SUPERMAN’s Box Office Revenue Said To Have Been Counteracted By WBD’s TV Losses

SUPERMAN’s Box Office Revenue Said To Have Been Counteracted By WBD’s TV Losses

Superman may have had a somewhat healthy box office run, but the movie’s revenue is said to have been offset by the company’s traditional-TV losses.

By DanielKlissmman - Nov 08, 2025 12:11 PM EST
Filed Under: Superman
Source: Variety

Superman's financial reception was a complex one. The movie's arrival marked a decisive point for not only DC Studios, but Warner Bros. Discovery as a whole. Given its large number of consecutive superhero flops at the box office, WBD desperately needed Clark Kent's latest standalone feature to hit it big. 

However, the movie arrived, and fortunately, it was not a flop... yet, it wasn't a massive blockbuster either. It was a moderate performer, with profits that, while likely not coming in from its theatrical period, would probably come in through ancillary markets. Now, a new report from Variety has revealed that revenue (Note: revenue, not profit) from Superman and other well-performing movies were just enough to compensate for significant losses in another area of the company—that of traditional television. 

Warner Bros. Discovery reported a $148 million loss in the third quarter of the year. The company is said to have received a boost in revenue of 74% through the performance of Superman, WeaponsThe Conjuring: Last Rites, and, as Variety reports, F1, which, while having premiered in the second quarter of the year, still generated revenue that carried over into quarter 3. Unfortunately, as mentioned, the money brought in by those features was offset by company losses.

Case in point, the revenue from WBD's traditional-TV ventures dropped 23% to $3.88 billion. Variety explained that some of the reasons for this decline is the lack of an event as significant as the 2024 Paris Olympics (which WBD had the rights to broadcast in Europe), and the lack of election-time news coverage. Furthermore, distribution and advertising revenue also fell, 8% and 21%, respectively. Overall, revenue for the third quarter is said to have experienced a 6% decrease from the same quarter from the previous year, resulting in $9 billion in revenue.

According to Variety, this revenue fall could prove beneficial to Warner Bros. Discovery in trying to sway shareholders regarding a drastic restructuring of the company. It was recently reiterated that top brass at Warner Bros. was contemplating splitting the company into two entities to sell them separately, as opposed to one big corporation.

One entity would be called Discovery Global, which would carry WBD's television networks like TNT, TBS and CNN. The other entity would be known simply as Warner Bros. and would carry all the properties and brands already associated with the studio. In this case, the WBD brands currently reported as suffering significant losses are those that would fall under the umbrella of Discovery Global. This is where a split could become enticing for shareholders. 

Per Variety, WBD has been letting its investors know it wants to restructure the company, and traditional-TV losses offsetting theatrical revenue will, according to Variety, serve as evidence to show shareholders why the split is necessary.

In a letter to shareholders, WBD stated: 

"[Warner Bros. Discovery]] is evaluating a broad range of strategic options, including proceeding with the planned separation, a potential transaction for the entire company, or separate transactions for the Warner Bros. and/or Discovery Global businesses." The company also said it was considering, "alternative separation structure that would enable a merger transaction involving Warner Bros., while Discovery Global would be spun off to our shareholders."

Superman is now streaming on HBO Max. 

About The Author:
DanielKlissmman
Member Since 8/28/2021
Daniel Klissmman is an entertainment journalist who's written for Movie Pilot, CBR.com, Cinemark and AMC Theatres. He loves superheroes with a passion and really wishes he'll one day get to hang out with Moon Knight.
James Gunn Shares Amazing Art Of David Corenswet’s Superman Teaming Up With Supergirl, Mr. Terrific And Krytpo
Related:

James Gunn Shares Amazing Art Of David Corenswet’s Superman Teaming Up With Supergirl, Mr. Terrific And Krytpo

SUPERMAN Concept Art Reveals Unexpectedly Gruesome Alternate Design For Lex Luthor’s Mr. Handsome
Recommended For You:

SUPERMAN Concept Art Reveals Unexpectedly Gruesome Alternate Design For Lex Luthor’s Mr. Handsome

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
harryba11zack
harryba11zack - 11/8/2025, 12:03 PM
User Comment Image
RockReigns
RockReigns - 11/8/2025, 12:20 PM
@harryba11zack - Zack wants to work with a pedo again, he’s not someone you wanna support 👍
NoName6315
NoName6315 - 11/8/2025, 12:36 PM
@RockReigns - Reminder James Gunn is friends with 2 pedos, threw a pedo party, and made thousands of pro pedo “jokes”.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 11/8/2025, 2:43 PM
@NoName6315 - Reminder, Zack Snyder is very philanthropic, he has adopted many small girls from China and loves children. Especially female Chinese children.
CrimsonComet40
CrimsonComet40 - 11/8/2025, 12:04 PM
User Comment Image
ElJefe
ElJefe - 11/8/2025, 2:24 PM
@CrimsonComet40 - Just for the record, the guy on the right loved Superman 25.
bobevanz
bobevanz - 11/8/2025, 12:12 PM
Before all of you get your panties in a bunch, it's because ad revenue is down. They should pivot to social media instead of jurassic Cable. 562.5m was the break even point. And you chuckle [frick]s know Disney sacrificed F4 just to take out Superman's legs. They had an entire year between Doomsday and they dropped 3 cbm's in 7 months.


Here's your context, send in the clowns

bobevanz
bobevanz - 11/8/2025, 12:14 PM
This site is full of Colin Robinsons, luckily I'm a [frick]ing Laszlo
ProfessorWhy
ProfessorWhy - 11/8/2025, 12:32 PM
@bobevanz - you're not even a Guillermo, chump
lazlodaytona
lazlodaytona - 11/8/2025, 2:00 PM
@bobevanz - but, are you a Jackie Daytona? Who hails from Tuscon, Arizoneeya...
MaxPaint
MaxPaint - 11/8/2025, 4:35 PM
@bobevanz - Keep coping gunntard.
MuadDib
MuadDib - 11/8/2025, 12:19 PM
Zaslav and Co continue the decade of bad decision making that has tarnished WB and HBO. The constant mergers only highlight the level of incompetence that had lead this studio to such a low point.

That he wants to remain in charge post merger with Paramount, should that be the ultimate outcome, is laughable and depressing since it’s likely.
lazlodaytona
lazlodaytona - 11/8/2025, 2:02 PM
@MuadDib - how do guys like that stay in power? I mean, who watches the watchers?
RockReigns
RockReigns - 11/8/2025, 12:20 PM
Superman, Sinners, and F1 saved them from having an awful year. Cable is hurting them a lot. That’s why Zaslav wants to split the company.
regmovieguy
regmovieguy - 11/8/2025, 12:38 PM
@RockReigns

Also, Weapons and Minecraft.
lazlodaytona
lazlodaytona - 11/8/2025, 2:03 PM
@regmovieguy - we are in a sad state when a Minecraft movie makes a difference
regmovieguy
regmovieguy - 11/8/2025, 2:24 PM
@lazlodaytona

Lmao. I didn’t love the movie but it cast a wide net. I honestly didn’t realize how big the game was until the movie came out. My girlfriend’s niece had us take her and the theater legit felt like Endgame for kids.

All the kids in the theater were clapping and geeking out and saying the lines. It was kind of a wild experience.
lazlodaytona
lazlodaytona - 11/8/2025, 5:00 PM
@regmovieguy - well, that's awesome then. Anytime a movie can give a good theater experience, especially for kids, then that's a great thing.

I stand corrected 😄
Fanmar16
Fanmar16 - 11/8/2025, 12:35 PM
The most overrated movie in recent times, it was a total lack of respect, they turned Superman into Super-Star-Lord, and Supergirl-influencer-paris hilton is still to come
lazlodaytona
lazlodaytona - 11/8/2025, 2:05 PM
@Fanmar16 - I like Paris Hilton. She makes great at-home, or hotel, movies.
TheVisionary27
TheVisionary27 - 11/8/2025, 3:41 PM
@Fanmar16 - For a superman film it’s ridiculously overrated. It’s actually laughable. I like the movie and I look forward to watching it again, it’s fun but cmon now it’s average at best. However art is subjective, I am truly happy for everyone who loved it. Sounds like it met people’s expectations that’s great. If this is what people want, more power to them.
PartyKiller
PartyKiller - 11/8/2025, 12:39 PM
If WB were interested in making the best long term moves they would've saw the success of Barbie and had a sequel or spin off in theaters in summer 2025.

Instead, they tried using hack James Gunn to form a powerhouse DCU to increase the bidding price for WB.

End result, James Gunn's, James Gunn's Superman did exactly what many of us knew it would.

Why did we know? Gunn's GOTG movies that were SNL style slapstick, parodies failed to hit $900 million even when released during the MCU's prime. Actual ticket sales did not increase even after being heavily plugged in Avengers 3 & 4.

It was clear that without the once popular MCU behind him, Gunn's Superman would get attention & curiosity & do a few hundred million less than GOTG 3. And also that his Superman's box office take will be the high water mark for the DCU with following movies doing less and less.

That means WB must spend less on future DCU movies because they know there will be no billion dollar hits. Those seeking to buy WB will obviously know the deal & if they're smart they will care more about what has worked, than WB's failed attempts to ride the once popular super hero genre that is now in steep decline.

Any buyer other than Netflix would be likely to drop Gunn, not even consider the Snyderverse and stop trying to ride the Marvel bandwagon that ended years ago.

Since WB already has more DCU movies in production, a buyer will hope those movies do well, and then they end the DCU. So we will see a new buyer take control, claim they are fully behind the DCU. (Gunn fans then claim "I told ya so!") A year or two later WB quietly ends it.
lazlodaytona
lazlodaytona - 11/8/2025, 2:08 PM
@PartyKiller - you lost me at "consider the Snyderverse."

It's not coming back and neither are the actors.
Colton
Colton - 11/8/2025, 1:51 PM
It's an inferior film in every way compared to MOS
regmovieguy
regmovieguy - 11/8/2025, 2:26 PM
@Colton

The score and cinematography are probably the only categories MOS outdoes Superman (2025) in. Zimmer’s Superman theme is goated. Shannon’s Zod was also great but so was Nic Hoult’s Lex.
DrServo
DrServo - 11/9/2025, 2:15 AM
@Colton - No.
Forthas
Forthas - 11/8/2025, 2:40 PM
"However, the movie arrived, and fortunately, it was not a flop... "

The 5 stages of grief
Denial: Disbelief and shock as a way to cope with the initial overwhelming emotions.
Anger: Frustration and rage that can be directed at others, oneself, or the situation.
Bargaining: A need to regain control by making deals or promises, often to a higher power.
Depression: Sadness and a sense of emptiness as the reality of the loss sets in.
Acceptance: Coming to terms with the loss and adjusting to life without the person or thing that was lost.

It looks like we are still in the first stage...

User Comment Image

SpiderParker
SpiderParker - 11/8/2025, 4:43 PM
@Forthas - Let's see. TDKR came out 13 years ago. MOS came out 12 years ago. Snyder was booted for the 2nd time 4 years ago. DCEU's last movie came out 2 years ago.

And still even after 13years, you are still bargaining for a cinematic universe with Bale and Cavil. In fact, you are just cycling between Denial-Anger-Bargaining for over a decade. When are you gonna get on with reality, feel a little bit sad and accept your situation as it is? Is 13 years not enough?
RolandD
RolandD - 11/8/2025, 5:03 PM
@Forthas - You worded that last sentence perfectly. “It looks like WE are still in the first stage...” Someday you and your friends who think that going back to Bale and Cavill is the best plan will get past your denial, although like @SpiderParker said, it has been well over a decade and Bale has consistently said that he is not doing Batman without Christopher Nolan, Nolan has said that he is done with the superhero genre and he has cut ties with WB, but you keep on believing otherwise.
Forthas
Forthas - 11/9/2025, 2:24 AM
@SpiderParker -

"...you are still bargaining"

This is why you LOST your wager in which you stated Superman would surpass Man of Steel's box office, because you have no idea what you are stating. In no way did I "bargain" anything. For thirteen years I WARNED Warner Brothers and this community that not utilizing The Dark Knight franchise and Man of Steel would lead to "disaster" and that is EXACTLY what has happened. The studio is being sold for a third time, there has been a revolving door of creatives and studio executives and the DC brand has never amounted to any thing since the end of The Dark Knight Trilogy. I am not bargaining...I am gloating because I was so right when everyone else was wrong...just like you are which is why you should not be posting on this site since you agreed to LEAVE IT as part of the wager you lost.

@RolandD - " Bale has consistently said that he is not doing Batman without Christopher Nolan, Nolan has said that he is done with the superhero genre and he has cut ties with WB, but you keep on believing otherwise."

I take it you also believed...

Batman’s Christian Bale Says No To Marvel Movies
https://cosmicbook.news/batmans-christian-bale-says-no-marvel-movies

...or that actors don't change their minds about roles ALL THE TIME...
https://www.buzzfeed.com/noradominick/actors-turned-down-roles-before-accepting-them

...or that Christian Bale did not also say “I’ll never say never"
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/dark-knight-rises-star-christian-350194/

...but you keep on believing otherwise.
RolandD
RolandD - 11/9/2025, 10:25 AM
@Forthas - First, I never said that Superman would outperformed MoS Man of Steel at the box office, but nice try. Secondly Christian Bale is 51 years old. There is no Batman movie with him on the horizon, so what would he be 54, 55 years old when the supposed movie starts shooting. There is no way that he will become the studios featured Batman. In Rises, he was already playing a Batman who was beyond his prime with significant lifelong injuries. If he ever came back to the role, and believe me, I would be OK with it, would be as a Batman many years beyond his prime. Affleck was considered old in the role over 10 years ago and he’s only two years older than Christian Bale and a decade has passed. Maybe he comes back in something Batman Beyond or Kingdom Come, but there is no way he comes back as the DCU’s main Batman.
Forthas
Forthas - 11/9/2025, 11:27 AM
@RolandD -

Here is a PARTIAL list of active super hero/villain actors roughly as old or older than Christian Bale...

Jeremy Renner
Mark Ruffalo
Paul Bettany
Pedro Pascal
David Harbour
Indira Varma
Nathan Fillion
Frank Grillo
Kyle Chandler
Ulrich Thomsen
Sacha Baron Cohen
Vincent D'Onofrio
Idris Elba
Paul Rudd
Robert Downey Jr.
Forthas
Forthas - 11/9/2025, 11:29 AM
@RolandD -

"First, I never said that Superman would outperformed MoS Man of Steel at the box office, but nice try. "

That statement was directed at @SpiderParker!
RolandD
RolandD - 11/9/2025, 11:38 AM
@Forthas -And not one of them is playing Batman, a superhero with no superpowers, either inherent or given by device like GL or Ant Man, one who heavily relies on his physicality . Most of the people that list have powers of some kind, and most of them are on their way out in the role as opposed to about to start it again. It just not going to happen. BTW, if he should ever come back into the role, I will be proven wrong and I do like to be right. On the other hand, if it’s done decently, I will be glad to see him in the role😀, but I just don’t see him as the main DCU Batman.
RolandD
RolandD - 11/9/2025, 11:48 AM
@Forthas - Okay, got it. Also, when he said that he would never say never, it was within the context of Christopher Nolan developing a new Batman story. I don’t think he changes his mind on this because it was also an agreement with Christopher Nolan that they would only do it if they had the story and they were both on board. It was not just him saying that he wouldn’t come back to the role. It sounds like there was a mutual respect there between the two of them. So finally, sure it could happen. Perhaps the most famous never say never was Sean Connery returning to the James Bond role for Never say Never, titled as such based on a suggestion by his wife because he said that he would never return to the role. Even at that, one of the themes of that movie was that he was not as young as he used to be, and found the physical demands difficult, at least when he was in training to go back into his role as 007.
SpiderParker
SpiderParker - 11/9/2025, 4:39 PM
@Forthas - First of all, I know for a average person like you, its difficult for you to remember our bet but it wasn't as straight forward as you make it out to be.

You can just admit that you forgot and accept that your memory and judgement is below average and I will enlighten you with screenshots about exactly what the bet was. If you can't admit you are wrong, like you always are, then I'll just bask in the knowledge you are inept and look forward to the many months and years it will take you to remember that detail and recognize your mistake. Don't worry when the time calls for it, I will still have the screenshot to prove it. :)

So, keep strutting it, its just making it that much more fun when you finally realize, you spent months arguing that I lost when in fact, I have not.

Secondly, lets look at your words first.

"For thirteen years I WARNED Warner Brothers and this community that not utilizing The Dark Knight franchise and Man of Steel would lead to "disaster" and that is EXACTLY what has happened."

Basically, you warned WB that it would be a disaster no matter what your subpar reasoning was, but that doesn't validate your reasoning just because it happened. In fact, many people including me, warned WB that a universe built on the foundation laid by Man of Steel would lead to disaster, "and that is EXACTLY what has happened." So, who is exactly right and who is wrong? Every person you are arguing against, said it will be a disaster too. Your reasoning is just flawed. Even if that reasoning led you to the same outcome, it doesn't validate your stance.

And have you ever listened to your self? You are asking for a new universe built around a Batman who is in his 50's. How many projects do you see him doing? You think he will spend rest of his career doing team-up and solo batman projects? How many will he do and how many can he do successfully at that age when its physically demanding? In the last 6 years, he has made 3 movies, you think he will be spending his next 6years to make 3 DC movies? Production takes 2 years in itself and sometimes upto 5years as well and he probably doesn't even have dates for the next 2 years at least.

So think carefully, if he makes a movie in every 2 year and doesn't have dates until late 2027, it will take production until at least 2030 to release the first movie if the movie goes under production by the end of 2027. Will he do another DC movie soon after? If not, then how many more years till the next one goes under production? Lets assume, he makes two non-dc movie after 2030 freeing him up in 2034, the next movie can't possibly come out before 2036, I even doubt 2037 since, once again, big movies very rarely take 2 years to produce and release. So, he would have made two DC movies in 12 years and he would be 63 by the end of his 2nd one. That's what you want? Really?
Nomis929
Nomis929 - 11/8/2025, 5:36 PM
"However, the movie arrived, and fortunately, it was not a flop... "

User Comment Image
Simonsonrules
Simonsonrules - 11/8/2025, 8:38 PM
We used to come to this site excited to talk about the next cbm. Now we come to debate box office and condemn films that have yet to appear.
1 2

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder