STAR TREK: YEAR ONE Pitch Has Officially Reached Paramount Skydance

STAR TREK: YEAR ONE Pitch Has Officially Reached Paramount Skydance

A potential Star Trek: Year One series following James T. Kirk’s first year as captain of the USS Enterprise has now been formally pitched to Paramount Skydance.

By MattThomas - Mar 14, 2026 08:03 AM EST
Filed Under: Star Trek
Source: SFFGazette.com

With the first season of Star Trek: Starfleet Academy now finished, attention is starting to shift toward what comes next for the Star Trek franchise. Two more seasons of Star Trek: Strange New Worlds are already on the way, along with at least one more season of Starfleet Academy. Beyond those projects, the long-term direction of the franchise is less certain.

As previously reported, there are currently no additional Star Trek television series in production or officially greenlit, marking the first time in more than a decade that the franchise does not have a newly announced show moving forward. That said, it does not necessarily mean new ideas are not being explored behind the scenes.

Speaking with TrekMovie, Strange New Worlds co-showrunner Henry Alonso Myers shared an update on the potential series Star Trek: Year One. The proposed show would follow James T. Kirk, played by Paul Wesley, during his first year as captain of the USS Enterprise.

Despite the lack of concrete updates on the proposed series, which was first talked about last year, Myers said he and executive producer Akiva Goldsman remain fully committed to the idea.

“We think it would be a great show. It feels like the natural next chapter for Star Trek and the story we have been telling,” Myers said. “But the decision is out of our hands.”

The concept for Star Trek: Year One was first discussed publicly last July during San Diego Comic-Con. At the time, Goldsman explained the idea to fans, though it had not yet been pitched to Paramount Skydance.

“We started thinking about those lost years that exist in our head canon and in the extended canon but have rarely been shown on screen,” Goldsman told the audience last year. “Our goal was to build from Pike’s Enterprise, tell stories with the sensibilities we have today, and lead right up to Kirk’s first day in command. That’s the hope and the plan. If you like the idea, maybe write to Skydance and Paramount and remind them they still have the sets and should make Star Trek: Year One.”

According to Myers’ latest comments over the weekend, the project has now been formally pitched.

“We’ve brought them a lot of material,” Myers said. “We’ve done a lot of work and shared it with them. Now it’s in their hands. They’re looking it over and deciding what they want to do. There’s a lot of love for our show there, and of course a lot of love for Star Trek.”

Star Trek: Strange New Worlds has been gradually introducing characters from Star Trek: The Original Series as the timeline moves closer to Kirk’s era. Along with James T. Kirk, played by Paul Wesley, the series already features younger versions of several familiar faces, including Spock (Ethan Peck), Nyota Uhura (Celia Rose Gooding), and Christine Chapel (Jess Bush). 

Kirk himself has appeared in several episodes, and Season 3 finally showed him taking the captain’s chair when he temporarily commanded the USS Farragut during a crisis. He is still far from the confident captain audiences know from The Original Series, but the moment offered a glimpse of the leader he is becoming and how the support of those around him helps shape that future.

Would you be interested in a Year One series that follows James T. Kirk in his first year as captain of the USS Enterprise? 

About The Author:
MattThomas
Member Since 10/11/2017
Star Trek: Year One Hopes Fade As Paramount Begins Dismantling Enterprise Sets
Related:

Star Trek: Year One Hopes Fade As Paramount Begins Dismantling Enterprise Sets

STAR TREK Comic Book Series Will Reveal The Secret Behind Sci-Fi Franchise's Red Shirts
Recommended For You:

STAR TREK Comic Book Series Will Reveal The Secret Behind Sci-Fi Franchise's "Red Shirts"

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
Irregular
Irregular - 3/14/2026, 9:04 AM
It would MAYBE...be smart if you are rebranding Star Trek for new audiences that Year One does release first for Skydance while the movie is being filmed.

However, given the IP they're acquiring, whatever next Star Trek iteration comes out I hope succeeds. Because if it doesn't, then it's going to be a fairly long time before we see anymore of the franchise.

But I'm holding out hope for DS9 & Voyager Blu-ray releases in the future and buy it from someone on eBay.
Matchesz
Matchesz - 3/14/2026, 9:07 AM
Was Chris Pine's Star Trek not a Year One story? Hollywood's becoming a caricature of itself
Irregular
Irregular - 3/14/2026, 9:09 AM
@Matchesz - That's a separate timeline though called the "Kelvin Universe" and no it is not a Year One story. It's an origin story to how Kirk acquired the Enterprise, not his first year on the Enterprise.

