Don't Judge A Movie Based On The Studio Making It

Don't Judge A Movie Based On The Studio Making It

I’ve noticed a common theme on many articles now, that certain members of CBM will attack other movies simply because they come from other studios. Thus they equate the quality of a movie (often yet to be released) with the studio producing it - rather than judging the movie for itself. I think this is ridiculous.

Editorial Opinion
By Nick56 - May 07, 2014 08:05 PM EST
Filed Under: Other

 



I’ve noticed a common theme on many articles now, that certain members of CBM will attack other movies simply because they come from other studios (most common are Fox and Sony). Thus they equate the quality of a movie (often yet to be released) with the studio producing it - rather than judging the movie for itself. 

 

I think this is completely absurd. Marvel Studios making a movie doesn’t automatically make it good (or going to be good) just as Fox Studios making a movie doesn’t mean its going to be bad. 

 

A movie should be judged on it own merits - writing, directing, acting, music, etc... Not on the studio in which makes it. 

 

The past records of studios can’t even be a clue as to the quality of movie they may produce. On the negative side, for every Fantastic Four 1 & 2 there is an Iron 2 or 3 or Ghost Rider 1 & 2. On the positive side, for every X-Men 2 & FC there is an Iron Man and Avengers or Spider-Man 1 & 2. 

 

The point is, every studio has made great films AND bad films. The studio producing the film is no indicator of the quality of movies yet to be released. And frankly using the “studio reason” as a defense for obvious trolling or justification of baseless negativity is pathetic.  

 

We live in a golden age of superhero and comic book movies on the big screen, whether it be the epic event films of Days of Future Past and Batman vs Superman or the growing universe of the MCU - any TRUE comic and/or movie fan should be happy at the quality CBMs being produced (despite the occasional stinker) no matter which studio its coming from. 

 

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion - you can love a movie or hate a movie, you can even have an opinion before a movie is released, but the studio producing it should have no effect on that opinion. 
 

Sorry for ranting, just was getting sick of seeing some of these ridiculous comments.

REAGAN Interview: Jon Voight On His Approach To Playing A KGB Agent And Pandemic Challenges (Exclusive)
Related:

REAGAN Interview: Jon Voight On His Approach To Playing A KGB Agent And Pandemic Challenges (Exclusive)

REAGAN Interview: Dennis Quaid & Penelope Ann Miller Explore Ronald And Nancy's Hollywood History (Exclusive)
Recommended For You:

REAGAN Interview: Dennis Quaid & Penelope Ann Miller Explore Ronald And Nancy's Hollywood History (Exclusive)

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

LEEE777
LEEE777 - 5/7/2014, 8:24 PM
Well I knew Robocop was gonna stink and shouldn't of been made...it did and the remake should not exist!

Pretty much like this FF movie reboot.

But apart from that, I'll give all and any cbm a change no matter how big or small it is.

Gave Webb's Spider-Man a chance, X-Men from Fox etc etc.

You right, we should be happy at the quality CBMs being produced.


Thumbs up.
Nick56
Nick56 - 5/7/2014, 8:59 PM
@LEEE777 I enjoyed the Robocop remake - at the very least it was better than Robocop 2/3 imo. But thanks for the thumbs up! And as long as you don't hate the FF reboot simply cause its Fox then your opinion is ok with me

@SniktBub I might, but I think in general it was disliked by most on this site
ruadh
ruadh - 5/7/2014, 9:14 PM
I concur. There's an amazing amount of kneejerk nose thumbing. The remake thing always bothered me. Can a retelling not be good? Can they not have learned from the original, and perhaps present it in a new and more entertaining way? Is something automatically lousy because it's a story that's already been told? Is this the case for something like Star Wars, which owes much to Kurosawa and Flash Gordon? Or Kurosawa's films like Ran or Throne of Blood?

I see remakes (and reboots) as the modern version of oral tradition. As someone who holds storytelling very dear, I'm always appalled when people automatically spit venom at something for no reason other than it being a retelling. And yeah, a lot of times remakes don't measure up, but sometimes they're pretty damned good. Especially when done by someone who has passion for the original story.

One of my favorite movies is Arsenic & Old Lace. I've sat down to attempt an updated version many times, just for fun as a writing exercise. But I'm never able to come up with any way of improving it. My affection for the movie is too large a hurdle. That's not to say someone else couldn't do it, and do it well. And I'd definitely watch it. And every time I watch a film, I do so in hopes of enjoying it. I don't devote as much time lately to films, particularly because I feel I've gotten pretty good at knowing my own taste, and trailers these days show you far too much so it makes it easy to know if you will like the movie or not.

The last point I'll make is about how bizarre it is to me how many people were talking about ASM 2 (and probably other movies, but this just happened so it's fresh in my memory) and how it was going to be completely bad. And a lot of these people would go on to lament having to go see it. Are these professional film critics? Why do they HAVE to see a movie when they've already made up their mind to not like it? Like Nick56 said, it's fine if you're indulging in prejudice, but why then subject yourself to a waste of 2+ hours and what ever tickets cost in your area? I can only assume these are young people, and I'm not casting aspersions on teens or whatnot, but I just cannot remember any other time in my life where I had that sort of time to waste.
case
case - 5/7/2014, 9:21 PM
Dont tell me what to do!
SauronsBANE
SauronsBANE - 5/7/2014, 9:43 PM
I agree to an extent...but I think the studio plays into it A LOT too.

