HALLOWEEN KILLS Director Explains Divisive Ending And Confirms Time Jump For HALLOWEEN ENDS - SPOILERS

HALLOWEEN KILLS Director Explains Divisive Ending And Confirms Time Jump For HALLOWEEN ENDS - SPOILERS

Halloween Kills director David Gordon Green has addressed the sequel's divisive ending, clearing a few lingering questions up and confirming a time jump when Halloween Ends kicks off. Check it out...

By JoshWilding - Oct 16, 2021 05:10 AM EST
Filed Under: Halloween
Source: IGN

Halloween Kills has proven to be surprisingly divisive, with the ending one of the most problematic issues for fans and critics alike. You can read our review of the movie by clicking here, but during a recent interview with IGN, director David Gordon Green shared his take on the way things wrap up. 

We broke down those crazy final few moments yesterday, but according to the filmmaker, he didn't intend to portray Michael Myers as a "supernatural" being. 

"The suggestion that he is more than a man is a theory that Laurie has," the director says. "My own personal concept for Michael, which will carry forward as long as I'm involved, is that he's capable of spectacular things but not impossible [things]. So I don't personally see him as supernatural, but I see the element of fear that he's generated and exacerbated is transcending the immediate character and moved on to an entire community."

That doesn't exactly line up with what we see in the movie because Michael manages to survive being impaled by a pitchfork shortly before he's stabbed in the base of his neck. It sounds pretty impossible to us, that's for sure. Regardless, Green adds that when it comes to Laurie Strode, "[Michael is] not personally motivated to kill a person, but he does have a beacon to go home."

As for where things go next, he dropped a few new details about Halloween Ends. "Our middle chapter is about that community and that expansion of the legacy," Green notes. "Some return for Ends. But Ends has a little less novelty and a little bit more specificity in the emotion of a Laurie/Michael connection." He concluded by saying "we're going to take a four-year leap in time."

That presumably means Michael has been free to kill for all that time...or he's just disappeared. It definitely sounds a little weird, and you have to wonder whether the negative critical reaction to Halloween Kills will change what Green has planned for the conclusion to his unexpectedly odd trilogy.

Halloween Kills is now playing in theaters and on Peacock.

2024 Halloween Gift Guide: No Tricks, All Treats This Spooky Season
Related:

2024 Halloween Gift Guide: No Tricks, All Treats This Spooky Season

HALLOWEEN TV Series Will Ignore Recent Trilogy & Return To Carpenter's Original For Full Creative Reset
Recommended For You:

HALLOWEEN TV Series Will Ignore Recent Trilogy & Return To Carpenter's Original For Full "Creative Reset"

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

kylo0607
kylo0607 - 10/16/2021, 6:56 AM
Seeing this tonight.

Nothing like a good old slasher at the cinema on a Saturday night.

Coming back home from it to a new Batman trailer will be the cherry on top.
99OPTIMISTPRIME
99OPTIMISTPRIME - 10/16/2021, 6:56 AM
Yeah more than most of the Halloweens, this movie really drove home the point, that Mike's immortal.😂
TheShape9859
TheShape9859 - 10/16/2021, 7:13 AM
Absolutely loved it...Michael kills
CurlyBill
CurlyBill - 10/16/2021, 7:49 AM
The argument that he isn't supernatural went out the window after the first film. In Halloween 2018 Michael is shot in the shoulder, ran over by a car going atleast 40 miles an hour, has two fingers blown off, stabbed, shot in the face with a rifle, and survives smoke inhalation being trapped in a basement on fire. Then in Kills which happens the same night Michael is stabbed a handful of times with a knife and pitchfork, shot point blank 3 to 4 times, neck curb stomped into stairs, beat with multiple weapons, and literally stabbed in the back of the neck and gets back up with almost no problem. I dont know what DGG is smoking, but Michael is definitely supernatural. As silly as it is I feel like there setting up destroying his mask as the only way to make him vulnerable and that's how he's finnaly going to be killed.
Dredd97
Dredd97 - 10/16/2021, 10:20 AM
@CurlyBill - yeah making the mask the focal point is a...choice for sure. Not sure if I dig it
CurlyBill
CurlyBill - 10/16/2021, 7:52 AM
Michael literally got up like this after the Mob beat him.
Grodd87
Grodd87 - 10/16/2021, 8:08 AM
This movie was horrible other then Micheal Myers
Supes17
Supes17 - 10/16/2021, 8:09 AM
Wasn’t a great piece of cinema, but I enjoyed it
DoubleD
DoubleD - 10/16/2021, 8:11 AM
I thought it was a great story and follow up to the first movie. The Boogeyman kills and kills some more.
McMurdo
McMurdo - 10/17/2021, 12:31 AM
@DoubleD - it is easily one of the worst big movies this year. Christ what a train wreck.
DoubleD
DoubleD - 10/17/2021, 8:43 AM
@McMurdo - That would be The Suicide Squad that bombed at the box office with a 26 million domestic opening. Even with having great critic reviews at Rotten Tomatoes. What happen?
TexasAvenger
TexasAvenger - 10/16/2021, 8:45 AM
It kinda sounds like these guys have no idea what they’re doing. But that’s just me.
connorblaze
connorblaze - 10/16/2021, 9:43 AM
Just watched it. Thought it was pretty bad. Awfully corny and obvious dialogue, trying too hard with the theme of turning the townspeople into monsters from fear, and a silly ending. Could have stuck the landing if the monologue was better (the one that suggested he’s supernatural as he rose after ridiculous amount of punishment) but it was terribly writtena and over the top. No subtlety here.

