How Exactly SUPERMAN Made Massive $100 Million Profit For Warner Bros. Discovery Has Finally Been Revealed

How Exactly SUPERMAN Made Massive $100 Million Profit For Warner Bros. Discovery Has Finally Been Revealed

DC Studios’ Superman was said to have made $100 million in profit for Warner Bros. Discovery. Now, where exactly that profit came from has finally been revealed.

By DanielKlissmman - Dec 06, 2025 12:12 PM EST
Filed Under: Superman
Source: Bloomberg

James Gunn's Superman arrived earlier this year to great reviews and a respectable box office haul. DC Studios' first feature is often labeled as a massive success for Warner Bros. Discovery. In November, for example, Forbes published a report stating the film had made $100 million in profit, and would end up making $150 million by year end's time. 

Superman made $616 million worldwide during its theatrical run. It was a good amount, but with a reported $225 million budget not including marketing (another report put it at over $300 million, which James Gunn debunked), the film's initial haul didn't seem enough to reach that $100-million profit milestone. As such, it was clear the project's success had largely stemmed from ancillary markets. Now, we finally know the exact markets its profit came from. 

Bloomberg published "Netflix Has a Huge Opportunity With the DC Studios Superheroes," a profile focused on DC Studios co-CEOs James Gunn and Peter Safran. A major part of the piece was the duo's successful start at the company, largely stemming from Superman's previously cited $100 million profit. The outlet proceeded to list the exact markets that allowed the David Corenswet-led film to reach said figure. Per Bloomberg, its profit came from a combination of three pivotal branches:

Ticket sales, online rentals and merchandise deals. 

Such markets guiding the movie into the realm of profitability isn't surprising. Merchandising has historically been a pivotal source of post-theatrical revenue for superhero films. Superman was a prime example of that. The film was (and, for the most part, continues to be) everywhere—food products, clothing, kitchen items, toys and collectibles. It hit every possible market. The film has also been widely recognized as a success on video on demand. As an example, it was revealed the project was on Google TV's top-three movies of 2025, alongside Ryan Coogler's Sinners.

Given those aspects, it makes sense Superman was able to turn in such a large profit. Regarding the studio's success, co-CEO Peter Safran told Bloomberg he and Gunn had only scratched the surface in their efforts to turn the DC brand into a "crown jewel" for Warner Bros. Discovery: "When we took the job, obviously the goal was to turn DC into the crown jewel that we knew it deserved to be. We've only literally started scratching the surface.

Despite the brand's prior monetary struggles, Superman's theatrical and post-theatrical performance served as a reminder of how profitable DC can be. Talking to Bloomberg about Netflix's acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery, media industry analyst at LightShed Partners, Rich Greenfield singled out DC's enormous financial potential: "DC is probably the single greatest opportunity in this transaction. [...] DC has been one of the most undermonitized franchises in all of Hollywood , and while it's certainly showing signs of life, it's still a tiny fraction of where Marvel got to under Disney." 

Superman is available to stream on HBO Max. Its follow-up, Man of Tomorrow, will fly into theaters on July 9, 2027. 

What do you think about this new information about Superman? Which of these markets did you contribute to ? Let me know in the comments!

About The Author:
DanielKlissmman
Member Since 8/28/2021
Daniel Klissmman is an entertainment journalist who's written for Movie Pilot, CBR.com, Cinemark and AMC Theatres. He loves superheroes with a passion and really wishes he'll one day get to hang out with Moon Knight.
Sydney Chandler Is Joining Her Father In The DCU - But Not As The Character She Tested For!
Related:

Sydney Chandler Is Joining Her Father In The DCU - But Not As The Character She Tested For!

Warner Bros. Discovery Reveals Superman Day 2026 Plans - Including Supergirl And Krypto
Recommended For You:

Warner Bros. Discovery Reveals Superman Day 2026 Plans - Including Supergirl And Krypto

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
lazlodaytona
lazlodaytona - 12/6/2025, 12:59 PM
I'm on information overload.
Goldboink
Goldboink - 12/6/2025, 1:03 PM
OK, this isn't going to be popular but...

