tony, or even Arwen and Aragorn. Heck, Lois isn’t even likable. And she’s written so poorly, like the screenwriters thought they needed to hit us over the head with how intense she is.

Henry Cavill’s Superman is also not incredibly likable. He broods, he let his dad die in Man of Steel and he has no Clark Kent charm. And he’s always hovering over people. Who thought that was a good idea? “Oh look, a family trapped on a roof during a flood. I’ll just hover here a bit before I save them.” “Well, I’m here for a Senate hearing where lots of people are protesting my very existence. Might as well hover over them to make them feel small or something.”

I felt absolutely nothing when that troll Doomsday killed Superman. I didn’t care. And we all know he isn’t really dead. People like to say that Marvel is afraid to be serious, but both Phil Coulson and Quicksilver have been killed and those deaths made me sad (not super sad, but it produced an emotion), even shocked me. This wasn’t shocking. I was a little surprised, but only because we’ve really had no time to get to know this Superman. We do know that a lot of people actually don’t like him at all, so why should we care, as an audience, if he’s dead?

And Batman. I can’t really empathize with a character who treats life so callously. The thing that makes Batman different from the Punisher, or Deadpool, is that he isn’t a killer. The Robin costume was a good touch to see how much toll the Batman life has had on Bruce, but we don’t see enough of that toll to justify Bruce willing to kill Superman. And not just be willing, but to make that Plan A, not even a last resort. Plus his motivation is so cloudily presented that I can’t get on the same page.

punisherbatman3_zps68ff3113

This is what Batman’s conversations with the Punisher are like. Batman doesn’t step over the line like Frank Castle does.

The interesting thing is that the characters I actually care about were in the film very little. Wonder Woman was set up nicely, and the scenes of the Flash and Aquaman were very well done (and it was very thoughtful of Lex to design logos for them too!). I care more about what happens to those three than I care about what happens to Batman, and especially Superman. I’m actually excited for the Wonder Woman movie now, although I’m not as sold on Gal Godot’s role as some folks. Oh…Cyborg. I’m just curious if they are renaming him “Bad CGI Man” because I’ve seen better special effects on Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.

santa-conquers-screenie-2-1024x578

Based on BvS Special Effects, this is likely what Cyborg will look like in Justice League.

I could go on for much longer, but I won’t, because dead horses don’t need beating. If you enjoyed this movie, good for you, but it is very shaky ground to build a mega-franchise on. Stay home and rent this later. Or if you want to spend money on it, wait for the Director’s Cut to be released, perhaps it will be edited better than the awkwardly paced hodge podge we got in cinemas.

Final Grade: 3 out of 10 stars.

Full article here!

We May Know Who The First Big Threat To The DCU Is Already And How They Play Into SUPERMAN
Related:

We May Know Who The First Big Threat To The DCU Is Already And How They Play Into SUPERMAN

Jesse Eisenberg Is Embarrassed To Admit That BATMAN V SUPERMAN: DAWN OF JUSTICE Hurt His Career
Recommended For You:

Jesse Eisenberg Is Embarrassed To Admit That BATMAN V SUPERMAN: DAWN OF JUSTICE "Hurt" His Career

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

DannRamm113
DannRamm113 - 3/26/2016, 8:31 AM
Lets get this straight, just because you dislike a movie doesn't mean a movie can't be liked
TheSchemer
TheSchemer - 3/26/2016, 11:54 AM
@dannramm113 - Um...never said that. In fact, I said the exact opposite.
fishybashi
fishybashi - 3/26/2016, 9:55 AM
I agree with this review. BvS is so disappointing. I enjoyed MOS, but this sequel is Grade A Trash. I'm ashamed to be a DC fan. And why would Geoff Johns endorse this?
ScarletWarlock
ScarletWarlock - 3/26/2016, 11:38 AM
My expectations were lowered to an all time low and I still consider this movie to be one of the worst comic book movies' out there. I would definitely put it in a top 10 list for the worst. Like you say, it's okay for anyone to like this movie if they have their own personal reasons, but for people to act as though it functions as an objectively good movie would just be wrong on so many levels.

I'm not a critic, nor do I like hurting people's feelings, but this was one of the most blatantly and most obviously bad film I have seen in a very, very long time, so I feel confident that there's a great deal of evidence to suggest the film is objectively bad. For the most part I think movies are subjective, but this movie practically punches you in the face, begging for you to hate it. As I said earlier, I don't intend to be mean, but this is the reality of the film. Heck, even my theater full of dirt bags filled the auditorium with sighs and whispers of "what the hell is going on" or "what the [frick] was that", and EVEN SOME CHUCKLING!

Once again, like the movie if you want, don't be discouraged, if you like select scenes of Battfleck and that saves the movie for you, then awesome, there's genuinely nothing wrong with that, people absorb movies in their own way, but I'm still saying this movie has VERY apparent flaws that can be judged in an objective way, mainly because these so called flaws are so apparent it's impossible to ignore.
ThunderKat
ThunderKat - 3/28/2016, 3:41 PM
I read most of the article. Your points are mostly valid and very applicable to "Man of Steel."

MoS: No character development therefore no empathy or sympathy, too much Krypton, too much focus on action. Great actors with under written characters.

I will enjoy BvS: DoJ when it hits the discount theater. I couldn't imagine paying full price.

I will say Affleck gets an award for best toupee. Did the sneer come with it?
NotHardtoThink
NotHardtoThink - 3/31/2016, 9:00 AM
Great write-up, and I especially appreciate you pulling that Batman & Punisher panel. People should actually care about these characters, and a film having a plot that makes sense, not just the fact they look cool on film and there is so much riding on it that they must defend it.
NotHardtoThink
NotHardtoThink - 3/31/2016, 9:02 AM
@NotHardtoThink - To clarify, I'm not saying people don't or cant enjoy the film, I'm saying that if they don't acknowledge the issues as real and valid that they may be lying to themselves. That's why I like that you brought up that you enjoy Ghostrider, but acknowledge it's not exactly an exercise in film-making that excels.
View Recorder