Marvel has a proven track record for respect for their characters, awesome direction, attention to details, solid stories, so why not use that to judge how their future movies will turn out? Despite some hate for some recent Marvel films, it's plenty arguable that their only bad film was Iron Man 2. And even then, it was only bad because it was too ambitious trying to set up The Avengers. Except for one or two blips, they've been really solid.

Compare that to other studios like Fox, which has shown that they'll churn out drivel like X-3 or X-Men Origins as long as it makes them profitable. Sure, they also produced hits like X-Men 1 and 2 and First Class...but they just don't have the same track record.

Or Sony, who struck gold with Sam Raimi's Spider-Man trilogy...but ever since, they've gone blatantly corporate and show absolutely no understanding of their character. That's exactly the same with WB/DC, who struck gold with Nolan's Batman trilogy...and based on Man of Steel, they definitely don't understand that character either.

Point is, of course we should judge movies based on their own merits. But the studio it comes from absolutely factors in as well. Just my two cents!
pesmerga44
pesmerga44 - 5/7/2014, 11:25 PM
Never have and never will judge a movie based upon the production company that makes it unless say it was Asylum Pictures or something like that because we know what they put out. I really don't care if a comic book movie comes out from Marvel or Sony, Fox or WB because I just wanna see good comic book movies. Now sure Marvel Studios has been putting out some of my favorite CBM's but I refuse to think a movie will suck just because Fox puts it out or Sony. Really what I feel are the top 4 CBM's of all time or represented across the production line Superman the Movie, Spider-Man 2, Dark Knight, and Avengers so I have no bias towards or against the different companies. Me not liking MOS or ASM2 has nothing to do with Sony and WB it comes down to things like writing, directing, pacing, etc...
Alphadog
Alphadog - 5/8/2014, 12:22 AM
It's completely justified to judge a movie on it's studio and it's promotional material even though I don't. The point of trailer and stuff like that is to give you an idea of what the movie will be and the studio are responsible for the quality of the movie. They choose the director and the writer and they supervise everything.
Alphadog
Alphadog - 5/8/2014, 12:24 AM
In fact it's an actual crime for the promotional material to give you a wrong idea of the movie.
MightyZeus
MightyZeus - 5/8/2014, 1:14 AM
I agree with this article not fully but i agree with some of your points. The studio has a major factor into the film and same can be said with the production behind the film. For example, i was hyped for TASM 2 but apparently upon viewing the film i was disappointed and i blame the screen play and the people responsible for the screen play where Alex Kurtzman and Robert Orci who have written poor film scrips before and i'm calling them out because i'm tired of these two screen writers getting work. So it's not just the studio's it can attribute towards the director, producer or screen writers.
Klone
Klone - 5/8/2014, 2:19 AM
People are basing it on past performances. Yes, it does not make a upcoming film automatically bad or good if the studio making it has had a weak or strong track record, but that does normally determine how much faith a person has in it.
Klone
Klone - 5/8/2014, 2:20 AM
X-Men fans are afraid of what Fox are doing to DOFP based on past performance.

DC fans either love/despise the sound and believe/doubt it will be good Superman/Batman based on the past performance
Klone
Klone - 5/8/2014, 2:22 AM
@Sauron

Careful! That's a dangerous film to be reckoning with! It gives off the impression it's intelligent! *whispers*But it isn't!*whispers*
CaptainAmerica31
CaptainAmerica31 - 5/8/2014, 6:16 AM
The only thing we should be worried about for DOFP is the director. Singer is on his downside and that's why we should he worried. Not because fox is making it. Fox making it has nothing to do with it. Ppl want to use the studio argument cause they have bias. They think one studio can do no wrong. But of course we all know they can. So who cares. Marvel studios made bad films, Fox made bad films, sony made bad films.
Klone
Klone - 5/8/2014, 6:44 AM
Marvel zealots: Hate on anything non Marvel Studios, worship anything Marvel Studios.

DC zealots: Hate on anything Marvel Studios, worship anything DC/WB, side with Sony/Fox to spite Marvel Studios.
nibs
nibs - 5/8/2014, 8:27 AM
Here's a wacky concept....what if we didn't judge the movie at all until we actually SEE it?

Crazy, I know.
QuestiontheAnswer
QuestiontheAnswer - 5/8/2014, 9:11 AM
Marvel-Iron Man, Cap 2, Avengers
Fox-X-Men 1, 2 and FC
Sony-Spider-Man 1 and 2
WB-Watchmen, V for Vendetta, Red, History of Violence, Road to Perdition, TDK trilogy, MoS

Unless Marvel replicates Cap 2, I doubt I'll enjoy their movies. TASM was completely underwhelming. X-Men looks promising, even F4 to me. WB must continue to make movies in the vein of those prior to MoS.
marvel72
marvel72 - 5/9/2014, 7:08 AM
@ dethpillow

i see my comment got deleted,truth hurt nick56.
tonytony
tonytony - 5/9/2014, 1:49 PM
Marvel fanboys hate any non disney movie. You get a thumbs up cuz
View Recorder