The Biggest Problem with The Amazing Spider-Man 2

The Biggest Problem with The Amazing Spider-Man 2

That no one is talking about.

Editorial Opinion
By VIRILEMAN - Aug 16, 2014 07:08 AM EST

For the  record I enjoyed The Amazing Spider-Man 2. I really loved the first one, but like many of you I found myself disappointed by the second film. Even though I was disappointed I think this film gets too much hate. It's like it's trendy or something to beat up on it. It had good acting, great special effects, good action, and great romance. It's a good set up for coming films and answered alot of questions (no one was asking I'll give you.) And Andrew as Peter Parker is just perfect. I have been reading Spider-Man comics for 20+ years and Andrew Garfield nails the character. So what is my biggest complaint about the film no one else is talking about?


 

Ashley Kofka. A great Spider-Man character was completely wasted. No, scratch that...the character was completely destroyed by this movie.

Ashley Kofka in the comics is a woman who has devoted her life to helping and reforming super criminals. She believes she can help them get to a better life. She is a loving, caring person.

The Ashley Kofka we got on film was a man. A german-mad-scientist who loves torturing/experimenting on his patients. He is almost the complete opposite of the character from the comics. The only simularity is that they are both criminal psychologists named Ashley Kofka. That's it.

Yes the movie had some bad dialogue ("It's time for me to light me candles!") yes the movie had a villain no one cares about (who runs around saying Electro is there favorite villain?) and yes the movie had it's moments of just flat out dumb moments (itsy bitsy spider played by Electro or the entire birthday cake scene) but I still found myself enjoying much of the movie due to Andrew and Emma and the fact The Amazing Spider-Man 2 has the best swing scenes in any Spidey flick by far.  But what they did to Dr. Ashley Kofka was and is unforgivable. Why even call the character Dr. Kofka if you are going to change everything about the character? It's like changing who the character was  as a person wasn't enough they had to arbitrarily change the characters' gender just to add insult to injury.
THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN 2 Returns To Theaters On Monday With A Less-Than-Spectacular Box Office Haul
Related:

THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN 2 Returns To Theaters On Monday With A Less-Than-Spectacular Box Office Haul

AMAZING SPIDER-MAN 2 Star Dane DeHaan Talks NO WAY HOME Rumors And Whether He'd Return As Green Goblin
Recommended For You:

AMAZING SPIDER-MAN 2 Star Dane DeHaan Talks NO WAY HOME Rumors And Whether He'd Return As Green Goblin

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
DrKinsolving
DrKinsolving - 8/16/2014, 8:41 AM
Far from the only problem.... The script, actually the writing in general, Webb doesn't understand Spider-Man, his villains, or his universe, the marketing execs also seem to have way too much input.

I also still don't see this franchise as a full reboot either because a lot of the same people that worked on the original trilogy are still working on this....

They also rebooted this because if they didn't they would have lost the rights. That's not a good reason to reboot a franchise.... Batman was rebooted but they gave it time, they took their time, found a fitting director and a it had a totally different take, that is what Spider-Man needs, a different and fresh take from a director and writers that understand the character.

I could list more problems, but they have been stated over and over....
0mega140
0mega140 - 12/17/2016, 3:42 PM
@DrKinsolving - webb understand the character. is the people who dont undertadn the character.
Dingbat
Dingbat - 8/16/2014, 9:44 AM
I blame the disjointed script on editing. I'd like to see a directors cut. However, I agree with this article and never understood why nobody complained about how they turned Kofka into a cartoon character like all the other villains.
0mega140
0mega140 - 12/17/2016, 3:44 PM
@Dingbat - because all the viallinas of spiderman basically are cartoon chaaracter?
EhMaybeSays
EhMaybeSays - 8/16/2014, 9:48 AM
Nobody cares. . .
3DOldskool
3DOldskool - 8/16/2014, 9:53 AM
@VIRILEMAN

You honestly have no idea who Peter Parker is then if you think Garfield is a good Peter Parker. That statement alone is an insult to Peter Parker himself.
SauronsBANE
SauronsBANE - 8/16/2014, 10:00 AM
When the Titanic sank, ALL the attention was placed on how the iceberg was the culprit. I'm sure somewhere on the ship, a toilet wasn't working properly. Or a window was jammed shut and couldn't open. Or a rug somewhere had a stain on it. Are all of those legitimate "flaws" in the ship? Sure, but are any of those the real reason why the ship sank? Of course not!

