THE HUNGER GAMES Director Now "Totally Regrets" Splitting MOCKINGJAY Into Two Parts

THE HUNGER GAMES Director Now "Totally Regrets" Splitting MOCKINGJAY Into Two Parts

Though he defended the decision at the time, The Hunger Games director Francis Lawrence has now admitted that he "totally regrets" adapting Mockingjay as two movies...

By MarkCassidy - Oct 17, 2023 07:10 AM EST
Filed Under: Sci-Fi
Source: Via SFF Gazette

Fans of Suzanne Collins' best-selling YA novel trilogy, The Hunger Games, were sceptical when it was announced that Lionsgate planned on splitting its adaptation of the final novel, Mockingjay, into two movies, and when the first film came out in 2014, that trepidation proved to be warranted.

Though The Hunger Games: Mockingjay, Part 1 received decent reviews and was a box office success, the studio was accused of padding out the story as an excuse to keep the franchise going and squeeze another film out of it.

In a 2015 interview to promote the release of Part 2, director Francis Lawrence defended the decision.

"I still completely stand by the idea," he told the BBC. "You know, we got some flack for splitting the movies; I think they're two distinct stories, but really, that kind of evolution [of the characters] would be a much, much, much more difficult thing to do in the course of two hours versus the course of two films."

However, his take has most definitely changed over the years.

"I totally regret it," the filmmaker admitted in a new PEOPLE interview. "I totally do. I'm not sure everybody does, but I definitely do. What I realized in retrospect — and after hearing all the reactions and feeling the kind of wrath of fans, critics, and people at the split — is that I realized it was frustrating. And I can understand that."

"In an episode of television, if you have a cliffhanger, you have to wait a week, or you could just binge it, and then you can see the next episodes," Lawrence continued. "But making people wait a year, I think, came across as disingenuous, even though it wasn't."

Lawrence was able to depict more of the book's story over the two movies and better explore the psychological impact of the war on the main characters, but most fans simply didn't feel it was necessary to expand the dystopian tale to that extent.

In any case, the director had no intention of making the same mistake with his upcoming prequel, The Ballad of Songbirds and Snakes, which will be the longest movie in the franchise at 2 hours, 36 minutes.

"I would never let them split the book in two," Lawrence said of the new movie. "It's a long book, but we got so much s--- for splitting Mockingjay into two — from fans, from critics, from everybody — that I was like, 'No way. I'll just make a longer movie.'"

How did you feel about Mockingjay being adapted as two films? Do you plan on seeing Songbirds and Snakes in theaters? Drop us a comment down below.

HIT MAN Star Glen Powell Spotted On Set Of Edgar Wright's THE RUNNING MAN; Movie's Logo Revealed
Related:

HIT MAN Star Glen Powell Spotted On Set Of Edgar Wright's THE RUNNING MAN; Movie's Logo Revealed

SQUID GAME Season 2 Trailer Sees Lee Jung-jae Embark On A Bloody New Mission As Player 456
Recommended For You:

SQUID GAME Season 2 Trailer Sees Lee Jung-jae Embark On A Bloody New Mission As Player 456

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

Origame
Origame - 10/17/2023, 7:03 AM
Yeah it was dumb. But we all know why.

?si=FP3WP4cqXQXI_U-V
MrDandy
MrDandy - 10/17/2023, 7:04 AM
Terrible decision. There was not even close to enough material to stretch it into two films
mountainman
mountainman - 10/17/2023, 8:55 AM
I liked how it was done for Deathly Hallows. Pt 1 was the lonely and isolating search for the horcruxes and Pt 2 focused on the final battle.

The Hobbit could have been split in two, but three was excessive.

Splitting Mockingjay was a mistake though.
MosquitoFarmer
MosquitoFarmer - 10/17/2023, 9:04 AM
@mountainman - Guillermo Del Toro's (and Peter Jackson's) original plan was for The Hobbit to be two films. After Del Toro left, and somewhere far into production of The Hobbit that Peter Jackson announced he was going to make it into three films. And, well, the behind-the-scenes of that trilogy and Jackson being overwhelmed by the production is pretty well known.
mountainman
mountainman - 10/17/2023, 9:10 AM
@MosquitoFarmer - Yes. It’s unfortunate how much studio interference was involved. There is actually a core of some good films in there, but the films we got were just ok. After how near perfect the Lord of the Rings trilogy was, just ok doesn’t cut it.

At least they were better than Rings of Power. Amazon is going to have to make a lot of adjustments to get fan goodwill back and even hope to break even on the investment on that one.
Origame
Origame - 10/17/2023, 9:45 AM
@MosquitoFarmer - it technically wasn't two movies. The first movie would've been the story of the hobbit. The second was gonna be a movie bridging the gap between the hobbit and lotr. As del Toro conceived it, it wasn't the same as splitting one book into two movies.
MosquitoFarmer
MosquitoFarmer - 10/17/2023, 9:50 AM
@Origame - Correct. I was just blanket-terming their whole conceived "Hobbit" production.
MasterMix
MasterMix - 10/17/2023, 11:32 AM
@mountainman - There's also The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 1 & 2. Splitting it in two sort of made sense. Between Bella as a human and Bella as a vampire.
mountainman
mountainman - 10/17/2023, 11:57 AM
@MasterMix - Never read the books or saw the movies so I didn’t mention it. My wife enjoyed the books and the movies so I assume they were adapted well.
MasterMix
MasterMix - 10/17/2023, 12:29 PM
@mountainman - If by adapted well, you mean cringy and melodramatic in a so bad it's good way, then yes.
mountainman
mountainman - 10/17/2023, 12:33 PM
@MasterMix - Weren’t the books like that too?
TheCoonII
TheCoonII - 10/17/2023, 9:30 AM
The split didn’t ABSOLUTELY BREAK the films but some tightening around the first half or so of part 1 could have easily made it a much better paced albeit near 3 hour movie
thewanderer
thewanderer - 10/17/2023, 12:55 PM
@TheCoonII - I personally had no issue with the split.
marvel72
marvel72 - 10/17/2023, 9:58 AM
Rachel Zegler casting is what I would regret more.
ThorArms
ThorArms - 10/17/2023, 10:13 AM
They are 2 very different films. I think it works just fine
Razorface1
Razorface1 - 10/17/2023, 10:14 AM
I honestly dont think they could have fit all that into a single movie.
BLEECH
BLEECH - 10/17/2023, 12:17 PM
They hired this hack AGAIN?

You had two movies to explore the one book and still [frick]ed up the ending.
View Recorder