Hulksta Reviews CAPTAIN AMERICA: CIVIL WAR

Hulksta Reviews CAPTAIN AMERICA: CIVIL WAR

“Hey, at least it’s better than Batman v Superman” – Me

Review Opinion
By Hulksta - May 05, 2016 11:05 PM EST

I really am not too sure what to say about Captain America: Civil War. Like Avengers: Age of Ultron and Iron Man 3, I came out from the movie with extremely mixed feelings. Full Spoilers ahead!

In a sense, this is the culmination of what the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) has been building towards. The idea that over multiple movies, TV shows, and so on, it can build a living and breathing universe; and in that sense this movie is a runaway success. I’m sure people will be analyzing this film, finding all the various threads that run throughout the MCU.

Which brings me to the most glaring issue of the movie for me. In service of building the universe, and all that comes with it (Black Panther! The Raft! SPIDER-MAN!) it takes away from some characters. The two that suffer the most are Helmut Zemo and Captain America.

Zemo in some ways is great. He doesn’t have much to work with, and he just hates The Avengers. He doesn’t have daddy issues, nor does he have an Infinity Stone, he just wants to mess shit up. However, what bothered me with his character is at the end they reveal that he’s simply another victim of Sokovia. Just like the kid who was killed, and Quicksilver, and the other dead people. It feels cheap, and hammers home the point that The Avengers did screw up a bit during the events of Age of Ultron. Which is fine when you bring it up the first few times, but Zemo’s backstory shouldn’t have been so tied to Sokovia. We found out from the mom that Tony and the Avengers failed. That’s all that was needed

Captain America also loses some steam. Not only is Cap essentially surrounded by charismatic characters like Tony Stark, Hawkeye, and Spider-Man in his own film, which doesn’t quite help; he’s essentially reacting to the surrounding events, which like tying things to Sokovia, works in small doses, but I don’t need it to be the crux of the character. I rewatched The Winter Soldier lately and what blew me away about that movie is how assertive Captain America is. I was hoping we’d get that, Cap who is frustrated with beauacracy and the failings of the government and takes a stand. This time though it seems like Cap just leisurely strolls into place, even if it is in revolt. There’s no urgency to his performance, there’s no vibrancy or excitement. Even evoking Cap’s great speech from the Civil War comic would’ve been great, but it has to be paraphrased to him. Essentially robbing Captain America of any great moments.

In terms of characters, the one character who seems to get the best attention is Bucky/The Winter Soldier. I’m glad they re-re-established his friendship with Steve, and It was nice to see him wrestle with the sins of his past. He was honestly the most interesting character in the film.

As I mentioned earlier, the movie fails in that it over emphasizes universe building over the individual character moments. It’s hard to deny just how cool the stuff for fans is however. Tom Holland is Spider-Man, and Chadwick Boseman made me care about a character I couldn’t give two shits about before. Seeing Giant Man was cool.

In this sense, I’m in conflict. The nerd in me really enjoyed the comic book references and the cool new additions to the MCU. As a fan of films though, I compare this film to The Winter Soldier or Guardians of The Galaxy where they balanced all those new additions to the MCU while still keeping the core of the characters intact, and in that sense this film is a disappointment. Not because it’s a bad film, but because I know the MCU is better than this.

With all that said, I award the film:

650/1000
Uncle Joeys


PS: Everret Ross is totally Red Skull. Calling it now!
SPIDER-MAN: Tom Holland Credits Robert Downey Jr. For Stopping His CIVIL WAR Scenes From Being Cut Down
Related:

SPIDER-MAN: Tom Holland Credits Robert Downey Jr. For Stopping His CIVIL WAR Scenes From Being Cut Down

CAPTAIN AMERICA: CIVIL WAR And TFATWS Actor Daniel Brühl Is Very Confident Zemo Will Return To The MCU
Recommended For You:

CAPTAIN AMERICA: CIVIL WAR And TFATWS Actor Daniel Brühl Is "Very Confident" Zemo Will Return To The MCU

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

DeusExSponge
DeusExSponge - 5/5/2016, 11:32 PM
I agree with you on Captain America. After dealing with SHIELDs fallout due to Hydra, you would think that he'd be a bit more assertive, militant and resistant to the Sokovia Accords. He seemed a bit too passive, and his actions were more dictated by circumstances than his own volition.

While I do personally disagree with you on the other matters and think that Civil War is one of the best that the MCU has to offer, your review was very good and provided a very interesting read and perspective. +1! Although it might take a while for that +1 to come around, mine never seems to register for some reason.
Forthas
Forthas - 5/6/2016, 8:49 AM
I thought it was a really good film that was effective in juggling the many subplots and stories in a seamless way. I have to give credit where credit is due and the film masterfully introduces new characters and deepens the connections to older more established characters. I also liked how the conflict between the heroes did not compromise their morality in order to have "good guys" vs "bad guys" cliche, but muddles the moral issues adequately enough that one did not see villainy in any hero's motives. The action was very well done, although it seems to have moved that universe closer to comic book physics (meaning none at all) which can be a bit jarring when a viewer is hit with numerous fantasy elements in a brief period. I tend to prefer movies that attempt to stick close to realism as possible.

However...because there were so many balls in the air...the individual stories suffered and felt hollow. The "villain" of the film - Zemo- felt very weak and more resourceful and calculating than his capacity as established by the film would suggest he could be. While I understand this is a comic book film, the broader world established around the film felt increasingly foreign as if it were set in the future. For those reason this movie did not rise to the level of Captain America: The Winter Soldier which I still contend is Marvel's best film to date, followed by the Avengers and Captain America: Civil War.

Overall I would give this film an 8.5/10
SteveBosell
SteveBosell - 5/6/2016, 10:25 AM
I wonder if Thanos will also fall into the Marvel curse of weak villains.
Here's an idea: Have Kevin Feig tweak and organize the DCEU and have WB write better villains for Marvel.
Hulksta
Hulksta - 5/6/2016, 11:24 AM
@Marxman12 - I hope not. I mean if we find out Thanos is doing everything because his girlfriend died in Sokovia that would be pretty shitty
sKeemAn
sKeemAn - 5/8/2016, 12:39 PM
After reading your review, I'm inclined to agree with you. The problem I initally had with the idea of a Civl War movie is be an Avengers movie. By making it a Captain America it would take away from the big CA moments had we had in WS. now I love the movie it is Platim in my book, but I still think it should have been an Avengers movie.

Your review made me think Nice one.
View Recorder