The Amazing Spider-Man 2 is the Titanic, the script/directing/studio executives are the iceberg, and Dr. Kafka is a clogged toilet. Or a stuck window. Or a stained rug. Legitimate flaw? Sure, but not even close to being the reason why The Amazing Spider-Man 2 failed so miserably.
0mega140
0mega140 - 12/17/2016, 3:45 PM
@SauronsBANE - no TASM2 is a good movie. only a easy story about peter and gwen and how dies. thast it
3DOldskool
3DOldskool - 8/16/2014, 10:05 AM
@SauronsBANE

One giant flaw everyone NEVER points out: Andrew Garfield doesn't have the same appeal as Tobey Maguire. He's horribly miscasted.
AC1
AC1 - 8/16/2014, 10:10 AM
I'm a fan of both TASM movies, but I think the main problem (for me) with TASM 2 was that it lost that more intimate, personal quality that really helped the story with the first one, at the expense of overfilling the film. There was a bit too much going on in TASM 2, with regards to setting up a wider universe - not to the level of, for example, Iron Man 2 or X-Men Origins: Wolverine - and the emotional content that was there still worked really well, but there was a bit too much "filler" for my liking as well, including Dr. Kafka (a completely unnecessary additional character). That's a reoccurring problem with Kurtzman and Orci's writing - they have good ideas, and they're pretty good writers, but they always seem to go overboard and try to cram way too much into their scripts.

Also, the hammy acting from the likes of Paul Giammatti as Rhino, and Marton Csokas as Kafka really annoyed me, and I'm surprised Marc Webb let them go on like that. I think Webb's a good director (or at least, has the potential to be one, given his lack of experience), but I have to agree with what some others have said on this site before - that he seems like he might be a bit of a pushover, too afraid to stand up for his vision and give criticism to people he's working with out of fear of offending them (actors AND producers).

As for the specific matter of Dr. Kafka - do they explicitly call him "Ashley Kafka" in the movie? Is there any way they could get away with introducing a more faithful, female Ashley Kafka into the series later on? Perhaps as this Dr Kafka's wife or something?
huckfinnisher
huckfinnisher - 8/16/2014, 10:19 AM
@3DOldschool I agree it infuriates me when people say Garfield a better Peter. He plays the roll way too cool. Too stylish too funny and likeable. There is supposed to be a huge personality change from peter to spiderman.
3DOldskool
3DOldskool - 8/16/2014, 10:24 AM
@huckfinnisher

Lol.. likable? I don't even find him anywhere likable at all.
huckfinnisher
huckfinnisher - 8/16/2014, 11:01 AM
@3doldschool, I mean he seems like he would be a popular kid in high school and isn't nerdy or introverted at all. The spiky bedhead skateboard punk look its just all wrong. I mean people in that world would like peter whereas in the comics he only had a few friends and was picked in mostly. They removed that whole layer of story to make him more "likeable" to the general audience although i despised it.
3DOldskool
3DOldskool - 8/16/2014, 11:04 AM
@ManCalledSting

Still better than whet Raimi gave us. Garfield is a damn good Ultimae Peter Parker(which this move takes huge inspiration from), and I couldn't stand Tobey as Parker.

For someone who can't even spell "ultimate" correctly, I don't think anyone is going to take you seriously.
AC1
AC1 - 8/16/2014, 11:12 AM
@huckfinnisher that's what nerds do nowadays though. They follow trends and try "cool stuff" like skateboarding because they think it'll help them gain acceptance, but it doesn't. You need to look beyond his clothes and his activities and see his personality - he's extremely introverted/anxious, and has poor social skills, so it's no wonder he's not popular, especially when his humour only takes the form of sarcasm, directed at popular kids who don't like him. It wouldn't make any sense to have him dress, talk and act like a '60s nerd (sweater vest, bow tie, wholly innocent vocabulary, no hobbies beyond studying), because that kind of nerd doesn't exist any more.

@3DOldskool you're really clutching at straws if you're hung up on what was clearly a typo, and using that as reason to disregard someone's opinion. You don't like Garfield as Peter? Fine, maybe he just annoys you one some subconscious level no one will ever truly understand. You say he's miscast as Peter because of that? You're wrong. He plays the character almost exactly as he should, with the main differences only stemming from a need to update the character to fit into a contemporary world.
huckfinnisher
huckfinnisher - 8/16/2014, 11:14 AM
@mancalledsting, being a nerd and somewhat unlikeable is part of what made him stand out so much. Not read much Ultimate but why would you take your cues from the substantially less popular version of the character... seems like a bad choice. I know mcu took quite a few things from ultimate universe but the characters themselves are more like thier classic counterparts.
Toby was an excellent peter, maybe you just like ultimate Spider-Man better, but that doesn't make Garfield the better Peter. If what you say is true they play diff. Spidermen entirely, both did well but my spidey is nerdy and hard to like, you can have boy band one direction spidey if you want.
SauronsBANE
SauronsBANE - 8/16/2014, 11:16 AM
"he's extremely introverted/anxious, and has poor social skills"

