Prototype Toy Created for Tim Burton's SUPERMAN LIVES

@comicoverlord: I actually wish this movie would've gotten made. It's not like it could've been any worse than Returns and at least this had a chance of not being boring

Also... I'm so sick of Nolanites. I find it ridiculous to praise him with such a "brilliant" portrayal of the batman universe. Burton's movies were FAR more accurate to the source material. The only thing Nolan has done right by the comics is Scarecrow.

Im glad the second one was called The Dark Knight... made it easier to pretend that wasn't the joker.

Sweet baby jesus!! My eyes they burn! Get this pile of horse shit out of my sight LOL
@deadwebbhead in my opinion this shit would.of seriously set back CBM I haven't seen a decent thing from this and returns was pretty good, it was dark very Batmanesk but I am far from Nolanite but i can't deny how well those films have done and heath ledgers portral of the joker was genius those films, whether you agree or not, has helped the CBM genre

@DeadWebHead..well im a "Nolanite"...of course it wasnt accurate...no one praised him at all for accuracy...Thats why hes so "brilliant". The movie doesnt have to be accurate at all to make it great...you just need the right material. nolan took a cartoon comicbook..and transformed it into a REAL WORLD movie...the stuff in the movie could actually happen...thats why its so brilliant.

Crap crap crap

I agree with comicbookjerk..
Those who have read 'death of superman' , 'reign of supermen' storylines will agree with me.. bcz the movie's concept has an epic feel to it like the comics..and I wouldn't mind seeing Nic Cacge as Superman (if he was doing this movie in the 90..lol :)

Lmao God how I wish this movie could've been made, just for the laugh factor alone. And say what you want, love or hate it, it would've been, without a shadow of a doubt, entertaining as hell!

I'm gonna jump in here and with DeadWebHead and comicoverlord on the Nolanites and just the general worshiping factor on with some fans. I can see why many people enjoy Nolan's take on Batman, but as a fan of the comics, I don't.

@loum410, when you said, "The movie doesnt have to be accurate at all to make it great...you just need the right material" I gotta disagree with that. No matter what it is that your making, if its an adaptation of other work, then there should be at least some level of accuracy. When Nolan took his so called realistic approach, he changed the format from the comics in many ways big time, which was perfectly fine, but one aspect he should've kept accurate was the essence of who Bruce Wayne/Batman really is. Even though he changed the look of Scarecrow and Joker, he still kept their sick personalities, their overall twisted mind frame, how they methodically conduct themselves, and in general, maintained the essence of these characters, but he lost that with Batman. In the movies you lose the brooding & damaged man, the brilliant & cunning mind, and just the badass alpha male attitude... Not to mention the physical factor, with how Bale looks way to skinny. Batman is a character that keeps his body at perfection. I know its not realistically possible to do that but Bale should have bulked up the way that(forgot his name) the new guy playing Superman has..... Point is, if your creating an adaptation, you gotta have some level accuracy.

It looks like something out of Tron

Touche', Mr Baggins. Touche'.

That is a toy you might find at Goodwill in a box in the back for 25 cents.

Iron Superman!

Some of the calibre of comments on here is [frick]in retarded

I loved Burton's take on Batman. Despite its floors and inaccuracies. But this doesn't count as "thinking outside of the box" and not bring "generic". It's called [frick]ing with shit just for the sake of [frick]ing with shit.

I love Nolan's take on Batman. Despite it innaccuracies. But that doesn't make me a Nolanite. It makes me a fan of good filmmaking. I like all of his other work, not just the Batman movies. To say his fight scenes are the "worst" is pretentious in itself.

So for people to complain about Nolan's break from the source material but still championing this abomination is ridiculous. It wouldn't have been "cool" to see this made, it would have set CBM's back years and left it in a state where the genre was laughable yet again.

And Cage as Superman?...that's the poo icing on a turd cake if ever I heard one.

You guys post more news about this failed Superman movie then you do about Man of Steel, wtf?

Let me guess...The Villian was Beetlejuice, Beetlejuice, BEETLEJUICE?

You don't bring a knife to a gun-fight.

You don't get a Goth involved in a SuperHero movie reboot.

The movie actually had a nice concept, I'll give it that. But so far from what I've seen and heard, the details, looks, and nearly everything else of it...none of them would've made a good movie.

And Burton and Nolan's Batman series are great in their own ways. Both had flaws and brilliances of their own...and in the end, it's just each person's preference that people debate about.

hm. watching Nic Cage as Superman.......disturbing.

WHEN WILL THIS SHITSTORM OF SUPERMAN LIVES CONCEPT ART AND PROTOTYPES END!?!?