The reason that WB was even up for sale and fought over so mightily is James Gunn.

That's it. He was able to establish a Superman that people liked and were entertained by. WB/DC have been unable to do that since Superman 2. Turning the vast DC library into profitable movies and TV shows that sell merch can't be underestimated. Gunn is going nowhere.

As for Snyder, not even close. Netflix gave him a bunch of money and he gave them unwatchable crap that only his cult liked.

Netflix bought WB solely because of James Gunn and the WB money people only sold it now because of James Gunn.
Rpendo
Rpendo - 12/6/2025, 1:10 PM
@Goldboink - …that is staggering in its myopic stupidity.
TheJok3r
TheJok3r - 12/6/2025, 1:12 PM
@Goldboink - Gunn will have even more weight to throw around once Man of Tomorrow releases, as that'll likely do even better at the box office. Between what Gunn is doing with Superman and what Reeves is doing with Batman, there's absolutely no scenario where they get removed in favor of Snyder, who did nothing but hurt the DC brand.
AmazingFILMporg
AmazingFILMporg - 12/6/2025, 1:14 PM
@Goldboink -


You are truly delusional and need to get on meds if you actually believe what you wrote🤡
NonPlayerC
NonPlayerC - 12/6/2025, 1:18 PM
@Goldboink - it doesn't matter who is at the head of DC movies. They are always gonna be able to sell merchandise. Kids were buying batman action figures long before gunn and will continue after hes dead. This hero worship saying one person Snyder or Gunn is the savior of DC is just not rational thought. To say Netflix bought Warner for gunn is ignoring the fact that they got a top competitor out of the market, and got their vast library of top tier HBO/warner content that will now bring all those loyal subscribers to come to Netflix. DC is more of a cherry on top than the main reason they bought it.
JDL
JDL - 12/6/2025, 2:06 PM
@NonPlayerC - If it's merch that is directly tied to the movie you can count it. Otherwise as you said, nope.
JackDeth
JackDeth - 12/6/2025, 3:53 PM
@Goldboink - 100% true.
mastakilla39
mastakilla39 - 12/6/2025, 5:15 PM
@Goldboink - its not Gunn, WB had hits this year in general. Minecraft, Sinners, Final Destination, etc were bigger return on investments than Superman. Zaslav made great decisions after buying WB which is projected to double WB's stocks in a couple of years. Thats why Paramount and Netflix had such a huge bidding war for WB, because they won't be able to buy it in a couple of years.
NonPlayerC
NonPlayerC - 12/6/2025, 5:27 PM
@JDL - I thought dc comics was a subsidiary of Warner too, not just holding movie rights? I was just saying any movie or show is advertisement for toys whether they are tied to comics, cartoons, or movies.
spr0cks
spr0cks - 12/6/2025, 5:46 PM
@Goldboink -
Not only not popular but stupid as well, and completely out of step with reality and the real reasons anything actually happened.

WB was up for sale the moment David Zaslav walking in the door.
He was hired specifically to prepare it for a sale and to shed as much debt as possible, and James Gunn and the DCU had nothing to do with anything in that decision as WB would have been sold regardless.

Also, Netflix categorically DID NOT buy WB "solely because of James Gunn and the WB money only sellling it because of James Gunn"....and you're a blithering idiot and buffon if you actually believe that tripe.

Netflix bought WB because of their content library and their HBO/MAX streaming services and content (which now become Netlfix assets).
That's the reason they were not interested in the rest of the TV production stuff (the news services like CNN and the like.
Netlfx Dead honcho Ted Sarandos as even come out in recent days and openly said as much.

You Gunn fans continue to sound like idiots every time you try to explain the world through the lens of your almighty god James Gunn.

Have you noticed how quiet he's been on Social Media since this deal went through?
Notice anything strange about that?

Wouldn't he be yammering endlessly if "he" was the reason this sale went through.