Amazing how he goes from that, to making out with Gwen and high-fiving the principal on his way out of his high school graduation. And all that "character development" managed to happen completely off-screen! Such great writing.
huckfinnisher
huckfinnisher - 8/16/2014, 11:22 AM
AC1 This is probably just a matter of opinion but i believe you are referring to ahipster. Hipsters follow trends, nerds don't. Maybe if in the movie they had shown he had no friends so he picked up a skateboard to try to fit in, but generally people referred to as nerds are not physically inclined (so no skateboarding) and di not follow trends which is why they are socially outcast. To you a nerd is somebody who does all that can to fit in but when they are alone get all angsty? Sounds like a normal high schooler to me.
3DOldskool
3DOldskool - 8/16/2014, 11:26 AM
@AC1

he's extremely introverted/anxious, and has poor social skills

I hardly buy into that especially from someone who is just using Peter Parker to his own caricature with those hipster glasses on.

@ManCalledSting

Might wanna get all your shit straight, before you worry about others.

Who get what straight? You come on CBM all day and brag about how Andrew is the best PP/SM ever like Jollem and don't even offer viable and lengthy enough of reasons to support your statements. And what you usually spit out sometimes has already been proven wrong for countless times by other people. It seems like you're just making your own claims based on what other people do and say and don't follow your own mentality and judgement.
huckfinnisher
huckfinnisher - 8/16/2014, 11:39 AM
@Mancalledsting, just didn't like his acting? Tobey is generally regarded as a good actor, to just say i didnt like his acting is strange as at the time he got dang good reviews from critics and public alike. There is a certain cheesiness in the first films, are you sure its not that you just like a cooler Spider-Man? If there are problems with the first films its not the acting. I think you are one of those people who just hate on Tobey because he has an ugly cry face lol.
AC1
AC1 - 8/16/2014, 11:57 AM
@huckfinnisher hipsters (supposedly) don't follow trends, they're notorious for trying to be "original" in whatever way they can - listening to obscure movies, wearing slightly more eccentric clothing (with a nerdy edge, granted), as an intentional attempt at steering away from trends. Nerds, on the other hand, nowadays have a tendency to TRY to follow trends, and while some manage to do so more than others, it usually doesn't help, because again, personality counts for a lot when it comes to popularity. They aren't very good at following trends, so they don't fit in, but they try because they want to. And being angsty is something that happens to pretty much all teens at some point in their lives, you know? It's a very confusing time in their lives, so they're bound to get irritated (and doubly so if they've discovered a conspiracy around their parents' death, and have also started mutating into something other than a normal human).

As for the skateboarding thing (not exactly a good thing to include in the movie, but it does help the point I'm making) - we never see Peter really skateboarding before he gets superpowers. All he does is ride it through the halls at school - something anyone can do if they're able to stand, walk and keep their balance. So again, he thinks it's cool, but he fails to gain acceptance (skateboarding is a pretty cool activity, but skateboarding through school seems like a stupid attempt at seeking attention and trying to 'look' cool, so again, he fails at being cool). He only starts doing tricks and stuff after he gains his powers, which can be seen as him experimenting with his new abilities.
TucksFrom2015
TucksFrom2015 - 8/16/2014, 12:07 PM
Because strapping a woman into an electric tank is cruel..and kinky.
AC1
AC1 - 8/16/2014, 12:09 PM
@SauronsBANE maybe I should've been clearer, but I meant that he started off as a socially awkward, anxious, introvert (i.e. at the beginning of TASM), obviously over time, especially with his successful superhero career and promising love life and future by the beginning of TASM 2, he has developed more confidence. But I agree, that was another fairly stupid moment in the movie. Again, I'm not claiming the movie is perfect, just that Andrew Garfield is great as Peter (although he is obliged to follow the script, and I'd be surprised if that was something he improvised - and even then, Marc Webb shouldn't have used that take in the final edit if it was improvised).

@3DOldskool I'm not sure what you mean by "especially from someone who is just using Peter Parker to his own caricature", who are you referring to? As for the "hipster glasses", Peter wore glasses in the comics prior to gaining his superpowers. In this (modern) version, he had contacts before finding his father's old glasses, and wore them because they reminded him of his dead parents (the better thing to nitpick would be his father having the exact same reading prescription as he does). But it's hardly "hipster" to wear glasses if you need them (which he clearly did because no one wears contacts for fun, unless changing eye-colour, which he wasn't). And, like the comics, he no longer needed them when he gained superpowers. In fact, Tobey Maguire's Peter also wore glasses pre-superpowers: does that make him a hipster too, in your opinion? Or by hipster are you referring to the style of glasses Garfield wore - which again, were hand-me-downs from the character's father, not a fashion statement.

@huckfinnisher just noticed a typo there, must've deleted part of a sentence by mistake. Should read: "listening to unknown music, watching obscure movies"...
1 2
View Recorder