I liked some of the 70s flourishes but yeah this was bad.

Ive been saying for awhile now they have to change up the story and forumla more significantly if they wanna keep this franchise alive, watching Michael walk around killing people might have been scary and interesting at first but after 43 years of it, it’s not remotely scary anymore.

I still think this sequel should have gone this way. They search the house which has burned to shit and dont find a body, but conclude he burned up. Maybe they find a tooth, I dont know, whatever. A year passes. Then a michael killing happens. Then another one. But it turns out theyre a cult of obsessed copycats that worship michael as their devil. They take vows of silence when theyre in the mask and kill in his name to bring him back. They dress like him. But you never know who is a michael copycat or not. And then youd have an added element of ‘is that the real Michael or another copycat?’ Is he really dead or alive? Is he supernatural and these nutters are really giving him power hy killing in his name, or are they delusional? Then have the real Michael turn up at the end.

Imagine having a whole hospital come under siege by a whole army of creepy cult dudes in Michael gear.

And thats just one idea for how you can keep the core element of Michael but change it up. They need to get more creative, even if my idea is shit. Come up aith something new. Exploring ptsd by having Laurie back, again, but she’s sarah connor, is not original enough.
DeaconFrostBite
DeaconFrostBite - 10/16/2021, 2:27 PM
@connorblaze - I like that idea 👍
Purefoy
Purefoy - 10/23/2021, 1:18 AM
@connorblaze - Buddy, nice idea. I was thinking the same thing this movie really didnt justify its existence as much as 2018 and that they really have to change up the formula to keep the franchise alive. Him just walking around has gotten old...or at least the way they are presenting it currently
roxas1003
roxas1003 - 10/16/2021, 9:53 AM
So… the movie was alrigh….the first one was so good and felt fresh this one was just meh?
Repian
Repian - 10/16/2021, 10:03 AM
This sequel is a failed attempt to do something different with the franchise.

I think that Michael wants to feel the same as he felt when he murdered Judith. He feels the same when he kills Lorie's daughter. The other murders are unsatisfactory.
Repian
Repian - 10/16/2021, 10:24 AM
@Repian - The Myers' house is a key element. If murder is a fulfilling experience for Michael, the house is the setting. The murder of Judith happened in the house and the murder of Lorie's daughter happened in the house.
Ocelot
Ocelot - 10/16/2021, 10:18 AM
With that abrupt ending a four year time skip makes zero sense.

So Michael kills everyone and then just goes on vacation? LOL

It is obvious the director has changed what they originally planned which was 3 Halloween movies which take place across the same night.
McMurdo
McMurdo - 10/17/2021, 12:32 AM
This was [frick]ing terrible. Like truly [frick]ing awful.
r4dagast
r4dagast - 10/17/2021, 11:52 AM
Man I don’t get it, I loved the movie, whoever goes into a slasher movie thinking it’s supposed to be a work of art story wise is just robbing themselves of a good time, the whole time I was worried that Michael was going to actually die in this one and then some other person was going to take his mask for the next one and THAT would of pissed me off
View Recorder