More From Andrew Garfield On Spider-Man And Playing A Teenager!

The poor guy must be getting pissed off with asking all these damned Spider-Man questions...at least in this one he talks about something other than loving the character as a kid, lol! :P At this point, I'm 100% convinced that he's perfect for the role. I just need to hear more from Webb in order to decide whether or not he's the best choice to direct!

once he started talking he couldn't stop huh? You are insanely fast at making articles dude, the whole whats new page is your work man. Once again cool find josh.

If welling can get away with it so can this guy.

Maquire was 27 when his first Spiderman came out. No biggie.

Thanks JoshW! I wish these articles would quit saying he's 28, he just turned 27 in August for crying out loud!!

Anyway, I can assume he'll be in his senior year for the whole movie and graduate at the very end of the movie which is what James Cameron was going to do but everything else in his script sucked.

Or he'll play a junior and the sequel will begin with him ending his senior year and beginning college as a freshman. Those are both two ways to solve the "age problem."

@JoshW
One of the things that can get boring about these types of interviews, and most in general, are really the repetiviness of the questions that are being asked by the interviewers and tabloids. He has been asked virtually the same things and has been answering them in the same manner with different words. Hoping to hear more details that isn't ground that's been covered though like what's going on with production and other inside details.

@wolverinesfury
Yeah I know. I was really hoping for a teenage actor and other same aged performers if they were really going to take this back to high school. But with these types of productions once a mature actor is chosen for a teenage role the rest will soon follow as I've said before. I wasn't into him at first, and barely paid attention to him when he was on the shortlist, because he was the oldest of the group. My attentions were mainly on Josh Hutcherson only because he was the right age and Jamie Bell because it was rumoured that he was already sealing the deal. Regardless Andrew is still a terrific actor and does look young enough to still play a young adult. As long as the actor/actress look their age I don't care how old they are. That's just my opinion.

@Superman8
Yep. Even though Garfield is going to be 2 or 3 years older in comparison to their respective features' release dates it isn't that big of a deal so long as he looks the age. And he does.

@jazzman
It's starting to become an epidemic! Damn mature folk! LOL! ;)

@Sweetre15
Congrats on getting this! :D
I assume that with Garfield's age (he should be 29 or 30 by the time the film is released) it would work to have him go to college by the next film.

@VIKEME
I'm getting that feeling too. :)

I'm not saying that this movie will suck, in fact I think with the talent involved it will most likely be very good, but I'm still aboard the [frick] teh reboot train on it. Just pointless. Even if it happened that Raimi and co couldn't make another, the smart thing to do surely was to just continue on where they left off. They could still have Garfield play an older Spidey! It just befuddles me.

Right with you RorMachine. Because of the budget this is as close to a guaranteed win as you can get in the movies. If it is any good at all it will make a fair bit of money.

whatever... here we go again... getting someone who's not a teenager playing 1... ok, ok even if this film was going to be good it should be in the MCU!

he is one ugly dude.. I bet he gets carded at the movies too