SPIDER-MAN: NO WAY HOME Writer Reveals Input [SPOILER] & [SPOILER] Had In Addressing Fallout From Their Films

SPIDER-MAN: NO WAY HOME Writer Reveals Input [SPOILER] & [SPOILER] Had In Addressing Fallout From Their Films

Spider-Man: No Way Home writer Chris McKenna reveals the input those actors had in exploring what happened to their characters once their respective franchises ended. Find the full spoilery details here!

By JoshWilding - Dec 29, 2021 04:12 PM EST
Filed Under: No Way Home
Source: The Hollywood Reporter

Spider-Man: No Way Home brings back Tobey Maguire and Andrew Garfield's versions of Peter Parker, giving fans the opportunity to learn what came next after Spider-Man 3 and The Amazing Spider-Man 2. While it sounds like Maguire's web-slinger got his happy ending with Mary Jane, the death of Gwen Stacy clearly sent Garfield's down a dark path. 

Talking to The Hollywood Reporter, No Way Home co-writer Chris McKenna shed some light on how he and co-writer Erik Sommers decided to pick up where Sam Raimi and Marc Webb left off with the two returning Spider-Men. As you might expect, that involved figuring out exactly how much of the fallout from those earlier movies they should include in this one. 

"As writers, we kept saying, 'Where are these characters in their lives when they come into the movie?' Where is Tobey? We’re not de-agifying him. He’s a guy who is 43, who is entering this movie, and Andrew Garfield, where are they in their lives?" he explains. "The last time you saw Andrew Garfield, it was the death of Gwen, and that must have sent him down a dark spiral, maybe he never got out of. We don’t know, because there wasn’t a third movie that we saw. Where did he go? Maybe a really dark place."

"We wanted to be true to the characters in those movies. Really having conversations about specifying where they are, without giving away too much," McKenna continued. "Not coming in, spilling all the beans. 'Tobey’s Peter is running Peter Parker Industries!' You just wanted to have little hints of that without it being all this exposition as fan service."

The trade then asked how much input both actors had in exploring what came next for their respective takes on the characters, and it sounds like Maguire and Garfield had very different approaches.

"Tobey wanted to be very minimal about how much you know. Very, very minimal. Andrew really loved the idea of he’s still tortured over what happened in Amazing Spider-Man 2 and where that left him, and how they could bring that to Tom," the writer recalls. "Tobey especially has come through that darkness. We thought it was cool that Andrew’s Peter was still in the midst of that darkness."

Maguire seemed happy not to be too specific about what came next for his Peter, clearly preferring to leave it up to the imagination of fans. Garfield, on the other hand, understandably relished this opportunity to address the fallout of Gwen's death after being robbed of the opportunity to do so in The Amazing Spider-Man 3 (a movie fans are now campaigning to make a reality). 

Will we see more of the original big screen Spider-Men? For now, that remains to be seen...
 

Tom Holland Shares Disappointment With SPIDER-MAN: NO WAY HOME - I Might Have Done Three Days On Location
Related:

Tom Holland Shares Disappointment With SPIDER-MAN: NO WAY HOME - "I Might Have Done Three Days On Location"

SPIDER-MAN: NO WAY HOME Star Charlie Cox Recalls Cut Reference To 2003's DAREDEVIL During His MCU Debut
Recommended For You:

SPIDER-MAN: NO WAY HOME Star Charlie Cox Recalls Cut Reference To 2003's DAREDEVIL During His MCU Debut

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3
manofillintent1
manofillintent1 - 12/29/2021, 4:19 PM
Don’t know why but I half expected tobey to reveal he had a kid with MJ
TheWalkingCuban
TheWalkingCuban - 12/29/2021, 4:26 PM
@manofillintent1 - I saw a bump, fingers crossed for baby sister
NightBoyWonder
NightBoyWonder - 12/29/2021, 4:27 PM
@manofillintent1 - I was expecting it too. I can’t remember the exact line, but he was talking about MJ and I was thinking we’d hear a name drop for Mayday
TheWarThor
TheWarThor - 12/29/2021, 4:35 PM
@MonkeyDLuffy - I was expecting that too, and I was so disappointed we didn't get it.
Thing94
Thing94 - 12/29/2021, 4:19 PM
I appreciate both their approaches and liked them both in the film
MosquitoFarmer
MosquitoFarmer - 12/29/2021, 4:31 PM
The writers realizing they get to bring Tobey Maguire back...

datfigures
datfigures - 12/29/2021, 4:31 PM
I like to take it as more ambiguous but if they want to be technical, age wise, wouldn’t Tobey’s Spidey be 37-38 and Andrew’s version only 25-26?

Armageddon26
Armageddon26 - 12/29/2021, 5:08 PM
@datfigures - MCU is in 2024, so Tobey’s would be 40
datfigures
datfigures - 12/29/2021, 5:15 PM
@Armageddon26 - Ah, duh. Forgot about that pesky blip, haha.
Darth258
Darth258 - 12/29/2021, 4:43 PM
And neither of them fought any other classic Spider-man villains outside of those in their movies in all the years they kept being Spidey..
TheManWithoutFear
TheManWithoutFear - 12/29/2021, 4:45 PM
Tobey didn't want to get too specific because he's saving that shit for Spider-Man 4
ScottSummers
ScottSummers - 12/29/2021, 4:47 PM
@TheManWithoutFear - yes we will have 8 villains
TheManWithoutFear
TheManWithoutFear - 12/29/2021, 4:55 PM
AviArad, Andrew Garfield now @AmyPascal

1 2 3
View Recorder