What an idiotic take.
JDL
JDL - 12/6/2025, 8:28 PM
@NonPlayerC - DC is indeed a subsidiary of Warner. My point was that any merch revenue that only exists because of a movie can be included as part of it's overall income.
Pimpanzee
Pimpanzee - 12/6/2025, 11:54 PM
I love that he didn't start by saying, "This isn't going to have anything to do with facts," but rather, "This isn't going to be popular." This asshole thinks his bullshit becomes true if enough people "like" it
HashTagSwagg
HashTagSwagg - 12/6/2025, 1:24 PM
User Comment Image
2BOOKOO4U
2BOOKOO4U - 12/6/2025, 1:28 PM
@DanielKlissmman User Comment Image
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 12/6/2025, 1:29 PM
Sweet!!.

However , we already know it was a success since I doubt a cheapskate like Zaslav would have ever approved of them doing a pseudo-sequel like MOT if the first one hadn’t done well or underperformed at the least though I’m sure some will continue to deny that.

Anyway , Superman was a solid film so I can’t wait to see more of him & his supporting cast in MOT & beyond!!.

User Comment Image
TheNewYorkerr
TheNewYorkerr - 12/6/2025, 1:39 PM
Cap! Shoutout to Zootopia 2 for making more than that in 2 weeks
kazuma
kazuma - 12/6/2025, 1:42 PM
@TheNewYorkerr - Zootopia 2 will mend its theatrical run making more than the entire DCEU lol
TheNewYorkerr
TheNewYorkerr - 12/6/2025, 3:06 PM
@kazuma - Facts.
Forthas
Forthas - 12/6/2025, 1:41 PM
Even if it is true, Man of Steel made an additional $120 million on JUST DVD sales, in addition to it already being profitable from its box office run. So why should anyone be impressed with this number.
epc1122
epc1122 - 12/6/2025, 4:58 PM
@Forthas - it’s not about being impressed. It’s seeing if the property can continue to be successful. Man of steel was also a decent start to the franchise but unfortunately Batman v Superman and Justice league let that version of Superman down and it was headed toward a future that would have been even more divisive with Superman teaming with darkseid and then raising Bruce’s son. While this current Superman is more silver age and not modern, it did well enough at the box office to at least have a sequel.
spr0cks
spr0cks - 12/6/2025, 6:23 PM
@epc1122 -

RE : " it’s not about being impressed. It’s seeing if the property can continue to be successful. Man of steel was also a decent start to the franchise but unfortunately Batman v Superman and Justice league let that version of Superman down"


I'll just leave this here....

Superman 2025 ($615 Million grossed) under-performed not only Man of Steel ($670 Million), but also both those "awful" follow-ups/sequels in Batman v Superman ($880 Million) and Justice League ($660 Million)
epc1122
epc1122 - 12/6/2025, 7:44 PM
@spr0cks - like a broken record! Wb expected over a billion for man of steel, Batman v Superman, and Justice League. Man of steel was a good start but Batman v Superman started the downfall for the Snyderverse which is also why Justice league did far worse than Batman v Superman. The second week drop for all three of the movies was rather big and didn’t have streaming to deal with. Yes there have been some hits since Covid but the theater business is nowhere near as high or consistent as it used to be. Superman 25 actually took in more money domestically compared to man of steel but didn’t resonate internationally. With that said, man of steel, justice league, and Superman 25 made about the same. It’s not like any of them were close to the billion dollar mark. Man of steel supposedly had a 42.7 million profit. Batman v Superman had about a 100 million profit but lost a lot of good faith which showed in the next installment. The studio apparently lost about 60 million on Justice league but let’s try to twist facts.
spr0cks
spr0cks - 12/7/2025, 4:05 AM
@epc1122 -

RE : >>>"Man of steel was a good start but Batman v Superman started the downfall for the Snyderverse which is also why Justice league did far worse than Batman v Superman."


....and yet they still all made more money than SuperDiaperCrapMan 2025.
In fact, here's more DCEU movies that made more money than SuperDiaperCrapMan 2025:-

Aquaman.
Wonder-Woman.
Suicide Squad.
Aquaman 2

RE : >>>" The second week drop for all three of the movies was rather big and didn’t have streaming to deal with. Yes there have been some hits since Covid but the theater business is nowhere near as high or consistent as it used to be."

....blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah

....so many excuses....
.....so little time...

Oh, and The Batman which was released DURING Covid and the lockdowns made $160 Million more than SuperDiaperCrapMan 2025.

And Deadpool and Wolverine released LAST YEAR, made $1.3 Billion.
There go those excuses.


RE : >>>" Superman 25 actually took in more money domestically compared to man of steel but didn’t resonate internationally."

....and yet Man of Steel STILL made more money overall than SuperDiaperCrap 2025 and didn't have to be pulled out of theaters after only 35 days because it was a laughable joke in terms of its performance and the studio had to recoup some money from streaming.

Deal with that.


RE : >>>"With that said, man of steel, justice league, and Superman 25 made about the same. It’s not like any of them were close to the billion dollar mark."


.......and you're a blatant IDIOT if you actually believe that.

RE : >>>"Man of steel supposedly had a 42.7 million profit. Batman v Superman had about a 100 million profit but lost a lot of good faith which showed in the next installment."

...and you're a blatant blithering IDIOT and Buffoon who can't do basic math if actually believe that.
Let's not even get into the fact that I'm not even factoring Inflation into any of these figures and if I did you'd look like an even BIGGER buffoon.

And just for the record, Man of Steel's 2013 $670 Million box office gross translates to $930 Million in 2025 dollars.

There's your comparison, dummy.


RE : >>>"The studio apparently lost about 60 million on Justice league but let’s try to twist facts."

I love how we just pull stupid nonsense out of our asses now and hold them up, and expect people to accept them as actual facts.

Speaking of people twisting facts and living in Delulu land with nonsense maths......
epc1122
epc1122 - 12/7/2025, 6:12 AM
@spr0cks - if the Snyderverse did so well it would have continued. There’s a reason why Snyder stopped after three movies and Netflix recently discontinued his twilight and rebel moon series. People generally enjoyed 1/3 movies he did for dc and even at the time it was mixed. It was only after time that people started to appreciate man of steel and that’s in large part due to Cavill’s casting. Justice league the Snyder cut also didn’t add subscribers like hbo max would have liked. You also shouldn’t use inflation with these scenarios because then you would have to use inflation for budget and marketing but you’re so into the cult that I don’t think you can use logic. You’re not really looking into more than just box office which is a bit narrow minded. No one said that there were no hits at the box office but to say that it’s recovered from Covid is absolutely ridiculous. Batman is a more popular character and it’s going to be less money to make. Recent reports for Deadpool and Wolverine also didn’t make as much due to the budget being so high. Box office vs profit go hand in hand but not the same thing and unfortunately you either just unwilling to accept that or not smart enough to understand it. The Snyderverse has a fan base and did ok early on but it was met with a lot of mixed reception and disappointment. Superman 25 didn’t need to make as much. It needed good reviews and positive word of mouth to get some of the faith back after bombs from blue beetle (underrated movie), Shazam 2, Wonder Woman 2, flash, and aquaman 2. The true test for the Gunnverse will be supergirl, and man of tomorrow. Nothing to do with excuses.
defenderofthefaith
defenderofthefaith - 12/6/2025, 1:45 PM
There is no way this movie made a 100 million dollar profit. Someone is fudging numbers. Or just lying.
RockReigns
RockReigns - 12/6/2025, 1:49 PM
@defenderofthefaith - It was heavy domestic, which automatically gives it a bigger ROI. US share is 70% first week and 60% for the rest of its run.

Making $350M domestically helps a lot.
defenderofthefaith
defenderofthefaith - 12/6/2025, 2:08 PM
@RockReigns - even with your nonsense it still doesn't make 100 million dollar profit. Superman made 354 million domestic. Even if Warner Brothers makes 70% of that total of 354 million (which we know only applies to the first week) it still only makes 247 million off that. Considering that against the budget of 300 million it still comes up short of a profit. But since we know it didn't make 70% of its entirety domestic box office run it made a lot less than 247 million domestically. No way this movie made 100 million dollar profit.
1 2

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder