SUPERMAN Has Reportedly Made A Staggering Amount Of Profit For WBD Since Leaving Theaters

SUPERMAN Has Reportedly Made A Staggering Amount Of Profit For WBD Since Leaving Theaters

After much debate regarding Superman’s profitability, a new report states the movie has actually made (and will continue to make) an impressive amount of money for Warner Bros. Discovery.

By DanielKlissmman - Nov 09, 2025 07:11 PM EST
Filed Under: Superman
Source: Forbes

It feels as though it's getting harder and harder for comic book movies to turn a profit in theaters. Just this year, out of the four major superhero movies released, two of them—Captain America: Brave New World and Thunderbolts*—were significant financial disappointments. The other two—Superman and The Fantastic Four: First Steps—fared much better, but still arguably struggled to reach the level of success its respective studios had hoped for them. 

Between the two projects, Superman's success has specifically been a topic of much disagreement, with the main debate being whether or not the movie made a profit during its theatrical run. Now, a new report states the film ended up making, and will continue to make, an impressive amount of profit for Warner Bros. Discovery. Forbes published an article that speculates on the potential routes the DCU could take.

There, the outlet stated that James Gunn's DCU feature has so far made $100 million in profit, and is well on its way to earn $150 million in all. This is somewhat similar to a previous report from Variety, which stated the film was expected to make a profit of $125 million. With that said, it was recently revealed that Superman's box office revenue was offset by Warner Bros. Discovery's traditional-TV losses. 

Keep in mind, the amounts reported by Forbes in this latest article are likely not referring to theatrical profits. Instead, the numbers given are probably from ancillary markets, such as home media, merchandising, streaming and ad partnerships. To provide context for why that may be, in October, Forbes (via Comicbook.com) broke down the profitability of the project. In it, the outlet explained that ticket earnings are usually split 50-50 with theaters (it's not a precise metric, but the split is the most commonly accepted in the industry to calculate theatrical profits).

According to Variety, Superman had a production budget of $225 million and a marketing budget of $125 million, for a combined total of $350 million. The film made $616 million at the global box office. Splitting the $616 million in half results in approximately $308 million in revenue for Warner Bros. This would mean the movie fell approximately $42 million short of breaking even theatrically.

However, YouTuber Dan Murrell also broke down the earnings of the film, and estimated the movie had lost approximately $77 million in the theatrical window (box office reporting is usually not an exact science unless you're privy to the actual spending on the project). If accuate, the amounts calculated by Forbes and Murrell point to the ancillary revenue being nearly or over $200 million in revenue to be able to recoup Superman's theatrical losses and still bring in over $150 million in profit. 

Now, it's important to make it clear that this information isn't meant as some sort of hit piece toward James Gunn's DCU. No, Superman was not a disastrous box office failure, but it also didn't necessarily live up to expectations in its theatrical run. Those two things can be true without Superman being some sort of enormous flop (which, again, it wasn't). 

Fortunately, the movie ended up finding success after being in theaters. Hopefully, the DCU will continue on to bigger heights with future installments Supergirl (my most anticipated DCU film), Clayface and 2027's Man of Tomorrow

Superman is available to stream on HBO Max. 

What do you think about the reported profit made by Superman? Let me know in the comments! 

About The Author:
DanielKlissmman
Member Since 8/28/2021
Daniel Klissmman is an entertainment journalist who's written for Movie Pilot, CBR.com, Cinemark and AMC Theatres. He loves superheroes with a passion and really wishes he'll one day get to hang out with Moon Knight.
James Gunn Shares Amazing Art Of David Corenswet’s Superman Teaming Up With Supergirl, Mr. Terrific And Krytpo
Related:

James Gunn Shares Amazing Art Of David Corenswet’s Superman Teaming Up With Supergirl, Mr. Terrific And Krytpo

SUPERMAN Concept Art Reveals Unexpectedly Gruesome Alternate Design For Lex Luthor’s Mr. Handsome
Recommended For You:

SUPERMAN Concept Art Reveals Unexpectedly Gruesome Alternate Design For Lex Luthor’s Mr. Handsome

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3
TheNewYorkerr
TheNewYorkerr - 11/9/2025, 7:35 PM
Sureeee.. 🤣
TheVandalore
TheVandalore - 11/9/2025, 11:54 PM
@TheNewYorkerr - lol
Lisa89
Lisa89 - 11/9/2025, 7:35 PM
SUPERMAN Has Reportedly Made A Staggering Amount Of “Articles” For CBM.com Since Leaving Theaters
SuperiorHeckler
SuperiorHeckler - 11/9/2025, 8:11 PM
@Lisa89 - 😄😆😂🤣
Highflyer
Highflyer - 11/9/2025, 7:36 PM
Gunn's Superman and The Batman are two films that I'm annoyed at myself for not loving. Especially Superman. Having remembered Gunn's amaazing work on GOTG, I warmed up to the idea a Gunn directed and written Superman movie, but if U'm being honest, it felt uninspired and HEAVY on the clunky exposition. Not to mention, the film felt like a rushed check list to give people who didn't like what Snyder did instead giving it the right amount of focus.
HashTagSwagg
HashTagSwagg - 11/9/2025, 7:57 PM
@Highflyer -
User Comment Image

It's entirely on Gunn, not you. The general response from normal people and online hasn't been good overall, there would be no need for these shill puff piece articles trying convince people that the film was actually successful if it just was, they certainly wouln't have released it on digital weeks after it come out in theatre's. Gunn's sh1t stunk and people were quicker to regonise it than they eventually did when Disney made their star wars movies.
RolandD
RolandD - 11/9/2025, 8:18 PM
@HashTagSwagg - It reviewed higher or equal to MoS on metrics including higher audience scores but if you repeat unscientifically gathered information enough, some people will believe you, the ones who aren’t concerned with facts mostly. The Snyderverse is not coming back.
WalletsClosed
WalletsClosed - 11/9/2025, 8:33 PM
@Highflyer - Both Gunn's Superman and the Batman are horrible parodies. Your final sentence is exactly what the movie was. A poorly written, clunky mess
WalletsClosed
WalletsClosed - 11/9/2025, 8:35 PM
@RolandD - Supershit: 7.1/10 on imdb after 3 months
Man of Steel: 7.1/10 on imdb after 5 years of insane review bombing from anti Snyder and MCU tards

Supershit: 616 million box office
Man of Steel: 670 million box office

Supershit: 7.1/10 metacritic rating
Man of Steel: 7.4/10 metacritic rating

We all know what's better. The facts are on our side.
RockReigns
RockReigns - 11/9/2025, 8:41 PM
@WalletsClosed -


SUPERMAN budget: $200 million + $120 million marketing
MAN OF STEEL budget: $225 million + $200 million marketing

This is why MOS made sooo much less profit.

$42M to $150M. :)
whynot
whynot - 11/9/2025, 8:56 PM
@WalletsClosed - Superman 2025 also had made moajority of its $ domestically which has a far better profitability then foreign. Also let’s not forget the boxoffice window for these 2 movies. If you have had Superman 2025 stay in theatres as long as MOS you would have seen a far greater box office
HashTagSwagg
HashTagSwagg - 11/9/2025, 8:58 PM
@RockReigns - Not sure where you get your numbers, but you are clearly leaving shit out to skew it in your favour.

2025's marketing budget was between $125 million and $200 million.
Also production budget is reported at approx. US $225 million, after tax incentives.

For Man of steel, Warner Bros. officially listed it at about $225 million.
Man of steel's marketing budget was estimated between $150 million and $170 million.


So far, both films sit in roughly the same range, but if Superman (2025) ends up spending closer to $400 million total and earns near Man of Steel’s level, it will make less profit — or potentially none at all — compared to Man of Steel.




lazlodaytona
lazlodaytona - 11/9/2025, 9:07 PM
@Highflyer - can't argue that!
WalletsClosed
WalletsClosed - 11/9/2025, 9:38 PM
@HashTagSwagg - I don't even bother responding to them anymore because they LOVE to leave things out in their favor
RolandD
RolandD - 11/9/2025, 9:38 PM
@WalletsClosed - Thank you for continuing the trend. I recently pointed out about how immature the comments are from people who hate James Gunn and as usual, you didn’t disappoint.
RolandD
RolandD - 11/9/2025, 10:27 PM
@WalletsClosed - Your hypocrisy is amazing since you left out Rotten Tomatoes, especially the all important audience score. One movie went splat the other one didn’t.
MoS Rotten Tomatoes 57% Audience 75%
Superman RT 83% Audience 90%
You also left out the critic scores for Metacritic, again showing your hypocrisy.
Mos 55
Superman 68
Finally, box office scores are becoming more and more irrelevant which the Gunn haters continue to ignore. Irrelevance is too strong of a word but it’s becoming less and less the only barometer of what makes a successful movie. Sure a box office blockbuster is going to be preferred by the movie studios, but comparing box office from 2013 to box office in 2025 is like saying the New York Times is no longer successful because they don’t sell as many paper copies of their newspaper as they used to. Times are changing and the intelligent are no longer hanging every financial measure of success on box office numbers, or maybe they do when it fits their agenda.
solskulldeath
solskulldeath - 11/9/2025, 11:25 PM
@HashTagSwagg - nah, general audience sucks. They like MOS, but we nerds hate it.
RegularPoochie
RegularPoochie - 11/10/2025, 2:23 AM
@RolandD -
User Comment Image
ClungeOfSteel
ClungeOfSteel - 11/10/2025, 3:07 AM
@RolandD - why do Gunn lovers love immature jokes in Gunn's movies but hate it when people use those immature jokes against their lord a saviour? 👀

Something to think about sir!
ClungeOfSteel
ClungeOfSteel - 11/10/2025, 3:50 AM
@Highflyer - probably one of the most level headed opinions on this movie I've seen.

I didn't love all of GOTG films but those movies at least had decent stories and were edited well.

I did like TSS and felt that was a well written movie despite Gunn being a bastard and killing most of the orginal team to push his new one.


When it comes to superman, you hit the nail on the head. It was rushed,the story was thin, the characters were 1 dimensional, the CGI looked unfinished, the editing was horrendous and the film was full of moments to please the people complaining about DCEU superman.

Im not sure how the critics gave the film such a pass as its so sloppy on a technical level.
TheVisionary27
TheVisionary27 - 11/10/2025, 3:58 AM
@RolandD - too long didn’t read. Are you a wannabe film expert or financial expert?
RolandD
RolandD - 11/10/2025, 7:35 AM
@ClungeOfSteel - I wouldn’t know because that was one of my criticisms about his past movies– what I called the middle school humor, especially in GOTG volume two. I was glad that he left it out of Superman 2025. Also, I am not a Gunn lover, which does not mean that I am not extremely tired of the Gunn haters. I just think that he got the character much better than Snyder did and that he makes movies with heart, despite his weakness for juvenile humor. In other words, he ain’t perfect, but he’s way better than Snyder.
RolandD
RolandD - 11/10/2025, 7:37 AM
@TheVisionary27 - That’s OK. If you look, you can see that the message was addressed to somebody who writes super long comments as well.
LiquidSwords
LiquidSwords - 11/10/2025, 8:17 AM
@RolandD - “ since you left out Rotten Tomatoes”

lol
McMurdo
McMurdo - 11/10/2025, 10:19 AM
@Highflyer - don't be annoyed. we like what we like. The Batman may be the biggest let down for me in terms of cinema in a really long time. They marketed it as this detective thriller, but they made Batman a horrendous detective in the film.
McMurdo
McMurdo - 11/10/2025, 10:34 AM
@TheVisionary27 - do you have the attention span of a goldfish?
TheRevelation
TheRevelation - 11/10/2025, 10:40 AM
@RolandD - Of course not, but it won't stop those that want more of whatever it was supposed to be. They're devoted.

User Comment Image

User Comment Image
spr0cks
spr0cks - 11/10/2025, 12:56 PM
@RockReigns -

You pulled that Man of Steel marketing number out of your ass.
Even when Deadline reported on it back in the day, they stated it was an estimation
(loser to $150-180 Million).

Likewise, the article (and presumably WB themselves) stated that Superman 2025's production budget was $225 Million (or $336 Milllion if you go by WB's own tax-filed documents, but let's indulge their own claim).

So where did that extra $25 Million disappear to from your calculation?
And where the hell did you get the $120 Million marketing number for Superman 2025 from?
(in 2025 YOU'RE SEIROUSLY TRYING TO CLAIM A MOVIE THAT COST OVER $200 TO MAKE, ONLY HAD a $120 Million marketing budget?!?!?!?!!? SERIOUSLY???
WTF is wrong with you, bro?)

This is why no one takes GunnBros seriously.

Here you are blatantly LYING about things that people can read for themselves in the very article you're commenting on, and pulling up other made-up nonsensical numbers that make no sense from your ass.


Bro.
Put some effort into it.
Make an effort.
BackwardGalaxy
BackwardGalaxy - 11/9/2025, 7:39 PM
Congratulations. Your writing has reached a new level of crap.
Nolanite
Nolanite - 11/9/2025, 7:41 PM
This sounds like a hit piece from the one and only Joshua Wilder...

This Klissman asshole thinks we don't know who he really is. We're not stupid.

Why can't Joshua Wilder just come forward and confess.

Nolanite out
DanielKlissmman
DanielKlissmman - 11/9/2025, 7:49 PM
@Nolanite - Hey! No need to insult each other :) We can have a discussion while being kind!
RolandD
RolandD - 11/9/2025, 7:54 PM
@Nolanite - Klissmman has been here for some number of years and also writes for other sites. If it’s really Josh, he’s pulling off a hell of a charade, we’re more than he did with Ruby Golding and Hamilton Parker. Wasn’t there a third one, too?
RolandD
RolandD - 11/9/2025, 7:56 PM
@RolandD -Way more, not we’re more. Bring back the edit button. @NateMoore
Rpendo
Rpendo - 11/9/2025, 8:51 PM
@Nolanite - stolen valor, Nolanite.
Nolanite
Nolanite - 11/10/2025, 10:20 AM
@Rpendo -

Not me.
Today is actually my birthday!
I just turned 250 years old!

Semper Fidelis
Nolanite out
McMurdo
McMurdo - 11/10/2025, 10:36 AM
@RolandD - you meant "we're more". You're clearly stating that Josh is ALL of us. WE ARE WILDING.
Ottsel
Ottsel - 11/9/2025, 7:42 PM
I enjoyed it so much I actually bought the physical copy. I think I have purchased 1, maybe 2, physical copies of new movies in the past 15 years. I guess I'm the continued profit they are talking about. You're welcome WBD
Humperdoo
Humperdoo - 11/9/2025, 10:17 PM
@Ottsel - Just literally got it today on blu ray for $9.99 with digital copy at walmart.
LiquidSwords
LiquidSwords - 11/10/2025, 8:19 AM
@Humperdoo - I found it in the $5 bin. Still walked away.
RolandD
RolandD - 11/9/2025, 7:45 PM
Is anyone else being bounced off lately? Even though I always check the remember me box, lately around every 3 to 4 times that I go to get on this site, I have to put my password in which never used to be the case. It’s only been within about the past week no longer for sure.
1 2 3

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder