Why Did SOLO: A STAR WARS STORY Fail At The Box Office? Wall Street Analyst Blames Poor Marketing

Why Did SOLO: A STAR WARS STORY Fail At The Box Office? Wall Street Analyst Blames Poor Marketing

It's quickly become clear that Solo: A Star Wars Story is going to be a serious box office disappointment for Disney and Lucasfilm and one expert analyst has shed some light on where things went wrong...

By JoshWilding - Jun 05, 2018 01:06 AM EST
Filed Under: Star Wars
Source: Deadline
As of right now, it appears as if Solo: A Star Wars Story is going to become the lowest grossing instalment in the franchise to date and one Wall Street media analyst blames that not on franchise fatigue or a lack of interest in Han Solo but poor marketing on the part of Disney and Lucasfilm. As a result of that, the spinoff's final domestic gross could actually end up being as low as $200 million.

While Solo's box office failings "[have] occasioned some concern that audiences may be suffering from Star Wars fatigue," Doug Creutz, a veteran media analyst at Cowen, notes. "We think this is probably not the case, and that Solo’s biggest problem was an uncharacteristically (for Disney) poor marketing campaign." Interestingly, he adds that behind the scenes issues and the tight release window with Star Wars: The Last Jedi were less important factors than that marketing campaign.

The problem with the spinoff was that the teaser "only had about 10 seconds of screen time where Ehrenreich’s face was clearly in the picture — not, in our opinion, nearly enough" and, unlike Rogue One, it simply didn't do enough to establish Han as someone moviegoers would want to root for. It relied more on them knowing who the character is and watching the movie for that reason alone.

So, will Solo's failings have a negative impact on Star Wars Episode IX next year? It doesn't appear so because the analyst believes that the J.J. Abrams helmed release, "will do quite well at the box office, probably exceeding Last Jedi." What do you think the main issues with the spinoff movie were?
Mark Hamill Contextualizes Previous Done With STAR WARS Comments
Related:

Mark Hamill Contextualizes Previous "Done With STAR WARS" Comments

Why SUPERMAN Director James Gunn Is Sick Of Your Who Would Win In A Fight? Debates
Recommended For You:

Why SUPERMAN Director James Gunn Is Sick Of Your "Who Would Win In A Fight?" Debates

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3 4
Pantherpool
Pantherpool - 6/5/2018, 2:09 AM
Poor marketing was probably the main reason. Not only did they start advertising this film just three months before it came out, but anything that I've seen from the marketing campaign was weak and lackluster. I spoke with a lot of people that go only to big franchise films like this and several of them had no idea this was coming out this soon. Combine that with the lack of interest in a solo Solo film, the fact that it came out right after two of the most anticipated blockbusters of the year and it makes sense that this movie bombed. It flew so low, it fell under the audienece's radar.
nikgrid
nikgrid - 6/5/2018, 2:16 AM
Oh Disney...get [frick]ing real. Solo did so poorly because of The Last Jedi pissing off fans. And Solo (An infinitely more entertaining film) paid the price.
Pantherpool
Pantherpool - 6/5/2018, 2:20 AM
@nikgrid - This article is actually talking about a Wall Street media analyst's opinion on why it bombed, not Disney's...
VileBlood
VileBlood - 6/5/2018, 4:57 AM
@nikgrid - Oh nikgrid...reading and comprehension is clearly not one of your strengths.
Humperdink
Humperdink - 6/5/2018, 2:16 AM
Poor marketing is an understatement.
It was barely marketed at all until the very last minute.

It felt like they had no faith in the film.
I don't even think it's a BAD film but it definitely didn't have much push before release.

Solo deserved better.
99OPTIMISTPRIME
99OPTIMISTPRIME - 6/5/2018, 2:20 AM
So BASICALLY Disney wisely saved money on marketing a movie, that they already suspected wouldn't be supported well enough at the box-office? Anybody who went and saw Force Awakens, knew that Solo was coming out. Sometimes movie-goers will be either fickle or selective. It's happened with the Batman franchise, Superman franchise, the DCEU, the FoX-Men franchise, etc.
TheUnworthyThor
TheUnworthyThor - 6/5/2018, 2:22 AM
I can almost buy that backlash against The Last Jedi caused some disappointing box office in the US but I can’t buy that it disappointed in every single market around the globe for that reason, in markets where the original trilogy was never even widely released, in markets that have very few longtime hardcore Star Wars fans. You really have to have strong feelings about something in the first place to boycott future efforts and spin-offs if you feel it’s disrespected. So yeah marketing is the common denominator here. And if you look at some of these reports around the world the common element you hear is something along the lines of “yeah the movie just came and went and nobody ever knew about it”. It’s like Disney decided to spend all their time and focus on Black Panther and Infinity War this year and just forgot about A Wrinkle in Time and Solo.
Pantherpool
Pantherpool - 6/5/2018, 2:28 AM
@TheUnworthyThor - One of the main reasons why I think they should have moved this to December is that they would have more time to promote the film.
TheUnworthyThor
TheUnworthyThor - 6/5/2018, 2:34 AM
@Pantherpool - If the marketing campaigns were as poor as some of what we are hearing then I don’t know if more time would have helped much although probably wouldn’t hurt to either. But with how crowded this December is I don’t think that would have been a good time to release it. But August or September on the other hand...
kallel
kallel - 6/5/2018, 2:43 AM
was a matter of time. starwars isnt what it used to be. the previous films have showed that. disneys just milking it. not even gonna bother watching this one.
RickGrimes95
RickGrimes95 - 6/5/2018, 2:44 AM
Oh wow guys, look, another article about how Solo is a failure. I’m getting tired of waking up and seeing these. Let’s move on.
BritishMonkey
BritishMonkey - 6/5/2018, 3:07 AM
It was a meh film. Too much drama around its production put people off. The casting of Han put people off. A huge amount saw the film as unecessary. And there was nothing in the trailers or promotional material to get enough attention because no one cared.
Like Avatar.
elcamino
elcamino - 6/5/2018, 3:11 AM
I just couldn't tell myself to go watch and support this movie after reading they cancelled Transformers.
konoyaro
konoyaro - 6/5/2018, 3:13 AM
make all the excuses you want,the facts are,

Most fans were not excited for a SOLO movie without HF.
A good percentage of the fanbase STILL are pissed because of TLJ.
And YES,people are tired of SWs being treated like a fastfood franchise where is more important the quantity then the quality.

Wanna bet more money on it Lucasfilms\Disney?
Show another trailer for EP9 with MaREY Sue being as inexpressive and perfect as always and see the box office hecatombe happen again.


MyBeard
MyBeard - 6/5/2018, 7:45 AM
@konoyaro - A wall street analyst is making excuses for Disney?
ElCidJedi
ElCidJedi - 6/5/2018, 3:19 AM
Future article:

“Episode 9 underperforms at box office due to impact from lack of advertising Solo / audience confused about release date / Disney waited too long to release new Star Wars film / death of Carrie Fisher impacts rewrites... but not because of the Last Jedi.... no no no, never because of that.”
VileBlood
VileBlood - 6/5/2018, 5:08 AM
@ElCidJedi - Future article:

"People are still whining about The Last Jedi. They still whine about how Rian Johnson raped their childhood only a decade after Lucas previously raped their childhoods. All this raping of childhoods may or may not be related to Last Jedi. Also, it rained yesterday which might be the fault of Last Jedi. Everything must be related to Last Jedi!!!
1 2 3 4
View Recorder