So there isn't really a proper year one for Trek in Kirk's era.
PapaSpank54
PapaSpank54 - 3/14/2026, 11:19 AM
@Irregular - wasn't Into Darkness within his first year of command? The end of that has them set out on the five year mission if I can recall through the fog of brain damage that movie gave me
Irregular
Irregular - 3/14/2026, 11:37 AM
@PapaSpank54 - Kinda sort of. I think what they mean by Year One is literally starting...WEEK ONE on the Enterprise instead of starting 9-10 months later from the 09 movie.

Either way, completely different timeline. Considering he begins his five year mission, five years earlier than the TOS series.

But fuk that movie...one of the worst Trek movies was Into Darkness.
Matchesz
Matchesz - 3/14/2026, 12:00 PM
@Irregular - But didnt it show their first steps onto the enterprise then immediately into their first mission which I thought lasted more than a week, a lot of stuff happened
Irregular
Irregular - 3/14/2026, 12:17 PM
@Matchesz - No not necessarily.

What it did was put it in the POV of Kirk but copying a page from a superhero blockbuster the way his origin is layered in the movie.

In fact, he doesn't get the role of Captain till close to the 3rd act, but it was only because he made Spock go ape-shit and have him step down from his role. Hell he didn't earn the rank of first officer to begin with! Even then, he is not "officially" given the role of Captain till...the very end of the movie. He earned it in this timeline because of the Narada battle, unlike working his way up the ladder like he originally did.

Also, it wasn't like Pike "wanted" Kirk there nor was he even supposed to be on the Enterprise. He gave him the role of first officer because of the circumstances with their battle with the Narada. Which is why Kirk went from "Cadet" to "Captain" in no time.

But like I said this is the "Kelvin Universe" and is considered AN ALTERNATE timeline. Hence...why they are not hiring Pine and crew again.
hue66
hue66 - 3/14/2026, 9:12 AM
I would be open to it. I haven't watched much of Strange New Worlds but Shatners Kirk has a presence I'm not sure Paul Wesley has. Has anyone watched the show that can speak to his Kirk in comparison to Shatner?
Irregular
Irregular - 3/14/2026, 9:16 AM
@hue66 - Honestly...he does a pretty good job. At first, it sounded like he had this very nasally Jim Carrey type of voice. Which I thought was semi-hilarious considering In Living Color's skit on Star Trek.

However he DOES grow on you. Best episode with him is in S3. (The Sehlat Who Ate It's Tail)

Also another great episode with him is a parallel universe where Kirk is stuck in the 21st Century with one of the Lieutenants in SNW. Not mirror universe by the way. Was for sure a different universe than mirror.
Dotanuki
Dotanuki - 3/14/2026, 9:15 AM
Let the past die. Kill it!
Repian
Repian - 3/14/2026, 9:25 AM
Cameron Monaghan as Chekov.
User Comment Image
Irregular
Irregular - 3/14/2026, 9:28 AM
@Repian - Isn't Chekov short as hell though? He's like 5'6.

He would be a good actor for Star Trek though.
Repian
Repian - 3/14/2026, 9:36 AM
@Irregular - Anton Yelchin is 5'9". I don't know if short stature is a fundamental requirement or if it can vary.
Irregular
Irregular - 3/14/2026, 9:38 AM
@Repian - And yet in every camera shot Anton was in, he's shorter than the rest of the crew. I think maybe one shot he's taller than Uhura or showing he's pretty talk.

But 6'0 is pretty damn tall for Chekov.
Joker666
Joker666 - 3/14/2026, 12:34 PM
@Repian - SNW already has a Chekov!
DocSpock
DocSpock - 3/14/2026, 9:49 AM

I'm all in. Bring it on, but please don't let Hollywood worm their weirdo sicko sh!t into it.
ModernAudience
ModernAudience - 3/14/2026, 10:45 AM
@DocSpock - they will. Amd when it doesn't appeal to the mass market and fails they'll blame the fans and call them ists and phobes.
DocSpock
DocSpock - 3/14/2026, 4:15 PM
@ModernAudience -

Probably. They always ruin great properties eventually.

WEAPONXOXOXO
WEAPONXOXOXO - 3/14/2026, 9:56 AM
I'm a Star Trek fan and I'm tired of seeing this copy/pastes, regurgitated shit. Next Generations, Deep Space 9 and Voyageur were at the least something NEW,NOT DONE BEFORE. It would be nice to get something done that's not connected to characters from the original show.
Simonsonrules
Simonsonrules - 3/14/2026, 10:13 AM
@WEAPONXOXOXO - Exactly. I would rather see a Picard spin off with the crew that they ended up with in the final episode.
Irregular
Irregular - 3/14/2026, 10:14 AM
@WEAPONXOXOXO - To be completely honest, the point of Year One, is to introduce new audiences to the OG crew. Even then, it's not like 20 years ago where they remade the VFX for TOS and excitement was through the roof. Now there's like two generations (Gen Z & Gen Alpha) now growing up and feel they could give fuk all for Star Trek. Unless their parent or a friend is a Trekkie, which again...is rare now...then they would never know.

So I get their point with doing a Year One to kind of give it a new refresh. Besides, as a fan, I am totally okay with seeing that crew together again! Because THEY ARE what made "Star Trek", Star Trek to begin with. So to make a TV show, or hell a miniseries based on that year, isn't such a really bad idea considering that year hasn't been explored very well.

Based on the news in the past though, that's what the new movie is going to be. New crew, new characters, totally unrelated to the past.
WEAPONXOXOXO
WEAPONXOXOXO - 3/14/2026, 1:03 PM
@Irregular - If "new audience" wants to be introduced to the Original Crew they could watch what out there now already. The loyal Star Trek fans that have been making them money want something new and different. Just my opinion. I love Kirk and Spock BUT enough already. Let the creative juices flow and do something new.



Simonsonrules
Simonsonrules - 3/15/2026, 9:32 AM
@Irregular - a compromise would be to have these goofy prequels, year one shows continue but then do something, anything to continue the legacy of TNG and its spinoffs, which are themselves TOS sequels. I guess what I'm saying is after decades of work on that material you have an interested audience, even if they may be a bit older. Why can't there be something for everyone? Seems like a missed opportunity
HistoryofMatt
HistoryofMatt - 3/14/2026, 10:15 AM
Nope.

Pull Star Trek from Kurtzman, and let it sit fallow for a few years so memory of this disastrous era of Woke Trek can dissipate.
Irregular
Irregular - 3/14/2026, 10:22 AM
@HistoryofMatt - Trek has always been woke since the 60's though sooo...yeah....this is awkward.....
HistoryofMatt
HistoryofMatt - 3/14/2026, 11:26 AM
@Irregular - Another tard who falsely claims, "Trek has always been Woke." The thing about Woketards that is the most frustrating is they pretend not to know what reality is, what words mean, etc., and that makes good faith discussions with them impossible.

No tard, Trek was NEVER Woke, because Woke is Cultural Marxism using the tenants of identity politics, intersectionality, and the lie of gender as its ideological underpinnings while also acting as a secular religion following it's own particular dogma that includes excommunication (cancelling) and demands of purity to the belief system. Woke bestows virtue and villainy in equal measure based on the color of your skin, the genitals between your legs, or the mental illness or sexual fetish you have that makes you claim to be the opposite sex or one of a 100 bullshit "genders."

Trek was always CLASSICALLY LIBERAL, which is the exact opposite of Woke, because to in liberalism, which comes from the Enlightenment, virtue and villainy is bestowed in equal measure based on the choices you make and the content of your character. Where you achieve based on hard work in merit, and are given nothing you didn't earn.

The characters in Star Trek from 1966 to 2004 were the best humanity and aliens had to offer, and their skin color or their genitals had nothing to do with it. Uhura wasn't on that bridge because she was a black woman, she was on that bridge because no one cared she was black or a woman, only that she could do her job better than anyone else.

There's always one tard like you who shows you never understood Star Trek. "Trek was always Woke."
Irregular
Irregular - 3/14/2026, 11:38 AM
@HistoryofMatt - Lol you're so triggered it's so funny.

On CBM no less LMFAO.
HistoryofMatt
HistoryofMatt - 3/14/2026, 12:52 PM
@Irregular - Things are what they are. I know as a Woketard, again, that you pretend things aren't what they are so you can substitute your preferred narratives for reality.

You say something that is incorrect, and I correct you. Then you say I'm triggered for correcting the bullshit thing you said. Another thing about Woketards is they constantly protect what they are onto others. Telling me I'm triggered when all I did was correct you is telling on yourself.
Irregular
Irregular - 3/14/2026, 2:00 PM
@HistoryofMatt - LOL again why do you keep insulting me? Who shit in your Cheerios this morning lmfao

I don't know why you had to write an entire essay filled with a political rant. Clearly not needed and honestly pretty sad on an article that has zero to do with whatever time you wasted writing that.

No reason to act like your favorite right-wing believer and go off over shows you clearly do not understand. Clearly you never saw Plato's Stepchildren...or Far Beyond the Stars...Measure of A Man.,...

"You say something that is incorrect, and I correct you."

Oh I'm sorry was there rules on CBM about comment etiquette? Didn't realize there was a debate here LOL Seriously though...who goes out of there way, to write an entire essay rant about what I said? If you don't think Star Trek is progressive, you've clearly never seen the shows. And judging by your entire essay....YOU'VE CLEARLY NEVER SEEN THE SHOWS.....

Well, I'm sorry for your everyday life. But I do hope you get well and try not to be so angry at the time. You remind me of that guy from King of the Hill who gets so angry and wound up that he literally barks himself into a heart attack. Liberals don't need to live in your head rent free you know. Isn't that totally antithetical to your beliefs anyway 🙄

Anyways man, enjoy your days and live long and prosper lmao 👍🙏
HistoryofMatt
HistoryofMatt - 3/14/2026, 4:30 PM
@Irregular - Again, your conflation of Woke with liberalism, even after an explanation as to why they are actually in opposition to one another, is you pretending to not know what reality is, making conversation impossible.

The episodes you mentioned have NOTHING to do with Wokeism and everything to do with classical liberalism, especially The Measure of a Man, which was about Data's rights as an individual. Maybe you watched those episodes, but you obviously didn't possess the intelligence to understand them.
FinnishDude
FinnishDude - 3/14/2026, 10:39 AM
No more Star Trek prequels! I am beyond sick of them, they usually end up being pretty bad and I see no story potential in this particular one.
bobevanz
bobevanz - 3/14/2026, 10:48 AM
NuTrek is 80% mediocre to the point where I just don't care that much anymore. Luckily the shows from Enterprise and before will always be there. They've tried to make things in the future. They suck. They tried to make things as a prequel, it mostly worked because it's episodic. Give me a show with DS9 characters or on that same timeline. They could bring back lower decks for DS9, VOY or even TOS. Legacy characters are why this franchise is successful. Kurtzman was always the wrong person in charge. They like him because he comes in under budget and finishes on time, not because he's a great showrunner. The Kelvin timeline is shit except for ST Beyond.

GIVE IT TO TERRY MATALAS and you'll have Rick Berman 2.0. He can make it better than ever.

FIRE KURTZMAN
PapaSpank54
PapaSpank54 - 3/14/2026, 11:21 AM
@bobevanz - yeah I am a huge Trek fan for years and still haven't made it through DS9, Voyager or Enterprise all the way through. There's so much great material, or at least material that feels right in a way that modern Trek does not.
tmp3
tmp3 - 3/14/2026, 11:30 AM
@PapaSpank54 - DS9 is incredible, you’re gonna love it
FleischerSupes
FleischerSupes - 3/14/2026, 10:49 AM
Nope, tell a story during the "Lost era" of the original films

User Comment Image
tmp3
tmp3 - 3/14/2026, 10:50 AM
Very excited for the new Trek movie, think getting the D&D guys for a new take with a new crew was absolutely the right move to go. Finished DS9 a few weeks back, and idk if Trek will ever be able to top that - just incredibly well written television. Need to hop on Picard s3 someday, heard Matalas did a great job, but SNW kind of lost its way and this dude’s not a great Kirk (thought Pine was perfect in the role but he’s sadly done with Trek).

Feel like they’re probably just shifting this to a big screen only franchise if that new movie is a hit
Simonsonrules
Simonsonrules - 3/15/2026, 9:33 AM
@tmp3 - Picard S3 was the ultimate fan service. And man it was good
Darrinconnell
Darrinconnell - 3/14/2026, 12:42 PM
So the pitch I’m aware of is to fill in the gap from Kirk’s first day as Enterprise Captain to the beginning of the original series. This wouldn’t touch TOS, unless they choose to go there.
Anyone else heard the same or otherwise?
Irregular
Irregular - 3/14/2026, 12:45 PM
@Darrinconnell - Precisely! There is no movie show (maybe a book idk) that actually explores his very first year as Captain.

You get from his very first day/week as Captain. Idk for a full 2 season series, but I think a mini-series event would be great.
TheNewYorkerr
TheNewYorkerr - 3/14/2026, 12:49 PM
I like what they’ve been doing with all of these. Wesley Is a good Kirk. I’m all for more. Keep ‘em coming.
1 2

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder